throbber
Case 5:17-cv-04467-BLF Document 397-1 Filed 03/11/21 Page 1 of 5
`Case 5:17-cv-04467-BLF Document 397-1 Filed 03/11/21 Page 1 of 5
`
`EXHIBIT A
`EXHIBIT A
`
`

`

`Case 5:17-cv-04467-BLF Document 397-1 Filed 03/11/21 Page 2 of 5
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`SAN JOSE DIVISION
`
`FINJAN LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability
`Company,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`SONICWALL, INC., a Delaware Corporation,
`
`Defendant.
`
`Case No.: 5:17-cv-04467-BLF (VKD)
`
`JOINT [PROPOSED] PRELIMINARY
`STATEMENT TO THE JURY AND
`PROPOSED VOIR DIRE QUESTIONS
`FOR THE COURT
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`[PROPOSED] VOIR DIRE QUESTIONS Case No.: 5:17-cv-04467-BLF (VKD)
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 5:17-cv-04467-BLF Document 397-1 Filed 03/11/21 Page 3 of 5
`
`
`
`JOINT [PROPOSED] PRELIMINARY STATEMENT TO THE JURY
`
`Good morning, ladies and gentlemen. I am Judge Beth Labson Freeman and I will be
`
`presiding over the trial in this matter for which a jury is about to be chosen. This case is Finjan
`
`LLC v. SonicWall, Inc. This case involves a dispute relating to United States Patents. The parties
`
`in this case are Plaintiff Finjan LLC (“Finjan” for short) and Defendant SonicWall, Inc.
`
`(“SonicWall” for short). For those of you selected to serve as jurors, I will give you more detailed
`
`instructions regarding the case once you are sworn-in as jurors and again at the conclusion of the
`
`trial. Briefly stated, Finjan accuses SonicWall of patent infringement under the patent laws of the
`
`United States of America by making, using, selling, or offering for sale certain computer security
`
`systems for detecting malware. SonicWall denies that it infringes any of Finjan’s patents.
`
`AGREED-UPON VOIR DIRE QUESTIONS
`
`1.
`
`Have you or any member of your immediate family ever been employed by Finjan
`
`or SonicWall?
`
`2.
`
`Have you or any member of your family ever had any financial interest in or had a
`
`business relationship of any kind with either of these companies?
`
`3.
`
`Have you or any member of your immediate family ever been employed by the
`
`United States Patent and Trademark Office?
`
`4.
`
`Has anyone ever applied for a patent? If so, in what field? Was the patent awarded
`
`to you?
`
`5.
`
`Do you or any member of your immediate family have specialized knowledge of
`
`computer security or antivirus products?
`
`6.
`
`Have you or someone close to you ever used any computer security or antivirus
`
`products?
`
`7.
`
`Have you ever worked in the fields of computer technology, computer security, data
`
`communications, telecommunications, or for any company that sells computers or computer
`
`security equipment?
`
`
`
`
`[PROPOSED] VOIR DIRE QUESTIONS Case No.: 5:17-cv-04467-BLF (VKD)
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 5:17-cv-04467-BLF Document 397-1 Filed 03/11/21 Page 4 of 5
`
`
`
`8.
`
`Do you or any member of your immediate family work as an Information
`
`Technology (“IT”) professional or technician?
`
`9.
`
`Have you ever served as a juror in a criminal or a civil case or as a member of a
`
`grand jury in either a federal or state court?
`
`10.
`
`Have you or anyone in your immediate family ever participated in a lawsuit either
`
`criminal or civil as a party, such as a plaintiff or defendant, or in any other capacity such as a
`
`witness?
`
`11.
`
`Does anyone have strong feelings about monetary damages awards that would cause
`
`you not to be able to follow the law as I give it to you?
`
`12.
`
`Does anyone have strong negative feelings about corporations that you feel would
`
`make you unable to be a fair and impartial juror?
`
`13.
`
`Does anyone have a religious observance or belief that would make it difficult for
`
`you to listen to the evidence and make decisions about whose evidence you believe or do not
`
`believe? Does anyone have a feeling that a jury should not be put in the position of having to make
`
`those decisions?
`
`14.
`
`Does the length of this trial or the schedule contemplated by the Court present a
`
`special problem to any member of the panel?
`
`15.
`
`Do you know any of the attorneys involved in the case or, to the best of your
`
`knowledge, have you or any of your immediate family had any business dealings with or been
`
`employed by any of these attorneys or their respective law firms?
`
`16.
`
`17.
`
`18.
`
`SonicWall?
`
`Are you familiar with any of the prospective witnesses?
`
`Have you heard or read anything about this case?
`
`Have you, or anyone close to you, had any experiences, good or bad, with Finjan or
`
`19.
`
`Have you or any member of your immediate family ever licensed or used products
`
`sold by SonicWall, for example, Capture ATP?
`
`
`
`
`2
`[PROPOSED] VOIR DIRE QUESTIONS Case No.: 5:17-cv-04467-BLF (VKD)
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 5:17-cv-04467-BLF Document 397-1 Filed 03/11/21 Page 5 of 5
`
`
`
`20.
`
`Have you or any member of your immediate family ever licensed or used products
`
`sold by Finjan, for example, VitalSecurity VPN or Invincibull?
`
`21.
`
`Do you have any opinions about or experiences with the following companies: M86
`
`Security, Trustwave, Singapore Telecom, Finjan, Inc., Dell, or Fortress Investment Group?
`
`22.
`
`Look around the room at the other potential jury members. Do you recognize any of
`
`the other jurors from any encounter before today?
`
`23.
`
`Have you or someone close to you had any experience with or opinions about the
`
`U.S. Patent and Trademark Office?
`
`24.
`
`25.
`
`Do you have any opinions about the U.S. Patent system or U.S. government?
`
`Do you have any special disability or problem that would make serving as a member
`
`of the jury difficult or impossible?
`
`26.
`
`27.
`
`Are you fluent in English and do you feel you understand my questions?
`
`Having heard the questions put to you by the court, does any other reason suggest
`
`itself to you as to why you could not sit on this jury and render a fair verdict based on the evidence
`
`presented to you and in the context of the Court’s instructions to you on the law?
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`[PROPOSED] VOIR DIRE QUESTIONS Case No.: 5:17-cv-04467-BLF (VKD)
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket