throbber
Case 5:17-cv-04467-BLF Document 359-2 Filed 03/04/21 Page 1 of 8
`
`DUANE MORRIS LLP
`D. Stuart Bartow (CA SBN 233107)
`dsbartow@duanemorris.com
`Nicole E. Grigg (CA SBN 307733)
`negrigg@duanemorris.com
`2475 Hanover Street
`Palo Alto, CA 94304-1194
`Telephone: 650.847.4150
`Facsimile: 650.847.4151
`DUANE MORRIS LLP
`Joseph A. Powers (PA SBN 84590)
`Admitted Pro Hac Vice
`japowers@duanemorris.com
`Jarrad M. Gunther (PA SBN 207038)
`Admitted Pro Hac Vice
`jmgunther@duanemorris.com
`30 South 17th Street
`Philadelphia, PA 19103
`Telephone: 215.979.1000
`Facsimile: 215.979.1020
`Attorneys for Defendant
`SONICWALL INC.
`
`DUANE MORRIS LLP
`Matthew C. Gaudet (GA SBN 287789)
`Admitted Pro Hac Vice
`mcgaudet@duanemorris.com
`John R. Gibson (GA SBN 454507)
`Admitted Pro Hac Vice
`jrgibson@duanemorris.com
`Robin L. McGrath (GA SBN 493115)
`Admitted Pro Hac Vice
`rlmcgrath@duanemorris.com
`David C. Dotson (GA SBN 138040)
`Admitted Pro Hac Vice
`dcdotson@duanemorris.com
`Jennifer H. Forte (GA SBN 940650)
`Admitted Pro Hac Vice
`jhforte@duanemorris.com
`1075 Peachtree NE, Suite 2000
`Atlanta, GA 30309
`Telephone: 404.253.6900
`Facsimile: 404.253.6901
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`SAN JOSE DIVISION
`
`FINJAN, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability
`Company,
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`SONICWALL INC., a Delaware Corporation,
`
`
`v.
`
`Defendant.
`
` Case No.: 5:17-cv-04467-BLF-VKD
`
`[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
`SONICWALL INC.’S ADMINISTRATIVE
`MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER
`SEAL
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING SONICWALL’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL
`CASE NO. 5:17-CV-04467-BLF-VKD
`
`

`

`Case 5:17-cv-04467-BLF Document 359-2 Filed 03/04/21 Page 2 of 8
`
`Having considered SonicWall Inc.’s (“SonicWall”) Administrative Motion to File
`Documents Under Seal and the declaration of Nicole Grigg in Support thereof, the Court hereby
`finds there to be good cause for granting the request to file certain documents and information under
`seal.
`
`Good cause having been shown, the Court finds that:
`1.
`There exist overriding confidentiality interests that overcome the right of public
`access to the following documents:
`
`Exh. No.
`
`
`Document
`SonicWall’s Motion
`to Exclude Improper
`Expert Testimony
`Based on Finjan’s
`Willfulness
`Allegations (Motion
`in Limine No. 1)
`
`Portion(s) to Seal
`Highlighted
`portions at:
`Pg. 1 at lines 8-19
`and 24-25; Pg. 2
`at lines 1-3, 7-9
`and 18-20; Pg. 3
`at lines 5-6
`
`
`
`
`SonicWall’s Motion
`in Limine to Exclude
`Dr. McDuff’s
`Method No. 1
`(Motion in Limine
`No. 2)
`
`Highlighted
`portions at:
`Pg. 1 at lines 2-5,
`11, 16-17, 21 and
`25; Pg. 2 at lines
`6-7, 13 and 21;
`Pg. 3 at lines 24
`and 26-27; Pg. 4
`at lines 2-3, 5, 10-
`12, 14, 19, 22-24
`and 26-28; Pg. 5
`at lines 2, 6-7, 11-
`
`Reason(s) for Sealing
`The highlighted portions of this
`document reflect information that
`SonicWall has designated as
`“Highly Confidential – Attorneys’
`Eyes Only” or “Highly
`Confidential – Attorney’s Eyes
`Only – Source Code” pursuant to
`the Stipulated Protective Order. If
`filed publicly, this confidential
`information could be used to
`SonicWall’s disadvantage by
`competitors as it concerns the
`identification, organization, and or
`operation of SonicWall’s
`proprietary products as well as
`SonicWall’s confidential business
`information. See Declaration of
`Nicole E. Grigg in Support of
`Administrative Motion to File
`Documents Under Seal (“Grigg
`Declaration”), ¶¶ 2-5.
`The highlighted portions of this
`document reflect information that
`SonicWall has designated as
`“Highly Confidential – Attorneys’
`Eyes Only” pursuant to the
`Stipulated Protective Order. If
`filed publicly, this confidential
`information could be used to
`SonicWall’s disadvantage by
`competitors as it concerns
`SonicWall’s confidential business
`information. Additionally,
`highlighted portions of this
`document reflect information that
`Finjan has designated as “Highly-
`
`
`
`1
`[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING SONICWALL’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL
`CASE NO. 5:17-CV-04467-BLF-VKD
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

`

`Case 5:17-cv-04467-BLF Document 359-2 Filed 03/04/21 Page 3 of 8
`
`Exh. No.
`
`Document
`
`Portion(s) to Seal
`12 and 18-20,
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1 to Gunther
`
`Reason(s) for Sealing
`Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes
`Only” pursuant to the Protective
`Order. See Declaration of Nicole E.
`Grigg in Support of Administrative
`Motion to File Documents Under
`Seal (“Grigg Declaration”), ¶¶ 2-5.
`The highlighted portions of this
`document reflect information that
`SonicWall has designated as
`“Highly Confidential – Attorneys’
`Eyes Only” or “Highly
`Confidential – Attorney’s Eyes
`Only – Source Code” pursuant to
`the Stipulated Protective Order. If
`filed publicly, this confidential
`information could be used to
`SonicWall’s disadvantage by
`competitors as it concerns the
`identification, organization, and or
`operation of SonicWall’s
`proprietary products. Additionally,
`highlighted portions of this
`document reflect information that
`Finjan has designated as “Highly-
`Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes
`Only” pursuant to the Protective
`Order. See Declaration of Nicole E.
`Grigg in Support of Administrative
`Motion to File Documents Under
`Seal (“Grigg Declaration”), ¶¶ 2-5.
`The highlighted portions of this
`document reflect information that
`SonicWall has designated as
`“Highly Confidential – Attorneys’
`Eyes Only” or “Highly
`Confidential – Attorney’s Eyes
`Only – Source Code” pursuant to
`the Stipulated Protective Order. If
`filed publicly, this confidential
`information could be used to
`SonicWall’s disadvantage by
`competitors as it concerns the
`identification, organization, and or
`operation of SonicWall’s
`proprietary products as well as
`SonicWall’s confidential business
`information. See Declaration of
`Nicole E. Grigg in Support of
`Administrative Motion to File
`Documents Under Seal (“Grigg
`Declaration”), ¶¶ 2-5.
`This document contains
`information that SonicWall has
`
`Pg. 1 at lines 4
`and 10-11; Pg. 5
`at line 18
`
`SonicWall’s Motion
`to Exclude Dr.
`Striegel’s Technical
`Apportionment
`Opinions and Dr.
`McDuff’s Reliance
`Thereon (Motion in
`Limine No. 3)
`
`SonicWall’s Motion
`in Limine to Exclude
`the Testimony of Dr.
`McDuff’s Price Per
`Scan Opinions
`(Method No. 3)
`(Motion in Limine
`No. 4)
`
`Pg. 1 at lines 16-
`21 and 23-28; Pg.
`2 at lines 1-3, 6-7,
`15 and 17-20; Pg.
`3 at lines 3-4, 6-
`10, 14-15 and 18;
`Pg. 4 at lines 7-9
`and 11; Pg. 5 at
`line 7
`
`Excerpts from the
`September 4, 2020
`
`Entirety
`
`2
`[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING SONICWALL’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL
`CASE NO. 5:17-CV-04467-BLF-VKD
`
`

`

`Case 5:17-cv-04467-BLF Document 359-2 Filed 03/04/21 Page 4 of 8
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`Exh. No.
`Declaration
`
`Document
`Expert Report of
`DeForest McDuff,
`Ph.D.
`
`Portion(s) to Seal
`
`3 to Gunther
`Declaration
`
`4 to Gunther
`Declaration
`
`Entirety
`
`Entirety
`
`Excerpts from the
`September 3, 2020
`Expert Report of Dr.
`Eric Cole Regarding
`Technology Tutorial
`and Infringement by
`SonicWall, Inc. of
`Patent Nos.
`6,154,844; 7,058,822;
`7,647,633; and
`8,677,494
`
`Excerpts from the
`September 3, 2020
`Expert Report of
`Michael
`Mitzenmacher, Ph.D.
`Regarding
`Infringement by
`SonicWall, Inc. of
`Patent Nos.
`6,804,780; 6,965,968;
`and 7,613,926
`
`5 to Gunther
`Declaration
`
`Entirety
`
`Excerpts from the
`September 3, 2020
`Expert Report of Dr.
`Nenad Medvidović
`Regarding
`
`Reason(s) for Sealing
`designated as “Highly Confidential
`– Attorneys’ Eyes Only” or
`“Highly Confidential – Attorneys’
`Eyes Only - Source Code”
`pursuant to the Stipulated
`Protective Order. If filed publicly,
`this confidential information could
`be used to SonicWall’s
`disadvantage by competitors as it
`concerns the identification,
`organization, and or operation of
`SonicWall’s proprietary products
`as well as SonicWall’s confidential
`business information. See Grigg
`Declaration, ¶¶ 2-5.
`This document contains
`information that SonicWall has
`designated as “Highly Confidential
`– Attorneys’ Eyes Only” or
`“Highly Confidential – Attorneys’
`Eyes Only - Source Code”
`pursuant to the Stipulated
`Protective Order. If filed publicly,
`this confidential information could
`be used to SonicWall’s
`disadvantage by competitors as it
`concerns the identification,
`organization, and or operation of
`SonicWall’s proprietary products,
`including its source code. See
`Grigg Declaration, ¶¶ 2-5.
`This document contains
`information that SonicWall has
`designated as “Highly Confidential
`– Attorneys’ Eyes Only” or
`“Highly Confidential – Attorneys’
`Eyes Only - Source Code”
`pursuant to the Stipulated
`Protective Order. If filed publicly,
`this confidential information could
`be used to SonicWall’s
`disadvantage by competitors as it
`concerns the identification,
`organization, and or operation of
`SonicWall’s proprietary products,
`including its source code. See
`Grigg Declaration, ¶¶ 2-5.
`This document contains
`information that SonicWall has
`designated as “Highly Confidential
`– Attorneys’ Eyes Only” or
`“Highly Confidential – Attorneys’
`Eyes Only - Source Code”
`
`
`
`3
`[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING SONICWALL’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL
`CASE NO. 5:17-CV-04467-BLF-VKD
`
`

`

`Case 5:17-cv-04467-BLF Document 359-2 Filed 03/04/21 Page 5 of 8
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`Portion(s) to Seal
`
`Exh. No.
`
`Document
`Infringement by
`SonicWall, Inc. of
`Patent Nos.
`8,225,408; 7,975,305;
`and 8,141,154
`
`6 to Gunther
`Declaration
`
`Entirety
`
`Excerpts from the
`September 3, 2020
`Expert Report of Dr.
`Aaron Striegel
`
`7 to Gunther
`Declaration
`
`Entirety
`
`Excerpts from the
`October 22, 2020
`deposition transcript
`of Eric Cole
`
`8 to Gunther
`Declaration
`
`Entirety
`
`Excerpts from the
`October 26, 2020
`deposition transcript
`of Michael
`Mitzenmacher
`
`Reason(s) for Sealing
`pursuant to the Stipulated
`Protective Order. If filed publicly,
`this confidential information could
`be used to SonicWall’s
`disadvantage by competitors as it
`concerns the identification,
`organization, and or operation of
`SonicWall’s proprietary products,
`including its source code. See
`Grigg Declaration, ¶¶ 2-5.
`This document contains
`information that SonicWall has
`designated as “Highly Confidential
`– Attorneys’ Eyes Only” or
`“Highly Confidential – Attorneys’
`Eyes Only - Source Code”
`pursuant to the Stipulated
`Protective Order. If filed publicly,
`this confidential information could
`be used to SonicWall’s
`disadvantage by competitors as it
`concerns the identification,
`organization, and or operation of
`SonicWall’s proprietary products
`as well as SonicWall’s confidential
`business information. See Grigg
`Declaration, ¶¶ 2-5.
`This document contains testimony
`that SonicWall has designated as
`“Highly Confidential – Attorneys’
`Eyes Only” pursuant to the
`Stipulated Protective Order. If filed
`publicly, this confidential
`information could be used to
`SonicWall’s disadvantage by
`competitors as it concerns the
`identification, organization, and or
`operation of SonicWall’s
`proprietary products, as well as
`confidential business information
`of SonicWall. See Grigg
`Declaration, ¶¶ 2-5.
`This document contains testimony
`that SonicWall has designated as
`“Highly Confidential – Attorneys’
`Eyes Only” pursuant to the
`Stipulated Protective Order. If filed
`publicly, this confidential
`information could be used to
`SonicWall’s disadvantage by
`competitors as it concerns the
`identification, organization, and or
`operation of SonicWall’s
`
`
`
`4
`[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING SONICWALL’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL
`CASE NO. 5:17-CV-04467-BLF-VKD
`
`

`

`Case 5:17-cv-04467-BLF Document 359-2 Filed 03/04/21 Page 6 of 8
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`Exh. No.
`
`Document
`
`Portion(s) to Seal
`
`9 to Gunther
`Declaration
`
`Entirety
`
`Excerpts from the
`November 3, 2020
`deposition transcript
`of Aaron Striegel
`
`10 to
`Gunther
`Declaration
`
`Excerpts from the
`November 2, 2020
`deposition transcript
`of DeForest McDuff
`
`Entirety
`
`13 to
`Gunther
`Declaration
`
`14 to
`Gunther
`Declaration
`
`Exhibit 5 to the
`November 2, 2020
`Deposition of
`DeForest McDuff,
`Ph.D.
`
`Exhibit 10 to the
`November 2, 2020
`Deposition of
`DeForest McDuff,
`Ph.D.
`
`Entirety
`
`Entirety
`
`Reason(s) for Sealing
`proprietary products, as well as
`confidential business and financial
`information of SonicWall. See
`Grigg Declaration, ¶¶ 2-5.
`This document contains testimony
`that SonicWall has designated as
`“Highly Confidential – Attorneys’
`Eyes Only” pursuant to the
`Stipulated Protective Order. If filed
`publicly, this confidential
`information could be used to
`SonicWall’s disadvantage by
`competitors as it concerns the
`identification, organization, and or
`operation of SonicWall’s
`proprietary products, as well as
`confidential business and financial
`information of SonicWall. See
`Grigg Declaration, ¶¶ 2-5.
`This document contains testimony
`that SonicWall has designated as
`“Highly Confidential – Attorneys’
`Eyes Only” pursuant to the
`Stipulated Protective Order. If filed
`publicly, this confidential
`information could be used to
`SonicWall’s disadvantage by
`competitors as it concerns the
`identification, organization, and or
`operation of SonicWall’s
`proprietary products, as well as
`confidential business and financial
`information of SonicWall. See
`Grigg Declaration, ¶¶ 2-5.
`This document was produced by
`third party Francisco Partners and
`was designated as “Highly
`Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes
`Only” pursuant to the Stipulated
`Protective Order. See Grigg
`Declaration, ¶¶ 2-5.
`This document contains internal
`email communications that
`SonicWall has designated as
`“Confidential” pursuant to the
`Stipulated Protective Order. If filed
`publicly, this confidential
`information could be used to
`SonicWall’s disadvantage by
`competitors as it concerns the
`identification, organization, and or
`operation of SonicWall’s
`proprietary products. See Grigg
`
`
`
`5
`[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING SONICWALL’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL
`CASE NO. 5:17-CV-04467-BLF-VKD
`
`

`

`Case 5:17-cv-04467-BLF Document 359-2 Filed 03/04/21 Page 7 of 8
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`Exh. No.
`
`Document
`
`Portion(s) to Seal
`
`17 to
`Gunther
`Declaration
`
`22 to
`Gunther
`Declaration
`
`23 to
`Gunther
`Declaration
`
`24 to
`Gunther
`Declaration
`
`25 to
`Gunther
`Declaration
`
`28 to
`Gunther
`Declaration
`
`Entirety
`
`Entirety
`
`January 16, 2014
`email bearing Bates
`numbers FINJAN‐
`SW 403755 -
`FINJAN‐SW 403759
`Exhibit 2 to the
`November 3, 2020
`Deposition of Aaron
`Striegel bearing the
`Bates number
`SonicWall-
`Finjan_00101991
`
`Entirety
`
`Entirety
`
`Entirety
`
`Entirety
`
`Exhibit 3 to the
`November 3, 2020
`Deposition of Aaron
`Striegel bearing the
`Bates number
`FINJAN-SW 158696
`January 8, 2017 email
`bearing the Bates
`numbers FINJAN-
`SW 403972 -
`FINJAN-SW 403979
`Excerpts from the
`February 27, 2020
`deposition transcript
`of Julie Mar-Spinola
`
`Excerpts from the
`October 9, 2020
`Expert Report of
`Stephen L. Becker
`
`Reason(s) for Sealing
`Declaration, ¶¶ 2-5.
`This document contains internal
`email communications that Finjan
`has designated as “Confidential”
`pursuant to the Stipulated
`Protective Order. See Grigg
`Declaration, ¶¶ 2-5.
`SonicWall has designated this
`document “Highly Confidential –
`Attorneys’ Eyes Only” pursuant to
`the Stipulated Protective Order. If
`filed publicly, this confidential
`information could be used to
`SonicWall’s disadvantage by
`competitors as it concerns the
`SonicWall’s confidential business
`information. See Grigg
`Declaration, ¶¶ 2-5.
`This document contains
`information that Finjan has
`designated as “Confidential”
`pursuant to the Stipulated
`Protective Order. See Grigg
`Declaration, ¶¶ 2-5.
`This document contains
`information that Finjan has
`designated as “Highly Confidential
`– Attorneys’ Eyes Only” pursuant
`to the Stipulated Protective Order.
`See Grigg Declaration, ¶¶ 2-5.
`This document contains testimony
`that Finjan has designated as
`“Highly Confidential – Attorneys’
`Eyes Only” pursuant to the
`Stipulated Protective Order. See
`Grigg Declaration, ¶¶ 2-5.
`This document contains testimony
`that SonicWall has designated as
`“Highly Confidential – Attorneys’
`Eyes Only” pursuant to the
`Stipulated Protective Order. If filed
`publicly, this confidential
`information could be used to
`SonicWall’s disadvantage by
`competitors as it concerns the
`identification, organization, and or
`operation of SonicWall’s
`proprietary products, as well as
`confidential business and financial
`information of SonicWall. See
`Grigg Declaration, ¶¶ 2-5.
`
`
`
`6
`[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING SONICWALL’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL
`CASE NO. 5:17-CV-04467-BLF-VKD
`
`

`

`Case 5:17-cv-04467-BLF Document 359-2 Filed 03/04/21 Page 8 of 8
`
`
`
`A substantial probability exists that the overriding confidentiality interests will be
`2.
`prejudiced if the record is not sealed;
`
`3.
`
`4.
`
`The proposed sealing is narrowly tailored; and
`
`No less restrictive means exist to achieve these overriding interests.
`
`IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that SonicWall’s Administrative Motion to File
`Documents Under Seal is GRANTED with respect to the documents set forth above.
`
`IT IS SO ORDERED.
`
`Dated:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Judge Beth Labson Freeman
`United States District Court Judge
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`7
`[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING SONICWALL’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL
`CASE NO. 5:17-CV-04467-BLF-VKD
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket