throbber
Case 5:17-cv-04467-BLF Document 489 Filed 09/28/21 Page 1 of 4
`
`Juanita R. Brooks (CA SBN 75934)
`brooks@fr.com
`Roger A. Denning (CA SBN 228998)
`denning@fr.com
`Jason W. Wolff (CA SBN 215819)
`wolff@fr.com
`John-Paul Fryckman (CA 317591)
`fryckman@fr.com
`K. Nicole Williams (CA 291900)
`nwilliams@fr.com
`FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
`12860 El Camino Real, Ste. 400
`San Diego, CA 92130
`Telephone: (858) 678-5070
`Facsimile: (858) 678-5099
`
`Robert Courtney (CA SNB 248392)
`courtney@fr.com
`FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
`3200 RBC Plaza
`60 South Sixth Street
`Minneapolis, MN 55402
`Telephone: (612) 335-5070
`Facsimile: (612) 288-9696
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`FINJAN LLC
`
`Matthew C. Gaudet (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
`mcgaudet@duanemorris.com
`John R. Gibson (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
`jrgibson@duanemorris.com
`Robin L. McGrath (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
`rlmcgrath@duanemorris.com
`David C. Dotson (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
`dcdotson@duanemorris.com
`Jennifer H. Forte (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
`jhforte@duanemorris.com
`DUANE MORRIS LLP
`1075 Peachtree Street, Ste. 1700
`Atlanta, GA 30309
`Telephone: (404) 253 6900
`Facsimile: (404) 253 6901
`
`Joseph A. Powers (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
`japowers@duanemorris.com
`Jarrad M. Gunther (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
`jmgunther@duanemorris.com
`DUANE MORRIS LLP
`30 South 17th Street
`Philadelphia, PA 19103
`
`Telephone: (215) 979 1000
`Facsimile: (215) 979 1020
`
`Attorneys for Defendant
`SONICWALL INC.
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`(SAN JOSE DIVISION)
`
`FINJAN LLC., a Delaware Limited Liability
`Company,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`Case No. 5:17-cv-04467-BLF-VKD
`
`STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
`ORDER ENLARGING TIME FOR
`FINJAN’S OBJECTIONS TO
`SONICWALL’S BILL OF COSTS
`
`SONICWALL, INC., a Delaware Corporation,
`
`Defendant.
`
`1 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER ENLARGING TIME FOR
`FINJAN’S OBJECTIONS TO SONICWALL’S BILL OF COSTS
`Case No. 5:17-cv-04467-BLF-VKD
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`

`

`Case 5:17-cv-04467-BLF Document 489 Filed 09/28/21 Page 2 of 4
`
`Pursuant to Local Rules 6-1(b), 6-2, and 54-2(b), the parties have met and conferred
`
`regarding the Bill of Costs filed by SonicWall, Inc., on September 22, 2021. ECF No. 486. Finjan
`
`LLC’s objections are due on October 6, 2021. With this stipulation, the parties propose enlarging
`
`the time for Finjan LLC’s objections to the Bill of Costs by one week, to October 13, 2021.
`
`The reasons for the enlargement of time follow. The parties are attempting to reach an
`
`agreement and stipulation regarding the Bill of Costs, which would reduce or eliminate the burden
`
`on the Court and parties in resolving such costs. A one week enlargement of time to respond
`
`would permit the parties additional time to try to find a compromise on the Bill of Costs pending
`
`Finjan’s appeals.
`
`Final judgment was ordered on September 8, 2021 and the case was closed. This is the
`
`first request for an enlargement of time since the case was closed.
`
`This enlargement of time would have no impact on the schedule for this case since it is
`
`closed, there are no other items on the schedule, and the case is now subject to two appeals. All
`
`that remains is resolving the Bill of Costs filed by SonicWall, Inc.
`
`2 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER ENLARGING TIME FOR
`FINJAN’s OBJECTIONS TO SONICWALL’S BILL OF COSTS
`Case No. 5:17-cv-04467-BLF-VKD
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`

`

`Case 5:17-cv-04467-BLF Document 489 Filed 09/28/21 Page 3 of 4
`
`IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2 by and among the parties,
`
`and the parties do jointly request that the Court enter an order enlarging the time for Finjan LLC’s
`
`objections to the bill of costs by one week, to October 13, 2021.
`
`Dated: September 28, 2021
`
`FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
`
`By: /s/ Jason W. Wolff
`Jason W. Wolff (CA SBN 215819)
`wolff@fr.com
`Attorney for Plaintiff
`FINJAN LLC
`
`Dated: September 28, 2021
`
`DUANE MORRIS LLP
`
`By: /s/ Jennifer H. Forte
`Jennifer H. Forte (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
`jhforte@duanemorris.com
`Attorney for Defendant
`SONICWALL INC.
`
`Pursuant to Civ. Local Rule 5.1(i)(3) regarding signatures, I attest under penalty of perjury
`
`that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from counsel for Sonicwall.
`
`Dated: September 28, 2021
`
`FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
`
`By: /s/ Jason W. Wolff
`Jason W. Wolff (CA SBN 215819)
`wolff@fr.com
`Attorney for Plaintiff
`FINJAN LLC
`
`3 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER ENLARGING TIME FOR
`FINJAN’s OBJECTIONS TO SONICWALL’S BILL OF COSTS
`Case No. 5:17-cv-04467-BLF-VKD
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`

`

`Case 5:17-cv-04467-BLF Document 489 Filed 09/28/21 Page 4 of 4
`
`PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
`
`September
`28th
`DATED this ________ day of _______________, 2021.
`
`The Honorable Beth Labson Freeman
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
`
`4 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER ENLARGING TIME FOR
`FINJAN’s OBJECTIONS TO SONICWALL’S BILL OF COSTS
`Case No. 5:17-cv-04467-BLF-VKD
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket