throbber
Case 5:17-cv-04467-BLF Document 374 Filed 03/04/21 Page 1 of 5
`
`Juanita R. Brooks (CA SBN 75934) brooks@fr.com
`Roger A. Denning (CA SBN 228998) denning@fr.com
`Jason W. Wolff (CA SBN 215819) wolff@fr.com
`John-Paul Fryckman (CA 317591) fryckman@fr.com
`K. Nicole Williams (CA291900) nwilliams@fr.com
`FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
`12860 El Camino Real, Ste. 400
`San Diego, CA 92130
`Telephone: (858) 678-5070 / Fax: (858) 678-5099
`
`Proshanto Mukherji (Pro Hac Vice) mukherji@fr.com
`FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
`One Marina Park Drive
`Boston, MA 02210
`Phone: (617) 542-5070/ Fax: (617) 542-5906
`
`Robert Courtney (CA SBN 248392) courtney@fr.com
`FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
`3200 RBC Plaza
`60 South Sixth Street
`Minneapolis, MN 55402
`Phone: (612) 335-5070 / Fax: (612) 288-9696
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`FINJAN LLC
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`(SAN JOSE DIVISION)
`FINJAN LLC., a Delaware Limited Liability
`Case No. 5:17-cv-04467-BLF (VKD)
`Company,
`
` Plaintiff,
`
`
`v.
`
`
`SONICWALL, INC., a Delaware Corporation,
`
` Defendant.
`
`FINJAN LLC’S CORRECTED
`ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE
`UNDER SEAL ITS MOTION IN LIMINE
`NO. 1
`Date: March 18, 2021
`Time: 1:30 PM
`Hon. Beth Labson Freeman
`Ctrm: 3, 5th Floor
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`Case No. 17-cv-04467-BLF (VKD)
`FINJAN LLC’S CORRECTED MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL ITS MIL NO. 1
`
`

`

`Case 5:17-cv-04467-BLF Document 374 Filed 03/04/21 Page 2 of 5
`
`
`
`I.
`
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`25
`
`Per Civil Local Rule 79-5(d)(1)(A) and 79-5(e), the statements above are confirmed by the
`accompanying Declaration of K. Nicole Williams in Support of Finjan LLC’s Corrected
`Administrative Motion to File Under Seal, filed contemporaneously herewith. Per Civil Local
`Rule 79-5(d)(1)(B), a proposed order narrowly tailored to seal only the sealable material, and
`listing in table format each document or portion thereof that is sought to be sealed, is attached
`hereto. Per Civil Local Rule 79-5(d)(1)(C) and (D), redacted and unredacted versions of the
`documents sought to be sealed are attached hereto as exhibits to Ms. Williams’s Declaration.
`II.
`ARGUMENT
`
`A.
`
`Legal Standard
`
`Under Fed. Rule Civ. P. 26(c)(1)(G), the Court may, in its discretion and for good cause,
`
`issue an order “requiring that a trade secret or other confidential research, development, or
`
`commercial information not be revealed or be revealed only in a specified way.” Similarly, in this
`
`Circuit, the Court may seal documents and information in the case of a dispositive motion if there
`
`are “compelling reasons” to do so, and where “good cause” exists in the case of non-dispositive
`
`motions. Ctr. For Auto Safety v. Chrysler Grp., LLC, 809 F.3d 1092, 1095-1100 (9th Cir. 2016).
`
`1
`Case No. 17-cv-04467-BLF (VKD)
`FINJAN LLC’S CORRECTED MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL ITS MIL NO. 1
`
`INTRODUCTION
`Plaintiff Finjan LLC (“Finjan”), having reviewed and complied with Civil Local Rule 79-
`5, hereby moves the Court for permission to file under seal the following documents:
`ECF or
`Document
`Portion(s) to Seal
`Reason(s) for Sealing
`Exh. No.
`ECF 369
`
`Finjan LLC’s Motion
`in Limine No. 1 To
`Preclude Testimony
`On Written Description
`from SonicWall’s
`Technical Experts
`
`Highlighted portions
`at page 2, lines 1-2,
`14-17, 19-20; page 3,
`lines 3-4
`
`The highlighted portions of
`this document reflect
`information SonicWall has
`designated “Highly
`Confidential – Attorneys’
`Eyes Only” pursuant to the
`Stipulated Protective Order
`(ECF No. 68), and from
`which confidential
`information regarding
`SonicWall’s accused
`products could potentially
`be discerned.
`
`

`

`Case 5:17-cv-04467-BLF Document 374 Filed 03/04/21 Page 3 of 5
`
`
`
`A motion is considered “non-dispositive” when the motion is no more than “tangentially related”
`
`to the underlying cause of action. Id. at 1099. The “good cause” standard requires a
`
`“particularized showing” that “specific prejudice or harm will result” if the information is
`
`disclosed. Phillips ex rel. Estates of Byrd v. Gen Motors Corp.¸ 307 F.3d 1206, 1210-11 (9th Cir.
`
`2002) (internal quotation marks omitted). “Broad allegations of harm, unsubstantiated by specific
`
`examples of articulated reasoning” will not suffice. Beckman Indus., Inc. v. Int’l Ins. Co., 966
`
`F.2d 470, 4766 (9th Cir. 1992). A request to seal material “must be narrowly tailored to seek
`
`sealing only of sealable material.” L.R. 79-5(b).
`
`B.
`
`Finjan’s Administrative Motion to Seal Is Supported by Good Cause and
`
`Compelling Reasons and is Narrowly Tailored
`
`Good cause and compelling reasons exist to file the documents in question under seal, as
`
`described in the Declaration of K. Nicole Williams In Support of Finjan LLC’s CORRECTED
`
`Motion to File under Seal its Motion in Limine No. 1 (“Williams Decl.”) accompanying this
`
`motion to seal.
`
`Finjan’s request is narrowly tailored to seal only information that has been designated as
`
`confidential by SonicWall pursuant to the protective order entered in this case. For the foregoing
`
`reasons, Finjan respectfully requests that the Court grant its request that the documents described
`
`above remain under seal.
`
`Respectfully Submitted,
`
`Dated: March 4, 2021
`
`
`
`By: /s/ K. Nicole Williams
`Juanita R. Brooks (CA SBN 75934)
`brooks@fr.com
`Roger A. Denning (CA SBN 228998)
`denning@fr.com
`Jason W. Wolff (CA SBN 215819)
`wolff@fr.com
`John-Paul Fryckman (CA 317591)
`fryckman@fr.com
`K. Nicole Williams (CA 291900)
`nwilliams@fr.com
`FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
`12860 El Camino Real, Ste. 400
`2
`Case No. 17-cv-04467-BLF (VKD)
`FINJAN LLC’S CORRECTED MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL ITS MIL NO. 1
`
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`25
`
`

`

`Case 5:17-cv-04467-BLF Document 374 Filed 03/04/21 Page 4 of 5
`
`San Diego, CA 92130
`Phone: (858) 678-5070 / Fax: (858) 678-5099
`
`Proshanto Mukherji (Pro Hac Vice)
`mukherji@fr.com
`FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
`One Marina Park Drive
`Boston, MA 02210
`Phone: (617) 542-5070/ Fax: (617) 542-5906
`
`Robert Courtney (CA SBN 248392)
`courtney@fr.com
`FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
`3200 RBC Plaza
`60 South Sixth Street
`Minneapolis, MN 55402
`Phone: (612) 335-5070 / Fax: (612) 288-9696
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`FINJAN LLC
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`25
`
`
`
`Case No. 17-cv-04467-BLF (VKD)
`3
`FINJAN LLC’S CORRECTED MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL ITS MIL NO. 1
`
`

`

`Case 5:17-cv-04467-BLF Document 374 Filed 03/04/21 Page 5 of 5
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing
`
`document has been served on March 4, 2021, 2021 to all counsel of record who are deemed to
`
`have consented to electronic service via the Court’s CM/ECF system. Any other counsel of record
`
`will be served by electronic mail and regular mail.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ K. Nicole Williams
`K. Nicole Williams
`nwilliams@fr.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`25
`
`
`
`Case No. 17-cv-04467-BLF (VKD)
`4
`FINJAN LLC’S CORRECTED MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL ITS MIL NO. 1
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket