throbber
Case 5:17-cv-04467-BLF Document 372-1 Filed 03/04/21 Page 1 of 13
`
`
`
`
`
`APPENDIX A
`
`Finjan’s Witness List
`
`

`

`Case 5:17-cv-04467-BLF Document 372-1 Filed 03/04/21 Page 2 of 13
`
`PLAINTIFF FINJAN LLC’S LIST OF FACT AND EXPERT WITNESSES
`
`United States District Court
`For the Northern District of California (San Jose Division)
`
`Finjan LLC v. SonicWall, Inc.
`
`Case No. 5:17-cv-04467-BLF
`
`
`
`Trial Date: May 3, 2021
`
`Plaintiff Finjan LLC (“Finjan”) identifies the following witnesses whom it may call live or
`
`by deposition at trial. This list is not a commitment that Finjan will call any particular witness at
`
`trial, or a representation that any of the witnesses listed are available or will appear for trial. If any
`
`third-party witness is unavailable, Finjan reserves the right to use his or her deposition testimony.
`
`With respect to Defendant SonicWall, Inc.’s (“SonicWall”) witnesses, Finjan reserves the right to
`
`introduce testimony through deposition or live examination, as appropriate. Finjan also reserves
`
`the right to call any witnesses listed or called by SonicWall, and to revise this list in light of further
`
`rulings by the Court, including any rulings regarding the amount of time allotted for the parties to
`
`present their case at trial, or any other changed circumstances.
`
`Defendant SonicWall’s Objections to Finjan’s May Call Witness List
`
`SonicWall objects to Finjan presenting live testimony from Daniel Chinn. Finjan failed to
`
`disclose Mr. Chinn in its Initial Disclosures dated March 27, 2018 (“Initial Disclosures”) and thus
`
`Mr. Chinn was not deposed in the Finjan v. SonicWall case. Under Federal Rules of Civil
`
`Procedure 26(a) and 37(c), Finjan is precluded from presenting live testimony from Mr. Chinn at
`
`trial. To the extent Finjan intends to call Mr. Chinn by deposition, Finjan is limited to Mr. Chinn’s
`
`deposition testimony in the Finjan v. Cisco case pursuant to the parties’ Stipulation Regarding
`
`Prior Depositions (Dkt. 235).
`
`SonicWall objects to Finjan presenting any testimony from Michael Kim, be it live or by
`
`deposition. Finjan failed to disclose Mr. Kim in its Initial Disclosures and thus Mr. Kim was not
`
`

`

`Case 5:17-cv-04467-BLF Document 372-1 Filed 03/04/21 Page 3 of 13
`
`deposed in the Finjan v. SonicWall case. Further, Mr. Kim was not identified in the parties’
`
`Stipulation Regarding Prior Depositions (Dkt. 235). Under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 26(a)
`
`and 37(c), Finjan is precluded from presenting Mr. Kim’s testimony at trial.
`
`SonicWall objects to Finjan presenting testimony from Philip Hartstein regarding facts that
`
`occurred at a point in time when he was not employed by Finjan and facts for which he lacks
`
`personal knowledge pursuant to Fed. R. Evid. 602, including but not limited to facts related to the
`
`subject matter disclosed below. SonicWall further objects to Finjan presenting testimony from
`
`Mr. Hartstein related to Finjan’s interactions and/or communications with Dell and/or SonicWall.
`
`Mr. Hartstein did not participate in such interactions and/or communications and thus lacks
`
`personal knowledge pursuant to Fed. R. Evid. 602. Further, Finjan failed to identify Mr. Hartstein
`
`as an individual with knowledge related to Finjan’s interactions and/or communications with
`
`SonicWall and/or Dell in response to SonicWall’s Interrogatory Nos. 6 and 16.
`
`SonicWall objects to Finjan presenting testimony from John Garland regarding facts that
`
`occurred at a point in time when he was not employed by Finjan and facts for which he lacks
`
`personal knowledge pursuant to Fed. R. Evid. 602, including but not limited to Finjan’s
`
`communications with Dell and/or SonicWall that predate Mr. Garland’s employment with Finjan.
`
`SonicWall objects to Finjan presenting testimony from Julie Mar-Spinola regarding facts
`
`that occurred at a point in time when she was not employed by Finjan and facts for which she lacks
`
`personal knowledge pursuant to Fed. R. Evid. 602, including but not limited to facts related to the
`
`subject matter disclosed below. SonicWall further objects to Finjan presenting testimony from
`
`Ms. Mar-Spinola related to Finjan’s interactions and/or communications with Dell and/or
`
`SonicWall to the extent that Ms. Mar-Spinola did not participate in such interactions and/or
`
`communications and thus lacks personal knowledge pursuant to Fed. R. Evid. 602. Further, Finjan
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case 5:17-cv-04467-BLF Document 372-1 Filed 03/04/21 Page 4 of 13
`
`failed to identify Ms. Mar-Spinola as an individual with knowledge related to Finjan’s interactions
`
`and/or communications with SonicWall and/or Dell in response to SonicWall’s Interrogatory No.
`
`6.
`
`Finjan’s Response to SonicWall’s Objections to Finjan’s “May Call” list
`
`SonicWall’s objection to “Finjan presenting live testimony from Daniel Chinn” is
`
`irrelevant because Finjan only plans to present deposition testimony from Mr. Chinn.
`
`As to SonicWall’s assertion that Finjan is limited to Mr. Chinn’s deposition testimony in
`
`the Finjan v. Cisco case, as well as to its objection to Finjan’s use of deposition testimony from
`
`Michael Kim taken in other matters, Finjan notes that SonicWall is likewise proposing to introduce
`
`testimony, such as from Mr. Noonan, that was not given in the present litigation and is not covered
`
`by the parties’ Stipulation Regarding Prior Depositions (Dkt. 235). To the extent SonicWall seeks
`
`to introduce such testimony, it cannot simultaneously maintain an objection to Finjan doing the
`
`same.
`
`SonicWall’s objection to John Garland testifying about unspecified facts from before his
`
`tenure at Finjan is vague and incorrect. SonicWall does not specify what “facts” it objects to
`
`except to cite “Finjan’s communications with Dell and/or SonicWall that predate Mr. Garland’s
`
`employment with Finjan.” This appears to be the gravamen of SonicWall’s objection, and its
`
`objection is misplaced. Mr. Garland was and is a Finjan corporate witness on this topic and is
`
`entitled to testify to Finjan’s knowledge of communications it had with SonicWall or Dell based
`
`on corporate records. Mr. Garland was designated as Finjan’s corporate 30(b)(6) witness on
`
`Finjan’s communications with SonicWall or Dell, was specifically identified as being
`
`knowledgeable about this topic in Finjan’s interrogatory responses, and testified to Finjan’s
`
`corporate knowledge of such communications at deposition. SonicWall’s attempt to bar his
`
`testimony on this topic is meritless.
`
`3
`
`

`

`Case 5:17-cv-04467-BLF Document 372-1 Filed 03/04/21 Page 5 of 13
`
`Also without merit are SonicWall’s blanket objections to Philip Hartstein and Julie Mar-
`
`Spinola testifying regarding unspecified facts from before their tenure at SonicWall. Again,
`
`SonicWall’s objection appears to relate to testimony about Finjan’s communications with
`
`SonicWall or Dell. Mr. Hartstein is a corporate representative of Finjan and has knowledge of
`
`facts relating to the communications with Dell/SonicWall on behalf of the corporation based on
`
`the corporate records. Ms. Mar-Spinola is likewise knowledgeable about Finjan’s corporate
`
`knowledge of such communications based on her role at Finjan. Furthermore, Mr. Hartstein was
`
`disclosed in Finjan’s initial disclosures as knowledgeable about “Finjan’s business” and SonicWall
`
`itself stated in its initial disclosures that it understood Mr. Hartstein to be knowledgeable about
`
`“all aspects of Finjan’s business,” including specifically including all its “licensing activities.”
`
`SonicWall likewise acknowledged in its initial disclosures that it understood Ms. Mar-Spinola to
`
`be “knowledgeable about Finjan’s litigation and licensing activities” including issues of “notice
`
`under 35 U.S.C. §287.” Further, SonicWall’s interrogatories nos. 6 and 16 do not request
`
`information regarding those in possession of Finjan corporation’s knowledge of discussions with
`
`SonicWall, and in any case (as Finjan objected at the time) were overbroad and unduly
`
`burdensome, and thus not proportional to the needs of the case, in asking for an identification of
`
`all persons with personal knowledge of such communications.
`
`I.
`
`FACT AND EXPERT WITNESSES
`
`A. Witnesses That Will Be Called in Connection with Finjan:
`
`
`
`4
`
`

`

`Case 5:17-cv-04467-BLF Document 372-1 Filed 03/04/21 Page 6 of 13
`
`Witness
`
`Subject Matter
`
`Dr. Eric Cole
`(expert)
`
`SonicWall’s
`infringement of U.S.
`Patent Nos.
`6,154,844
`and 8,677,494
`
`Estimated
`length
`(Direct/Cross)
`
`1.5 hours direct /
`1 hour cross
`[Live]
`
`Dr. Michael
`Goodrich
`(expert)
`
`Validity of U.S.
`Patent Nos.
`7,975,305,
`8,225,408, and
`8,141,154
`
`50 minutes direct /
`35 minutes cross
`[Live]
`
`Expert Testimony
`
`Expert CV
`and Report
`Citation1
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Theory: SonicWall’s
`infringement of
`Finjan’s patents
`
`Bases: Knowledge and
`experience in field,
`testing of accused
`products, review of
`Finjan and SonicWall
`documents, source
`code, deposition
`testimony, public
`documents, pleadings;
`materials identified
`within expert reports
`dated September 3,
`2020
`Theory: Rebuttal to
`SonicWall’s expert’s
`invalidity theories
`
`Bases: Knowledge and
`experience in field,
`review of SonicWall’s
`expert reports, prior art,
`deposition testimony,
`Finjan and SonicWall
`documents, public
`documents, pleadings;
`materials identified
`within expert report
`dated October 9, 2020
`
`
`
`1 Copies of Finjan’s Expert Reports are concurrently being lodged with the Court.
`
`5
`
`

`

`Case 5:17-cv-04467-BLF Document 372-1 Filed 03/04/21 Page 7 of 13
`
`Estimated
`length
`(Direct/Cross)
`
`30 minutes direct /
`40 minutes cross
`[Live]
`
`
`
`Expert Testimony
`
`Expert CV
`and Report
`Citation1
`
`
`
`
`
`Witness
`
`Subject Matter
`
`Philip Hartstein,
`President of
`Finjan
`
`Finjan’s business,
`including Finjan’s
`products and
`financials, Finjan’s
`agreements and
`contracts, including
`Finjan’s license
`agreements; Finjan’s
`interactions with
`SonicWall and Dell,
`and communications
`with SonicWall and
`Dell; the preparation
`and prosecution of
`the asserted patents
`and related patents;
`conception and
`reduction to
`practice;
`products/designs/ser
`vices that embody
`the subject matter of
`the asserted patents;
`the value of Finjan’s
`technology and
`intellectual property;
`Finjan’s awareness
`of SonicWall’s
`infringement; non-
`infringing
`alternatives; factual
`basis for damages;
`communications
`with M86 Security
`
`6
`
`

`

`Case 5:17-cv-04467-BLF Document 372-1 Filed 03/04/21 Page 8 of 13
`
`Witness
`
`Subject Matter
`
`Dr. DeForest
`McDuff
`(expert)
`
`Damages
`
`Estimated
`length
`(Direct/Cross)
`
`1 hour direct /
`40 minutes cross
`[Live]
`
`Dr. Nenad
`Medvidovic
`(expert)
`
`1.5 hours direct /
`1 hour cross
`[Live]
`
`SonicWall’s
`infringement of U.S.
`Patent Nos.
`8,225,408,
`7,975,305, and
`8,141,154
`
`Dr. Michael
`Mitzenmacher
`(expert)
`
`1.5 hours direct /
`1 hour cross
`[Live]
`
`SonicWall’s
`infringement of U.S.
`Patent Nos.
`6,804,780,
`6,965,968,
`7,613,926
`
`7
`
`Expert Testimony
`
`Expert CV
`and Report
`Citation1
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Theory: Damages owed
`by SonicWall to Finjan
`for patent infringement
`
`Bases: Knowledge and
`experience in field,
`review of Finjan and
`SonicWall documents,
`deposition testimony,
`public documents,
`pleadings; articles and
`books; materials
`identified within expert
`reports dated
`September 4, 2020
`
`Theory: SonicWall’s
`infringement of
`Finjan’s patents
`
`Bases: Knowledge and
`experience in field,
`testing of accused
`products, review of
`Finjan and SonicWall
`documents, source
`code, deposition
`testimony, public
`documents, pleadings;
`materials identified
`within expert reports
`dated September 3,
`2020
`
`Theory: SonicWall’s
`infringement of
`Finjan’s patents
`
`Bases: knowledge and
`experience in field,
`testing of accused
`products, review of
`Finjan and SonicWall
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 5:17-cv-04467-BLF Document 372-1 Filed 03/04/21 Page 9 of 13
`
`Witness
`
`Subject Matter
`
`Estimated
`length
`(Direct/Cross)
`
`Expert Testimony
`
`Expert CV
`and Report
`Citation1
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`documents, source
`code, deposition
`testimony, public
`documents, pleadings;
`materials identified
`within expert reports
`dated September 3,
`2020
`
`Theory: Rebuttal to
`SonicWall’s expert’s
`invalidity theories
`
`Bases: Knowledge and
`experience in field,
`review of SonicWall’s
`expert reports, prior art,
`deposition testimony,
`Finjan and SonicWall
`documents, public
`documents, pleadings;
`materials identified
`within expert report
`dated October 9, 2020.
`
`Theory: Technology
`related to the Asserted
`Patents and
`SonicWall’s use and
`incorporation of the
`technology within their
`products
`
`Bases: Knowledge and
`experience in field,
`testing of accused
`products, review of
`Finjan and SonicWall
`documents and expert
`reports, source code,
`deposition testimony,
`public documents,
`pleadings; materials
`
`Dr. Alessandro
`Orso (expert)
`
`Validity of U.S.
`Patent Nos.
`6,154,844,
`8,677,494,
`6,804,780,
`7,613,926, and
`6,965,968
`
`1.5 hour direct /
`1 hour cross
`[Live]
`
`Dr. Aaron
`Striegel
`(expert)
`
`Technology related
`to the Asserted
`Patents
`
`30 minutes direct /
`30 minutes cross
`[Live]
`
`8
`
`

`

`Case 5:17-cv-04467-BLF Document 372-1 Filed 03/04/21 Page 10 of 13
`
`Witness
`
`Subject Matter
`
`Estimated
`length
`(Direct/Cross)
`
`Expert Testimony
`
`Expert CV
`and Report
`Citation1
`
`
`
`identified within expert
`reports dated
`September 3, 2020.
`
`9
`
`

`

`Case 5:17-cv-04467-BLF Document 372-1 Filed 03/04/21 Page 11 of 13
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`B. Witnesses That May Be Called Live or by Deposition:
`
`Witness
`
`Subject Matter2
`
`
`
`Dmitriy Ayrapetov
`
`Vice President of SonicWall’s
`Platform Architecture
`
`Yuval Ben-Itzhak
`
`Inventor of the ’154 patent;
`Former Finjan CTO and
`consultant
`
`Daniel Chinn
`
`Chairman of the Finjan Board of
`Directors and former CEO
`
`Graham Carter
`
`Director of Business Intelligence
`and Analysis
`
`SonicWall’s accused
`products/services
`
`Conception, development, and
`reduction to practice of the ’154
`Patent; the Finjan Vital Security
`Appliances; Finjan’s interactions
`with SonicWall
`
`Communications with SonicWall,
`Finjan’s business
`
`SonicWall’s accused
`products/services
`
`Senthil Cheetancheri
`
`Distinguished Engineer
`
`SonicWall’s accused
`products/services
`
`Estimated Length
`(Direct or Finjan
`/ SonicWall or Cross)
`
`15 minutes Finjan /
`10 minutes SonicWall
`[Deposition]
`
`15 minute Finjan/
`10 minutes SonicWall
`[Live]
`
`10 minutes Finjan /
`5 minutes SonicWall
`[Deposition]
`
`10 minutes Finjan /
`10 minutes SonicWall
`[Deposition]
`
`20 minutes Finjan /
`10 minutes SonicWall
`[Deposition]
`
`Brook Chelmo
`
`Senior Product Marketing Manger
`
`SonicWall’s accused
`products/services, marketing, and
`communications
`
`15 minutes Finjan /
`10 minutes SonicWall
`[Deposition]
`
`Ravi Chopra
`
`Chief Financial Officer
`
`SonicWall’s accused
`products/services, sales and
`financial information
`
`20 minutes Finjan /
`10 minutes SonicWall
`[Deposition]
`
`Evan Daar
`
`Principal at Francisco Partners
`
`Alex Dubrovsky
`
`Vice President of Software
`Engineering
`
`
`SonicWall’s accused
`products/services, financial
`information, and acquisition
`history
`SonicWall’s accused
`products/services
`
`
`10 minutes Finjan /
`5 minutes SonicWall
`[Deposition]
`
`20 minutes Finjan /
`10 minutes SonicWall
`[Deposition]
`
`
`2 Finjan also incorporates by reference the subject matter of its designated deposition testimony.
`10
`
`

`

`Case 5:17-cv-04467-BLF Document 372-1 Filed 03/04/21 Page 12 of 13
`
`Witness
`
`Subject Matter2
`
`
`
`Estimated Length
`(Direct or Finjan
`/ SonicWall or Cross)
`
`John Garland
`
`Director of Business Development
`
`Finjan’s licensing practices,
`communications with SonicWall
`and Dell
`
`20 minute direct /
`15 minute cross
`[Live]
`
`John Gmuender
`
`Chief Technology Officer
`
`John Gordineer
`
`Former Director Product
`Marketing
`
`Eric Hawkes
`
`Former Principal Software
`Engineer
`
`SonicWall’s accused
`products/services
`
`20 minutes Finjan /
`10 minutes SonicWall
`[Deposition]
`
`SonicWall’s accused
`products/services, marketing, and
`communications
`
`10 minutes Finjan /
`10 minutes SonicWall
`[Deposition]
`
`SonicWall’s accused
`products/services
`
`10 minutes Finjan /
`5 minutes SonicWall
`[Deposition]
`
`Michael Kim
`
`Former Finjan Senior IP Counsel
`
`Knowledge of the Asserted
`Patents
`
`5 minutes Finjan /
`5 minutes SonicWall
`[Deposition]
`
`Michael King
`
`Senior Software Engineer
`
`SonicWall’s accused
`products/services
`
`15 minutes Finjan /
`5 minutes SonicWall
`[Deposition]
`
`David R. Kroll
`
`Inventor of the ’926 and ’494
`Patents
`
`Matt Neiderman
`
`
`Chief Administration Officer
`
`Conception, development and
`reduction to practice of the ’926
`and ’494 Patents
`
`20 minute direct /
`10 minutes SonicWall
`[Live]
`
`SonicWall’s accused
`products/services and licensing
`practices
`
`15 minutes Finjan /
`10 minutes SonicWall
`[Deposition]
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`11
`
`

`

`Case 5:17-cv-04467-BLF Document 372-1 Filed 03/04/21 Page 13 of 13
`
`Estimated Length
`(Direct or Finjan
`/ SonicWall or Cross)
`
`15 minutes Finjan /
`15 minutes SonicWall
`[Deposition]
`
`Witness
`
`Subject Matter2
`
`
`
`Julie Mar-Spinola
`
`Finjan Vice President of Legal
`Operations and Chief IP Officer
`
`Finjan’s litigation, business,
`licenses, and licensing practices;
`facts concerning objective indicia
`of non-obviousness; ownership of
`the asserted patents; economic
`analyses and valuations of the
`asserted patents and Finjan’s
`intellectual property portfolio;
`marking; Finjan’s
`communications concerning
`SonicWall or Dell and the accused
`products/services/technology;
`non-infringing alternatives; factual
`basis for damages
`
`
`Shlomo Touboul
`
`Inventor of the ’844, ’780, ’968,
`’408, ’305, and ’494 Patents,
`founder and former CEO of Finjan
`
`Shunhiu Zhu
`
`Vice President of Engineering
`
`Conception, development, and
`reduction to practice of the ’844,
`’780, ’968, ’408, ’305, and ’494
`Patents; Finjan’s business
`
`20 minutes Finjan /
`15 minutes SonicWall
`[Deposition]
`
`SonicWall’s accused
`products/services
`
`20 minutes Finjan /
`15 minutes SonicWall
`[Deposition]
`
`
`
`12
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket