Case 5:17-cv-04467-BLF Document 401-2 Filed 03/11/21 Page 1 of 7
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`(SAN JOSE DIVISION)
`
`
`
`
`FINJAN LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability
`Company,
`
` Plaintiff,
`
`
`v.
`
`
`SONICWALL, INC., a Delaware Corporation,
`
` Defendant.
`
`
`Case No. 5:17-cv-04467-BLF (VKD)
`
`[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
`FINJAN LLC’S ADMINISTRATIVE
`MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL ITS
`OPPOSITIONS TO SONICWALL’S
`MOTION IN LIMINE NOS. 1, 2 and 4 AND
`EXHIBITS
`
`
`
`
`
`March 18, 2021
`DATE:
`1:30 PM
`TIME:
`JUDGE: Hon. Beth Labson Freeman
`Ctrm: 3, 5th Floor
`PLACE:
`
`
`
`Plaintiff Finjan LLC’s (“Finjan”) Administrative Motion to File Documents Under Seal
`
`came before this Court on March 4, 2021. Upon consideration of this motion and the declaration
`
`of K. Nicole Williams filed in support thereof, the Court finds good cause for granting the request
`
`to file the documents described below under seal.
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`Case No. 5:17-cv-04467-BLF (VKD)
`PROPOSED ORDER GRANTING FINJAN’S
`MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL ITS MILS AND
`EXHIBITS
`
`

`

`ECF or
`Exh. No.
`ECF 398
`
`Highlighted portion at
`page 4, line 13
`
`Finjan LLC’s
`Opposition to
`SonicWall’s Motion in
`Limine To Exclude
`Background and
`Opinions (Motion in
`Limine No. 1)
`
`ECF 399
`
`Finjan LLC’s
`Opposition to
`SonicWall’s Motion in
`Limine To Exclude Dr.
`McDuff’s Method No.
`1 (Motion in Limine
`No. 2)
`
`Highlighted portions
`at page 1, lines 16, 18,
`20; page 2, lines 1, 10,
`12-15; page 3, line 20;
`page 4, lines 11, 15-
`16; page 5, lines 7, 9-
`10, 15-17, 19.
`
`Case 5:17-cv-04467-BLF Document 401-2 Filed 03/11/21 Page 2 of 7
`
`1.
`
`There exists overriding confidentiality interests that overcome the right of public
`
`access to the record for the following documents:
`
`Document
`
`Portion(s) to Seal
`
`Reason(s) for Sealing
`
`This document reflects
`information SonicWall has
`designated “Highly
`Confidential – Attorneys’
`Eyes Only” pursuant to the
`Stipulated Protective Order,
`and from which confidential
`information regarding
`SonicWall’s accused
`products could potentially
`be discerned. See Williams
`Decl. ¶ 3.
`This document reflects
`information regarding
`Finjan’s internal business
`practices and licensing
`negotiations, which Finjan
`has designated “HIGHLY
`CONFIDENTIAL –
`ATTORNEYS’ EYES
`ONLY” under the Protective
`Order (ECF No. 68).
`Additionally, the
`highlighted portions include
`third party confidential
`information regarding
`licensing with Finjan.
`Public disclosure of this
`information would cause
`harm to Finjan. See
`Declaration of K. Nicole
`Williams in Support of
`SonicWall’s Administrative
`Motion to File Under Seal
`(“Williams Decl.”) ¶ 4.
`This document also reflects
`information SonicWall has
`designated “Highly
`Confidential – Attorneys’
`Eyes Only” pursuant to the
`Stipulated Protective Order,
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`Case No. 5:17-cv-04467-BLF (VKD)
`PROPOSED ORDER GRANTING FINJAN’S
`MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL ITS MILS AND
`EXHIBITS
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 5:17-cv-04467-BLF Document 401-2 Filed 03/11/21 Page 3 of 7
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`ECF 393
`
`Finjan LLC’s
`Opposition to
`SonicWall’s Motion in
`Limine To Exclude Dr.
`McDuff’s Method No.
`3 (Motion in Limine
`No. 4)
`
`Highlighted portions
`at page 1, lines 17-25;
`page 2, lines 1-4, 21-
`24; page 3, lines 1-8,
`lines, 10-15, 18; page
`4, lines 1-3, 7, 20-21,
`23-25; page 5, lines 1-
`2, 19.
`
`Exh. A
`
`Excerpts from Expert
`Report of DeForest
`McDuff, Ph.D. dated
`September 4, 2020
`
`Entirety
`
`and from which confidential
`information regarding
`SonicWall’s accused
`products could potentially
`be discerned.
`This document reflects
`information regarding
`Finjan’s internal business
`practices and licensing
`negotiations, which Finjan
`has designated “HIGHLY
`CONFIDENTIAL –
`ATTORNEYS’ EYES
`ONLY” under the Protective
`Order (ECF No. 68). Public
`disclosure of this
`information would cause
`harm to Finjan. See
`Williams Decl. ¶ 5. This
`document also reflects
`information SonicWall has
`designated “Highly
`Confidential – Attorneys’
`Eyes Only” pursuant to the
`Stipulated Protective Order,
`and from which confidential
`information regarding
`SonicWall’s accused
`products could potentially
`be discerned.
`This document reflects
`information regarding
`Finjan’s internal business
`practices and licensing
`negotiations, which Finjan
`has designated “HIGHLY
`CONFIDENTIAL –
`ATTORNEYS’ EYES
`ONLY” under the Protective
`Order (ECF No. 68). Public
`disclosure of this
`information would cause
`harm to Finjan. See
`Williams Decl. ¶ 6. This
`document also reflects
`information SonicWall has
`designated “Highly
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`Case No. 5:17-cv-04467-BLF (VKD)
`PROPOSED ORDER GRANTING FINJAN’S
`MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL ITS MILS AND
`EXHIBITS
`
`

`

`Case 5:17-cv-04467-BLF Document 401-2 Filed 03/11/21 Page 4 of 7
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`Exh. B
`
`Exh. C
`
`Exh. D
`
`
`
`
`
`Confidential – Attorneys’
`Eyes Only” pursuant to the
`Stipulated Protective Order,
`and from which confidential
`information regarding
`SonicWall’s accused
`products could potentially
`be discerned.
`This document reflects
`information SonicWall has
`designated “Highly
`Confidential – Attorneys’
`Eyes Only” and “Highly
`Confidential – Attorneys’
`Eyes Only – Source Code”
`pursuant to the Stipulated
`Protective Order, and from
`which confidential
`information regarding
`SonicWall’s accused
`products could potentially
`be discerned. See Williams
`Decl. ¶ 7.
`This document reflects
`information SonicWall has
`designated “Highly
`Confidential – Attorneys’
`Eyes Only” and “Highly
`Confidential – Attorneys’
`Eyes Only – Source Code”
`pursuant to the Stipulated
`Protective Order, and from
`which confidential
`information regarding
`SonicWall’s accused
`products could potentially
`be discerned. See Williams
`Decl. ¶ 7.
`This document reflects
`information SonicWall has
`designated “Highly
`Confidential – Attorneys’
`Eyes Only” and “Highly
`Confidential – Attorneys’
`Eyes Only – Source Code”
`pursuant to the Stipulated
`Protective Order, and from
`
`Entirety
`
`Excerpts from the
`Expert Report of Dr.
`Eric Cole Regarding
`Technology Tutorial
`and Infringement by
`SonicWall, Inc. of
`Patent Nos. 6,154,844;
`7,058,822; 7,647,633
`and 8,677,494 dated
`September 3, 2020
`
`Entirety
`
`Entirety
`
`Excerpts from the
`Expert Report of
`Michael
`Mitzenmacher, Ph.D.
`Regarding
`Infringement by
`SonicWall, Inc. of
`Patent Nos. 6,804,780;
`6,965,968 and
`7,613,926 dated
`September 3, 2020
`
`Excerpts from the
`Expert Report of Dr.
`Nenad Medvidovic
`Regarding
`Infringement by
`SonicWall, Inc. of
`Patent Nos. 8,225,408;
`7,975,305 and
`8,141,154 dated
`
`4
`
`Case No. 5:17-cv-04467-BLF (VKD)
`PROPOSED ORDER GRANTING FINJAN’S
`MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL ITS MILS AND
`EXHIBITS
`
`

`

`Case 5:17-cv-04467-BLF Document 401-2 Filed 03/11/21 Page 5 of 7
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`September 3, 2020
`
`Exh. E
`
`Entirety
`
`Excerpts from the
`deposition transcript of
`DeForest McDuff,
`Ph.D. taken November
`2, 2020
`
`Exh. F
`
`Excerpts from Expert
`Report of Dr. Aaron
`Striegel dated
`September 3, 2020
`
`Entirety
`
`Exh. G
`
`Excerpts from the
`deposition transcript of
`Aaron Striegel, Ph.D.
`
`Entirety
`
`which confidential
`information regarding
`SonicWall’s accused
`products could potentially
`be discerned. See Williams
`Decl. ¶ 7.
`This deposition transcript
`reflects information
`regarding Finjan’s internal
`business practices and
`licensing negotiations,
`which Finjan has designated
`“HIGHLY
`CONFIDENTIAL –
`ATTORNEYS’ EYES
`ONLY” under the Protective
`Order (ECF No. 68). Public
`disclosure of this
`information would cause
`harm to Finjan. See
`Williams Decl. ¶ 6. This
`document also reflects
`information SonicWall has
`designated “Highly
`Confidential – Attorneys’
`Eyes Only” pursuant to the
`Stipulated Protective Order,
`and from which confidential
`information regarding
`SonicWall’s accused
`products could potentially
`be discerned.
`This document reflects
`information SonicWall has
`designated “Highly
`Confidential – Attorneys’
`Eyes Only” pursuant to the
`Stipulated Protective Order,
`and from which confidential
`information regarding
`SonicWall’s accused
`products could potentially
`be discerned. See Williams
`Decl. ¶ 7.
`This deposition transcript
`reflects information
`SonicWall has designated
`
`
`
`
`
`5
`
`Case No. 5:17-cv-04467-BLF (VKD)
`PROPOSED ORDER GRANTING FINJAN’S
`MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL ITS MILS AND
`EXHIBITS
`
`

`

`Case 5:17-cv-04467-BLF Document 401-2 Filed 03/11/21 Page 6 of 7
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`Exh. J
`
`Exh. K
`
`Exh. L
`
`Exh. O
`
`
`
`
`
`taken November 3,
`2020
`
`Entirety
`
`Entirety
`
`Entirety
`
`Entirety
`
`Excerpts from the
`Expert Report of Dr.
`Kevin Almeroth on
`Invalidity of U.S.
`Patent Nos. 6,154,844
`and 8,141,154 dated
`September 4, 2020
`Excerpts from the
`Expert Report of Dr.
`Patrick McDaniel
`Regarding the
`Invalidity of the ‘494
`and ‘780 Patents dated
`September 4, 2020
`Excerpts from the
`Rebuttal Expert Report
`of Dr. Patrick
`McDaniel Regarding
`Non-Infringement of
`U.S. Patent Nos.
`6,804,780 and
`8,677,494 dated
`October 9, 2020
`Excerpts from the
`Expert Report of
`Stephen L. Becker,
`Ph.D. on Behalf of
`Defendant dated
`October 9, 2020
`
`“Highly Confidential –
`Attorneys’ Eyes Only”
`pursuant to the Stipulated
`Protective Order, and from
`which confidential
`information regarding
`SonicWall’s accused
`products could potentially
`be discerned. See Williams
`Decl. ¶ 7.
`This document was
`designated by SonicWall as
`“Highly Confidential –
`Attorneys’ Eyes Only”
`pursuant to the Stipulated
`Protective Order. See
`Williams Decl. ¶ 8.
`This document was
`designated by SonicWall as
`“Highly Confidential –
`Attorneys’ Eyes Only”
`pursuant to the Stipulated
`Protective Order. See
`Williams Decl. ¶ 8.
`This document was
`designated by SonicWall as
`“Highly Confidential –
`Attorneys’ Eyes Only –
`Source Code” pursuant to
`the Stipulated Protective
`Order. See Williams Decl. ¶
`8.
`
`This document reflects
`information regarding
`Finjan’s internal business
`practices and licensing
`negotiations, which Finjan
`has designated “Highly
`Confidential – Attorneys’
`Eyes Only” under the
`Protective Order (ECF No.
`68). Public disclosure of
`this information would
`cause harm to Finjan. See
`Williams Decl. ¶ 9. This
`document also reflects
`
`6
`
`Case No. 5:17-cv-04467-BLF (VKD)
`PROPOSED ORDER GRANTING FINJAN’S
`MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL ITS MILS AND
`EXHIBITS
`
`

`

`Case 5:17-cv-04467-BLF Document 401-2 Filed 03/11/21 Page 7 of 7
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`information SonicWall has
`designated “Confidential –
`Outside Counsel Eyes Only”
`pursuant to the Stipulated
`Protective Order, and from
`which confidential
`information regarding
`SonicWall’s accused
`products could potentially
`be discerned.
`
`
`
`2.
`
`A substantial probability exists that the overriding confidentiality interests will be
`
`prejudiced if the record is not sealed;
`
`The proposed sealing is narrowly tailored; and
`
`No less restrictive means exist to achieve these overriding interests.
`
`3.
`
`4.
`
`IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Finjan’s Administrative Motion to File Documents
`
`Under Seal is GRANTED with respect to the documents set forth above.
`
`IT IS SO ORDERED.
`
`Dated: ____________________
`
`
`Hon. Beth Labson Freeman
`United States District Court
`
`
`
`17
`
`
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`7
`
`Case No. 5:17-cv-04467-BLF (VKD)
`PROPOSED ORDER GRANTING FINJAN’S
`MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL ITS MILS AND
`EXHIBITS
`
`