throbber
Case 5:18-cv-03463-BLF Document 28-4 Filed 10/04/18 Page 1 of 61
`Case 5:18—cv-03463-BLF Document 28-4 Filed 10/04/18 Page 1 of 61
`
`EXHIBIT 4
`
`

`

`Case 5:18-cv-03463-BLF Document 28-4 Filed 10/04/18 Page 2 of 61
`Case 5:18-c—v-“03463 BLF Document 28-4 Filed 10/04/18 Page 2 of 61
`|||||||||||||||||||||||||l||||lll||||||||||||||l||g|||l|l||||||||ll||l||l|||
`
`US007945544B2
`
`(12) Umted States Patent
`(10) Patent No.:
`US 7,945,544 B2
`
`Farber et a].
`(45) Date of Patent:
`May 17, 2011
`
`(54) SIMILARITY-BASED ACCESS CONTROL OF
`DATA IN A DATA PROCESSING SYSTEM
`
`(75)
`
`Inventors: D’Wid A- Farber, Ojai, CA (US);
`Ronald D. Lachman, Nonhbrook, 1L
`(US)
`
`(73) Assignees: Kinetech, Inc., Studio City, CA (US);
`Level 3 Communications, LLC,
`Broomfie1d: CO (US)
`
`( "‘ ) Notice:
`
`Subject to any disclaimer, the term ofthis
`patent is extended or adjusted under 35
`U.S.C. 154(b) by 624 days.
`
`(21) Appl. No.: 11/980,688
`
`(22)
`
`Filed:
`
`Oct. 31, 2007
`
`(51)
`
`Int. Cl.
`(2006.01)
`G06F 17/00
`(52) US. Cl.
`......................... 707/698; 707/821; 707/822
`(58) Field of Classification Search .................. 707/609,
`707/821—828, 697~698
`See application file for complete search history.
`
`(56)
`
`References Cited
`
`US. PA’l‘EN't' DOCUMENTS
`3,668,647 A
`6/1972 Evangelisti et al.
`3.835.260 A
`9/1974 Prescher et at.
`(Continued)
`
`FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS
`
`EP
`
`0 268 069 A2
`
`5/1988
`
`(“mm“)
`
`(65)
`
`Prior Publication Data
`US 2008/0065635 A1
`Mar 13 2008
`'
`’
`
`Related US. Application Data
`(60) Continuation of application No. 11/724,232, filed on
`Mar. 15, 2007, which is a continuation of application
`No. 11/017,650, filed on Dec. 22, 2004, which is a
`continuation of application No. 09/987,723, filed on
`Nov. 15, 2001, now Pat. No. 6,928,442, which is a
`continuation of application No. 09/283,160, filed on
`Apr. 1, 1999, now Pat. No. 6,415,280, which is a
`division of application No. 08/960,079, filed on Oct.
`24, 1997, now Pat. No. 5,978,791, which is
`a
`continuation of application No. 08/425,160, filed on
`Apr. 11, 1995, now abandoned, application No.
`] 1/980,688, which is a continuation ofapplication No.
`10/742,972, filed on Dec. 23, 2003, which is a division
`ofapplication No. 09/987,723, which is a continuation
`ofapplication No. 09/283,160, which is a division of
`application No. 08/960,079, which is a continuation of
`application No. 08/425,160.
`
`(”HER PUBLICMIONS
`Fowler, et al. “A User-Level Replicated File System," AT&T Bell
`Laboratories Technical Memorandum 0112670-930414-05, Apr.
`
`1993, and USlelX 1993 Summer Conference Proceedings, Cincin-
`nati, OH, Jun 1993.
`
`(Continued)
`
`Primary Examiner — Khanh B Pham
`(74) AI/orney, Agent, or Firm W Davidson Berquist Jackson
`& Gowdey, LLP; Brian Siritzky
`
`(57)
`
`ABSTRACT
`
`Similarity of data items is determined by analyzing corre-
`sponding segments of the data items. A function is applied to
`each segment of a data item and the output of that function is
`compared to the output of the same function applied to a
`corresponding segment of another data item. A function may
`be applied to the output of the functions. The functions may
`be hash or message digest functions.
`
`56 Claims, 31 Drawing Sheets
`
`.II'
`
`DI“
`mtnrru‘m1
`
`PAW DITA ITS.INTO
`mum
`
`
`
`I
`
`
`
`
`
`
`mutt: mutt. a: nrrl a! mu
`munmu I new! um: :I m- m n
`
`“I”+1
`
`EXHIBIT 4 - 1
`
`

`

`Case 5:18-cv-03463-BLF Document 28-4 Filed 10/04/18 Page 3 of 61
`Case 5:18-cv-03463-BLF Document 28-4 Filed 10/04/18 Page 3 of 61
`
`US 7,945,544 B2
`
`Page2
`
`U S. PATENT DOCUMENTS
`
`5.361.356 A
`
`II/l994 (Zlnrk etal.
`
`4,096,568 A
`4,215,402 A
`4,221,003 A
`4,290,105 A
`4376 299 A
`'
`’
`4,405,829 A
`4,412,285 A
`4414 624 A
`4’441‘155 A
`'
`'
`‘
`4,464,713 A
`4,490,782 A
`4,558,413 A
`4,571,700 A
`4,577,293 A
`4642 764 A
`1
`1
`4,642,793 A
`4658 093 A
`4‘675'810A
`4691299 A
`~
`’
`-
`’
`’
`‘
`4,725,945 A
`4773 039 A
`4'821’184 A
`4887235 A
`’
`'
`4888681 A
`1
`’
`‘
`4,914,571 A
`4,914,586 A
`4,922,414 A
`4,922,417 A
`4,937,863 A
`4,949,302 A
`4,953,209 A
`4,972,367 A
`5,014,192 A
`5,025,421 A
`5,032,979 A
`5047918 A
`5050074 A
`5‘050‘212 A
`5,057,837 A
`5077 658 A
`5,084,815 A
`5,1173“ A
`53129081 A
`“291082 A
`5141667 A
`{1631147 A
`5,179,680 A
`51:52:79) A
`5’199073 A
`5,202,982 A
`5204 897 A
`'
`'
`‘
`5,204,958 A
`5,204,966 A
`5208 858 A
`52221134 A
`51230105] A
`5,239,648 A
`5,24%“ A
`5,247,620 A
`5,260,999 A
`g’gzg'gg‘f 2
`512871499 A
`52871514 A
`'
`1
`‘
`5 297279 A
`5301286 A
`5,301,316 A
`5,317,693 A
`5321841 .A
`5‘339‘403 A
`5‘341‘477 A
`5:343:527 A
`5,347,653 A
`5351302 A
`5,357,440 ,A
`5,357,623 .A
`5,357,630 A
`5,359,523 A
`
`6/1978 Benneu e1 .11.
`,
`.
`7/ 1980 Mllchcll cl .11.
`,
`,
`91980 Chang, e121].
`,
`.
`.
`9/ 1981 Clchclllctnl
`3/1983 Rivesl
`,
`,
`91983 R1vesl e1 :11.
`,
`10193:! Neches et :11,
`11’1983 Summer Jr e141
`41’1984
`F1 1 h 31:11 ‘
`’,
`6° 6” ‘
`81984 Benhaseelal.
`,
`.
`12/1984 Dlxon at 111.
`,
`,
`.
`12/1985 Schm1dlela].
`2/1986 Emry, Jr. et :11
`,
`.
`31986 Manck e1 :11.
`2/1987 Auslander
`,
`21987 Meaden
`4/1987 Helhmn
`1
`1
`6,1987 G 1
`‘
`91987 1oves1e111
`',
`.“ne’e “-
`,
`,
`'
`‘
`21988 kronstndl e1 :11.
`9/1988 Lamom
`4,1989 Chncyet 11
`12/1989 Holloway e161
`,
`12/1989 Barneset '11
`‘
`‘
`4/1990 Barntzetnl.
`4/1990 Swinehurl e1 :11
`5/1990 Hollowayclal.
`5/1990 Churmelal
`6/1990 Robcn clal.
`8/1990 Arnold/31:11.
`8/1990 Ryder, 51201111.
`11/1990 Bmke
`5/1991 Mansfield et .11.
`6/1991 Cho
`7/1991 HcchtctaL
`9/1991 Schwmlzelal.
`9,1991 Mm
`9,1991 Dglso'n
`10/1991 Colwell e1 (11.
`12/1991 Bendene1 .11
`1,1992 M
`_.
`531992 M31310
`7/1992 Kobaynshi el :11.
`7/1992
`11an e111
`9,199;
`I,
`g, “I
`1
`11ng;
`(fig-12'9““ ‘1
`{“595 Coleell e1 '11
`1/1993 'l'amum el al
`3/1993 Soon
`4/1993 Gmmlich e1 :11.
`4/1993 Wymnn
`,
`,
`4"993 ('heng 9"“
`41993 Willenbcrg €111].
`5/1993 v611cn cl :11
`6,199} w- '1- ~1-1
`791993
`1““ 1‘
`81993 1212:1131
`8/1993 Reed 6' 1,
`9/1993 Fukuzawnel :11.
`11/1993 Wyman
`:’::333 ffrresllleltnll,
`231994 N?“ e “-
`23,994 Gm“
`’,
`mm
`3/1994 Bannon et :11.
`4,1994 anani
`4/1994 l-Inmillon etal.
`5/1994 Cuenod eml.
`6/1994 Eastetal
`8,1994 park“
`3,,994 mane”,
`8/1994 Moore
`9/1994 Flynn etal
`9/1994 Leighton etal
`10/1994 Talbon e1 .11,
`10/1994 Megory-Cohen
`10/1994 Oprcscu cl :11
`10/1994 Talbot! 61111.
`
`.
`
`5.371.897 A
`5,375.206 A
`5,384,565 A
`5,394.555 A
`5403639 A
`’
`'
`5,404,508 A
`5,438.508 A
`5'442'343 A
`5,448.668 A ‘
`5,448,718 A
`5,452,447 A
`5,454,000 A
`5,454,039 A
`5,459,860 A
`5465 365 A
`'
`’
`5,467,471 A
`“751826 A
`5,479,654 A *
`5,491,817 A
`5,499,294 A
`5504 879 A
`"
`’
`5,530,757 A ~
`5’537'585 A
`5,542,087 A
`5,548,724 A
`5553143 A
`{5(8'181 A
`513,;1'615 A
`5’581'758 A
`5‘581'764 A
`5’583'995 A
`5’588'147 A
`5'596‘744 A
`5‘600'834 A
`5’604‘803 A
`5’604’892 A
`'
`’
`5,630,067 A
`5,632,031 A
`3838223 A
`’
`'
`’
`5,649,196 A
`5,677,952 A
`5578938 A
`5,678,046 A
`5,694,472 A *
`5,694,596 A
`5,701,316 A
`5’710'922 A
`5,724,425 A
`£338; A
`'
`'
`5,745,879 A
`5757 913 A
`5’757'915 A
`1
`'
`5,781,629 A
`5,802,291 A
`5180”“ A
`5,826,049 A
`588451.233:
`5’907'619 A
`5:907:704 A
`5,940,504 A
`5,978,791 A
`5,991,414 A
`6,006,018 A
`8831888 A
`6’415’280 £31
`'
`'
`6,732,180 131
`6,816,872 131*
`6,928,442 B2
`2002/0052884 A1
`2002/0082999 A1
`2003/0078888 A1
`2003/0078889 A1
`2003/0095660 A1
`2004/0139097 A1
`
`.
`
`.. 714/21
`
`.............. 714/54
`
`
`713/188
`
`””994 B’W" 6‘ :11.
`12/1994 Hunter cl :11.
`,
`1/1995 Cannon
`2/1995 Huntcrctnl
`4/1995 B1
`1
`|
`.
`“a“ “'
`4/1995 Konrad 61:11.
`,
`8/1995 Wyman
`8/1995 CM" em"
`9/1995 Perelsonetnl.
`9/1995 Cohn el :11
`9/1995 Nelson etal
`
`9/1995 Dorfmnn
`-
`9/1995 Coppexsmlt
`10/1995 Burnett
`“/1995 W'
`t b
`”‘ er 0”“
`11/1995 Bader
`.
`””995 F'Sd‘e’
`12/1995 Squibb .......................... 707/695
`.
`.
`2/1996 Gopaletnl
`3/1996 Fr1edman
`1
`4,1996 11‘
`be
`”e"
`’gem'
`6/1996 Kr'nwczyk
`
`”1996 Bl'ernmfie
`7/1996 Neunatetal.
`-
`8/1996 Aklzawaeral.
`9,1996 Rowen”
`l
`‘d t
`10/1996 C
`12,1996 S'l’eenwm e ‘1‘
`12,1996 B:::ctt
`'|
`12/1996 F'l'
`'1d
`12,1996 6”?" [31‘1”
`12,1996 N“ crc[(l.
`“1997 Deem‘ImIe “'
`”997 Ha”:
`2,1997 A°.w’”
`1
`2/1997 {if 11
`1.” a 6”“
`5/1997 K1qdell eta].
`5/1997 Vehsszu'opoulos etal.
`8833;
`fltefilflf‘a“
`1
`3““ ”3“"
`7/1997 Woodh111etnl.
`10/1997 Blakley, 111 61:11.
`‘0/ 1997 [3°C5‘e’etfll'
`10/1997 Cah1ll 61:11
`12/1997 Johnsonetnl.
`12/1997 Campbell
`12/1997 Alferness at :11.
`“1998 Alley et :11
`3/1998 Changetal.
`3833: 32°83,
`‘ “5‘“ e’
`4/1998 Wyman
`5/1998 Bellme e141
`1
`51998 A
`.h‘ '
`’
`“5m“ “‘1'
`7/1998 Haberenll.
`9/1998 Balick etal.
`”998 Nguyen
`10/1998 Ogam eta].
`1
`11:13:: gerglal.
`5,1999 ngism‘a'
`5/1999 Gudmundson el :11.
`8/1999 Griswold
`11/1999 Fmberet :11.
`11/1999 Gamy el al.
`12/1999 Burnett eta].
`188888 {85:53:}
`'l
`£00,
`be
`‘
`’
`* F‘“ ”‘“'
`5/2004 Ilaleelal.
`11/2004 Squibb
`8/2005 Farber 61:11.
`6/2002 l’zu'ber 6101.
`6/2002 Lee etal.
`4/2003 Lee e161.
`4/2003 Lee et a1.
`50003 Lee et :11.
`7/2004 Farber e1 .11.
`
`............... 713/189
`
`1/1
`
`EXHIBIT 4 - 2
`
`

`

`Case 5:18-cv-03463-BLF Document 28-4 Filed 10/04/18 Page 4 of 61
`Case 5:18-cv-03463-BLF Document 28-4 Filed 10/04/18 Page 4 of 61
`
`US 7,945,544 B2
`Page 3
`
`2005/0010792 A1
`2005/0114296 A1
`2007/0185848 A1
`2008/0065635 A1
`2008/0066191 A1
`2008/0071855 A1
`2008/0082551 A1
`
`l/2005 Carpentier et al.
`5/2005 Farber et al.
`/2007 Farbcr ct al.
`3/2008 Far ber et al.
`3/2008 Farbcr ct aI.
`3/2008 Far‘ber et aI.
`3/2008 Farber ct a].
`
`EP
`EP
`IiP
`EP
`EP
`HP
`EP
`GB
`JP
`JP
`JP
`JP
`JP
`JP
`JP
`W0
`W0
`W0
`W0
`W0
`
`FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS
`0 315 425
`5/1989
`0 558 945 A2
`9/1993
`0 566 967 A2
`lO/1993
`0592045
`4/1994
`0631 226 A1
`12/1994
`0 654 920 A2
`5/1995
`0 658 022 A2
`6/1995
`2294132 A
`4/1996
`59058564
`4/1984
`63-106048
`5/1988
`63-273961
`11/1988
`2-127755
`5/1990
`05162529
`6/1993
`06187384 A2
`7/1994
`06348558 A
`12/1994
`WO 92/20021
`11/1992
`W0 94/06087
`3/ I 994
`WO 94/20913
`9/1994
`“/0 95/01599
`l/1995
`WO 97/43717
`11/1997
`
`OTHER PUBLICATIONS
`
`Greene, D., et a1., “Multi-Index Hashing for Information Retrieval”,
`Nov. 20-22, | 994, Proceedings, 35th Annual Symp on Foundations of
`Computer Science, IEEE, pp. 722-731.
`Hirano, et al, “Extendible hashing for concurrent insertions and
`retrievals," in Proc 4th Ettromicro Workshop on Parallel and Distrib-
`uted Processing, 1996 (PDP ’96), Jan. 24, 1996 to Jan. 26, 1996, pp.
`235-242. Braga , Portugal,
`Preneel et a1 , “The Cryptographic Hash Function RIPEMD-IGO”,
`appeared in CryptoBytes RSA Laboratories, vol. 3. No. 2, pp. 9-14,
`Fall, 1997 (also Bosselaers et al , “The RIPEMD-160 Cryptographic
`Ilash Function", Jan. 1997, Dr. Dobb’s Journal, pp. 24-28).
`I‘msker et al ," l‘he Siphon: Managing Distant Replicated Reposito-
`rics” Nov 8-9, 1990, Proc Management of Replicated Data IEEE.
`Reply to Examination Repor1, Munich, Nov. 18,2009, inAppIication
`N0. EP 96 910 762.2 [19 pgs]
`Rich, K ct al, “Hobgoblin: A II'ile and Directory Auditor", Sep
`30-Oct 3, 1991. Lisa V,, San Diego, CA
`USPTO Final Office Action in US Appl No. 10/'742,972, Dec. 22,
`2009.
`USPTO, Advisory Action, Mar. 23, 2010.
`[1,980,679
`USPTO, Final Office Action in US
`90/010,260, Jan. 29, 2010,
`USPI'O, Final Office Action mailed Jan. 12, 2010 in US. Appl. No
`11/980,679
`USP’TO, Final Office Action mailed Aug 18, 2009 in U S Appl No
`Il/OI7,650
`USPTO, Final Office Action mailed Sep. 30, 2009 in US. Appl. No.
`1 ”724,232
`USP’TO, Final Office Action, Mar. 5, 2010 in US Appl No
`11/980,687
`Chcriton, David R. and Mann, Timothy P., “Dccentralizing a global
`naming service for improved performance and fault tolerance”, ACM
`Transactions on Computer Systems, vol. 7, No. 2, May 1989, pp.
`147-183
`Request for Reexamination of US Patent No. 6.928.442: Reexam
`Control No 90/010,260. filed on Aug. 29, 2008.
`[Proposed] Order Regarding Construction of Terms, filed Mar. 29,
`2007 in CD Cal case no, CV 06-5086 SJO (Ex) [9 pgs].
`Analysis 01' Plaintiffs' Claim Chart for the '280 Patent As Against
`Defendant Media Sentry, Inc. 11 pages
`Analysis of Plaintiffs' Claim Chart for the '791 Patent As Against
`Defendant Media Sentry, Inc (11916 0010150 A) pp 1-48.
`
`Recxam Control No
`
`in US. Appl. No.
`
`Analysis of Plaintiffs’ Claim Chart for the '791 Patent As Against
`Defendant Overpeer pp. l-40
`Barbara, 1)., et al , “Exploiting symmetries for low-cost comparison
`of file copies,” 8th Int'l Conf. on Distributed Computing Systems,
`.Iun. 1988, pp 471-479, San Jose, CA.
`Campbell, M1, “The Design of Text Signatures for Text Retrieval
`Systems," Tech. Report, Sept 5, 1994, Deakin University. School of
`Computing & Math . Geelong, Australia
`Chang, W W. et al., "A signature access method for the Starburst
`database system," in Proc.
`|5|h Int’l Conf. on Very Large Data Bases
`(Amsterdam, The Netherlands), pp 145-153
`Changes to Mar. 23, 2007 Deposition ofRobeit B. K Dewar, in C D
`Cal. case No. CV 06-5086 $10 (Ex) [3 pgs + cover letter]
`Communication from El—‘() in European Application No 96 910
`762 271225 dated May 8, 2009 [4 pgs]
`Communication pursuant to Article 96(2) EPC from EPO (Exzunina-
`tion Report), Jan. 17,2007, inAppIication No EP 96 910 762.2- 1225
`[1 pg. with 5 pg annex]
`Complaint for Patent Infringement. Permanent Injunction and Darn-
`ages, Aug. 8, 2006, in CD Cal. case No. CV 06-5086 SJO (Ex) [11
`was]
`Complaint for Patent Infringement. Permanent Injunction and Dam-
`ages, filed Sep 21, 2007 in C D. Cal Case No CV 07-06161 VBI"
`(PLAx) [10 pgs]
`Declaration ofCharles S Baker in Support ofDefendant Lime Wire’s
`Motion to Stay Pending Reexamination of Patent and Request for
`Extension of Deadlines, Aug 29, 2008,
`in C. D. Cal. Case No CV
`07-06161 VBF (PLAx) [2 pgs J
`Defendant Lime Wire, LLC’s liirst Amended Answer, Alfrrrnative
`Defenses and Counterclaims, Oct 2, 2008, CD. Cal. case No.
`07-06161VBI"(PLAX)[13 pgs].
`Defendant Lime Wire, LLC’s Second Amended Answer, Affirmative
`Defenses and Cotmterclaims, Oct. 27, 2008, from CD. Cal. case No.
`07-06161VBF(PLAx)[13 pgs]
`Defendant Michael Weiss's Answer to Plaintiffs Complaint for
`Patent Infringement, Permanent Injunction and Damages, Demand
`for Jury Trial, Sep. 15, 2006. case No CV 06-5086 SJO (Ex) [10
`PgS-I‘
`Defendant Recording Industry Association 01' America's Amended
`Notice of Motion and Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on
`Plaintilfs' Claims for Patent Infringement and Inducing Patent
`Infringement; Memorandum of Points and Authorities, May 22,
`2006, redacted, original confidential, filed under seal, in CD. Cal.
`case No. CV 04-7456 JFW (C'I‘x) [l9 pgs]
`Defendant Recording Industry Association of America's and
`Mcdiasentry, 1nc.’s Notice of Motion and Motion for Partial Surn-
`mary Judgment Based on Implied License or,
`in the Alternative,
`Based on Patent Misuse and Unclean Hands, May 22, 2006,
`Redacted, in CD Cal. case No CV 04-7456 JFW (CTx) [21 pgs].
`Defendant Recording Industry Association of America's and
`Mediasentry, Inc’s Notice of Motion and Motion for Partial Sum-
`mary Judgment Based on Implied License or,
`in the Alternative,
`Based on Patent Misuse and Unclean Hands, May 8, 2006, in CD.
`Cal case No CV 04-7456 JI"W (C'l'x) [20 pgs]
`Defendant StreamCast Networks Inc.'s Answer to Plaintiff's Corn-
`plaint for Patent Infringement, Permanent Injunction and Damages;
`Demand for Jury Trial, Sep. 5, 2006, CD. Cal case No. CV 065086
`SJO (Ex) [[0 pgs]
`Defendants' Amended Preliminary Claim Constructions [Patent
`Rule 4-2], filed Feb. 7, 2007 in CD Cal. case No. CV 06-5086 SJO
`(EX) [10 pgs]-
`Defendant’s Second Amended Preliminary Claim Constructions
`[Patent Rule 4-2].
`tiled Feb 9, 2007 in CD Cal case No. CV
`06-5086 SJO (Ex) [10 pgs]
`Dewar, Rebuttal Expert Report of Robert B.K. Dewar, in C D. Cal.
`case No. CV 04-74 56 JFW (CTx), Apr. 10, 2006 [87 pgs].
`Faloutsos, C. “Access methods for text." ACM Cornput Surv l7, 1
`(Mar 1985), 49-74
`Faloutsos, C. et al., “Description and performance analysis of signa-
`ture file methods for office filing,” ACM Trans. Inf Syst. 5, 3 (Jul.
`1987), 237-257.
`
`EXHIBIT 4 - 3
`
`

`

`Case 5:18-cv-03463-BLF Document 28-4 Filed 10/04/18 Page 5 of 61
`Case 5:18-cv-03463-BLF Document 28-4 Filed 10/04/18 Page 5 of 61
`
`US 7,945,544 B2
`Page 4
`
`Faloutsos, C etal ,“Signature files: an access method for documents
`and its analytical performance evaluation,” ACM Trans. Inf. Syst 2,
`4 (Oct. 1984), 267-288.
`Federal Information Processing Standards (FIPS) Publication 180-];
`Secure Hash Standard, Apr. 17, I995 [[7 pgs.].
`Feigenhaum, J et al., “Cryptographic protection of databases and
`software,” in Distributed Computing and Cryptography: Proc
`DIMACS Workshop, Apr. I991. pp 161-172, American Mathemati-
`cal Society, Boston, Mass.
`First Amended Answer of Defendant Mediasentry to Second
`Amended Complaint and Counterclaim, Apr 24, 2006. in C D Cal
`case No. cv 04-745611-‘W (C'I'x) [29 pgs J.
`First Amended Answer of Defendant RIAA to Second Amended
`Complaint and Counterclaim, Apr. 24, 2006, in CD. Cal Case No
`CV 04-7456JFW(C'1'X) [27 pgs.].
`Infringement, Permanent
`I’irst Amended Complaint
`for Patent
`Injunction and Damages, filed Sep 8, 2008 in CD. Cal Case No. CV
`07-06161 v131'-' (PLAx) [10 pgs.].
`Harrison, M. C., “Implementation of the substring test by hashing,”
`Commun. ACM 14, 12 (Dec 1971), 777-779.
`IEEE, The Authoritative Dictionary of IEEE Standards Terms, 7th
`ed., Copyright2000,pp. 107, 176, 209, 240, 241, 432, 468. 505, 506,
`682, 1016, 1113, 1266, and 1267.
`Ishikawa, Y., et al , “Evaluation of‘signature files as set access facili-
`ties in OODBs," In Proc. ofthe 1993 ACM SIGMOD Inter Conf. on
`Management ofData (Washington, DC . US, May I993). P. Bunc-
`man & S. Jajodia, Eds. SIGMOD '93 ACM, NY, NY, 247-256.
`Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement, N.D. Ca]. Rule
`4-3, Feb. 12, 2007, in CD. Cal. case No. CV 06-5086 $10 (Ex) [20
`ass-1-
`Karp, R. M. and Rabin, M. 0., “Efficient randomized pattern-match-
`ing algorithms,” IBM J. Res. Dev. 31, 2 (Mar. 1987), 249-260.
`List of Asserted Claims and Infringement Chan for Each Asserted
`Claim, Jul. 28, 2008, in CD. Cal. Case No. CV 07-06161 VBF
`(PLAx) [31 pgs.].
`McGregor D. R. And Mariani, .I. A. “Fingerprinting~A technique
`for file identification andmaintenance," Software: Practice and Expe-
`rience, vol. 12, No. 12, Dec. 1982, pp. 1165-1166.
`Notice ofInterested Parties, filed Sep 21, 2007 in C D. Cal Case No
`cv 07-06161 VBF (PLAx) [2 pgs.].
`Notice of Motion and Motion of Defendant Lime Wire to Stay Liti-
`gation Pending Reexamination of Patent and Request for Extension
`ofDeadlines, Sep. 22, 2008. CD Cal. Case No. CV 07-06161 VBF
`(PLAx) [[1 pgs.].
`Notice ofRelated Cases, filed Sep. 2 | . 2007 in CD. Cal. Case No. CV
`07-06161 VBF (PLAx) [2 pgs.].
`Panagopoulos, G., et al., “Bit-sliced signature files for very large text
`databases on a parallel machine architecture," In Proc. ofthe4th Inter
`Cont'. on Extending Database Technology (EDBT), Cambridge,
`U.K., Mar. 1994, pp 379-392 (Proc LNCS 779 Springer 1994, ISBN
`3-540-57818-8) [14 pgs]
`PatentAbstract, “Management System for Plural Versions," Pub. No
`63273961 A, published Nov. 11, 1988, NEC Corp
`Patent Abstracts of Japan, “Data P1 ocessor,” Appln No. 05135620,
`filed Jun. 7, 1993, Toshiba Corp.
`Plaintiff Kinetcch, Inc.'s Responses to Defendant Mcdiasentry’s
`First set of Interregatories, May 1, 2006, in C D Cal. Case No. CV
`04-7456 JFW (CTx) [14 pgs.].
`Inc.‘s Supplemental
`Plaintifl'—Counterclaim Defendant Altnet,
`Responses to Defendant-Counterclaim Plaintifvaerpeer Inc ’5 First
`Set ofInterrogatories, Mar. 8, 2006, redacted, in C D Cal. case No
`CV 04-7456 JFW (CTx) [24 pgs.].
`Plainti1T-Counterclaim Defendant Brilliant Digital Entertainment,
`Inc ’5 Supplemental Responses to Det'endant-Counte1claim Plaintiff
`Overpeer Inc 's First Set ofInterrogatories, Mar. 8, 2006, redacted, in
`CD. Cal. case No. CV 04-7456 JFW (CTx) [24 pgs.].
`Plaintiff-Counterclaim Defendant Kinetech, Inc.‘s Supplemental
`Responses to Defendant-Counterclaim PlaintilTOverpeer Inc.’s First
`Set ofInterrogatories Mar. 8, 2006. redacted, in C D Cal. case No
`cv 04-7456 .IFW (CTx) [24 pgs.].
`Plaintiffs Altnet, Inc. Brilliant Digital, Inc., and Kinetech, Inc 's
`Responses to Defendant Recording Industry Association of Ameri-
`
`ca's First Set of Requests forAdmissions, Jan. 6, 2006, in CD. Cal.
`case No. (:v 04-7456 .IFW (CTx) [26 pgs.].
`Plaintiffs’ Claim Construction Opening Briefand Exhibits A-D, F, G;
`May 7.2007, in (:1), Cal. case No. (1v 06-5086 $10 (Ex) [I 12 pgs.].
`Plaintiffs’ Preliminary Claim Constructions and Extrinsic Evidence,
`Feb. 6,2006, in case (:v 06-5086 $10 (Ex) [20 pgs.].
`Plaintiff‘s Reply to Defendant Mediasentry’s Counterclaims in its
`Answer to the Second Amended Complaint, May I, 2006, in CD.
`(1.11. Case No. (:v 04-7456 .IFW (CTx) [11 pgs.].
`PlaintilI’s Reply to Defendant RIAA’s Counterclaims in its Answer
`to the Second Amended Complaint, May 1, 2006, in C D. Cal case
`No. cv 04 -7456 MW (C’1'x) [11 pgs.].
`Plaintitfs‘ Reply to Defendants’ Claim Construction Brief, filed Apr.
`23, 2007 in C D Cal. case No CV 06-5086 ODW (13x) [15 pgs.J
`Reply to Examination Report, Jul. 19, 2007, in Application No. EP 96
`910 7622-1225 [7 pgsj
`Response to Non-Final Office Action filed May 19, 2009 in U S.
`Appl No 11/017,650 [19pgs.J.
`Rivest. R , RFC 1320, “The MD4 Message-Digest Algorithm," The
`Internet Engineering'l'ask 1‘0rce(11;"1'l"),Apr. I992
`Sacks-Davis, R , et a] , “Multikey access methods based on superim-
`posed coding techniques,” ACM Trans. Database Syst. 12, 4 (Nov.
`1987), 655-696.
`Siegel, A , et al , “Deceit: aFlexible Distributed File System," Free.
`Workshop on the Management of Replicated Data, Houston, '1 X, pp.
`15-17, Nov. 8-9, 1990.
`Siegel, A., et al., “Deceit: a Flexible Distributed File System,” Tech-
`nical Report, TR89-1042, Cornell University, Nov. 1989.
`Stipulation and Proposed order to (1) Amend the Complaint, (2)
`Amend pretrial Schedule, and(3)Withdraw Motion to Stay, filed Sep.
`8, 2008 in CD. Cal. Case No. CV 07-06161VBF(PLAx) [6 pgs.].
`Streamcast Networks Inc.’s Supplemental Responses to Certain of
`Plaintiffs“ First SetofInterrogatories, Apr. 16, 2007, in CD. Cal. case
`No. CV 06-5086 SJO (Ex) [61 pgs.].
`StreamCast's Brief Re Claim Construction, Apr. 12, 2007, in CD.
`Cal. case N0. (2v 06-5086 $.10 (Ex) [11 pgs.].
`Transcript ofDeposition of David Farber, Feb. 16, 2006, in CD. Cal.
`case No. CV 04-7456 JFW (CTX) [94 pgs.].
`Transcript of Deposition of Robert B. K. Dewar, Mm: 23, 2007, in
`CD. cm case No. cv 06-5086 SJO (Ex) [61 pgs.].
`Transcript ofDeposition ofRonald Lachman. Feb. 1, 2006, CD. Cal.
`case No. CV 04-7456 JFW (CTX) [96 pgs.].
`USPTO, Non-Final Office Action mailed May 6. 2009 in US. Appl.
`No. 11/980,679.
`USPTO, Non-Final Office action mailed Jun. IS, 2009 in US. Appl.
`No. 11/980,687.
`USPTO, Non-Final Office action mailed Jun. 18, 2009 in Reexam
`No. 90/010,260.
`Advances
`in Cryptology-AUSCRYPT '92—Workshop on the
`Theory and Application of Cryptographic Techniques Gold Coast,
`Queensland, Australia Dec. 13-16, 1992 Proceedings.
`Advances in Cryptology-EUROCRYPT '93, Workshop on the
`Theory and Application of Cryptographic Techniques Loflhus, Nor-
`way, May 23-27, 1993 Proceedings.
`Affidavit of'limolhy P. Walker in Support ofCWIS’ Opening Mark-
`man Brief Construing the Terms at
`Issue in US. Patent No.
`6,415,280, dated Jul. 25, 2003, from Civil Action No. 02-11430
`RWZ.
`Akamai and MIT’s Memorandum in Support of Their Claim Con-
`stmction of USPA'I' 5,978,791. dated Aug. 31, 2001, from Civil
`Action No. 00-cv-11851RWZ.
`Akamai’s Answer, Affirmative Defenses and Counterclaims to
`Amended Complaint, filed Dec. 6, 2002, in Civil Action No. 02-CV-
`1 1430RWZ
`Akamai's Brief on Claim Constnlction, dated Aug. 8, 2003. from
`Civil Action No. 02-11430 RWZ.
`Albert Langer
`(cmf‘851@anu.oz au), http://groupsgoogle com/
`groups?se1m:1991Aug7.225159 786%40newshosLanu.
`edu.au
`&oe=U'1F-8&output=gplain, Aug. 7, 1991.
`Alexander Dupuy (dupuy@smarts.com), "MDS and I.IFNs (was:
`Misc Cormnents)”, www acl.lanl.gov/URI/archive/uri~94q2.mes-
`sages/0081.huril, Apr. 17, 1994.
`
`EXHIBIT 4 - 4
`
`

`

`Case 5:18-cv-03463-BLF Document 28-4 Filed 10/04/18 Page 6 of 61
`Case 5:18-cv-03463-BLF Document 28-4 Filed 10/04/18 Page 6 of 61
`
`US 7,945,544 132
`Page 5
`
`Alexander Dupuy (dupuy@smatts com), “Re: MD5 and LIFNs (was:
`Misc Comments)”, wwwacl [an[.gov/[IRI/archive/uri-94q2.mes-
`sages/01 [3.html, Apr. 26, [994
`Answer ofDefendant RIAA to First Amended Complaint and Coun-
`terclairn, dated Feb 8, 2005, frorn Civil Action No. CV04-7456 JFW
`(CTx).
`Berners-Iee, T et al., “Hypertext Transfer ProtocoliHTTP/I .0,”
`May [996, pp. 1-54.
`Berners-Iee, T. et al ,“Uniform ResourceI.ocators(URI.),"pp. [-25,
`Dec. [994.
`Berners-Lee, T, “Universal Resource Identifiers in WWW," Jun.
`1994, pp. 1-25
`Bert dem Boer, el al., Collisions for the compression function of
`MD sub 5 pp 292-304, [994
`Birgit Pfitzman, Sorting Out Signature Schemes, Nov 1993, 1 sup st
`Conf. Computer & Comm Security '93, p 74-85.
`Birgit Pfitzmann, Sorting Out Signature Schemes, Nov. [993, [st
`Conf. Computer 81. Comm. Security ‘93 pp 74-85
`Bowman, C Mic, et al., “Harvest: A Scalable, Customizable Discov-
`ery and Access System,” Aug 4, 1994, pp. 1-27
`Bowman, C Mic, et al , “Harvest: A Scalable, Customizable Discov-
`ery and Access System," Mar. 12, 1995, pp. 1-29.
`Brisco, ‘1', “DNS Support for Load Balancing," Apr [995, pp. 1-7
`Browne, Shirley et al , “Location-Independent Naming for Vittual
`Distributed Soltware Repositories," 1995, 7 pages
`Browne, Shirley et al , “Location-Independent Naming for Virtual
`Distributed Software Repositories," 1995, printed from http:/www
`netlib.org/utk/papers/lifn/main html on Mar. 22, 2006, 18 pages.
`Carter, J. Lawrence, et al. "Universal Classes of “ash I‘unctions."
`Journal ofComputer and System Sciences, vol. 18, No. 2, Apr. 1979,
`pp 143-154.
`Chris Charnes and Josef Pieprzky. Linear Nonequivalence versus
`Nonlinearity, Pieprzky, pp 156-164, 1993
`Civil Minutes General dated Jan. 25, 2005, from CivilAction No. CV
`04-7456-JFW (CTx)
`Clifford Lynch (Calur@uccmvsa bitnet), “ietf ur'l/uri overview draft
`paper
`(long)", www.ac[.[anI.gov/URI/archive/uri-93qI.messages/
`0015.htm[, Mar. 25, 1993
`Complaint for Patent Infringement, Permanent Injunction, and Darn-
`ages, datcd Sep 8, 2004, from Civil Action No. CV 04-7456 JFW
`(AJWx).
`Cormen, Thomas 11., et al. Introduction to Algorithms. The MIT
`Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, [994, pp. 219-243, 991-993.
`CWIS' Opening Markman Brief Construing the Tenns at Issue in
`US. Patent No. 6,41 5,280, dated Jul. 25, 2003, from Civil Action No.
`02-11430 RWZ.
`CWIS’ Reply Markman BriefConstruing the Terms at Issue in U.S.
`Patent No. 6,415,280, dated Aug 15. 2003, from Civil Action No
`02-11430 RWZ.
`Danzig, RB, et al., ““Distributed Indexing: A Scalable Mechanism
`for Distributed Information Retrieval,” Proceedings of the 14th
`Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and
`Development in Information Retrieval, pp. 220-229, Oct. 13-16,
`1991.
`Davis, James R , “A Server for aDistributed Digital Technical Report
`Library," Jan 15. 1994, pp. 1-8.
`Declaration of Robert BK. Dewar in Support ofCWIS’ Construction
`of the Terms at Issue in US. Patent No. 6,415,280, dated Jul. 25,
`2003, from Civil Action No 02-CV-11430RWZ.
`Deering, Stephen,
`et
`al.
`“Multicast Routing in Datagram
`Internetworks and Extended LANs.” ACM Transactions on Corn-
`puler Systems, vol. 8, No. 2, May [990, pp. 85-110.
`Defendant Digital Island’s Opening Brief on Claim Construction
`Issues dated Aug.
`[7, 2001. from Civil Action No. 00-cv-11851-
`RWZ.
`Defendant Lime Wire, LLC‘s Answer, Affirmative Defenses and
`Counterclaims dated Nov. 15,2007, from CivilAclion No. 07-06161
`var" (PLAx)
`Defendant Media Sentry. Inc.’s Reply Memorandum of Points and
`Authorities in Further Support of Its Motion to Dismiss, dated Nov.
`15, 2004, from Civil Action No. CV04-7456 JFW (CTx)
`
`Defendant MediaSentry Inc.’s Notice ofMotion and Motion to Dis-
`miss First Amended Complaint; Mernorandum of Points and
`Authorities in Support Thereof, (Lated Dec.
`[3, 2004, from Civil
`Action No. CV04-7456 JFW.
`Defendant MediaSentry, Ine.'s Answer to Plaintiffs’ First Amended
`Complaint and Counterclaims, dated Feb 8, 2005, from Civil Action
`No. CV04-74 56 JFW (CTX).
`Defendant RIAA's Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss First
`Amended Complaint; Memorandum of Points and Authorities in
`Support Thereof, dated Dec. [3, 2004, from Civil Action No CV04-
`7456 JFW (CTx).
`Defendants Loudeye Corp '3 and Overpeer, Inc ’5 Answer to Plain-
`tiffs’ First Amended Complaint and Counterelaim, dated Feb. 8,
`2005, from Civil Action No. 04-7456 JI‘W (AJWx)
`Defendants’ Preliminary Invalidity Contentions dated Dec 14, 2006,
`from Civil Action No CV 06-5086 810 (Ex)
`Devine, Robert. “Design and Implementation ofDDI-I1A Distributed
`Dynamic Hashing Algorithm." In Proc. of4th International Confer-
`ence on Foundations of Data Organizations and Algorithms, 1993,
`pp. 101-114.
`issued Dec. 23, 2004 in correpsonding
`European Search Report
`European Application No. 96910762.2-2201.
`Expert Report of Professor Ellis Horowitz, dated Mar. 6, 2006, from
`Civil Action No. 04-7456 JFW (CTx).
`Expert Report of the Honorable Gerald J Mossinghofl‘, dated Mar
`13, 2006, from Civil Action No. 04-7456 JFW (CTx).
`Faltstrom, P. et al., “How to Interact with a Whois++ Mesh,” Feb.
`1996, pp. 1-9.
`Feeley, Michael, et al. “Implementing Global Memory Management
`in aWorkstation Cluster." In Proc. ofthe [5th ACM Symp on Oper-
`ating Systems Principles, 1995, pp. 201-212.
`Fielding, R. et al., “Hypertext Transfer ProtocolitlTTP/IJ," Jim.
`1997, pp. 1-163.
`Fielding, R. et al., “Hypertext Transfer Pr'otocol—I-ITTP/I .1.” Jun.
`1999, pp. 1-157.
`Infringement, Permanent
`for Patent
`First Amended Complaint
`Injunction and Damages, dated Nov. 24, 2004, from CivilAction No.
`CV 04-7456 JFW (CTx).
`Floyd, Sally, et al. “A reliable Multicast Framework for Light-Weight
`Sessions and Application Level Framing." In Proceeding of ACM
`SIGCOMM ’95, pp. 342-356.
`Fredman, Michael, et al. “Storing a Sparse Table with 0(1) Worst
`Case Access Time." Journal of the Association for Computing
`Machinery, vol. 31, No. 3, Jul. 1984, pp. 538-544
`G. L. Friedman, Digital Camera With Apparatus For Authentication
`of Images Produced From an Image File, NASA Case No. NPO-
`19108-1-CU, U.S. Appl. No. 08/159,980, Nov. 24, I993
`Grigni, Michelangelo, el al. “Tight Bounds on Minimum Broadcasts
`Networks." SIAM Journal of Discrete Mathematics, vol. 4, No 2,
`May 1991, pp. 207-222.
`Gwertzman, James, et al. “The Case for Geographical Push-Cach-
`ing." Technical Report HU TR 34-94 (excerpt), Harvard University,
`DAS, Cambridge, MA 02138, [994, 2 pgs.
`Goodman, Ada, Object-Oriented Techniques. and Concurrency in
`Teaching Data Structures and File Management Report Documenta-
`tion p. AD-A275 385-94-04277.
`H. Goodman, Feb. 9, 1994 Ada, Object-Oriented Techniques, and
`Concurrency in Teaching Data Sructures and File Management
`Report Documentation P. AD-A275 385794 -04277
`lIauzeur, B. M., “A Model for Naming, Addressing. and Routing,”
`ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 4, Oct. 4, 1986), 293-311.
`International Search Report dated Jun. 24, 1996 in corresponding
`international application PCT/USI996/004733.
`K. Sollins and L Masinter, “Functional Requirements for Uniform
`Resource Names", www.w3.org/Addressing/rfe[737 txt, Dec [994,
`pp. 1-7
`Khare, R. and Lawrence, S., “Upgrading to TLS Within HTTP/1.1.”
`May 2000, pp. 1-12.
`Khoshafian, S N. et al. 1986. Object identity In Conl‘ Proc on
`Object-Oriented Programming Systems, Languages and Applica-
`tions (Portland, Oregon. United States, Sep 29—Oct. 2, 1986). N.
`Meyrowitz, Ed. OOPLSA ’86. ACM Press, New Yor k. I\Y, 406-416
`
`EXHIBIT 4 - 5
`
`

`

`Case 5:18-cv-03463-BLF Document 28-4 Filed 10/04/18 Page 7 of 61
`Case 5:18-cv-03463-BLF Document 28-4 Filed 10/04/18 Page 7 of 61
`
`US 7,945,544 132
`Page 6
`
`Kim et aI., "Experiences with Tripwire: Using Integrity Checkers for
`Intrusion Detection". COAST Labs Dept of Computer Sciences
`Purdue University, Feb. 22, 1995, pp. 1-12.
`Kim et al., “The Design and implementation of Tripwire: A file
`System Integrity Checker”, COAST I.abs. Dept. of Computer Sci-
`ences Purdue University, Feb. 23, 1995, pp. 1-18.
`Kim et al., “The Design and Implementation of Tripwire: A file
`System Integrity Checker", COAST I.abs. Dept of Computer Sci-
`ences Purdueliniversity, Nov 19, I993,pp. 1-21
`Kiln, Gene H., and Spafford, Eugene H.. "Writing, Supporting, and
`Evaluating Tripwire: A Publicly Available Security Tool" Coast
`Labs. Dept ofComputer Sciences Purdue University, Mar. 12, 1994,
`pp 1-23
`Knuth, Donald L" , “'I'heArt ofComputer Programming," 1973, vol
`3,Ch 6.4, pp. 506-549.
`Lantz, K. A., et al., “Towards a universal directory service.” In Proc.
`4th Annual ACM Symp, on Principles of Distributed Computing
`(Minaki, Ontario, Canada). I’ODC ’85. ACM Press, New York, NY,
`250-260
`Leach. 1’. J., et al..'1he file system ofan integrated local network In
`Proc. 1985 ACM 13th Annual Conf. on Comp. Sci. CSC '85. ACM
`Press, NY, NY, 309-324.
`Leach. P.J., et a1., “UIDs as Internal Names in a Distributed File
`System," In Proc. Ist ACM SIGACT-SIGOPS Syrnp. on Principles of
`Distributed Computing (Ottawa, Canada, Aug. 18-20, 1982) PODC
`’82. ACM Press, NewYork, NY, 34-41.
`Ma, C. 1992. On building very large naming systems. In Proc. 5th
`Workshop on ACM SIGOPS European Workshop: Models and Para-
`digms for Distributed Systems Structuring (France, Sep. 21-23,
`1992). EW 5. ACM Press, New York, NY, 1-5.
`Memorandum of Points an

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket