throbber
Case 5:17-cv-04467-BLF Document 401-1 Filed 03/11/21 Page 1 of 11
`
`Juanita R. Brooks (CA SBN 75934) brooks@fr.com
`Roger A. Denning (CA SBN 228998) denning@fr.com
`Jason W. Wolff (CA SBN 215819) wolff@fr.com
`John-Paul Fryckman (CA SBN 317591) fryckman@fr.com
`K. Nicole Williams (CA291900) nwilliams@fr.com
`FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
`12860 El Camino Real, Suite 400
`San Diego, CA 92130
`Telephone: (858) 678-5070 / Fax: (858) 678-5099
`
`Proshanto Mukherji (Pro Hac Vice) mukherji@fr.com
`FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
`One Marina Park Drive
`Boston, MA 02210
`Phone: (617) 542-5070/ Fax: (617) 542-5906
`
`Robert Courtney (CA SBN 248392) courtney@fr.com
`FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
`3200 RBC Plaza
`60 South Sixth Street
`Minneapolis, MN 55402
`Phone: (612) 335-5070 / Fax: (612) 288-9696
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`FINJAN LLC
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`(SAN JOSE DIVISION)
`
`
`
`FINJAN LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability
`Company,
`
`Case No. 5:17-cv-04467-BLF (VKD)
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`SONICWALL INC., a Delaware Corporation,
`
`Defendant.
`
`DECLARATION OF K. NICOLE
`WILLIAMS IN SUPPORT OF FINJAN
`LLC’S OMNIBUS ADMINISTRATIVE
`MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL ITS
`OPPOSITIONS TO SONICWALL’S
`MOTION IN LIMINE NOS. 1, 2 and 4
`AND EXHIBITS
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case No. 5:17-cv-04467 BLF (VKD)
`DECLARATION OF K. NICOLE WILLIAMS
`IN SUPPORT OF FINJAN’S ADMIN.
`MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 5:17-cv-04467-BLF Document 401-1 Filed 03/11/21 Page 2 of 11
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`I, K. Nicole Williams, hereby declare and state as follows:
`
`1.
`
`I am licensed to practice in the State of California and am a principal in the law firm
`
`3
`
`of Fish & Richardson P.C., counsel of record for Plaintiff Finjan LLC in the above-captioned matter.
`
`4
`
`I have personal knowledge of all the facts contained herein and, if called as a witness, I could and
`
`5
`
`would testify competently thereto.
`
`6
`
`2.
`
`I submit this declaration in support of Finjan LLC’s Omnibus Administration Motion
`
`7
`
`to File Under Seal its Opposition to SonicWall’s Motions in Limine Nos. 1, 2 and 4, and
`
`8
`
`accompanying Exhibits A-G, J-L, and O. All exhibits are attached to the Omnibus Declaration of
`
`9
`
`Robert Courtney in Support of Finjan’s Oppositions to SonicWall’s Motions in Limine . As required
`
`10
`
`under Civil L.R. 79-5(d)(1)(A), Civil L.R. 79-5(e), and this Court’s Standing Order, the basis for
`
`11
`
`asserting confidentiality and the grounds for filing under seal the documents listed below are as
`
`12
`
`follows:
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`Document
`
`Portion(s) to Seal
`
`Reason(s) for Sealing
`
`ECF or
`Exh. No.
`ECF 398
`
`Highlighted portion at
`page 4, line 13
`
`Finjan LLC’s
`Opposition to
`SonicWall’s Motion in
`Limine To Exclude
`Background and
`Opinions (Motion in
`Limine No. 1)
`
`This document reflects
`information SonicWall has
`designated “Highly
`Confidential – Attorneys’
`Eyes Only” pursuant to the
`Stipulated Protective Order,
`and from which confidential
`information regarding
`SonicWall’s accused
`products could potentially
`be discerned. See Williams
`Decl. ¶ 3.
`This document reflects
`information regarding
`Finjan’s internal business
`practices and licensing
`negotiations, which Finjan
`has designated “HIGHLY
`CONFIDENTIAL –
`ATTORNEYS’ EYES
`ONLY” under the Protective
`
`ECF 399
`
`Finjan LLC’s
`Opposition to
`SonicWall’s Motion in
`Limine To Exclude Dr.
`McDuff’s Method No.
`1 (Motion in Limine
`No. 2)
`
`Highlighted portions
`at page 1, lines 16, 18,
`20; page 2, lines 1, 10,
`12-15; page 3, line 20;
`page 4, lines 11, 15-
`16; page 5, lines 7, 9-
`10, 15-17, 19.
`
`
`
`1
`
`Case No. 5:17-cv-04467 BLF (VKD)
`
`DECLARATION OF K. NICOLE WILLIAMS
`IN SUPPORT OF FINJAN’S ADMIN.
`MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL
`
`

`

`Case 5:17-cv-04467-BLF Document 401-1 Filed 03/11/21 Page 3 of 11
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`Order (ECF No. 68).
`Additionally, the
`highlighted portions include
`third party confidential
`information regarding
`licensing with Finjan.
`Public disclosure of this
`information would cause
`harm to Finjan. See
`Declaration of K. Nicole
`Williams in Support of
`SonicWall’s Administrative
`Motion to File Under Seal
`(“Williams Decl.”) ¶ 4.
`This document also reflects
`information SonicWall has
`designated “Highly
`Confidential – Attorneys’
`Eyes Only” pursuant to the
`Stipulated Protective Order,
`and from which confidential
`information regarding
`SonicWall’s accused
`products could potentially
`be discerned.
`This document reflects
`information regarding
`Finjan’s internal business
`practices and licensing
`negotiations, which Finjan
`has designated “HIGHLY
`CONFIDENTIAL –
`ATTORNEYS’ EYES
`ONLY” under the Protective
`Order (ECF No. 68). Public
`disclosure of this
`information would cause
`harm to Finjan. See
`Williams Decl. ¶ 5. This
`document also reflects
`information SonicWall has
`designated “Highly
`Confidential – Attorneys’
`Eyes Only” pursuant to the
`Stipulated Protective Order,
`and from which confidential
`information regarding
`
`ECF 393
`
`Finjan LLC’s
`Opposition to
`SonicWall’s Motion in
`Limine To Exclude Dr.
`McDuff’s Method No.
`3 (Motion in Limine
`No. 4)
`
`Highlighted portions
`at page 1, lines 17-25;
`page 2, lines 1-4, 21-
`24; page 3, lines 1-8,
`lines, 10-15, 18; page
`4, lines 1-3, 7, 20-21,
`23-25; page 5, lines 1-
`2, 19.
`
`
`
`2
`
`Case No. 5:17-cv-04467 BLF (VKD)
`
`DECLARATION OF K. NICOLE WILLIAMS
`IN SUPPORT OF FINJAN’S ADMIN.
`MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL
`
`

`

`Case 5:17-cv-04467-BLF Document 401-1 Filed 03/11/21 Page 4 of 11
`
`Exh. A
`
`Excerpts from Expert
`Report of DeForest
`McDuff, Ph.D. dated
`September 4, 2020
`
`Entirety
`
`SonicWall’s accused
`products could potentially
`be discerned.
`This document reflects
`information regarding
`Finjan’s internal business
`practices and licensing
`negotiations, which Finjan
`has designated “HIGHLY
`CONFIDENTIAL –
`ATTORNEYS’ EYES
`ONLY” under the Protective
`Order (ECF No. 68). Public
`disclosure of this
`information would cause
`harm to Finjan. See
`Williams Decl. ¶ 6. This
`document also reflects
`information SonicWall has
`designated “Highly
`Confidential – Attorneys’
`Eyes Only” pursuant to the
`Stipulated Protective Order,
`and from which confidential
`information regarding
`SonicWall’s accused
`products could potentially
`be discerned.
`This document reflects
`information SonicWall has
`designated “Highly
`Confidential – Attorneys’
`Eyes Only” and “Highly
`Confidential – Attorneys’
`Eyes Only – Source Code”
`pursuant to the Stipulated
`Protective Order, and from
`which confidential
`information regarding
`SonicWall’s accused
`products could potentially
`be discerned. See Williams
`Decl. ¶ 7.
`This document reflects
`information SonicWall has
`designated “Highly
`Confidential – Attorneys’
`
`Entirety
`
`Excerpts from the
`Expert Report of Dr.
`Eric Cole Regarding
`Technology Tutorial
`and Infringement by
`SonicWall, Inc. of
`Patent Nos. 6,154,844;
`7,058,822; 7,647,633
`and 8,677,494 dated
`September 3, 2020
`
`Excerpts from the
`Expert Report of
`Michael
`Mitzenmacher, Ph.D.
`
`Entirety
`
`Exh. B
`
`Exh. C
`
`
`
`3
`
`Case No. 5:17-cv-04467 BLF (VKD)
`
`DECLARATION OF K. NICOLE WILLIAMS
`IN SUPPORT OF FINJAN’S ADMIN.
`MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`

`

`Case 5:17-cv-04467-BLF Document 401-1 Filed 03/11/21 Page 5 of 11
`
`
`
`
`
`Exh. D
`
`Regarding
`Infringement by
`SonicWall, Inc. of
`Patent Nos. 6,804,780;
`6,965,968 and
`7,613,926 dated
`September 3, 2020
`
`Excerpts from the
`Expert Report of Dr.
`Nenad Medvidovic
`Regarding
`Infringement by
`SonicWall, Inc. of
`Patent Nos. 8,225,408;
`7,975,305 and
`8,141,154 dated
`September 3, 2020
`
`Entirety
`
`Exh. E
`
`Entirety
`
`Excerpts from the
`deposition transcript of
`DeForest McDuff,
`Ph.D. taken November
`2, 2020
`
`Eyes Only” and “Highly
`Confidential – Attorneys’
`Eyes Only – Source Code”
`pursuant to the Stipulated
`Protective Order, and from
`which confidential
`information regarding
`SonicWall’s accused
`products could potentially
`be discerned. See Williams
`Decl. ¶ 7.
`This document reflects
`information SonicWall has
`designated “Highly
`Confidential – Attorneys’
`Eyes Only” and “Highly
`Confidential – Attorneys’
`Eyes Only – Source Code”
`pursuant to the Stipulated
`Protective Order, and from
`which confidential
`information regarding
`SonicWall’s accused
`products could potentially
`be discerned. See Williams
`Decl. ¶ 7.
`This deposition transcript
`reflects information
`regarding Finjan’s internal
`business practices and
`licensing negotiations,
`which Finjan has designated
`“HIGHLY
`CONFIDENTIAL –
`ATTORNEYS’ EYES
`ONLY” under the Protective
`Order (ECF No. 68). Public
`disclosure of this
`information would cause
`harm to Finjan. See
`Williams Decl. ¶ 6. This
`document also reflects
`information SonicWall has
`designated “Highly
`Confidential – Attorneys’
`Eyes Only” pursuant to the
`Stipulated Protective Order,
`
`
`
`4
`
`Case No. 5:17-cv-04467 BLF (VKD)
`
`DECLARATION OF K. NICOLE WILLIAMS
`IN SUPPORT OF FINJAN’S ADMIN.
`MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`

`

`Case 5:17-cv-04467-BLF Document 401-1 Filed 03/11/21 Page 6 of 11
`
`Exh. F
`
`Excerpts from Expert
`Report of Dr. Aaron
`Striegel dated
`September 3, 2020
`
`Entirety
`
`Exh. G
`
`Entirety
`
`Excerpts from the
`deposition transcript of
`Aaron Striegel, Ph.D.
`taken November 3,
`2020
`
`and from which confidential
`information regarding
`SonicWall’s accused
`products could potentially
`be discerned.
`This document reflects
`information SonicWall has
`designated “Highly
`Confidential – Attorneys’
`Eyes Only” pursuant to the
`Stipulated Protective Order,
`and from which confidential
`information regarding
`SonicWall’s accused
`products could potentially
`be discerned. See Williams
`Decl. ¶ 7.
`This deposition transcript
`reflects information
`SonicWall has designated
`“Highly Confidential –
`Attorneys’ Eyes Only”
`pursuant to the Stipulated
`Protective Order, and from
`which confidential
`information regarding
`SonicWall’s accused
`products could potentially
`be discerned. See Williams
`Decl. ¶ 7.
`This document was
`designated by SonicWall as
`“Highly Confidential –
`Attorneys’ Eyes Only”
`pursuant to the Stipulated
`Protective Order. See
`Williams Decl. ¶ 8.
`This document was
`designated by SonicWall as
`“Highly Confidential –
`Attorneys’ Eyes Only”
`pursuant to the Stipulated
`Protective Order. See
`Williams Decl. ¶ 8.
`This document was
`designated by SonicWall as
`“Highly Confidential –
`
`Excerpts from the
`Expert Report of Dr.
`Kevin Almeroth on
`Invalidity of U.S.
`Patent Nos. 6,154,844
`and 8,141,154 dated
`September 4, 2020
`Excerpts from the
`Expert Report of Dr.
`Patrick McDaniel
`Regarding the
`Invalidity of the ‘494
`and ‘780 Patents dated
`September 4, 2020
`Excerpts from the
`Rebuttal Expert Report
`of Dr. Patrick
`
`Entirety
`
`Entirety
`
`Entirety
`
`Exh. J
`
`Exh. K
`
`Exh. L
`
`
`
`5
`
`Case No. 5:17-cv-04467 BLF (VKD)
`
`DECLARATION OF K. NICOLE WILLIAMS
`IN SUPPORT OF FINJAN’S ADMIN.
`MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`

`

`Case 5:17-cv-04467-BLF Document 401-1 Filed 03/11/21 Page 7 of 11
`
`
`
`
`
`Exh. O
`
`McDaniel Regarding
`Non-Infringement of
`U.S. Patent Nos.
`6,804,780 and
`8,677,494 dated
`October 9, 2020
`Excerpts from the
`Expert Report of
`Stephen L. Becker,
`Ph.D. on Behalf of
`Defendant dated
`October 9, 2020
`
`Entirety
`
`Attorneys’ Eyes Only –
`Source Code” pursuant to
`the Stipulated Protective
`Order. See Williams Decl. ¶
`8.
`
`This document reflects
`information regarding
`Finjan’s internal business
`practices and licensing
`negotiations, which Finjan
`has designated “Highly
`Confidential – Attorneys’
`Eyes Only” under the
`Protective Order (ECF No.
`68). Public disclosure of
`this information would
`cause harm to Finjan. See
`Williams Decl. ¶ 9. This
`document also reflects
`information SonicWall has
`designated “Confidential –
`Outside Counsel Eyes Only”
`pursuant to the Stipulated
`Protective Order, and from
`which confidential
`information regarding
`SonicWall’s accused
`products could potentially
`be discerned.
`
`3.
`
`The highlighted portion of Finjan LLC’s Opposition to SonicWall’s Motion in
`
`Limine No. 1 reflects information SonicWall has designated “Highly Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes
`
`Only” pursuant to the Stipulated Protective Order, and from which confidential information
`
`regarding SonicWall’s accused products could potentially be discerned
`
`4.
`
`The highlighted portions of Finjan LLC’s Opposition to SonicWall’s Motion in
`
`Limine No. 2 reflect information and testimony regarding Finjan’s business practices and licensing
`
`negotiations, which Finjan designated as “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES
`
`ONLY” subject to the Protective Order. Additionally, the highlighted portions contain confidential
`
`
`
`6
`
`Case No. 5:17-cv-04467 BLF (VKD)
`
`DECLARATION OF K. NICOLE WILLIAMS
`IN SUPPORT OF FINJAN’S ADMIN.
`MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`

`

`Case 5:17-cv-04467-BLF Document 401-1 Filed 03/11/21 Page 8 of 11
`
`
`
`
`information of third parties regarding their licensing negotiations with Finjan. Finjan treats this
`
`1
`
`2
`
`confidential business and licensing information as highly confidential within its business and makes
`
`3
`
`substantial efforts not to disclose such information to the public. Such information could be used
`
`4
`
`by Finjan’s competitors, as it reveals information related to Finjan’s business practices and dealings.
`
`5
`
`The highlighted portions also reflect information SonicWall has designated “Highly Confidential –
`
`6
`
`Attorneys’ Eyes Only” pursuant to the Stipulated Protective Order (ECF No. 68), and from which
`
`7
`
`confidential information regarding SonicWall’s accused products could potentially be discerned.
`
`8
`
`Accordingly, good cause and compelling reasons exist to seal the highlighted portions of Finjan’s
`
`9
`
`Opposition to SonicWall’s Motion in Limine No. 2.
`
`10
`
`5.
`
`The highlighted portions of Finjan LLC’s Opposition to SonicWall’s Motion in
`
`11
`
`Limine No. 4 reflect information and testimony regarding Finjan’s business practices and licensing
`
`12
`
`negotiations, which Finjan designated as “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES
`
`13
`
`ONLY” subject to the Protective Order. Additionally, the highlighted portions contain confidential
`
`14
`
`information of third parties regarding their licensing negotiations with Finjan. Finjan treats this
`
`15
`
`confidential business and licensing information as highly confidential within its business and makes
`
`16
`
`substantial efforts not to disclose such information to the public. Such information could be used
`
`17
`
`by Finjan’s competitors, as it reveals information related to Finjan’s business practices and dealings.
`
`18
`
`The highlighted portions also reflect information SonicWall has designated “Highly Confidential –
`
`19
`
`Attorneys’ Eyes Only” pursuant to the Stipulated Protective Order (ECF No. 68), and from which
`
`20
`
`confidential information regarding SonicWall’s accused products could potentially be discerned.
`
`21
`
`Accordingly, good cause and compelling reasons exist to seal the highlighted portions of Finjan’s
`
`22
`
`Opposition to SonicWall’s Motion in Limine No. 4.
`
`6.
`
`Exhibits A and E to the Courtney Declaration reflect information regarding Finjan’s
`
`business practices and
`
`licensing negotiations, which Finjan designated as “HIGHLY
`
`
`
`7
`
`Case No. 5:17-cv-04467 BLF (VKD)
`
`DECLARATION OF K. NICOLE WILLIAMS
`IN SUPPORT OF FINJAN’S ADMIN.
`MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`

`

`Case 5:17-cv-04467-BLF Document 401-1 Filed 03/11/21 Page 9 of 11
`
`
`
`
`CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” subject to the Protective Order. Additionally,
`
`1
`
`2
`
`the highlighted portions contain confidential information of third parties regarding their licensing
`
`3
`
`negotiations with Finjan. Finjan treats this confidential business and licensing information as highly
`
`4
`
`confidential within its business and makes substantial efforts not to disclose such information to the
`
`5
`
`public. Such information could be used by Finjan’s competitors, as it reveals information related to
`
`6
`
`Finjan’s business practices and dealings. The document also reflect information SonicWall has
`
`7
`
`designated “Highly Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only” pursuant to the Stipulated Protective
`
`8
`
`Order (ECF No. 68), and from which confidential information regarding SonicWall’s accused
`
`9
`
`products could potentially be discerned. Accordingly, good cause and compelling reasons exist to
`
`10
`
`seal Exhibits A and E to the Courtney Declaration.
`
`11
`
`7.
`
`Exhibits B, C, D, F, and G reflect information SonicWall has designated “Highly
`
`12
`
`Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only” or “Highly Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only – Source
`
`13
`
`Code” pursuant to the Stipulated Protective Order, and from which confidential information
`
`14
`
`regarding SonicWall’s accused products could potentially be discerned.
`
`15
`
`8.
`
`SonicWall designated Exhibits J, K, and L to the Courtney Declaration have been
`
`16
`
`designated “Highly Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only” or “Highly Confidential – Attorneys’
`
`17
`
`Eyes Only – Source Code” by SonicWall pursuant to the Stipulated Protective Order (ECF No. 68).
`
`18
`
`9.
`
`Exhibit O to the Courtney Declaration reflects information regarding Finjan’s
`
`19
`
`business practices and
`
`licensing negotiations, which Finjan designated as “HIGHLY
`
`20
`
`CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” subject to the Protective Order. Additionally,
`
`21
`
`the highlighted portions contain confidential information of third parties regarding their licensing
`
`22
`
`negotiations with Finjan. Finjan treats this confidential business and licensing information as highly
`
`23
`
`confidential within its business and makes substantial efforts not to disclose such information to the
`
`public. Such information could be used by Finjan’s competitors, as it reveals information related to
`
`
`
`8
`
`Case No. 5:17-cv-04467 BLF (VKD)
`
`DECLARATION OF K. NICOLE WILLIAMS
`IN SUPPORT OF FINJAN’S ADMIN.
`MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`

`

`Case 5:17-cv-04467-BLF Document 401-1 Filed 03/11/21 Page 10 of 11
`
`
`
`
`Finjan’s business practices and dealings. The was also designated “Confidential – Outside Counsel
`
`1
`
`2
`
`Eyes Only” by SonicWall pursuant to the Stipulated Protective Order (ECF No. 68), and from which
`
`3
`
`confidential information regarding SonicWall’s accused products could potentially be discerned.
`
`4
`
`Accordingly, good cause and compelling reasons exist to seal Exhibit O to the Courtney Declaration.
`
`5
`
`10.
`
`Plaintiff Finjan has carefully balanced the need to protect highly confidential and
`
`6
`
`proprietary information along with information that is reasonable for the public to know. Finjan has
`
`7
`
`demonstrated “good cause” and “compelling reasons” for filing this information under seal.
`
`8
`
`I declare under the penalty of perjury of the laws of the United States of America that the
`
`9
`
`foregoing is true and correct.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`Executed on March 11, 2021, in San Diego, California.
`
`/s/ K. Nicole Williams
`K. Nicole Williams
`nwilliams@fr.com
`
`
`
`
`9
`
`Case No. 5:17-cv-04467 BLF (VKD)
`
`DECLARATION OF K. NICOLE WILLIAMS
`IN SUPPORT OF FINJAN’S ADMIN.
`MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL
`
`

`

`Case 5:17-cv-04467-BLF Document 401-1 Filed 03/11/21 Page 11 of 11
`
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing
`
`document has been served on March 11, 2021 to all counsel of record who are deemed to have
`
`consented to electronic service via the Court’s CM/ECF system. Any other counsel of record will
`
`be served by electronic mail and regular mail.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ K. Nicole Williams
`K. Nicole Williams
`nwilliams@fr.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`10
`
`Case No. 5:17-cv-04467 BLF (VKD)
`
`DECLARATION OF K. NICOLE WILLIAMS
`IN SUPPORT OF FINJAN’S ADMIN.
`MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket