Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 217-3 Filed 10/04/18 Page 1 of 62
`Case 5:18—md-02834-BLF Document 217-3 Filed 10/04/18 Page 1 of 62
`
`EXHIBIT 3
`
`

`

`Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 217-3 Filed 10/04/18 Page 2 of 62
`Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 217-3 Filed 10/04/18 Page 2 of 62
`
`
`US007802310B2
`
`(12) United States Patent
`Farber et a].
`
`(10) Patent N0.:
`(45) Date of Patent:
`
`US 7,802,310 B2
`*Sep. 21, 2010
`
`(54)
`
`(75)
`
`(73)
`
`(*)
`
`(21)
`(22)
`(65)
`
`(60)
`
`(51)
`
`CONTROLLING ACCESS TO DATA IN A DATA
`PROCESSING SYSTEM
`
`Inventors: David A. Farber. Ojai. CA (US):
`Ronald D. Lachman. Northbrook. IL
`(US)
`Assignees: Kineteeh, Ine.. Studio City. CA (US);
`Level 3 Communications. LLC.
`Broomfield. C0 (US)
`Subject to any disclaimer. the lerm 01' this
`patent is extended or adjusted under 35
`U.S.C. 154(b) by 79 days.
`This patent is subject to a terminal dis-
`claimer.
`
`Notice:
`
`App]. N0.:
`Filed:
`
`1 1/980,687
`Oct. 31, 2007
`Prior Publication Data
`
`US 2008/0066191 Al
`
`Mar. 13. 2008
`
`Related U.S. Application Data
`
`Continuation of application No. 11/724232. filed on
`Mar. 15. 2007. which is a continuation of application
`No. 11/017,650. filed 011 Dec. 22_. 2004. which is a
`continuation of application No. 09/987,723. filed 011
`Nov. 15. 2001. now Pat. No. 6.928.442. which is a
`continuation of application No. 09/283.160. filed 011
`Apr. 1. 1999. now Pat. No. 6.415.280. which is a divi-
`sion of application No. 08/960.079. filed 011 Oct. 24.
`1997. now Pat. No. 5.978.791. which is a continuation
`of application No. 08/425.160. filed 011 Apr. 1 1. 1995.
`now abandoned. application No. 11/980.687.w11ic11is
`a continuation of application No. 10/742.972. filed 011
`Dec. 23. 2003. which is a division of application No.
`09/987.723. filed on Nov. 15. 2001. 110w Pat. No.
`6.928.442, which is a continuation ofapplieation No.
`()9/283.16(),F1ed(111 A.pr l. 1999. now Pat. No. 6415.
`280. whichls a division ofapplication No. 08/960. 079.
`filed on Oct 24. 1997 now Pat No. 5.978. 791. which
`is a continuation of application No. 08/425.160_. filed
`011 Apr. 11. 1995. now abandoned.
`Int. Cl.
`H04L 29/06
`G06F 2l/00
`
`(2006.01)
`(2006.01)
`
`. 726/28: 711/163
`(52) US. Cl.
`(58) Field of Classtficatlon Search ................... 726/28.
`726/27 29. 713/181
`See application file for complete search history.
`References Cited
`
`(56)
`
`U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS
`
`3.668.647 A
`
`6/1972 Evangelisti et a1
`
`(Continued )
`FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS
`0 268 069 A2
`51’1988
`
`EP
`
`(Continued)
`OTHER PUBLICATIONS
`
`Cheriton. David R. and Mann. Timothy P. “Decentralizing a global
`naming service for improved performance and fault tolerance”. ACM
`Transactions on Computer Systems, vol 7. No 2, May 1989. pp
`147-183.
`
`(Continued)
`
`Primary ExamineriGilberto Barrett. Jr.
`Assistant Examiner Samson B Lemma
`(74) Attornev. Agent. orFt'rm—Davidson Berqnist Jackson &
`Gowdey. LLP: Brian Siritzky
`
`(57)
`
`ABSTRACT
`
`Access to and delivery of licensed content is controlled using
`content names that were determined based on the content. A
`name for a data item is obtained. the name having been
`determined based at least in part 011 the data which comprise
`the contents of the data item. Access to the data item is
`authorized based at least in part 011 the name. Once autho-
`rized. access may be granted from more than one computer.
`The name may have been detemtined using a hash or message
`digest function such as MD4. MD5 or SHA. The data item
`may comprise a file. a portion oia lile. a page in memory. a
`digital message, a digital image. a video signal or an audio
`signal.
`
`87 Claims, 31 Drawing Sheets
`
`102
`192
`
`
`
`PROCESSOR
`PROCESSOR
`
`
`
`106
`
`
`
`102
`
`
`PROCESSOR
`PRO 0 E5 SOR
`PROCESSDR
`
`
`
`
`EXHIBIT 3 - l
`
`

`

`Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 217-3 Filed 10/04/18 Page 3 of 62
`Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 217-3 Filed 10/04/18 Page 3 of 62
`
`US 7,802,310 32
`
`Page 2
`
`US. pATENT DOCUMENTS
`
`3.835.260 A
`4.096.568 A
`4.215.402 A
`4.221.003 A
`4.290.105 A
`4.376.299 A
`4.405.829 A
`4.412.285 A
`4.414.624 A
`4.441.155 A
`4.464.7l3 A
`4.490.782 A
`4.558.413 A
`4.571.700 A
`4.577.293 A
`4.643.793 A
`4.658.093 A
`4.675.8l0 A
`4.691.299 A
`4.725.945 A
`4.773039 A
`4.821.184 A
`4.887.235 A
`4.888.681 A
`4.914.586 A
`4.9221414 A
`4.922.417 A
`4.949.302 A
`4.972.367 A
`5.007.653 A
`5.014.192 A
`5.025.421 A
`5.047.918 A
`5.050.074 A
`5.050.212 A
`5.057.337 A
`5.077.658 A
`5.034.315 A
`5.117.351 A
`5.129.081 A
`5.129.082 A
`5.144.667 A
`5.163.147 A *
`5.179.680 A
`5.182.799 A
`5.199.073 A
`5.202.982 A 4‘
`5.204.897 A
`5204958 A
`5.204.966 A
`5.208.858 .A
`5.247.620 A
`5.260.999 A
`5.276.869 A
`5.376.901 A
`5.287.499 A
`5.287.514 A
`5.297.279 A
`5.301.286 A
`5.301.316 .A
`5.317.693 A
`5.341.477 A
`5.343.527 A
`5.347.653 A
`5.351.302 A
`5.357.440 A
`5.357.623 A
`5.359.523 A
`5.361.356 A
`5.371.897 A
`5.384.565 A
`
`911974 Plcschel e1 81
`61978 Bennen 61:11.
`7/1980 Mitcllcllelal.
`91980 Chang 61111.
`91981 Cichelli e1 :1].
`311933 [UVCSI
`9/1983 Rivestetal-
`1011983 Nechesclnl
`111’1983 Summer. .11'. e1 :11.
`4/1984 Fletcherel 111-
`81984 Benhaseelal-
`12/1984 Dixon e101.
`12/1985 Schmidletnl
`2/1986 E1my..1r_el 211.
`3/1986 Matick cl .11.
`2/1987 Menden
`4/1987 Hellman
`6/1987 Grunerclnl-
`91/1987
`Ill-"651614111
`2/1988 Kronsladl ct :11,
`91/1983 71511110171
`4/1989 Clancy 01:11.
`1211989 Holloway el al
`12/1989 Barncsclal.
`4/1990 Swineharl etal.
`51990 l’IOIIOWUY 3‘31
`511990 01111111 e121.
`81990 Arnold e1 :11.
`1111/1990 Burke
`4/1991 301106119131
`51,1991
`0431151701091 211
`61991 C110
`91991 Schwmtz et a1
`9/1991 MFU'Ca
`9/1991 Dyson
`10'1991 C01W01101 (11
`12/1991 Bendcn
`1'1997- anznrio
`5"1997- M11131
`7/1992 Kobaynshi el :11
`711992 Tirfing 81111-
`9/1992 Pogue. Jr etal
`
`..
`11"1992 Orila
`111993 Colwell e1 41
`11’1993 Tamum 61:11.
`3/1993 560“
`4/1993 Gramlich e101.
`411993 Wyman
`4/1993 Chengcml-
`4/1993 Witlenberg 6101
`5/1993 Vollen etal
`9/1993 Fuknzawn c161.
`1111993 Wyman
`1/1994 Forrest el :11.
`11,1994 H0W01161 01-
`2/1994 Nemes
`2/1994 Gram
`3/1994 Bannon elal.
`4/1994 Mani
`41994 Hamilton e161.
`511994 Cuenod e101
`8/1994 Pitkin etal.
`71994 M0016
`9/1994 Flynn cl 1'11
`9/1994 Leighton e1 :11.
`10’1994 Talbert ctnl.
`10/1994 MegOJy-Cohen
`10/1994 Talboll et a1
`11/1994 Clark 01.11
`12/1994 Brown e181.
`111995 Cannon
`
`5.394.555 A
`5.403.639 A
`5.404.508 .A
`5.438.508 A
`5.442.343 A
`5.448.668 A *
`5443.713 A
`5.452.447 A
`5.454.000 A ’1
`5.454.039 A
`5.459.860 A
`5.465.365 A
`5.467.471 A
`5.475.826 A
`5.479.654 A *
`5491317 A
`5.499.294 A
`5.504.879 A
`5.530.757 A *
`5.537.585 .A 11
`5.542.087 A
`5551143 A
`5.568.181 A
`5.581.615 A
`5.581.758 A
`5.581.764 A
`5.583.995 A
`5.588.147 A
`5.600.834 A
`55041303 A
`5.604.892 A
`5.630.067 A
`5.632.031 A
`5.638.443 A
`5.640.564 A
`5.649.196 A
`5.677.952 A
`5.678.038 A
`5.678.046 A
`5.694.472 A *
`5.694.596 A
`5.701.316 A
`5.710.922 A
`5.724.425 A
`5734553 A
`5.742.807 A :1
`5.745.879 A
`5.757.913 A
`57571915 A
`5.781.629 A
`5.802.291 A
`5309494 A
`5.826.049 A
`5.835.087 A
`5.864.683 A
`5.907.619 A
`5.907.704 A
`5.940.504 A
`5.978.791 A
`5.991.414 A
`6.006.018 A
`6.134.603 A
`6.135.646 A
`6.415.280 131
`6.732.180 B1
`6.816.872 131*
`6.928.442 133
`200210052884 A1
`200210082999 Al
`200310078888 A1
`2003/0078889 Al
`2003/0095660 A1
`200410139097 A1
`
`707/9
`
`[’1
`
`.. 714 21
`
`.. 713/188
`..
`
`........ 707/205
`
`713189
`
`........................ 707/1
`
`21995 l-lunre1 e1 01
`41995 Belsan e131.
`41995 Konrad cl :1].
`81995 Wyman
`31995 C210 e1 :11.
`911995 Perelson 01.11.
`91995 Cohn 61 :11
`911995 Nelson 61:11
`91995 Dorfman ..................... 714/54
`911995 Coppersmilh €1.11.
`1011995 Burnett
`1111995 Winterbollom
`1111995 Bndcr
`1211995 Fischer
`12/1995 Squibb ....................... 7071695
`2/1996 Gopnl et {11
`311996 Friedman
`4/1996 L’isenbelg el :11.
`611996 meczyk .........
`711996 Bljckcnsmffcl n1
`7/1996 Neimnl cl 211.
`911996 Ross 91 :11.
`101996 Grocnwoodclnl.
`12/1996 319m
`12/1996 Burnett
`1211996 Fitzgerald 81 a1.
`12/1996 Gardnm e1 .11
`12/1996 Neelmn 01:11,
`211997 IIoszrd
`2/1997 Aziz
`21997 Nullall el 11].
`5/1997 Kindell et al.
`5/1997 Velissaropoulos 01:11
`61997 Slefik el 01
`61997 l’lmnillon e111
`7/1997 Woodhill e1 :11.
`10/1997 Blaklcy. 111131.11.
`1011997 Dockle1 e1 :11.
`1011997 Cflh1110101.
`1211997
`Johnson 01:11.
`12/1997 Campbell
`1311997 A1femesse1a|
`111998 Alleyel 61.
`3/1998 Chang et a1.
`311993 Taoda
`411998 Masintel
`41998 Wyman
`51998 Bellm‘e elal.
`51998 Aucsmith e1 :11.
`711998 nabs. e1 :11.
`911998 Bfll1CkCl .11.
`9/1998 Nguyen
`[01998 ogma e161.
`1111993 Herz el :11
`111999 Boeben e181.
`511999 Davis
`5/1999 Gudmundson el :11
`81999 Griswold
`11,1999 Ember el al.
`1111999 Gamy el al.
`1211999 Bumen 81(11—
`1012000 Jones 61.11,
`1012000 Kahn e131
`712002 Farberel a1.
`512004 Hale e101.
`1112004 Squibb
`312005 Farbel' el :11.
`512002 Fru'ber e1 :11.
`6/2002 Lee e101
`4/2003 Lce 618.1.
`4/2003 Lee 61:11.
`50003 Lee 0101
`712004 81115616161.
`
`.
`
`111
`
`EXHIBIT 3 - 2
`
`

`

`Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 217-3 Filed 10/04/18 Page 4 of 62
`Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 217-3 Filed 10/04/18 Page 4 of 62
`
`US 7,802,310 B2
`
`Page 3
`
`.. 713/193
`
`20050010792 Al*
`2005/0114296 A1
`2007/0185848 A1
`2008’0065635 Al
`2008’0066191 AI
`2008/0071855 A1
`2008/0082551 A1
`
`lr’2005 Carpentier el al
`5/2005 l‘zu‘ber et a1.
`’/2007 Farber et al
`3/2008 Farber et a1.
`3/2008 liarber et a1.
`3/2008 Farber et a1.
`4/2008 Farber et a1.
`
`FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS
`
`EP
`EP
`EP
`EP
`EP
`EP
`EP
`GB
`JP
`JP
`JP
`JP
`JP
`JP
`JP
`W0
`WC
`W0
`W0
`W0
`
`0315425
`0 558 945 A2
`0 566 967 A2
`0592045
`0631 226 A1
`0 654 920 A2
`0 658 022 A2
`2294132 A
`59058564
`63-106048
`63—273961
`2-127755
`05162529
`06187384 A2
`06348558 A
`WO 92/2002]
`WO 94/06087
`WO 94/20913
`WO 95/01599
`WO 97/43717
`
`5/‘1989
`9/1993
`10/1993
`4/1994
`12/1994
`5/1995
`6/1995
`4/1996
`4/ 1984
`5/1988
`11/1988
`5/1990
`6/1993
`7/1994
`12/ 1994
`11/ 1992
`3/ 1994
`9/1994
`1/1995
`11/1997
`
`OTI IER PUBLICATIONS
`
`Request for Reexamination of US Patent No. 6.928.442: Reexam
`U.S Appl No. 90/010260. filed on Aug. 29. 2008.
`Advances
`in Cryptology—AUSCRYPT ’92 Workshop on the
`Theory and Application of Cryptographic Techniques Gold Coast.
`Queensland. Australia Dec 13-16. 1992 Proceedings
`Advances
`in Cryptology-EUR(')CRYPT ’93. Workshop on the
`Theory and Application of Cryptographic Techniques Lofthus. Nor-
`way. May 23-27. 1993 Proceedings.
`Affidavit ofTimothy P. Walker in Support ofCWIS’ Opening Mark—
`man Brief Construing the Terms at Issue in US. Patent No.
`6.415.280. dated Jul. 25. 2003. from Civil Action No 02-11430
`RWZ.
`Akamai and MII"s Memorandum in Support of Their Claim Con-
`struction of USPAT 5.978.791. dated Aug 31, 2001. from Civil
`Action No 00-cv-1 1851RWZ.
`Akamai’s Answer. Affirmative Defenses and Counterciaims to
`Amended Complaint. filed Dec. 6. 2002. in Civil Action No. 02-CV-
`11430RWZ.
`Akmnai’s Brief on Claim Construction. dated Aug. 8. 2003. from
`Civil Action No 02-11430 RWZ
`Albert Langer
`(cmf851@anu.oz.au). http://groups googlecom’
`goups‘?selm=1991Aug7.225159.786%40newshost.anu.
`edu.au
`&oe’1ITF-8&output’gplain. Aug 7. 1991.
`Alexander Duptry (dupuy@smarts.com). “MD5 and 1 IFNs (was:
`Misc Comments)”. “wwacl.lanl.gov/URI/archivefuri-94qZ.mes-
`sages/0081 htrnl. Apr 17. 1994.
`Alexander Dupuy ('dupuy@smarts com). “RE: MD5 and LIFNs
`(was: Misc Comments)". wvwvacl.lanl.gov/URI/archive/uri-94q2.
`messages/0113.htm1. Apr. 26. 1994.
`Answer of Defendant RIAA to First Amended Complaint and Coun-
`tcrclaim. dated Feb. 8. 2005. from Civil Action No. CV04-74 56 JFW
`(CTx).
`Bemers—Lee. T. et al.. "Hypertext Transfer Protocol—HTTP/IO.”
`May 1996. pp. 1-54.
`Berners-Lee. T et a1.. “Uniform Resource Locators (URL).” pp. 1-25.
`Dec. 1994.
`Berners—Lee. T. “Universal Resource Identifiers in WWW." Jun.
`1994. pp. 1—25.
`Bert dem Boer. et a1. Collisions for
`MD.sub.5 pp 292-304. 1994.
`
`the compression function of
`
`lst
`
`Birgit Pfitzman. Sorting Out Signature Schemes.Nov. 1993. l.sup.st
`Conf. Computer & Comm. Security ’93. p. 74-85.
`Birgit Pfitzmann. Sorting Out Signanu‘e Schemes. Nov 1993.
`('onf. Computer 8; Comm. Security ’93 pp. 74—85.
`Bowman. C. Mic. et a1.. “Harvest: A Scalable. Customizable Discov-
`ery and Access System.” Aug. 4. 1994. pp. 1-27.
`Bowman. C. Mic. et 111.. “Harvest: A Scalable. Customizable Discov-
`ery and Access System.” Mar. 12. 1995. pp. 1-29.
`Brisco. T.. “DNS Support for Load Balancing." Apr. 1995. pp. 1-7
`Browne. Shirley et a1.. “Locatiomlndependent Naming for Virtual
`Distributed Software Repositories.” 1995. 7 pages.
`Browne. Shirley ct at. “Location-Independent Naming for Virtual
`Distributed Software Repositories.” 1995. printed from http:/www
`,
`netlib.org/‘utk/papers/lilh/main.html on Mar. 22. 2006. 18 pages.
`Carter. J. Lawrence. et a1. "Universal Classes of flash Functions.’
`Journal ofComputer and System Sciences. vol. 18. No. 2. Apr 1979.
`pp. 143-154.
`Chris Chartres and Josef Pieprzky. Linear Nonequivaience versus
`Nonlinear-ity. Pieprzky. pp. 156-164. 1993.
`Civil Minutes General dated Jan 25. 2005. from Civil Action No CV
`04-7456-JFW (CTx).
`Clifford Lynch (Calur@uccmvsa.bitnet). “ietf url/uri overview draft
`paper Gong)". vwvwaclianlgov/URI/archivc/uri-93q1.mcssagcs/
`0015.html. Mar. 25. 1993.
`Complaint for Patent Infringement. Permanent Injunction. and Darn-
`ages. dated Sep 8. 2004. from Civil Action No CV 04-7456 JFW
`(AJWX).
`Cormen. Thomas 11.. et al. Introduction to Algorithms. '1 he MIT
`Press. Cambridge. Massachusetts. 1994. pp. 219-243. 991-993.
`CWIS' Opening Markman Brief Construing the Terms at Issue in
`LLS. Patent No. 6.4 I 5.280. dated Jill 25. 2003. from Civil Action No.
`02-11430 RWZ.
`CWIS’ Reply Markman Brief Construing the Terms at Issue in U S.
`Patent No. 6.415.280. dated Aug. 15. 2003. from Civil Action No.
`02-11430 RWZ.
`Danzig. PB . et a1.. ““Distribuled Indexing: A Scalable Mechanism
`For Distributed Information Retrieval.”" Proceedings of the 14th
`Annual
`international ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and
`Development in Information Retrieval. pp 220-229. Oct 13-16.
`l99l.
`Davis. James R.. “A Server for a Distributed Digital Technical Report
`Library.” Jan. 15. 1994. pp. 1-8
`Decimation ofRobert B.K. Dewar in Support ofCWIS’ Construction
`of the i'erms at issue in US. Patent No. 6.415.280. dated Jul. 25.
`2003. from Civil Action No. 02-cv-I I430RWZ.
`in Datagram
`Deering. Stephen.
`et
`a1
`“Multicast Routing
`lnternetworks and Extended LANs.” ACM Transactions on Corn-
`puter Systems. vol 8. No 2. May 1990. pp. 85-110.
`Defendant Digital Island’s Opening Brief on Claim Construction
`Issues dated Aug. 17. 2001. from Civil Action No. 00-cv-11851-
`RWZ
`Defendant Lime Wire. LLC’s Answer. Affirmative Defenses and
`Counterclaims dated Nov. 15. 2007. from Civil Action No. 07-06161
`VBF (PLAX)
`Defendant Media Sentry. Inc.’s Reply Memorandum of Points and
`Authorities in I‘urther Support of Its Motion to Dismiss. dated Nov.
`15. 2004. from Civil Action No. CV04-7456 JFW (CTx)
`Defendant MediaSenLry Inc ’5 Notice of Motion and Motion to Dis-
`miss Fir st Amended Complaint; Memorandum of Points and
`Authorities in Support Thereof. dated Dec. 13. 2004. from Civil
`Action No. CV04—7456 JFW.
`Defendant MediaSentry. Inc.’s Answer to Plaintiffs’ I-‘irst Amended
`Complaint and Counterclaims. dated Feb 8. 2005 . from Civil Action
`No. CV04 -7456 JFW (CTx).
`Defendzmt RIAA’s Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss First
`Amended Complaint; Memorandum of Points and Authorities in
`Support Thereof. dated Dec. 13. 2004. from Civil Action No CV04-
`7456 JFW (Cix).
`Defendants Loudeye Corp.’s and Overpeer. Inc.’s Answer to Plain-
`tiffs' First Amended Complaint and Counterclairn. dated Feb. 8.
`2005. from Civil Action No. 04-7456 JFW (AJWx)
`Defendants' Preliminary InvalidityContentions dated Dec. 14. 2006.
`from Civil Action No CV 06-5086 SJO (Ex)
`
`EXHIBIT 3 - 3
`
`

`

`Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 217-3 Filed 10/04/18 Page 5 of 62
`Case 5:18—md-02834—BLF Document 217-3 Filed 10/04/18 Page 5 of 62
`
`US 7,802,310 BZ
`Page 4
`
`Devine. Robert. “Design andImplementation ot‘DDI—I: A Distribrrted
`Dynamic Hashing Algorithm." In Proc. of 4th International Confer-
`ence on Foundations of Data Organizations and Algorithms. 1993.
`pp l01-1l4.
`issued Dec. 23. 2004 in correpsonding
`European Search Report
`European Application No 96910762.2-2201.
`Expert Report of Professor Ellis Horowitz. dated Mar. 6. 2006. from
`Civil Action No 04-7456 .IFW (CTx)
`Expert Report of the Honorable Gerald J Mossinghoff. dated Mar.
`13. 2006. from Civil Action No. 04-7456 JFW (.CTx).
`I‘aItstr'om. P. et at . "How to Interact with a Whois++ Mesh.” Feb.
`I996. pp. I-9.
`Feeley. Michael. et al. “Implementing Global Memory Management
`in aWorkstation Cluster.” In Proc. ofthe 15th ACM Symp. on Oper-
`ating Systems Principles. 1995. pp 201-212.
`Fielding. R. et al.. “Hypertext Transfer Protocol—HTTP/IJ." Jan.
`I997. pp. 1-163.
`Fielding. R. et al . “Hypertext Transfer Protocol—IITTP/I 1.” Jun.
`1999.pp.1-157
`Infringement. Permanent
`for Patent
`First Amended Complaint
`Injunction and Damages. dated Nov. 24. 2004. from Civil Action No.
`CV 04-7456 JFW (CTx).
`Floyd. Sally. et al. "A reliable Mrrlticast Framework for Light-Weight
`Sessions and Application Level Framing.” In Proceeding ofACM
`SIGCOMM ’95. pp. 342—356
`Fredman. Michael. et al. “Storing a Sparse Table with 0(1) Worst
`Case Access Time.” Journal of the Association for Computing
`Machinery. vol. 31. No. 3. Jul. 1984. pp. 538-544.
`G. L. Friedman. Digital Camera With Apparatus for Authentication
`of Images Produced From an Image File. NASA Case No NPO-
`I9108—I-CU. U.S Appl. No. 08/159980. Nov 24.1993.
`Grigni. Michelangelo. et al. “ I ight Bounds on Minimum Broadcasts
`Networks” SIAM Journal of Discrete Mathematics. vol. 4. No. 2.
`May 1991. pp. 207-222.
`Gwert7man. James. et al. “The Case for Geographical Push—Cach-
`ing.” Technical Report EU 'I R 34-94 (excerpt). Harvard University.
`DAS. Cambridge. MA 02138. 1994. 2 pgs.
`I-I. Goodman. Ada. Obj eel-Oriented Techniques. and Concurrency in
`Teaching Data Structures and File Management Report Documenta-
`tion p. Ad-A275 385-94-04277.
`H. Goodman. Feb 9. [994 Ada. Object -Oriented Techniques. and
`Concurrency in Teaching Data Srtrcttues and File Management
`Report Documentation P. AD-A275 385-94-04277
`Hauzeur‘. B. M.. “A Model for Naming. Addressing. and Routing.”
`ACM Trans Inf. Syst. 4, Oct. 4. 1986). 293-311.
`International Search Report dated Jun 24. 1996 in corresponding
`international application PCT/USI996/004733.
`K Sollins and L Masinter. “Functional Requirements for Uniform
`Resource Names”. vmww3.org/Addressing/rfc1737.txt. Dec. 1994.
`pp. I-7.
`Khare. R. and Lawrence. S . “Upgrading to 'I'LS Within HTTPI'I .1."
`May 2000. pp. I-12
`Khoshafian. S. N. et al. 1986. Object identity. In Conf. Proc. On
`Object-Oriented Programming Systems. Languages and Applica-
`tions (Portland. Oregon. United States. Sep. 29-Oct. 2. 1986). N.
`Meyrowitz. lid. OOPLSA '86. ACM Press. NewYork. NY. 406-416.
`Kim el al.. “Experiences with Tripwire: Using Integrity Checkers for
`Intrusion Detection”. COAST Labs. Dept of Computer Sciences
`Purdue University. Feb 22. 1995. pp. I-12
`Kim et al.. “The Design and Implementation of Tripwire: A file
`System Integrity Checker”. COAST Labs. Dept. of Computer Sci—
`ences Pru‘due University. Feb. 23. 1995. pp. I-IS.
`Kim et al.. “The Design and Implementation of Tripwire: A tile
`System Integrity Checker”. COAST Labs. Dept. of Computer Sci—
`ences Purdue University. Nov. 19. 1993. pp. 1—21.
`Kim. Gene H . and Spafford. Eugene H.. “Writing. Supporting. and
`Evaluating Tripwire: A Publicly Available Security Tool.” COAST
`Labs. Dept. ofCornputer Sciences Purdue University. Mzu. 12. 1994.
`pp. I-23.
`Knuth. Donald E.. “The Art ofComputer Progrzunming." 1973. vol
`3. Ch. 6 4. pp 506-549
`
`Lantz. K A.. et al.. "Towards a universal directory service.” In Proc.
`4th Annual ACM Syrnp. on Principles of Distributed Computing
`(Minaki. Ontario. Canada) PODC ’85 ACM Press. NewYork. NY.
`250-260
`Leach. P. J.. et al.. The file system ofan integrated local network. In
`Proc. 1985 ACM 13th Annual Conf. on Comp Sci. CSC ’85. ACM
`Press. NY. NY. 309-324
`Leach. P]. et al.. “L'IDs as Internal Names in a Distributed File
`System." In Proc. lst ACM SIGACT—SIGOPS Syrnp on Principles of
`Distributed Computing (Ottawa. Canada. Aug 18-20. 1982). PODC
`'82 ACM Press. Nchork. NY. 34-41.
`Ma. C. 1992 On building very large naming systems In Proc 5th
`Workshop on ACM SIGOPS European Workshop: Models and Par. -
`digms For Distributed Systems Structuring (France. Sep. 21-23.
`1992) EW 5. ACM Press. New York. FY. 1-5.
`Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support ofLoudeye’s and
`Overpeer’s Motion to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint for
`Failure to State a Claim or'. In the Alternative. for a More Definitive
`Statement. dated Dec 13. 2004. from Civil Action No CV-04-7456
`JFW (AJWX)
`Ming-Ling Lo et al.. On Optimal Processor Allocation to Support
`Pipelined Hash Joins. ACM SIGMOD. pp. 69-78. May 1993.
`Moats. R.. “URN Syntax.” May 1997. pp. 1-8.
`Murlidhar Koushik. Dynamic Hashing With Distributed OverIIow
`Space: A File Organization With Good Insertion Performance. I993.
`Info Sys. vol. 18. No. 5. pp. 299-317
`Myers. J and Rose. M. “The Content-MUS Header Field.” Oct.
`1995. pp. 1-4.
`Naor. Moni. et al. “The Load. Capacity and Availability ot‘Quorum
`Systems.” In Proceedings of the 35th IEEE Symposium on Founda-
`tions ofComputcr Science. Nov 1994. pp 214-225
`Nisan. Noam. “Psuedorandom Generators for Space-Bounded Com-
`putation." In Proceedings of the Twenty-Second Annual ACM Sym-
`posium on Theory oliComputing. May 1990. pp. 204-212.
`Office Action in corresponding Japanese Application No. 53l.073.’
`1996 mailed on Apr. 25. 2006.
`Otfice Communication in corresponding European Application No.
`9691076224225 dated Jan. 17.2007.
`Order Re Claim Construction dated Nov. 8. 2001. from Civil Action
`No. 00-11851-RWZ.
`Palmer. Mark. et a1. “Fido: A Cache that Learns to Fetch.” In Pro-
`ceedings of the 17th International Conference on Very Large Data
`Bases. Sep. 1991. pp. 255-264.
`Patent Abstracts of Japan. "Device for Generating Database and
`Method for the Same.” Application No 03-080504. Sun Microsyst.
`Inc. published Jun. 1993. 38 pages.
`Patent Abstracts ofJapan. “Electr onic Mail Multiplexing System and
`Cornmtu'rication Control Method in The System ” Jun 30. 1993. JP
`051625293.
`Patent Abstracts of Japan. “Method for Registering and Retrieving
`Data Base.” Application No. 03-187303. Nippon 'I'elegr. & 'I‘eleph.
`Corp. published Feb. 1993. It pages
`Peleg. David. et at “The Availability of Quorum Systems.” Informa-
`tion and Computation 123. 1995. 210-223
`Peter Deutsch (peterd@bunyip.com). “Re: MDS and LiFNs (was:
`Misc Comments)”. wwwacllanl gov/URI/archive/’uri-94q2 mes-
`sages/0106.html. Apr. 26. 1994
`Peterson. L. I.. I938. A yellow-pages service for a local—area net-
`work. In Proc ACM Workshop on Frontiers in Computer Commu-
`nications Technology (Vermont. 1987). J. J. Garcia-Luna-Aceves.
`Ed. SIGCOMM ‘87. ACM Press. New York. NY. 235-242.
`PlaintiITs’ Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Opposition to
`Loudeye Det'endants’ Motion to Dismiss. dated Nov. 8. 2004. Item
`Civil Action No. CV-04-7456 JFW (:AJWX).
`Plaintifl‘s’ Opposition to Media Sentry’s Motion to Dismiss; Memo-
`randum of Points and Authorities in Support Thereof. dated Nov 8.
`2004. from Civil Action No. CV 04-7456 .IFW (CTx).
`Plaintiff‘s Opposition to Recording Industry Association of Ameri-
`ca‘s Motion to Dismiss; Memorandum of Points and Authorities in
`Support Thereof. dated Nov. 8. 2004. from Civil Action No CV-O4-
`7456 JFW (CTx).
`
`EXHIBIT 3 - 4
`
`

`

`Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 217-3 Filed 10/04/18 Page 6 of 62
`Case 5:18—md-02834-BLF Document 217-3 Filed 10/04/18 Page 6 of 62
`
`US 7,802,310 B2
`Page 5
`
`Plaintifi‘ s Reply to Defendant l oudeye Corp.’s and Overpeer. lnc.’s
`Counterclairns. dated Mar. 3. 2005.
`from Civil Action No. CV
`04-7456 JFW (CTx).
`Plaintifi‘s Reply to Defendant MediaSentry's Counterclaims. dated
`Mar. 3, 2005. from Civil Action No. CV 04-7456 JFW (Ctx).
`Plaintiffs Reply to Defendant RIAA’s Counterclaims. dated Mar. 3.
`2005. from Civil Action No. 04-7456 JFW (CTx).
`Proceedings ofthe 1993 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on
`Management of Data. vol 22. Issue 2. Jun. 1993.
`Rabin. Michael. “Efficient Dispersal of Information for Security.
`Load Balancing. and Fault tolerance.” Journal of the ACM. vol. 36.
`No. 2. Apr 1989. pp. 335-348.
`Ravi. R.. “Rapid Rumor Ramification: Approximating the Minimum
`Broadcast Time.” In Proc. of the 35th IEEE Symp. on Foundation of
`Computer Science. Nov. 1994. pp. 202-213.
`Ravindran. K. and Ramakrishnan. K K 1991. A naming system for
`feature-based service specification in distributed operating systems.
`SIGSMALL’PC Notes 17.3-4 (Sep. 1991). 12-21
`Reed Wade (wade@cs.utk edu). "re: Dienst and BFD/LIFN doctr-
`ment.”Aug 8. 1994. printed from http://www.wcbhistory.org/waww
`lists’www-talkl994q3/0416.hlml on Mar. 22. 2006. (7 pages).
`Rtvest. R.. “the MD5 Message-Digest Algorifltm." Apr. 1992. pp.
`1-19 and errata sheet (1 page).
`Rose. M . “The Content-MD5 Header Field.” Nov. 1993. pp 1-3.
`Ross. K.. “Hash-Routing for Collections of Shared Web Caches."
`IEFF. Network Magazine. pp. 37-44. Nov.—Dec. 1997.
`Sakti Prarnanik et al.. Multi-Directory Hasing. 1993. Info. Sys.. vol.
`18. No. 1. pp. 63-74
`Schrnidl. Jeanette. et a1. “Chernoff—Hoet‘fding Bounds for Applica-
`tions with Limited Independence " In Proceedings of the 4th ACS-
`SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms. 1993. pp. 331-340.
`Schncicr. Bnlcc. “One-Way Hash Functions. Using Crypographic
`Algorithms for Hashing.” 1991. printed from http://202.179135.4/
`data/DDJ/zu'ticles/I991/9109/91909g/9109g.ht_m on Mar 22. 2006.
`Schwartz. M.. et al. 1987. Aname service for evolving heterogeneous
`systems. In Proc. 11th ACM Syrnp. on OS Principles (Texas. Nov.
`8-11. 1987). SOSP ‘87. ACM Press. NY. NY 52—62.
`Search Report dated Jun 24. 1996
`Shaheen-Gouda. A.And Loucks. L. 1992 . Name borders. In Proc. 5th
`Workshop on ACM SIGOPS Europerm \Vorkshop: Models and Para—
`digms For Distributed Systems Structuring (Mont Saint-Michel.
`France. Sep. 21-23. 1992). EW 5. ACM Press. NY. NY. 1-6.
`Sun Microsystems. Inc.. “NFS: Network File System Protocol Speci-
`fication.” Mar 1989. pp 1-25.
`Tarjan. Robert Endrc. et at. “Storing a Sparse Table." C ommunica-
`tions of the ACM. vol. 22.510. 11. Nov. 1979. pp. 606-611.
`Terry. D. B. 1984. An analysis ot‘nzuning conventions for distributed
`computer systems. In Proc. ACM SIGCOMM Symp. on Communi-
`cations Architectures and Protocols: Tutorials & Symp SIGCOMM
`’84. ACM Press. NY. NY. 218-224
`Thomas A. Berson. Differential Cryptanalysis Mod 2 sup.32 with
`Applications to MD5. pp. 69—81. 1992.
`Vijay Kumar. A Concurrency Control Mechanism Based on Extend-
`ible Hashing for Main Memory Database Systems. ACM. vol 3.
`1989. pp. 109-113
`Vijay Kumar. A concurrency Control Mechanism based on Extend-
`iblc Hashing for Main Memory Database Systems. pp. 109-113.
`ACM. vol. 3. 1989.
`Vincenzetti. David and Cotrrozzi. Massimo. “Anti Tampering Pro—
`gram.” Proceedings of the Fourth {USENIX} Security Symposium.
`Santa Clara. CA. 1993. 11 pages.
`Vincenzet‘ti. David and Cotrro7.7i. Massimo. “Anti Tampering Pro-
`gram.” Proceedings of the Fourth {USENIX} Security Symposium.
`Santa Clara. CA. undated. printed from http:f/wwwjanet/CERI/
`Vincenzettiiand_Cotroz7.i/ATP_Anti_Tamp on Mar. 22. 2006. 8
`pages
`Vitter. Jeffrey Scott. et at. “Optimal Prefetching via Data Compres-
`sion." In Proceedings of 32nd IEEE Symposium on Foundations of
`Computer Science. Nov. 1991. pp. 121-130.
`W3C :ID. HTTP: A protocol for networked information. “Basic
`HTTP as defined in 1992". wwwth org/Protocols/HTTPZ.html.
`1992.
`
`Wegrnan. Mark. et al. “New l-lash Functions and TheirUse in Authen-
`tication and Set Equality” .lotu‘nal ofComputer and System Sciences
`vol. 22. Jun 1981. pp 265-279
`Willizun Perrizo. et al.. Distributed Join Processing Performance
`Evaluation. 1994. Twenty—Seventh Hawaii International Conference
`on System Sciences. vol. II. pp. 236-244.
`Witold Litwin ct at . LH.sup.—Lincar Hashing for Distributed Files.
`111’ Labs Tech. Report No. HI’L-93-21. Jun 1993. pp. t-22.
`Witold Litwin et al. Linear Hashing for Distributed Files. ACM
`SIGMOD. May 1993. pp. 327-336.
`Witold Litwin. et al.. LH Linear Hashing for Distributed Files. HP
`Labs Tech. Report No. IIPL-93—21 Jun. 1993. pp. 1—22.
`Yao. Andrew Chi-Chih. "Should Tables be Sorted?” Journal of the
`Association for Computing Machinery. vol. 28.310. 3. Jul 1981. pp.
`615-623
`Yuliang Zheng et al.. Haval—A One-Way Hashing Algorithm with
`Variable Length of Output (Extended Abstract). pp. 83-105.
`Yuliang Zheng. el al . Haval—A One-Way Hashing Algorithm with
`Variable Length of Output
`(Extended Abstract). pp. 83-105.
`Advances in Cryptology. AUSCRIPT ’92. 1992.
`Zhiyu Tian. et al.. A New Hashing Function: Statistical Behaviour
`and Algorithm. pp. 3-13. SIGIR Forum. 1993.
`Zhiyu Tian. et al.. A New Hashing Function: Statistical Behaviour
`and Algorithm. pp. 3-13. SIGIR Forum. Spring 1993.
`[Proposed] Order Regarding Construction of Terms. filed Mar 29.
`2007 in CD. Cal. case No. CV 06-5086 SJO (Ex) [9 pgs].
`Analysis of Plaintiffs‘ Claim Chart for the ’280 Patent As Against
`Defendant Media Sentry. Inc. 11 pages.
`Analysis of Plaintiffs' Claim Chan for the ’791 Patent As Against
`Defendant Media SentJy. Inc. (11916 001 0150a) pp. 1-48.
`Analysis of Plaintiffs' Claim Chart for the '791 Patent As Against
`Defendant Overpeer pp. l-40.
`Barbara. 1).. et al.. “Exploiting symmetries for low-cost comparison
`of file copies”. 8th Int’l Conf. on Distributed Computing Systems.
`Jun. 1988. pp. 471-479. San Jose. CA.
`Campbell. M.. “The Design of Test Signatures for Text Retriewil
`Systems.”Tech. Repon. Sep. 5. ”’04. Deakin University. School of
`Computing 8: Math. Geelong. Australia.
`Chang. W. W. et al.. “A signature access method for the Starburst
`database system.” in Proc. 15th Int ’1 Conf. on Very Large Data Bases
`(Amsterdam. The Netherlands). pp 145-153
`Changes to Mar. 23. 2007 Deposition ofRober't B K Dewar. in C D
`Cal. case No. CV 06-5086 SJO (Ex) [3 pgs + cover letter.j.
`Communication from EPO in European Application No. 96 910
`762.2—1225 dated May S. 2009 [4 pgs].
`Communication pursuant to Article 96(2) EPC from EPO (Examina—
`tion Report). Jan 17. 2007. in Application No EP 96 910 762 2-1225
`[1 pg. with 5 pg. annex].
`Complaint for Patent Infringement. Permanent Injunction and Dam-
`agcs. Aug. 8. 2006. in CD. Cal. case No CV 06-5086 SJO (Ex) [11
`pgs].
`Complaint for Patent Infringement. Permanent Injunction and Drun-
`ages. tiled Sep. 21. 2007 in CD. Cal. Case No Cv 07-06161VBF
`(PLA‘c) [10 pgs ].
`Declzu‘ation ofCharles S Baker in Support ochfcndant Lichirc’s
`Motion to Stay Pending Reexamination of Patent and Request for
`Extension of Deadlines. Aug. 29. 2008.
`in CD. Cal. Case No. CV
`07-06161VBF(PLAX) [2 pgs ].
`Defendant Lime Wire. LLC’s First Amended Answer. Affirmative
`Defenses and Counter claims. Oct. 2. 2008. CD. Cal case No
`07-06161VBF(PLA‘<) [13 pgs ].
`Defendant I ime Wire. LLC’s Second Amended Answer. Affirmative
`Defenses and Counterctaims.0ct. 27.2008. From CD. Cal. case No.
`07-06161VBF(PLAX)[13 pgs].
`Defendant Michael Weiss‘s Answer to Plaintiffs Complaint for
`Patent Infringement. Permanent Injunction and Damages; Demand
`for Jury Trial. Sep. 15. 2006. case No. CV 06-5086 SJO (Ex) [10
`p.515-1-
`Dcfendant Recording Industry Association ofAmerica‘s Amended
`Notice of Motion and Motion for Partial Stunmary Judgment on
`Plaintiffs’ Claims for Patent Infringement and Inducing Patent
`Infringement. Memorandtun of Points and Authorities. May 22.
`2006. redacted. original confidential. tiled under seal. in CD. Cal.
`case No. CV 04-7456 JFW (CTx) [19 pgs]
`
`EXHIBIT 3 - 5
`
`

`

`Case 5:18-md-02834-BLF Document 217-3 Filed 10/04/18 Page 7 of 62
`Case 5:18—md-02834-BLF Document 217-3 Filed 10/04/18 Page 7 of 62
`
`US 7,802,310 B2
`Page 6
`
`
`
`1
`
`Defendant Recording Industry Association of America’s and
`Mediasentry. Inc’s Notice of Motion and Motion for Partial Surn-
`rnary Judgment Based on Implied License or. In the Alternative.
`Based on Patent Misuse and Unclean Hands. May 22. 2006.
`Redacted. in C D Cal case No. CV 04-7456 JFW (C'I'x) [21 pgs]
`Defendant Recording Industry Association of America’s and
`Mediasentry. Inc’s Notice of Motion and Motion for Partial Srun-
`rnary Judgment Based on Implied License or. In the Alternative.
`Based on Patent Misuse and Unclean I-Iands. May S. 2006. in CD.
`Cal. case No. CV 04-7456 JFW (C'Ix) [20 pgs.].
`Defendant StrearnCast Networks Inc ‘5 Answer to Plaintiffs Corn-
`plaint for Patent Infringement. Permanent Injunction and Damages;
`Demand for Jrrry Trial. Sep. 5. 2006. CD. Cal. case No. CV 06-5086
`SJO (Ex) [10 pgs.].
`Dcfcndants' Amended Preliminary Claim Constructions [Patent
`Rule 4-2]. filed Feb. 7. 2007 in CD Cal. case No. CV 06-5086 SJO
`(Ex) [10 pgs.].
`Defendant‘s Second Amended Preliminary Claim Constructions
`[Patent Rule 4-2]. filed Feb. 0. 2007 in CD. Cal. case No CV
`06-5086 SJO (Ex) [10 pgs.].
`Dewar. Rebuttal Expert Report of Robert BK. Dewar. in CD. Cal.
`case No. CV 04-7456 JFW (CTx). Apr. 10.2006 [87 pgs]
`Faloutsos. C. “Access methods for text.” ACM Comprrt. Surv I7.
`(Mar. 1985). 49-74.
`Faloutsos. C et al . "D