Case 5:18-cv-04037-BLF Document 42-1 Filed 07/19/21 Page 1 of 3
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`SAN JOSE DIVISION
`
`IN RE: PERSONALWEB
`TECHNOLOGIES, LLC ET AL., PATENT
`LITIGATION
`
`Case No. 18-md-02834-BLF
`
`
`
`PROPOSED AMENDED JUDGMENT
`
` 18-cv-00149-BLF,
` 18-cv-00150-BLF, 18-cv-00154-BLF
` 18-cv-00155-BLF, 18-cv-00156-BLF
` 18-cv-00157-BLF, 18-cv-00159-BLF
` 18-cv-00160-BLF, 18-cv-00161-BLF
` 18-cv-00162-BLF, 18-cv-00163-BLF
` 18-cv-00165-BLF, 18-cv-00166-BLF
` 18-cv-00169-BLF, 18-cv-00170-BLF
` 18-cv-00171-BLF, 18-cv-00173-BLF
` 18-cv-00175-BLF, 18-cv-00176-BLF
` 18-cv-00177-BLF, 18-cv-00178-BLF
` 18-cv-00183-BLF, 18-cv-00196-BLF
` 18-cv-00409-BLF, 18-cv-00767-BLF
` 18-cv-03452-BLF, 18-cv-03453-BLF
` 18-cv-03455-BLF, 18-cv-03457-BLF
` 18-cv-03458-BLF, 18-cv-03459-BLF
` 18-cv-03461-BLF, 18-cv-03462-BLF
` 18-cv-03463-BLF, 18-cv-03571-BLF
` 18-cv-03572-BLF, 18-cv-03573-BLF
` 18-cv-03578-BLF, 18-cv-03579-BLF
` 18-cv-03577-BLF, 18-cv-03580-BLF
` 18-cv-03581-BLF, 18-cv-03582-BLF
` 18-cv-03583-BLF, 18-cv-03584-BLF
` 18-cv-03997-BLF, 18-cv-03998-BLF
` 18-cv-04037-BLF, 18-cv-02140-BLF
` 18-cv-04625-BLF, 18-cv-04626-BLF
` 18-cv-04627-BLF, 18-cv-04628-BLF
` 18-cv-04624-BLF, 18-cv-05195-BLF
` 18-cv-05198-BLF, 18-cv-05199-BLF
` 18-cv-05201-BLF, 18-cv-05202-BLF
` 18-cv-05203-BLF, 18-cv-05204-BLF
` 18-cv-05205-BLF, 18-cv-05206-BLF
` 18-cv-05200-BLF, 18-cv-05272-BLF
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`Northern District of California
`
`United States District Court
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`SAN JOSE DIVISION
`
`IN RE: PERSONALWEB
`TECHNOLOGIES, LLC ET AL., PATENT
`LITIGATION
`
`Case No. 18-md-02834-BLF
`
`
`
`PROPOSED AMENDED JUDGMENT
`
` 18-cv-00149-BLF,
` 18-cv-00150-BLF, 18-cv-00154-BLF
` 18-cv-00155-BLF, 18-cv-00156-BLF
` 18-cv-00157-BLF, 18-cv-00159-BLF
` 18-cv-00160-BLF, 18-cv-00161-BLF
` 18-cv-00162-BLF, 18-cv-00163-BLF
` 18-cv-00165-BLF, 18-cv-00166-BLF
` 18-cv-00169-BLF, 18-cv-00170-BLF
` 18-cv-00171-BLF, 18-cv-00173-BLF
` 18-cv-00175-BLF, 18-cv-00176-BLF
` 18-cv-00177-BLF, 18-cv-00178-BLF
` 18-cv-00183-BLF, 18-cv-00196-BLF
` 18-cv-00409-BLF, 18-cv-00767-BLF
` 18-cv-03452-BLF, 18-cv-03453-BLF
` 18-cv-03455-BLF, 18-cv-03457-BLF
` 18-cv-03458-BLF, 18-cv-03459-BLF
` 18-cv-03461-BLF, 18-cv-03462-BLF
` 18-cv-03463-BLF, 18-cv-03571-BLF
` 18-cv-03572-BLF, 18-cv-03573-BLF
` 18-cv-03578-BLF, 18-cv-03579-BLF
` 18-cv-03577-BLF, 18-cv-03580-BLF
` 18-cv-03581-BLF, 18-cv-03582-BLF
` 18-cv-03583-BLF, 18-cv-03584-BLF
` 18-cv-03997-BLF, 18-cv-03998-BLF
` 18-cv-04037-BLF, 18-cv-02140-BLF
` 18-cv-04625-BLF, 18-cv-04626-BLF
` 18-cv-04627-BLF, 18-cv-04628-BLF
` 18-cv-04624-BLF, 18-cv-05195-BLF
` 18-cv-05198-BLF, 18-cv-05199-BLF
` 18-cv-05201-BLF, 18-cv-05202-BLF
` 18-cv-05203-BLF, 18-cv-05204-BLF
` 18-cv-05205-BLF, 18-cv-05206-BLF
` 18-cv-05200-BLF, 18-cv-05272-BLF
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`Northern District of California
`
`United States District Court
`
`
`
`Case 5:18-cv-04037-BLF Document 42-1 Filed 07/19/21 Page 2 of 3
`
`
`
`
`
` 18-cv-05373-BLF, 18-cv-05436-BLF
` 18-cv-05599-BLF, 18-cv-05966-BLF,
` 18-cv-05967-BLF, 18-cv-05968-BLF,
` 18-cv-05595-BLF, 18-cv-05596-BLF,
` 18-cv-05611-BLF, 18-cv-05600-BLF,
` 18-cv-05606-BLF, 18-cv-05619-BLF,
` 18-cv-05624-BLF, 18-cv-05625-BLF,
` 18-cv-05969-BLF, 18-cv-05970-BLF,
` 18-cv-06042-BLF, 18-cv-06043-BLF,
` 18-cv-06044-BLF, 18-cv-06045-BLF,
` 18-cv-06046-BLF, 18-cv-06612-BLF,
` 18-cv-06614-BLF, 18-cv-06615-BLF,
` 18-cv-07119-BLF
`
`
`
`
`
`On March 13, 2019, the Court issued its order granting in part and denying in part
`
`Amazon’s motion for summary judgment on the basis that all infringement claims made against
`
`Amazon’s Simple Storage Service (“S3”) were barred by claim preclusion and the Kessler
`
`doctrine. ECF 394. The following eight customer cases which allege infringement based solely on
`
`the customer’s use of Amazon S3 are fully adjudicated by this March 13, 2019 order: 18-cv-
`
`05599-BLF, 18-cv-05606-BLF, 18-cv-05969-BLF, 18-cv-05970-BLF, 18-cv-06044-BLF, 18-cv-
`
`06046-BLF, 18-cv-06612-BLF, and 18-cv-07119-BLF. The Court hereby enters final judgment in
`
`these actions in favor of defendant(s) named in this action and against Plaintiff PersonalWeb
`
`Technologies, LLC and Level 3Communications, LLC.
`
`On February 3, 2020, the Court issued its order granting in part and denying in part
`
`Amazon.com, Inc.’s and Amazon Web Services, Inc.’s motion for summary judgment of
`
`noninfringement, and granting Twitch Interactive, Inc.’s motion for summary judgment of
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`Northern District of California
`
`United States District Court
`
`20
`
`noninfringement. ECF 578. Based on this order and the Court’s March 13, 2019 order, the
`
`following cases are fully adjudicated: 18-md-2834-BLF, 18-cv-05966-BLF, 18-cv-05967-BLF18-
`
`cv-05968-BLF, 18-cv-05595-BLF, 18-cv-05596-BLF,18-cv-05611-BLF, 18-cv-05600-BLF, 18-
`
`cv-05619-BLF18-cv-05624-BLF, 18-cv-05625-BLF18-cv-06042-BLF, 18-cv-06043-BLF, 18-cv-
`
`06045-BLF, 18-cv-06614-BLF, 18-cv-06615-BLF, 18-cv-00149-BLF, 18-cv-00150-BLF, 18-cv-
`
`00154-BLF, 18-cv-00155-BLF, 18-cv-00156-BLF, 18-cv-00157-BLF, 18-cv-00159-BLF, 18-cv-
`
`2
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`
`
`Case 5:18-cv-04037-BLF Document 42-1 Filed 07/19/21 Page 3 of 3
`
`
`
`00160-BLF, 18-cv-00161-BLF, 18-cv-00162-BLF, 18-cv-00163-BLF, 18-cv-00165-BLF, 18-cv-
`
`00166-BLF, 18-cv-00169-BLF, 18-cv-00170-BLF, 18-cv-00171-BLF, 18-cv-00173-BLF, 18-cv-
`
`00175-BLF, 18-cv-00176-BLF, 18-cv-00177-BLF, 18-cv-00178-BLF, 18-cv-00183-BLF, 18-cv-
`
`00196-BLF, 18-cv-00409-BLF, 18-cv-00767-BLF, 18-cv-03452-BLF, 18-cv-03453-BLF, 18-cv-
`
`03455-BLF, 18-cv-03457-BLF, 18-cv-03458-BLF, 18-cv-03459-BLF, 18-cv-03461-BLF, 18-cv-
`
`03462-BLF, 18-cv-03463-BLF, 18-cv-03571-BLF, 18-cv-03572-BLF, 18-cv-03573-BLF, 18-cv-
`
`03578-BLF, 18-cv-03579-BLF, 18-cv-03577-BLF, 18-cv-03580-BLF, 18-cv-03581-BLF, 18-cv-
`
`03582-BLF, 18-cv-03583-BLF, 18-cv-03584-BLF, 18-cv-03997-BLF, 18-cv-03998-BLF, 18-cv-
`
`04037-BLF, 18-cv-02140-BLF, 18-cv-04625-BLF, 18-cv-04626-BLF, 18-cv-04627-BLF, 18-cv-
`
`04628-BLF, 18-cv-04624-BLF, 18-cv-05195-BLF, 18-cv-05198-BLF, 18-cv-05199-BLF, 18-cv-
`
`05201-BLF, 18-cv-05202-BLF, 18-cv-05203-BLF, 18-cv-05204-BLF, 18-cv-05205-BLF, 18-cv-
`
`05206-BLF, 18-cv-05200-BLF, 18-cv-05272-BLF, 18-cv-05373-BLF, and 18-cv-05436-BLF. The
`
`Court hereby enters final judgment in these actions in favor of defendant(s) named in this action
`
`and against Plaintiff PersonalWeb Technologies, LLC and Level 3Communications, LLC.
`
`Pursuant to this final judgment, PersonalWeb’s claims in the above actions are
`
`DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
`
`On March 2, 2021, the Court awarded Amazon.com, Inc., Amazon Web Services, Inc., and
`
`Twitch Interactive, Inc. $4,615,242.28 in attorney fees and $203,300.10 in non-taxable costs. ECF
`
`648. On April 19, 2021, the Court granted an additional $571,961.71 in attorney fees and
`
`$11,120.97 in non-taxable costs in a separate order. ECF 656. $1,497.62 in post-judgment interest
`
`has accrued through July 14, 2021. Accordingly, judgment is hereby entered in favor of, Amazon
`
`and against PersonalWeb Technologies LLC, in the amount of $5,403,122.68.
`
`IT IS SO ORDERED.
`
`
`Dated: July 26, 2021
`
`
`______________________________________
`BETH LABSON FREEMAN
`United States District Judge
`
`3
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`Northern District of California
`
`United States District Court
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
