Case 5:18-cv-03459-BLF Document 28-3 Filed 10/04/18 Page 1 of 62
`Case 5:18—cv-03459—BLF Document 28-3 Filed 10/04/18 Page 1 of 62
`
`EXHIBIT 3
`
`

`

`Case 5:18-cv-03459-BLF Document 28-3 Filed 10/04/18 Page 2 of 62
`Case 5:18-cv-03459-BLF Document 28-3 Filed 10/04/18 Page 2 of 62
`
`USOO780231082
`
`(12) United States Patent
`US 7,802,310 B2
`(10) Patent N0.:
`Farber et a1.
`
`(45) Date of Patent: *Sep. 21, 2010
`
`(54) CONTROLLING ACCESS TO DATA IN A DATA
`PROCESSING SYSTEM
`
`(75)
`
`Inventors: David A. Farber, Ojai, CA (US);
`Ronald D. Lachman, Northbrook, IL
`(US)
`(73) Assignees: Kinetech, Inc., Studio City, CA (US);
`Level 3 Communications, LLC,
`Broomfield, CO (US)
`Subject to any disclaimer, the term of this
`patent is extended or adjusted under 35
`U.S.C. 154(b) by 79 days.
`This patent is subject to a terminal dis-
`claimer.
`
`( * ) Notice:
`
`(21) Appl.No.: 11/980,687
`(22)
`Filed:
`Oct. 31, 2007
`(65)
`Prior Publication Data
`US 2008/0066191 A1
`Mar. 13, 2008
`Related US. Application Data
`
`(60) Continuation of application No. 11/724,232, filed on
`Mar. 15, 2007, which is a continuation of application
`No. 11/017650, filed on Dec. 22, 2004, which is a
`continuation of application No. 09/987,723, filed on
`Nov. 15, 2001, now Pat. No. 6,928,442, which is a
`continuation of application No. 09/283,160, filed on
`Apr. 1, 1999, now Pat. No. 6,415,280, which is a divi-
`sion of application No. 08/960,079, filed on Oct. 24,
`1997, now Pat. No. 5,978,791, which is a continuation
`ofapplieation No. 08/425,160, filed on Apr. 11, 1995,
`now abandoned, application No. I 1/980,687, which is
`a continuation of application No. 10/742,972, filed on
`Dec. 23, 2003, which is a division of application No.
`09/987,723, filed on Nov. 15, 2001, now Pat. No.
`6,928,442, which is a continuation of application No.
`09/283,160, filed on Apr. 1, 1999, now Pat. No. 6,415,
`280, which is a division ol'application No. 08/960,079,
`filed on Oct. 24, 1997, now Pat. No. 5,978,791, which
`is a continuation of application No. 08/425,160, filed
`on Apr. 1 1, 1995, now abandoned.
`Int. CI.
`11041. 29/06
`006F 21/00
`
`(2006.01)
`(2006.01)
`
`(51)
`
`726/28: 711/163
`(52) US Cl.
`(58)
`Field of Classification Search ................... 726/28,
`726/27, 29; 713/181
`See application tile for complete search history.
`
`(56)
`
`EP
`
`References Cited
`U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS
`
`3,668,647 A
`
`6/1972 Evangelistietal.
`
`(Continued)
`FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS
`0 268 069 A2
`5/1988
`
`(Continued)
`OTHER PUBLICATIONS
`
`Cheriton, David R. and Mann, Timothy R. “Decentralizing a global
`naming service for improved performance and fault tolerance". ACM
`Transactions on Computer Systems, vol. 7. No. 2. May 1989. pp.
`147-183.
`
`(Continued)
`
`Primary Examiner—Gilberto Barron, Jr.
`Assistant Examiner—Samson B Lemma
`(74) Attorney, Agent, or Firm—Davidson Berqu ist Jackson &
`Gowdey, LLP; Brian Siritzky
`
`(57)
`
`ABSTRACT
`
`Access to and delivery of licensed content is controlled using
`content names that were determined based on the content. A
`name for a data item is obtained.
`the name having been
`determined based at least in part on the data which comprise
`the contents of the data item. Access to the data item is
`authorized based at least in part on the name. Once autho-
`rized, access may be granted from more than one computer.
`The name may have been determined using a hash or message
`digest function such as MD4, MD5 or SHA. 'lhe data item
`may comprise a file, a portion ofa file, a page in memory. a
`digital message, a digital image, a video signal or an audio
`signal.
`
`87 Claims, 31 Drawing Sheets
`
`STORAGE
`DEVICE
`
`
`
`102
`
`
`PRU BESS 0R
`PROCESSOR
`
`
`
`
`
`108
`
`
`102
`
`
`PROCESSOR
` PROCESSOR PROCESSOR
`
`
`
`
`
`EXHIBIT 3 — l
`
`

`

`Case 5:18-cv-03459-BLF Document 28-3 Filed 10/04/18 Page 3 of 62
`Case 5:18-cv-03459-BLF Document 28-3 Filed 10/04/18 Page 3 of 62
`
`US 7,802,310 B2
`
`PageZ
`
`U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS
`
`3.835.260 A
`4.096.568 A
`4.215.402 A
`4.221.003 A
`4.290.105 A
`4.376299 A
`4.405.829 A
`4.412.285 A
`4.414.624 A
`4.441.155 A
`4.464.713 A
`4.490.782 A
`4.558.413 A
`4.571.700 A
`4.577.293 A
`4642.703 A
`4.658.093 A
`4.675.810 A
`4.691.299 A
`4.725.945 A
`4.773.039 A
`4.821.184 A
`4.887.235 A
`4.888.681 A
`4.914.586 A
`4.922.414 A
`4.922.417 A
`4.949.302 A
`4.972.367 A
`5.007.658 A
`5.014.192 A
`5.025.421 A
`5.047.918 A
`5.050.074 A
`5.050.212 A
`5.057.837 A
`5.077.658 A
`5.084315 A
`5.117.351 A
`5.129.081 A
`5.129.082 A
`5.144.667 A
`5.163.147 A '1
`5.179.680 A
`5.182.799 A
`5.199.073 A
`5.202.982 A *
`5.204.897 A
`5.204.958 A
`5.204.966 A
`5.208.858 A
`5.247.620 A
`5.260.999 A
`5.276.869 A
`5.276.901 A
`5.287.499 A
`5.287.514 A
`5.297.279 A
`5.30I.286 A
`5.301.316 A
`5.317.693 A
`5.341477 A
`5.343.527 A
`5.347.653 A
`5.351.302 A
`5.357.440 A
`5.357.623 A
`5.359.523 A
`5.361.356 A
`5.371.897 A
`5.384.565 A
`
`9/1974 Prescherelal
`6/1978 Bennett et a].
`7/1980 Mitchell eta].
`911980 Chang elal-
`9/1981 Cichellietal
`3/1983 Rivest
`9/1983 Rivcstctal-
`10/1983 Nechesetal-
`11/1983 Summer. Jr. e181.
`4/1984 Fletcheret a1.
`8/1984 Benhaseelal.
`12/1984 D'onn e1 al.
`12/1985 Schmidlelal.
`211986 Emrer-elal-
`3/1986 Matick et 81.
`2/l987 Menden
`4/1987 Hellman
`6/1987 Grunerelal-
`9/1987 Rivestetal.
`2/1988 Kronstadt e1 8]
`9/1988 Zamora
`4/1989 Clancyelal.
`12/1989 Hollowayclal.
`12/1989 Bamesetal-
`4/l990 Swinehan eta].
`50990 Hollowayetal-
`5/1990 Churm et al.
`8/1990 Arnold e1 al.
`”/1990 Burke
`4099! Bendert 981-
`5/1991 Mansfieldel :11
`6/1991 Cho
`9/1991 Schwartzet 111
`0/l991 Maren
`9/1991 Dyson
`10/1991 Colwell et a1.
`12/1991 Bends/1
`1/1992 Mazznrio
`5/1992 Miller
`7/1992 Kobayashielal.
`7/1992 Tirfing er a1.
`9/1992 PogueaJrvelali
`11/1992 Orita ............................. 707/9
`1/1993 Colwell et 211-
`[/1993 Tamuraeta].
`30993 Scott
`4/1993 Gramlich elal.
`40993 Wyman
`40993 Chengelal-
`4/1993 Wittenberg eta].
`5/1993 V0115“ etaJ.
`9/1993 Fukuzawa e121].
`”/1993 Wyman
`1/1994 Forrest e1 :11.
`1/1994 Howell et a1.
`2/1994 Nemes
`2/1994 Gram
`3/1994 anon at 8].
`4/ I994 Rajani
`409% Hamilton etal-
`5/1994 Cuenod eta].
`809% Firkin el al-
`8/1994 Moore
`9/1994 Flynn etal-
`9/1994 Leighton eta].
`10/1994 Talbert eta].
`10/1994 Megory-Cohen
`10/1994 Talbot! et al.
`11/1994 Clark 618.1.
`12/1994 Brown eta].
`1/1995 Cannon
`
`................... 1/1
`
`5.394.555 A
`5.403.639 A
`5.404.508 A
`5.438.508 A
`5442343 A
`5.448.668 A *
`5.448.718 A
`5.452.447 A
`5.454.000 A *
`5.454.039 A
`5.459350 A
`5.465.365 A
`5.467.471 A
`5475325 A
`5.479.654 A *
`5.491.817 A
`5.499294 A
`5.504.879 A
`5.530.757 A *
`5.537.585 A *
`5.542.087 A
`55531143 A
`5.568.181 A
`5‘531'515 A
`5.581.758 A
`5.581.764 A
`5.583.995 A
`5.588.147 A
`5.600.834 A
`5504303 A
`5.604.892 A
`5.630.067 A
`5.632.031 A
`5.638.443 A
`5.640.564 A
`5.649.196 A
`5.677.952 A
`5.678.038 A
`5.678.046 A
`5.694.472 A *
`5.694.596 A
`5.701.316 A
`5.710.922 A
`5.724.425 A
`5724552 A
`5.742.807 A *
`51745379 A
`5.757.913 A
`5‘757‘915 A
`5.781.629 A
`5.802.291 A
`5309494 A
`5.826.049 A
`5.835.087 A
`5.864.683 A
`5307519 A
`5.907.704 A
`5.940.504 A
`5.978.791 A
`59912114 A
`6.006.018 A
`6.134.603 A
`5.135546 A
`6.415.280 Bl
`6.732.180 Bl
`6.816.872 131*
`6.928.442 132
`2002/0052884 A1
`2002/0082999 A1
`2003/0078888 A1
`2003/0078889 A1
`2003/0095660 A1
`2004/0139097 A1
`
`............... 714/21
`
`707/695
`
`............. 713/189
`
`2/1995 Hunteretal.
`4/1995 Belsnn e1 81.
`4/1995 Konrad e1 .11,
`8/1995 Wymzm
`3/1995 Cato et a1.
`9/1995 Perelson etal.
`9/1995 Cohn c181,
`9/1995 Nelson at al.
`9/1995 Dorfman ..................... 714/54
`9/1995 Coppersmith e1 al.
`10/1995 Burnett
`11/1995 Winterbottom
`“/1995 Bader
`12/1995 Fischer
`12/1995 Squibb
`2/1996 Gopal et a].
`3/1996 Friedman
`4/1996 Eiscnbcrg 01111.
`6/1996 Krawczyk ................... 713/188
`7/1996 Blickensmt‘fet n1.
`........ 707/205
`7/1995 Neimatetal.
`9/1995 Rossel a].
`10/1996 Greenwoodelal.
`12/1996 Slern
`121/1995 Bumen
`12/1996 Fitzgerald et a].
`12/1996 Gnrdnerei n1.
`12/1996 Neeman et a].
`2/1997 Howaxd
`2/1997 Azjz
`2/1997 Nuttal] et a].
`5/1997 Kindelletal.
`5/1997 Velissampouloselal.
`6/1997 Stcfik c1 :11.
`51/1997 Hamilton eta].
`7/1997 Woodhillel n1.
`10/1997 Blak]ey.111e1a1.
`10/1997 Dockteretal.
`10/1997 Cahil] e181.
`12/1997 Johnson eta].
`12/1997 Campbell
`12/1997 Alrerness el al.
`1/1998 Alley cial.
`3/1998 Changeta].
`3/1998 Taoda
`4/1998 Masinter ........................ 707/1
`4/1998 Wyn-11m
`5/1998 Bellare et a1.
`5/1998 Aucsmith e1 31.
`7/1998 Haber et a].
`9/1998 Balicketal
`9/1998 Nguyen
`10/1998 Ogata et al.
`11/1998 Hex-z et a].
`1/1999 Boebert e] a].
`5/1999 Davis
`5/1999 Gudmundson at al.
`8/1999 Griswold
`11/1999 Farbel'elal.
`11/1999 Garay e181.
`12/1999 Burnett ctal.
`10/2000 Jones et a].
`10/2000 Kahn eta].
`7/2002 Farber et a1.
`5/2004 Hale eta].
`11/2004 Squibb ..............................
`8/2005 Huber 6181.
`5/2002 Fa.rber e1 81.
`6/2002 Lee e] a].
`412003
`lee e1 :11.
`4/2003 Lee el al.
`5/2003 Lee eta].
`7/2004 Farber e1 :1].
`
`l/l
`
`EXHIBIT 3 - 2
`
`

`

`Case 5:18-cv-03459-BLF Document 28-3 Filed 10/04/18 Page 4 of 62
`Case 5:18-cv-03459-BLF Document 28-3 Filed 10/04/18 Page 4 of 62
`
`US 7,802,310 32
`Page 3
`
`2005/0010792 AI“
`2005/0114296 A1
`2007/0185848 A1
`2008/0065635 Al
`2008/0066191 A1
`2008/0071855 A1
`2008/0082551 Al
`
`1/2005 Carpentier et a1.
`5/2005 Farber et a1.
`8/2007 Farber et a1.
`3/2008 Farber et a1.
`3/2008 Farber et a1.
`3/2008 Farber et a1.
`4/2008 Farber ct a1.
`
`713/193
`
`EP
`EP
`EP
`EP
`131’
`EP
`EP
`GB
`.JP
`JP
`JP
`.IP
`JP
`JP
`JP
`W0
`W0
`W0
`W0
`W0
`
`FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS
`0315425
`5/1989
`0 558 945 A2
`9/1993
`0 566 967 A2
`10/1993
`0592045
`4/1994
`0631 226 A1
`12/1994
`0 654 920 A2
`5/1995
`0 658 022 A2
`6/1995
`2294132 A
`4/1996
`59058564
`4/1984
`63-106048
`5/1988
`63-27396]
`11/1988
`2-127755
`5/1990
`05162529
`6/1993
`06187384 A2
`7/1994
`06348558 A
`12/1994
`WO 92/2002]
`11/1992
`W0 94/06087
`3/1994
`W0 94/209121
`9/1994
`WO 95/01599
`1/1995
`WO 97/43717
`11/1997
`
`OTHER PUBLICATIONS
`
`Request for Reexamination of US. Patent No. 6.928.442: Reexam
`U.S. Appl. No. 90/010,260. filed on Aug. 29. 2008.
`Advances
`in Cryptology-AUSCRYPT '92—Workshop on the
`Theory and Application of Cryptographic Techniques Gold Coast.
`Queensland. Australia Dec. 13-16. 1992 Proceedings.
`Advances in Cryptology-EUROCRYP’T '93. Workshop on the
`Iheory and Application ofCryptographic Techniques Lofthus. Nor-
`way. May 23-27. 1993 Proceedings.
`Affidavit ofTimothy P. Walker in Support ofCWIS' Opening Mark-
`man Brief Construing the Terms at
`Issue in US. Patent No.
`6.415.280. dated Jul. 25. 2003. from Civil Action No. 02-11430
`RWZ.
`Akamai and MIT’s Memorandum in Support of Their Claim Con-
`struction of USPAT 5.978.791. dated Aug. 31. 2001. from Civil
`Action No.00-cv-11851RWZ.
`Akamai‘s Answer. Affirmative Defenses and Counterciaims to
`Amended Complaint. filed Dec. 6. 2002. in Civil Action No 02-CV—
`1 1430RWZ.
`Akamai‘s Brief on Claim Construction. dated Aug. 8. 2003. from
`Civil Action No. 02-11430 RWZ.
`Albert Langer
`(cmf851@anu.oz.au). http://groups.google.com/
`groups?selm—l99 I Aug7.225 159 786%40newshost.anu.
`edu.au
`&oe=UTF-8&output=gpiain. Aug. 7. 1991.
`Alexander Dupuy (dupuy@smarts.com). "MD5 and LIFNs (was:
`Misc Comments)". www.ac1.1an1.gov/URI/archive/uri-94q2.mes-
`sages/008Lhtml. Apr. 17. 1994.
`Alexander Dupuy (dupuy@smarts.com). “RE: MD5 and LIFNs
`(was: Misc Comments)". www.acl.lanl.govf[JRI/archive/uri-94q2.
`tnessages/0113.html. Apr. 26. 1994.
`Answer ofDefendant RIAA to First Amended Complaint and Coun-
`terciaim. dated Feb. 8. 2005. from Civil Action No. CV04—7456 JFW
`(CTx)
`Berners-Lee. T. et ai.. “Hypertext Transfer Protocol
`May 1996. pp. 1-54.
`Berners—Lee. T. et a1 .. "Uniform Resource Locators (URL)." pp. 1-25.
`Dec. 1994.
`Berners-lee. T.. “Universal Resource Identifiers in WWW." Jun
`1994. pp. 1-25.
`Bert dem Boer. et a1.. Collisions for the compression function of
`MD.sub.5 pp. 292—304. 1994.
`
`HTTP/ 1 .0."
`
`lst
`
`Birgit Pfitzman. Sorting Out Signature Schemes. Nov. 1993. i.sup.sl
`Conf. Computer & Corrun. Security ’93. p. 74-85.
`Birgit Pfitzmann. Sorting Out Signature Schemes. Nov. 1993.
`Conf. Computer & Comm. Security '93 pp. 74-85.
`Bowman. C. Mic. et aI.. “Harvest: A Scalable. Customizable Discov-
`ery and Access System." Aug. 4. 1994. pp. 1-27.
`Bowman. C. Mic. ct a1.. “Harvest: A Scalable. Customizable Discov-
`ery and Access System." Mar. 12. 1995. pp. 1-29.
`Brisco. T.. “DNS Support for Load Balancing." Apr. 1995. pp 1-7.
`Browne. Shirley et a1.. "Location-Independent Naming for Virtual
`Distributed Software Repositories." 1995. 7 pages.
`Browne. Shirley et a.l.. “Location-Independent Naming for Virtual
`Distributed Sofiware Repositories." 1995. printed from http:/www.
`netiib.org/utk/papers/iifn/main html on Mar. 22. 2006. 18 pages.
`Caner. J. Lawrence. et a1. “Universal Classes of Hash Functions ."
`Journal ofComputer and System Sciences. vol 18. No. 2. Apr. 1979.
`pp. 143-154.
`Chris Charnes and Josef Pieprlky. Linear Nonequivalcnce versus
`Noniinearity. Pieprzky. pp. 156-164. 1993.
`Civil Minutes General dated Jan. 25. 2005. from Civil Action No. CV
`04-7456—JFW (CTx).
`Clifford Lynch (Ca1ur@uccmvsa.bitnet). “ietfurl/uri overview drafi
`paper Gong)". wwwacl.1a.nl.gov/URI/archive/uri-93q|.messages/
`0015.htm1. Mar. 25. 1993.
`Complaint for Patent Infringement. Permanent Injunction. and Dam-
`ages. dated Sep. 8. 2004. from Civil Action No. CV 04-7456 JFW
`(AJWx).
`introduction to Algorithms. The MIT
`Cormen. Thomas 11. et a1.
`Press. Cambridge. Massachusetts. 1994. pp. 219-243. 991-993.
`CWIS‘ Opening Markman Brief Construing the Terms at Issue in
`US Patent No. 6.415.280. dated Jul. 25. 2003. from Civil Action No.
`02-11430 RWZ.
`CWIS‘ Reply Markman BriefConstruing Lhe Terms at Issue in US.
`Patent No. 6.415.280. dated Aug. 15. 2003. from Civil Action No.
`02-11430 RWZ.
`Danzig. P.B.. et al.. ““Distrihuted Indexing: A Scalable Mechanism
`For Distributed Information Retrieval."” Proceedings of the 14th
`Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and
`Development
`in Information Retrieval. pp. 220-229. Oct. 13-16.
`1991.
`Davis. James R.. “A Server for a Distributed Digital Technical Report
`Library." Jan. 15. 1994. pp [—8.
`Declaration ofRobcrt B.K. Dewar in Support ofCWIS' Construction
`of the Terms at Issue in US. Patent No. 6.415.280. dated Jul. 25.
`2003. from Civil Action No. 02-cv-l I430RW7..
`in Datagram
`Deering. Stephen.
`et
`a1.
`“Multicast Routing
`Intemetworks and Extended LANs." ACM Transactions on Com-
`puter Systems. vol 8. No. 2. May 1990. pp 85-1 10
`Defendant Digital Island's Opening Brief on Claim Constmction
`Issues dated Aug. 17. 2001. from Civil Action No. OO-cv-11851-
`RWZ.
`Defendant Lime Wire. LLC's Answer. Affirmative Defenses and
`Counterclaims dated Nov. 15.2007. from Civil Action No. 07-06161
`VBF (PLAx).
`Defendant Media Sentry. Inc‘s Reply Memorandum of Points and
`Authorities in Further Support of Its Motion to Dismiss. dated Nov.
`15. 2004. from Civil Action No. CV04-7456 JFW (CTx).
`Defendant MediaSentry Inc.'s Notice of Motion and Motion to Dis-
`miss First Amended Complaint; Memorandum of Points and
`Authorities in Support Thereof. dated Dec. I3. 2004. from Civil
`Action No. CV04-74S6 JFW.
`Defendant MediaSenLry. Inc.'s Answer to Piaintiffs’ First Amended
`Complaint and Counterclaims. dated Feb. 8. 2005. from Civil Action
`No. CV04-7456 JFW (CTx).
`Defendant RIAA’s Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss First
`Amended Complaint; Memorandum of Points and Authorities in
`Support Thereof. dated Dec. 13.2004. from Civil Action No CV04-
`7456 JFW (CTx).
`Defendants Loudeye Corp.'s and Overpeer. Inc ‘5 Answer to Plain-
`tiffs’ First Amended Complaint and Counterclaim. dated Feb 8.
`2005. from Civil Action No. 04-7456 JFW (AJWX).
`Defendants' Preliminary Invalidity Contentions dated Dec. 14. 2006.
`from Civil Action No. CV 06-5086 SJO (Ex).
`
`EXHIBIT 3 - 3
`
`

`

`Case 5:18-cv-03459-BLF Document 28-3 Filed 10/04/18 Page 5 of 62
`Case 5:18-cv-03459-BLF Document 28-3 Filed 10/04/18 Page 5 of 62
`
`US 7,802,310 B2
`Page 4
`
`Devine. Robert. “Design and Implementation ofDDH: A Distributed
`Dynamic Hashing Algorithm." In Proc. of4th International Confer-
`ence on Foundations of Data Organizations and Algorithms. 1993.
`pp. 101—114.
`issued Dec. 23. 2004 in con'epsonding
`European Search Report
`European Application No. 96910762.2-2201.
`Expert Report ofProfessor Ellis Horowitz. dated Mar. 6.2006. from
`Civil Action No. 04-7456 JFW (CTx).
`Expert Report of the Honorable Gerald J. Mossinghoff. dated Mar.
`13. 2006. from Civil Action No. 04-7456 JFW (CTx).
`Faltstrom. P. et 31.. “How to Interact with a Whois++ Mesh." Feb
`1996. pp. 1-9.
`Fccley. Michael. ct a1. “Implementing Global Memory Management
`in aWorkstation Cluster." In Proc. ofthe 15th ACM Symp. on Oper-
`ating Systems Principles. 1995. pp. 201—212.
`Fielding. R. et al.. “Hypertext Transfer Protocol—HTTP/l .1." Jan
`1997. pp. 1-163.
`Fielding. R. el al.. “Hypertext Transfer Protocol—HTTP/l .1." Jun
`1999. pp l-157.
`Infringement. Permanent
`for Patent
`First Amended Complaint
`Injunction and Damages. dated Nov 24. 2004. from Civil Action No
`CV 04—7456 JFW (CTx).
`Floyd. Sally. et al. "A reliable Multicast Framework for Light-Weight
`Sessions and Application Level Framing." In Proceeding of ACM
`SIGCOMM ‘95. pp. 342-356.
`Frcdman. Michael. ct a1. “Storing a Sparse Table with 0(1) Worst
`Case Access Time." Journal of the Association for Computing
`Machinery. vol. 31. No. 3. Jul. 1984. pp. 538-544.
`G. L. Friedman. Digital Camera With Apparatus for Authentication
`of Images Produced From an Image File. NASA Case No. NPO-
`19108-1-CU. U.S.App1. No. 08/159.980. Nov. 24. 1993.
`Grigni. Michelangelo. et a1. “Tight Bounds on Minimum Broadcasts
`Networks." SIAM Journal 01' Discrete Mathematics. vol. 4. No. 2.
`May 1991. pp. 207-222.
`Gwertzman. James. et al. “The Case for Geographical Push—Cach-
`ing." Technical Report HU TR 34-94 (excerpt). Harvard University.
`DAS. Cambridge. MA 02138. 1994.2 pgs.
`H. Goodman. Ada. Object-Oriented Techniques. and Concurrency in
`Teaching Data Stnrctures and File Management Report Documenta-
`tion p. Ad-A275 385-94-04277.
`H. Goodman. Feb. 9. I994 Ada. Object-Oriented Techniques. and
`Concurrency in Teaching Data Sructures and File Management
`Report Documentation P. AD-A275 385-94-04277.
`I-Iauzeur. B. M.. “A Model for Naming. Addressing. and Routing."
`ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 4. Oct. 4. 1986). 293-311.
`International Search Report dated Jun. 24. 1996 in corresponding
`international application PCT/US1996/004733.
`K. Sollins and I.. Masinler. “Functional Requirements for Uniform
`Resource Names". www.w3.org/Addressing/rfc1737.t:xt. Dec. 1994.
`pp. 1—7.
`Khare. R. and Lawrence. S.. “Upgrading to TLS Within HTTP/1.1."
`May 2000. pp 1-12.
`Khoshafian. S N. et a1. 1986. Object identity. In Conf. Proc. On
`Object-Oriented Programming Systems. Languages and Applica—
`tions (Portland. Oregon. United States. Sep. 29-Oct. 2. 1986). N.
`Meyrowitz. lid. OOPLSA ‘86 ACM Press. New York. NY. 406-4 16.
`Kim et al.. "Experiences with Tripwire: Using Integrity Checkers for
`Intrusion Detection”. COAST Labs. Dept. of Computer Sciences
`Purdue University, Feb. 22. 1995. pp. 1—12.
`Kim et al.. “The Design and Implementation of Tripwire: A file
`System Integrity Checker". COAST Labs. Dept. of Computer Sci—
`ences Purdue University. Feb. 23. 1995. pp. 1-18.
`Kim ct al.. “The Design and Implementation of Tripwire: A file
`System Integrity Checker". COAST Labs. Dept. of Computer Sci-
`ences Purdue University. Nov. 1‘). 1093. pp. 1-21.
`Kim. Gene H.. arid Spafford. Eugene H.. “Writing. Supporting. and
`Evaluating Tripwire: A Publicly Available Security Tool." COAST
`Labs. Dept. ofComputer Sciences Purdue University. Mar. 12. 1994.
`pp. 1-23.
`Knuth. Donald E.. “The Art of Computer Programming." 1973. vol.
`3. Ch. 6.4. pp. 506-549.
`
`Lantz. K.A.. eta1.. “Towards a universal directory service." In Proc.
`4th Annual ACM Symp. on Principles of Distributed Computing
`(Minaki. Ontario. Canada). PODC ‘85. ACM Press. New York1 NY.
`250-260.
`Leach. P. J.. et al.. The file system ofan integrated local network. In
`Proc. 1985 ACM 13th Annual Conf. on Comp Sci CSC '85. ACM
`Press. NY. NY. 309-324.
`Leach. P.J.. et al.. “Ule as Internal Names in a Distributed File
`System." In Proc. IstACM SIGAC'ILSIGOPS Symp. on Principles of
`Distributed Computing (Ottawa. Canada. Aug 18-20. 1982). PODC
`'82. ACM Press. New York. NY. 34-41
`Ma C. 1992. On building very large naming systems. In Proc. 5th
`Workshop on ACM SIGOPS European Workshop: Models and Para-
`digms For Distributed Systems Structuring (France. Sep. 21-23.
`1992). EW 5. ACM Press. New York. NY. [-5.
`Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support ofLoudeye's and
`Overpeer's Motion to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint for
`Failure to State a Claim or. In the Alternative. for a More Definitive
`Statement. dated Dec. 13. 2004. from Civil Action No. CV-04-7456
`JFW (AJWX)
`Ming-Ling Lo et al.. 0n Optimal Processor Allocation to Support
`Pipelined Hash Joins. ACM SIGMOD. pp. 69-78. May 1993.
`Meats. R.. “URN Syntax." May 1997. pp. 1-8.
`Murlidhar Koushik. Dynamic Hashing With Distributed Overflow
`Space: A File Organization With Good Insertion Performance. 1993.
`Info. Sys.. vol. 18. No. 5. pp. 299-317.
`Myers.
`.1. and Rose. M.. “The Content—MDS Header Field." Oct.
`1995. pp. 1-4.
`Naor. Moni. ct a]. “The Lead. Capacity and Availability of Quorum
`Systems." In Proceedings of the 35th IEEE Symposium on Founda-
`tions ofComputer Science. Nov. 1994. pp. 214-225.
`Nisan. Noam. "Psuedorarrdom Generators for Space-Bounded Com-
`putation." In Proceedings of the Twenty-Second Annual ACM Sym-
`posium on Theory of Computing. May 1990. pp. 204-212.
`Office Action in corresponding Japanese Application No. 531.073/
`1996 mailed on Apr 25. 2006.
`Office Communication in corresponding Europerm Application No.
`96910762.2—l225 dated Jan. 17. 2007.
`Order Re Claim Construction dated Nov. 8. 2001. from Civil Action
`No.00-11851—RWZ.
`Palmer. Mark. et a1. “Fido: A Cache that Learns to Fetch." In Pro-
`ceedings of the 17th Intemational Conference on Very Large Data
`Bases. Sep 1991. pp. 255-264.
`Patent Abstracts of Japan. “Device for Generating Database and
`Method for the Same." Application No. 03-080504. Sun Microsyst.
`Inc.. published Jun. 1993. 38 pages.
`Patent Abstracts ofJapan. “Electronic Mail Multiplexing System and
`Communication Control Method in The System." .Iun. 30. 1993. JP
`051625293.
`Patent Abstracts of Japan. “Method for Registering and Retrieving
`Data Base.” Application No. 03-187303. Nippon Telegr. & Teleph.
`Corp. published Feb 1993. I 1 pages.
`I’eleg. David. et al. “The Availability onuorum Systems." Informa-
`tion and Computation 123. 1995. 210-223.
`Peter Deutsch (peterd@bunyip.com). “Re: MDS and LiFNs (was:
`Misc Comments)". www.acl.lan1.govl1IRI/archivcmri-94q2.mcs-
`sages/0106.htrnl. Apr. 26. 1994.
`Peterson. L. L. 1988. A yellow-pages service for a local-area net-
`work. In Proc. ACM Workshop on Frontiers in Computer Commu-
`nications Technology (Vermont. 1987). J. J. Garcia-Luna-Aceves.
`Ed. SIGCOMM '87. ACM Press. New York. NY. 235—242.
`Plaintifls‘ Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Opposition to
`Loudeye Dcfcndants' Motion to Dismiss. dated Nov. 8. 2004. from
`Civil Action No. CV-04-7456 JFW (AJWX).
`Plaintiffs' Opposition to Media Sentry's Motion to Dismiss. Memo-
`randum of Points and Authorities in Support Thereof. dated Nov. 8.
`2004. from Civil Action No. CV 04-7456 JFW (CTx).
`Plaintifl‘s Opposition to Recording Industry Association of Ameri-
`ca's Motion to Dismiss; Memorandum of Points and Authorities in
`Support Thereof. dated Nov. 8. 2004. from Civil Action No CV-04-
`7456 JFW (CTx).
`
`EXHIBIT 3 - 4
`
`

`

`Case 5:18-cv-03459-BLF Document 28-3 Filed 10/04/18 Page 6 of 62
`Case 5:18-cv-03459-BLF Document 28-3 Filed 10/04/18 Page 6 of 62
`
`US 7,802,310 BZ
`Page 5
`
`Plaintiff‘s Reply to Defendant Loudeye Corp.'s and Overpeer. Inc.'s
`Counterclaims. dated Mar. 3. 2005. from Civil Action No. CV
`04-7456 JFW (CTX).
`Plaintifl‘ 5 Reply to Defendant MediaSentry's Counterclaims. dated
`Mar. 3. 2005. from Civil Action No. CV 04-7456 JFW (CTx)
`Plaintiff‘s Reply to Defendant RIAA‘s Counterclaims. dated Mar. 3.
`2005. from Civil Action No 04-7456 JFW (CTx).
`Proceedings ofthe 1993 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on
`Management of Data. vol. 22. Issue 2. Jun. 1993.
`Rabin. Michael. “Efficient Dispersal of Information for Security.
`Load Balancing. and Fault Tolerance." Journal of the ACM. vol. 36.
`No. 2. Apr. 1989. pp. 335-348.
`Ravi. 11.. “Rapid Rumor Reunification: Approximating the Minimum
`Broadcast Time." In Proc. ofthe 35th IEEE Symp. on Foundation of
`Computer Science. Nov. 1994. pp. 202-213.
`Ravindran. K. and Ramakrishnan. K. K. 1991. A naming system for
`feature-based service specification in distributed operating systems.
`SIGSMAIIJPC Notes 17.3-4 (Sep. 1991). 12-21.
`Reed Wade (wade@cs.utk.edu). “re: Dienst and BFD/‘LIFN docu-
`ment." Aug. 8. 1994. printed from http://wwwwebhistoryorg/www
`lists/www-talkI994q3/0416.html on Mar. 22. 2006. (7 pages).
`Rivest. R.. “The MDS Message-Digest Algorithm." Apr. 1992. pp
`1-19 and errata sheet (1 page).
`Rose. M.. “The Content-MDS Header Field." Nov. 1993. pp [-3.
`Ross. K.. “Hash-Routing for Collections of Shared Web Caches."
`IEEE Network Magazine. pp. 37-44. Nov-Dec 1997.
`Sakti Pramanik et al.. Multi-Dircctory Hasing. 1993. Info. Sys.. vol
`18. No. 1. pp. 63—74.
`Schmidt. Jeanette. et al. “Chernoff-Hoeffding Bounds for Applica-
`tions with Limited Independence." In Proceedings of the 4th ACS-
`SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms. 1993. pp. 331-340.
`Schneier. Bruce. “One-Way Hash Functions. Using Crypographic
`Algorithms for Hashing." 1991. printed from http://202.l79135 4/
`data’DDJ/articles/‘199I/9109/91909g/9109ghtm on Mar. 22.2006.
`Schwartz. M.. et a1 1987. A name service for evolvingheterogeneous
`systems. In Proc. 11th ACM Symp. on ()5 Principles (Texas. Nov.
`8-11. 1987). SOSP '87. ACM Press. NY. NY 52-62.
`Search Report dated Jun. 24. I996.
`Shaheen-Gouda.A.And Loucks. L. 1992. Name borders. In Proc. 5th
`Workshop on ACM SIGHPS European Workshop: Models and Para-
`digms For Diaribuled Systems Slmcl tiring (Mont Saint -\atiche1.
`France. Sep. 31-23. 1992). IEW 5. ACM Press. NY. NY. 1-6.
`Sun Microsystems. Inc... “NFS: Network File System Protocol Speci-
`fication." Mar. 1989. pp. 1-25.
`'l'arjan. Robert Endre. et al. “Storing u Sparse 'l'able." Communica-
`tions ofthc ACM. vol. 22. No. 11. Nov. 1979. pp. 606-611.
`‘Icrry. D. B. 19841. An analysis ofniuning conventions for distributed
`computer systems. In I‘roc. ACM SIGCOMM Symp. on Communi-
`cations Architectures and Protocols: 'l‘urorials 8.: Symp. SIGCOMM
`'84 ACM Press. NY. NY. 2 [8-224.
`Thomas A. Berson. Differential Cryptanalysis Mod 2.sup.32 with
`Applications to MDS. pp. 69-81. 1992.
`Vuay Kumar. A Concurrency Control Mechanism Based on Extend-
`ible Hashing for Main Memory Database Systems. ACM. vol. 3.
`1989. pp. 109—113.
`\r'rjay Kunmr. A concurrency Control Mechanism based on Extend-
`ihlc Hashing for Main Memory Database Systems. pp. 109-113.
`ACM. vol 3. I989.
`Vinccnzet‘ti. David and Cotrrozzi. Massimo. “Anti Tampcring Pro-
`gram." Proceedings ofthe Fourth {USENIX} Security Symposium.
`Santa Clara. CA. 1993. 11 pages.
`Vineenzetti. David and Comozzi. Massimo. “Anti Tampering Pro-
`gram." Proceedings of the Fourth {USENIX} Security Symposium,
`Santa Clara. CA. undated. printed from httpa'i'mwjanctJCiERIt
`Vinccnzctti_and_Cotrozzi/ATP_Anti_Tamp on Mar. 22. 2006. 8
`pages.
`Vitter. Jeffrey Scott. et a1. “Optimal Prefetching via Data Compres-
`sion." In Proceedings of32nd IEEE Symposium on Foundations of
`Computer Science. Nov. I991. pp. 121—130.
`W3C:ID, HTTP; A protocol for networked information. “Basic
`I'l'l'l'l1 as defined in 1992". wwxuw’j.orga'l‘rotocolsli-inPZ.html.
`I992.
`
`Wegman. Mark. et al. “New Hash Functions and 'Iheir Use in Authen-
`tication and Set Equality.” Journal of Computer and System Sciences
`vol. 22. Jun. 1981. pp. 265-279.
`William Perrizo. et al.. Distributed Join Processing Performance
`Evaluation. l994.’1‘wenty-Sevendi Hawaii Intemational Conference
`on System Sciences. vol. II. pp 236-244.
`Witold Litwin et al.. LII.sup —Linear IIashing for Distributed Files.
`HP Labs Tech. Report No. HPL-93-21. Jun. 1993. pp. 1-22.
`Witold Litwin et al.. Linear IIashing for Distributed Files. ACM
`SIGMOD. May 1993. pp. 327-336.
`Witold Litwin. et al.. LH—Linear Hashing for Distributed Files. HP
`Labs Tech. Report No. IIPL-93-21 Jun. 1993. pp. 1-22
`Yao. Andrew Chi-Chih. “Should Tables be Sorted?" Joumal of the
`Association for Computing Machinery. vol. 28. No. 3. Jul 1981. pp.
`615-628.
`Yuliang Zheng et al.. Haval—A One-Way Hashing Algorithm with
`Variable Length of Output (Extended Abstract). pp 83-105.
`Yuliang Zheng. et al.. Haval—A One-Way Hashing Algorithm with
`Variable Length of Output
`(Extended Abstract). pp. 83-105.
`Advances in Cryptology. AUSCRIPT ‘92. I992.
`Zhiyti Tian. ct al.. A New Hashing Function: Statistical Behaviour
`and Algorithm. pp. 3-13. SIGIR Forum. 1993
`Zhiyu Tian. et al.. A New Hashing Function: Statistical Behaviour
`and Algorithm. pp. 3-13. SIGIR Forum. Spring 1993.
`[Proposed] Order Regarding Construction of Terms. filed Mar. 29.
`200? in C'.D.Ca1 case No. CV 06-5086 SJO (Ex) [9 pgs.].
`Analysis of Plaintiffs‘ Claim Chart for the ’280 Patent As Against
`Defendant Media Sentry. Inc.
`|
`1 pages.
`Analysis of Plaintiffs’ Claim Chart for the '791 Patent As Against
`Defendant Media Sentry. Inc. (I 1916.001.0150.a) pp. 1-48.
`Analysis of Plaintiffs' Claim Chart for the ‘791 Patent As Against
`Defendant Overpeer pp. 1-40.
`Barbara. D.. et al.. “Exploiting symmetries for low-cost comparison
`of file copies". 8th Int'l Conf. on Distributed Computing Systems.
`Jun. 1988. pp. 471-479. San Jose. CA.
`Campbell. M.. “The Design of text Signatures for Text Retrieval
`Systcins."Tech. Report. Sep. 5. I994. Dcztkin University. School of
`Computing & Math. Geelong. Australia.
`Chang. W. W. et al.. “A signature access method for the Starburst
`database system." in Proc. 15th Int'l Conf. on Very Large Data Bases
`(Amsterdam. The Netherlands). pp. 145—153.
`Changes to Mar. 23. 200? Deposition of Robert B. K. Dewar. in CD
`Cal. case No. CV 06—5086 5100.53) [3 pgs + cover letter].
`Communication from EI’O in European Application No. 96 910
`762.2-1225 dated May 8. 2009 [4 pgs.].
`Cormi'lunication pursuant to Article 96(2) EPC from EPt'J (Examina-
`tion Report). Jan. 17. 200?. inApplication No.131'96 910 7622-1225
`[1 pg. with 5 pg. annex].
`(.‘omplaint for Patent Infringement. Permanent Injunction and Dam-
`ages. Aug. 8. 2006. in CD. Cal. case No. CV 06-5086 SJO (Ex) [11
`pgs.]-
`Compltu'rtt for Patent Infringement. Permanent Injunction and Darn-
`ages. filed Sep. 21. 2007 in CD. Cal. Case No. Cv 07-06161 VBF
`(PLAX) [10 pgs.].
`Declaration ofCharles S. Baker in Support ofDefcndant Lime Wire's
`Motion to Stay Pending Reexamination of Patent and Request for
`Extension of Deadlines. Aug 29. 2008. in CD. Cal. Case No. CV
`07-06161 VBF (PLAx) [2 pgs.].
`Defendant Lime Wire. LLC's First Amended Answer. Affirmative
`Defenses and Countcrclaims. Oct. 2. 2008. CD. Cal case No.
`07-06161VBF(PLAX)[13 pgs.].
`Defendant Lime Wire. LLC’s Second Amended Answer. Affirmative
`Defenses and Counterclaims. Oct. 27. 2008. From CD. Cal. case No.
`07-06161VBF(PLAX)[13 pgs.].
`Defendant Michael Weiss's Answer to Plaintiff‘s Complaint for
`Patent Infringement. Permanent Injunction and Damages: Demand
`for Jury 'I't’ial. Sep. 15. 2006. case No. CV 06-5086 $.30 (Ex) [10
`9158-]-
`Defentlartt Recording Industry Association of America‘s Amended
`Notice of Motion and Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on
`Plaintiffs' Claims for Patent Infringement and Inducing Patent
`Infringement. Memorandum of Points and Authorities. May 22.
`2006. redacted. original confidential. filed under seal. in CD. Cal.
`case No. CV 04-7456 JFW (CTx) [19 pgs ].
`
`EXHIBIT 3 - 5
`
`

`

`Case 5:18-cv-03459-BLF Document 28-3 Filed 10/04/18 Page 7 of 62
`Case 5:18-cv-03459-BLF Document 28-3 Filed 10/04/18 Page 7 of 62
`
`US 7,802,310 B2
`Page 6
`
`1
`
`Defendant Recording Industry Association of America's and
`Mudiasentry. Inc.‘s Notice of Motion and Motion for Partial Sum-
`mary Judgment Based on Implied License or. In the Altemalive.
`Based on Patent Misuse and Unclean Hands. May 22. 2006.
`Redacted. in C.D. Ca] case No. CV 04-7456 JFW (CTx) [21 pgs.].
`Defendant Recording Industry Association of America's and
`Mediasentry. Inc‘s Notice of Motion and Motion for Partial Sum-
`mary Judgment Based on Implied License or. In the Alternative.
`Based on Patent Misuse and Unclean Hands. May 8. 2006. in CD.
`Cal. case No. CV 04-7456 JFW (CTx) [20 pgs.].
`Defendant SLreamCast Networks Inc.‘s Answer to Plaintiff’s Com-
`plaint for Patent Infringement. Permanent Injunction and Damages;
`Demand for Jury 'l'rial, Sep. 5. 2006. C.D. Ca]. case No. CV 06-5086
`SJO (Ex) [10 pgs.].
`Defendants' Amended Preliminary Claim Constructions [Patent
`Rule 4-2]. filed Feb. 7. 2007 in C.D. Cal. case No. CV 06-5086 SJO
`(Ex) 110 pgsi.
`Defendant‘s Second Amended Preliminary Claim Constructions
`[Patent Rule 4-2]. filed Feb. 9. 2007 in C.D. Cal. case No. CV
`06-5086 SJO (Ex) [10 pgs.].
`Dewar. Rebuttal Expert Report of Robert B.K. Dewar. in CD. Cal
`case No CV 04-7456 JFW (C'I'x). Apr. 10. 2006 [87 pgs].
`Faloutsos. C. "Access method