`
`DUANE MORRIS LLP
`D. Stuart Bartow (CA SBN 233107)
`dsbartow@duanemorris.com
`Nicole E. Grigg (CA SBN 307733)
`negrigg@duanemorris.com
`2475 Hanover Street
`Palo Alto, CA 94304-1194
`Telephone: 650.847.4150
`Facsimile: 650.847.4151
`DUANE MORRIS LLP
`Joseph A. Powers (PA SBN 84590)
`Admitted Pro Hac Vice
`japowers@duanemorris.com
`Jarrad M. Gunther (PA SBN 207038)
`Admitted Pro Hac Vice
`jmgunther@duanemorris.com
`30 South 17th Street
`Philadelphia, PA 19103
`Telephone: 215.979.1000
`Facsimile: 215.979.1020
`Attorneys for Defendant
`SONICWALL INC.
`
`DUANE MORRIS LLP
`Matthew C. Gaudet (GA SBN 287789)
`Admitted Pro Hac Vice
`mcgaudet@duanemorris.com
`John R. Gibson (GA SBN 454507)
`Admitted Pro Hac Vice
`jrgibson@duanemorris.com
`Robin L. McGrath (GA SBN 493115)
`Admitted Pro Hac Vice
`rlmcgrath@duanemorris.com
`David C. Dotson (GA SBN 138040)
`Admitted Pro Hac Vice
`dcdotson@duanemorris.com
`Jennifer H. Forte (GA SBN 940650)
`Admitted Pro Hac Vice
`jhforte@duanemorris.com
`1075 Peachtree NE, Suite 2000
`Atlanta, GA 30309
`Telephone: 404.253.6900
`Facsimile: 404.253.6901
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`SAN JOSE DIVISION
`
`FINJAN, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability
`Company,
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`SONICWALL INC., a Delaware Corporation,
`
`
`Defendant.
`
` Case No.: 5:17-cv-04467-BLF-VKD
`
`[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
`DEFENDANT SONICWALL INC.’S
`MOTION TO EXCLUDE IMPROPER
`EXPERT TESTIMONY BASED ON
`FINJAN’S WILLFULNESS
`ALLEGATIONS (MOTION IN LIMINE
`NO. 1)
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT SONICWALL INC.’S MOTION IN LIMINE NO. 1
`CASE NO. 5:17-CV-04467-BLF (VKD)
`
`
`
`
`Case 5:17-cv-04467-BLF Document 360-1 Filed 03/04/21 Page 2 of 2
`
`[PROPOSED] ORDER
`
`Defendant SonicWall, Inc.’s (“SonicWall”) Motion to Exclude Improper Expert Testimony
`Based on Finjan’s Willfulness Allegations was brought before this Court.
`The Court has read and considered the Motion papers filed in support of and in opposition to
`the Motion, the arguments of counsel at the hearing, and the case file in this action. Good cause
`appearing for the requested relief, the Court finds that the Motion should be GRANTED.
`IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
`Cisco’s Motion to Exclude Improper Expert Testimony Based on Finjan’s Willfulness
`Allegations is GRANTED.
`
`IT IS SO ORDERED.
`
`Dated:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Honorable Beth Labson Freeman
`United States District Court Judge
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT SONICWALL INC.’S MOTION IN LIMINE NO. 1
` CASE NO. 5:17-CV-04467-BLF (VKD)
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`