Case 5:17-md-02773-LHK Document 641 Filed 08/09/18 Page 1 of 11
`
`
`KEKER, VAN NEST & PETERS LLP
`Robert A. Van Nest - # 84065
`rvannest@keker.com
`Eugene M. Paige - # 202849
`epaige@keker.com
`Cody S. Harris - #255302
`charris@keker.com
`Justina Sessions - # 270914
`jsessions@keker.com
`Jesselyn Friley - # 319198
`jfriley@keker.com
`633 Battery Street
`San Francisco, CA 94111-1809
`Telephone:
`415 391 5400
`Facsimile:
`415 397 7188
`
`CRAVATH, SWAINE & MOORE LLP
`Gary A. Bornstein (pro hac vice)
`gbornstein@cravath.com
`Yonatan Even (pro hac vice)
`yeven@cravath.com
`825 Eighth Avenue
`New York, New York 10019-7475
`Telephone: (212) 474-1000
`Facsimile: (212) 474-3700
`
`Attorneys for Defendant
`QUALCOMM INCORPORATED
`
`
`MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP
`Richard S. Taffet (pro hac vice)
`richard.taffet@morganlewis.com
`101 Park Avenue
`New York, NY 10178-0060
`Telephone: (212) 309-6000
`Facsimile: (212) 309-6001
`
`MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP
`Willard K. Tom (pro hac vice)
`willard.tom@morganlewis.com
`1111 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
`Washington, DC 20004-2541
`Telephone: (202) 739-3000
`Facsimile: (202) 739-3001
`
`MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP
`Geoffrey T. Holtz (SBN 191370)
`gholtz@morganlewis.com
`One Market, Spear Street Tower
`San Francisco, CA 94105-1596
`Telephone: (415) 442-1000
`Facsimile: (415) 442-1001
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`SAN JOSE DIVISION
`
`
`IN RE: QUALCOMM ANTITRUST
`LITIGATION
`
`
`
`This Document Relates To:
`
`ALL ACTIONS
`
`Case No. 5:17-md-02773-LHK-NMC
`
`DEFENDANT QUALCOMM
`INCORPORATED’S ADMINISTRATIVE
`MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL
`QUALCOMM’S OPPOSITION TO CLASS
`CERTIFICATION, ACCOMPANYING
`EXHIBITS, AND MOTION TO STRIKE
`THE DECLARATION OF DR. KENNETH
`FLAMM
`
`Dept.:
`Judge:
`
`Courtroom 8, 4th Floor
`Hon. Lucy H. Koh
`
`Trial Date: June 24, 2019
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`DEF. QUALCOMM INCORPORATED’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL
`Case No. 5:17-md-02773-LHK
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`1292728
`
`

`

`Case 5:17-md-02773-LHK Document 641 Filed 08/09/18 Page 2 of 11
`
`
`Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 7-11 and 79-5(d), Defendant Qualcomm Incorporated
`
`(“Qualcomm”) hereby moves the Court to issue an administrative order authorizing the filing
`
`under seal of portions of Qualcomm’s Opposition to Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification
`
`(“Opposition to Class Certification”), the accompanying exhibits, and Qualcomm’s Motion to
`
`Strike the Declaration of Dr. Kenneth Flamm (“Motion to Strike”). In accordance with the
`
`Court’s Local Rules, public, redacted versions of the Opposition to Class Certification,
`
`accompanying exhibits, and Motion to Strike have been filed.
`
`LEGAL STANDARD
`
`Local Rule 79-5 provides that documents, or portions thereof, may be sealed if a party
`
`“establishes that the documents, or portions thereof, are privileged, protectable as a trade secret,
`
`or otherwise entitled to protection under the law.” Civ. L. R. 79-5(b). Where a party seeks to file
`
`under seal documents designated as confidential by an opposing party or non-party pursuant to a
`
`protective order, the submitting party “must identify the document or portions thereof which
`
`contain the designated confidential material and identify the party that has designated the material
`
`as confidential.” Civ. L. R. 79-5(e). The burden then falls to the party that has previously
`
`designated the material as confidential to establish that the designated material is sealable. Id.
`
`Courts apply a “strong presumption in favor of access” to court records. Kamakana v.
`
`City and Cty. Of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1178 (9th Cir. 2006). This presumption of access,
`
`however, does not apply to judicial records filed under seal when attached to a non-dispositive
`
`motion. In re Midland Nat. Life Ins. Co. Annuity Sales Practices Litig., 686 F.3d 1115, 1119 (9th
`
`Cir. 2012). In such circumstances, a party need only make a particularized showing of good
`
`cause to justify sealing the relevant document. In re High-Tech Employee Antitrust Litig., No.
`
`11-cv-2509-LHK, 2013 WL 163779, at *1-2 (N.D. Cal. Jan. 15, 2013). Briefs regarding class
`
`certification are considered non-dispositive. Id. at *2. Sealing may be justified to prevent
`
`judicial documents from being used as sources of business information that might harm a
`
`litigant’s competitive standing. Id. at *1.
`
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`
`1
`DEF. QUALCOMM INCORPORATED’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL
`Case No. 5:17-md-02773-LHK
`
`1292728
`
`

`

`Case 5:17-md-02773-LHK Document 641 Filed 08/09/18 Page 3 of 11
`
`
`ARGUMENT
`
`Qualcomm’s Opposition to Class Certification, accompanying exhibits, and Motion to
`
`Strike contain information designated as confidential by both Qualcomm and third parties under
`
`the governing Protective Orders and Supplemental Protective Orders in In re: Qualcomm
`
`Antitrust Litigation, No. 17-md-02773-LHK-NMC (N.D. Cal.) (“MDL Action”); Federal Trade
`
`Commission v. Qualcomm Incorporated, No. 17-cv-00220-LHK-NMC (N.D. Cal.) (“FTC
`
`Action”); and Apple, Inc. v. Qualcomm Incorporated, No. 17-cv-0108-GPC-MDD (“S.D. Cal.
`
`Action”) (together, “Protective Orders”). Qualcomm moves to file this information under seal for
`
`the reasons detailed below.
`
`
`
`Qualcomm Information
`
`Qualcomm’s Opposition to Class Certification and Exhibit H to the Declaration of Justina
`
`Sessions in Support of Qualcomm’s Opposition to Class Certification (the Declaration of Dr.
`
`John H. Johnson) reference calculations by one of Plaintiffs’ proposed experts of alleged royalty
`
`overcharges by Qualcomm. Declaration of Geoffrey Holtz in Support of Qualcomm’s
`
`Administrative Motion to File under Seal ¶ 4 (filed concurrently herewith). These estimated
`
`overcharges could be used to determine the details of the terms of licensing agreements between
`
`Qualcomm and third parties. Qualcomm previously requested that these calculations be sealed in
`
`the filing of Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification. See Dkt. 597 (Decl. of Fabian Gonell in
`
`support of Motion to Seal Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification) ¶¶ 12-13; Dkt. 597-1 (Decl.
`
`of Geoffrey Holtz in support of Motion to Seal Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification) ¶¶ 6-7.
`
`Qualcomm treats the specific terms of its licensing agreements with third parties as confidential.
`
`See Decl. of Fabian Gonell in support of Motion to Seal Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification
`
`¶ 13. Disclosure of such information would impede Qualcomm’s ability to maintain and develop
`
`business relationships, and would harm third parties by revealing sensitive information regarding
`
`their agreements. Id. Courts recognize that revealing information contained in licensing
`
`agreements “could harm a litigant’s competitive standing.” TriQuint Semiconductor, Inc. v.
`
`Avago Technologies Ltd., No. CV 09-1531-PHX-JAT, 2011 WL 4947343, at *2 (D. Ariz. Oct.
`
`18, 2011).
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`
`2
`DEF. QUALCOMM INCORPORATED’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL
`Case No. 5:17-md-02773-LHK
`
`1292728
`
`

`

`Case 5:17-md-02773-LHK Document 641 Filed 08/09/18 Page 4 of 11
`
`
`Exhibit H also contains or references information regarding the content of specific
`
`licensing agreements between Qualcomm and third parties, and testimony of a Qualcomm
`
`employee regarding negotiations with third parties. Qualcomm previously requested that these
`
`calculations be sealed in the filing of Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification. See Decl. of
`
`Fabian Gonell in support of Motion to Seal Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification ¶¶ 12-13;
`
`Decl. of Geoffrey Holtz in support of Motion to Seal Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification ¶¶
`
`6-7. As discussed above, disclosure of the content of specific licensing agreements as well as
`
`information regarding negotiations with third parties would impede Qualcomm’s ability to
`
`maintain and develop business relationships, and would harm third parties by revealing sensitive
`
`information regarding their agreements.
`
`Exhibit H also references figures from one of Plaintiffs’ proposed expert declarations,
`
`which reveal Qualcomm’s internal business strategy and data. Qualcomm previously requested
`
`that these figures be sealed in the filing of Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification. See Dkt.
`
`Decl. of Fabian Gonell in support of Motion to Seal Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification ¶¶
`
`12-13; Decl. of Geoffrey Holtz in support of Motion to Seal Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class
`
`Certification ¶¶ 6-7. Disclosure of such information would place Qualcomm at a competitive
`
`disadvantage by offering competitors insight into Qualcomm strategies, policies, and decisions.
`
`See Decl. of Fabian Gonell in support of Motion to Seal Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification
`
`¶ 13. Courts often grant requests to seal such confidential business documents where the
`
`company has a strong interest in maintaining confidentiality regarding its technology and internal
`
`business operations. See, e.g., In re iPhone Antitrust Litig., No. No. 11-MD-2250-LHK, 2013
`
`WL 12335013, at *2 (N.D. Cal. Nov. 25, 2013); see also Ehret v. Uber Techs., Inc., No. 14-cv-
`
`00113-EMC, 2015 WL 12977024, at *2 (N.D. Cal. Dec. 2, 2015) (granting motion to seal exhibit
`
`that contains company’s “sensitive, proprietary business strategy and financial information).
`
`On this basis, Qualcomm requests that the Court apply to Exhibit H the following
`
`redactions, as indicated in the attached highlighted declaration:
`
`Location
`
`Paragraph 6
`
`Basis
`Overcharges that could reveal terms of
`licensing agreements
`
`
`
`
`3
`DEF. QUALCOMM INCORPORATED’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL
`Case No. 5:17-md-02773-LHK
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`1292728
`
`

`

`Case 5:17-md-02773-LHK Document 641 Filed 08/09/18 Page 5 of 11
`
`
`Paragraph 26 and note 18
`Exhibits 6-10, E1
`
`Notes 41 and 117
`
`Highlighted portions of paragraphs 5-6,
`50, 52, 54, 65, 69, 72, 99, 112, 130-32,
`146, 149, 152
`
`
`Paragraph 45
`Notes 77, 80, 122
`
`Terms of licensing agreements
`Overcharges that could reveal terms of
`licensing agreements
`Overcharges that could reveal terms of
`licensing agreements
`Overcharges that could reveal terms of
`licensing agreements
`
`Negotiations with third parties
`Internal business strategy
`
`
`
`Further, Qualcomm requests that the Court redact from Qualcomm’s Opposition to Class
`
`Certification the following references to information in the categories described above:
`
`
`
`
`
`Location
`Graphic on page 4
`
`Graphic on page 12
`
`Page 13, line 5
`
`Page 14, lines 2-3 & 13
`
`Page 15, line 27
`
`Basis
`Overcharges that could reveal terms of
`licensing agreements
`Overcharges that could reveal terms of
`licensing agreements
`Overcharges that could reveal terms of
`licensing agreements
`Overcharges that could reveal terms of
`licensing agreements
`Overcharges that could reveal terms of
`licensing agreements
`
`Information belonging to Plaintiffs or Third Parties
`
`Additionally, Qualcomm’s Opposition to Class Certification, Exhibit H, and Motion to
`
`Strike contain or reference information designed as confidential by Plaintiffs and third parties
`
`under the Protective Orders. See Declaration of Matan Shacham in Support of Qualcomm’s
`
`Administrative Motion to File under Seal Qualcomm’s Opposition to Class Certification,
`
`Accompanying Exhibits, and Motion to Strike the Declaration of Dr. Kenneth Flamm.
`
`Qualcomm therefore moves to file this information under seal. See Civ. L. R. 79-5(d)(1)(A).
`
`Although this request is particularized and narrowly tailored to sealing only the information that
`
`has been designated as confidential by the parties listed below, Qualcomm takes no position as to
`
`whether the following confidential designations satisfy the requirements for sealing.
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`
`4
`DEF. QUALCOMM INCORPORATED’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL
`Case No. 5:17-md-02773-LHK
`
`1292728
`
`

`

`Case 5:17-md-02773-LHK Document 641 Filed 08/09/18 Page 6 of 11
`
`
`First, Qualcomm’s Opposition to Class Certification cites to or references information
`
`designated as confidential by Plaintiffs and third parties under the governing Protective Orders.
`
`Qualcomm therefore requests redaction of the following portions of Qualcomm’s Opposition to
`
`Class Certification based on its reference to confidential materials:
`
`
`
`Designating Party
`Best Buy
`Plaintiffs
`
`Apple
`Apple
`Plaintiffs
`
`Plaintiffs
`Apple
`Apple
`
`Plaintiffs
`
`Plaintiffs
`
`AT&T
`Verizon
`US Cellular
`T-Mobile
`Best Buy
`Target
`Newegg
`Fry’s
`Plaintiffs
`
`Essential Products
`
`Apple
`
`Huawei
`
`Motorola
`
`Blackberry
`
`Samsung
`
`Location
`Page 1, lines 22-24
`Page 2, lines 12-17
`& lines 23-25; page
`3, line 1
`Page 3, line 2
`Page 4, lines 13-15
`Page 4, lines 22-23
`& note 10
`Page 5, lines 24-25
`Page 7, line 25
`Page 8, lines 1-2 and
`note 14
`Page 8, lines 2-3 &
`lines 22-24
`Page 9, lines 1 &
`lines 4-9
`Page 10, lines 5-9
`Page 10, lines 5-9
`Page 10, lines 5-9
`Page 10, lines 5-9
`Page 10, lines 5-9
`Page 10, lines 5-9
`Page 10, lines 5-9
`Page 10, lines 5-9
`Page 10, lines 18-20;
`Page 11, lines 15-16
`Page 11, lines 24-25
`& note 17; page 12
`line 1
`Page 12, lines 2-3 &
`note 18
`Page 12, lines 4-5 &
`note 19
`Page 12, lines 6-8 &
`note 20
`Page 12, lines 9-11
`& note 21
`Page 13, line 4
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`
`5
`DEF. QUALCOMM INCORPORATED’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL
`Case No. 5:17-md-02773-LHK
`
`1292728
`
`

`

`Case 5:17-md-02773-LHK Document 641 Filed 08/09/18 Page 7 of 11
`
`
`Plaintiffs
`Apple
`
`Apple
`
`AT&T
`
`Plaintiffs
`
`LGE
`
`Page 13, lines 11-12
`Page 14, lines 17, 19
`& 22-23
`Page 15, lines 3-5, 7-
`8, 17-19, 22-23, 26
`Page 15, line 24-25;
`page 16, line 1
`Page 17, line 25;
`page 16, lines 1-3
`Page 19, note 31
`
`Second, Qualcomm attaches as exhibits to the Declaration of Justina Sessions documents
`
`designated as confidential by Plaintiffs and third parties under the governing Protective Orders.
`
`Qualcomm therefore requests that the following confidential materials be filed under seal:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Designating Party
`Best Buy
`Plaintiffs
`Apple
`Essential Products
`Motorola
`Blackberry
`LGE
`
`Document
`Exhibit A
`Exhibits B, D, J, and P
`Exhibits I, L, and O
`Exhibit K
`Exhibit M
`Exhibit N
`Exhibit P
`
`Third, Exhibit H cites to or references information designated as confidential by Plaintiffs
`
`and third parties under the governing Protective Orders. Qualcomm therefore requests redaction
`
`of the following portions of Exhibit H based on its reference to confidential materials:
`
`
`
`Designating Party
`Plaintiffs
`
`Location
`Paragraph s 9, 80, 148
`
`Plaintiffs
`
`Plaintiffs
`
`Apple
`
`Apple
`
`Exhibit 33
`
`Notes 251-53
`
`Paragraphs 5-6, 21-22, 24, 45,
`47, 52, 61-65, 70, 83-87, 89-92,
`100, 108, 110-12
`Exhibits 1, 2, 8, 10-11, 14-16, 18-
`19, 22, 23-24, D2, E1, E2, E3,
`E4, E5, E6, F1
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`
`6
`DEF. QUALCOMM INCORPORATED’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL
`Case No. 5:17-md-02773-LHK
`
`1292728
`
`

`

`Case 5:17-md-02773-LHK Document 641 Filed 08/09/18 Page 8 of 11
`
`
`Apple
`
`Apple
`
`AT&T
`
`AT&T
`
`AT&T
`
`Verizon
`Verizon
`T-Mobile
`T-Mobile
`
`T-Mobile
`
`US Cellular
`
`US Cellular
`Motorola
`
`Motorola
`
`Motorola
`
`Samsung
`
`Samsung
`
`Samsung
`
`Samsung
`
`Best Buy
`
`Best Buy
`
`Best Buy
`
`Amazon
`
`Amazon
`
`Huawei
`
`Blackberry
`
`Notes 14, 81-82, 89, 100, 105,
`106, 153, 156-58, 160-65, 172,
`195, 197, 207, 222
`Appendix D: note 18, paragraph
`9, note 24, paragraph 11
`Paragraph 8, 69, 75, 120, 129,
`132-33
`Exhibit 12, 25, 27, 28, F4, F5,
`F6, F7
`Note 126, 227
`
`Paragraph 8, 33, 75, 120, 131-32
`Exhibit 25, F4, F5, F6
`Paragraph 8, 74-75, 120
`Exhibit 13, 25, F4, F7
`
`Note 127, 135
`
`Paragraph 8, 120
`
`Exhibit 25, F4, F5, F6
`Paragraph 45
`
`Exhibit 10, F1
`
`Note 18
`
`Paragraph 28, 31, 53, 66, 88
`
`Exhibits 9, 10, 17, F1
`
`Notes 22-25, 106, 126
`
`Appendix D note 26
`
`Paragraph 30, 121
`
`Exhibit 5, 26, F8, F9, F10
`
`Note 208
`
`Note 27
`
`Exhibits F8, F9, F10
`
`Paragraph 45
`
`Paragraph 47
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`
`7
`DEF. QUALCOMM INCORPORATED’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL
`Case No. 5:17-md-02773-LHK
`
`1292728
`
`

`

`Case 5:17-md-02773-LHK Document 641 Filed 08/09/18 Page 9 of 11
`
`
`Blackberry
`
`Note 106
`
`Essential Products
`
`LGE
`
`LGE
`
`Sprint
`
`Sprint
`
`Wistron
`
`Wistron
`
`Wistron
`
`Target
`
`Target
`
`Newegg
`
`Newegg
`
`Fry’s
`
`Fry’s
`
`HTC
`
`Asus
`
`Brightstar
`
`Walmart
`
`Paragraph 47
`
`Paragraph 54
`
`Exhibit 10, F1
`
`Paragraph 75, 132
`
`Exhibit F4, F5, F6
`
`Paragraph 103
`
`Exhibit F2
`
`Note 184, 192
`
`Paragraph 121
`
`Exhibit 26, F11
`
`Paragraph 121
`
`Exhibit 26, F8, F9
`
`Paragraph 121
`
`Exhibit 26, F8, F9
`
`Exhibit F1
`
`Exhibit F1
`
`Exhibit F3
`
`F8, F9
`
`Finally, Qualcomm’s Motion to Strike cites to or references information designated as
`
`confidential by Plaintiffs and third parties under the governing Protective Orders. Qualcomm
`
`therefore requests redaction of the following portions of Qualcomm’s Motion to Strike based on
`
`its reference to confidential materials:
`
`
`
`Designating Party
`
`Location
`
`Apple
`
`Plaintiffs
`
`Notes under Exhibit 20
`
`Page 6 lines 13-15
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`
`8
`DEF. QUALCOMM INCORPORATED’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL
`Case No. 5:17-md-02773-LHK
`
`1292728
`
`

`

`Case 5:17-md-02773-LHK Document 641 Filed 08/09/18 Page 10 of 11
`
`
`Wistron
`
`Apple
`
`Wistron
`
`Page 7 lines 18-19, 21-
`22, and note 6
`Exhibit 22
`
`Page 11, lines 16-18
`
`CONCLUSION
`
`Accordingly, to comply with the Protective Orders and for the foregoing reasons,
`
`Qualcomm respectfully moves this Court to keep sealed the portions of Qualcomm’s Opposition
`
`to Class Certification, accompanying exhibits, and Motion to Strike as described above and in
`
`accordance with the proposed redactions filed as attachments to Qualcomm’s Administrative
`
`Motion to File under Seal.
`
`//
`
`//
`
`//
`
`
`
`9
`DEF. QUALCOMM INCORPORATED’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL
`Case No. 5:17-md-02773-LHK
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`1292728
`
`

`

`Case 5:17-md-02773-LHK Document 641 Filed 08/09/18 Page 11 of 11
`
`
`Dated: August 9, 2018
`
`KEKER, VAN NEST & PETERS LLP
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`By:
`
`/s/ Robert A. Van Nest
`ROBERT A. VAN NEST
`EUGENE M. PAIGE
`JUSTINA SESSIONS
`JESSELYN FRILEY
`
`
`Gary A. Bornstein (pro hac vice)
`Yonatan Even (pro hac vice)
`CRAVATH, SWAINE & MOORE LLP
`Worldwide Plaza
`825 Eighth Avenue
`New York, NY 10019-7475
`Tel.: (212) 474-1000
`Fax: (212) 474-3700
`gbornstein@cravath.com
`yeven@cravath.com
`
`Richard S. Taffet (pro hac vice)
`MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP
`101 Park Avenue
`New York, NY 10178-0060
`Tel.: (212) 309-6000
`Fax: (212) 309-6001
`richard.taffet@morganlewis.com
`
`Willard K. Tom (pro hac vice)
`MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP
`1111 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
`Washington, DC 20004-2541
`Tel.: (202) 739-3000
`Fax: (202) 739 3001
`willard.tom@morganlewis.com
`
`Geoffrey T. Holtz (SBN 191370)
`MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP
`One Market, Spear Street Tower
`San Francisco, CA 94105-1596
`Tel.: (415) 442-1000
`Fax: (415) 442-1001
`donn.pickett@morganlewis.com
`gholtz@morganlewis.com
`
`Attorneys for Defendant
`QUALCOMM INCORPORATED
`
`10
`DEF. QUALCOMM INCORPORATED’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL
`Case No. 5:17-md-02773-LHK
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`1292728
`
`