Case 5:17-cv-04467-BLF Document 351 Filed 01/21/21 Page 1 of 8
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`Juanita R. Brooks (CA SBN 75934) brooks@fr.com
`Roger A. Denning (CA SBN 228998) denning@fr.com
`Jason W. Wolff (CA SBN 215819) wolff@fr.com
`John-Paul Fryckman (CA SBN 317591) fryckman@fr.com
`K. Nicole Williams (CA291900) nwilliams@fr.com
`FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
`12860 El Camino Real, Suite 400
`San Diego, CA 92130
`Telephone: (858) 678-5070 / Fax: (858) 678-5099
`
`Proshanto Mukherji (Pro Hac Vice) mukherji@fr.com
`FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
`One Marina Park Drive
`Boston, MA 02210
`Phone: (617) 542-5070/ Fax: (617) 542-5906
`
`Robert Courtney (CA SNB 248392) courtney@fr.com
`FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
`3200 RBC Plaza
`60 South Sixth Street
`Minneapolis, MN 55402
`Phone: (612) 335-5070 / Fax: (612) 288-9696
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`FINJAN LLC
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`(SAN JOSE DIVISION)
`
`
`
`FINJAN LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability
`Company,
`
`Case No. 5:17-cv-04467-BLF (VKD)
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`FINJAN LLC’S OMNIBUS
`ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE
`UNDER SEAL
`
`SONICWALL INC., a Delaware Corporation,
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`24
`
`
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`Case No. 5:17-cv-04467 BLF (VKD)
`FINJAN ADMINISTRATIVE
`MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL
`
`

`

`Case 5:17-cv-04467-BLF Document 351 Filed 01/21/21 Page 2 of 8
`
`
`
`
`I.
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`Plaintiff Finjan LLC (“Finjan”), having reviewed and complied with Civil Local Rule 79-
`
`5, hereby moves the Court for permission to file under seal the following documents:
`
`
`
`ECF or
`Exh. No.
`ECF 348
`
`Document
`
`Portion(s) to Seal
`
`Reason(s) for Sealing
`
`Finjan LLC’s Motion
`To Preclude Trial
`Testimony Relating to
`Written Description
`
`Highlighted portions
`at page 2, lines 21-22;
`page 3, lines 16-19,
`21-22; page 4, line 8
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`The highlighted portions of
`this document reflect
`information SonicWall has
`designated “Highly
`Confidential – Attorneys’
`Eyes Only” pursuant to the
`Stipulated Protective Order
`(ECF No. 68), and from
`which confidential
`information regarding
`SonicWall’s accused
`products could potentially
`be discerned.
`This document reflects
`information SonicWall has
`designated “Highly
`Confidential – Attorneys’
`Eyes Only” pursuant to the
`Stipulated Protective Order.
`
`This document was
`designated by SonicWall as
`“Highly Confidential –
`Attorneys’ Eyes Only”
`pursuant to the Stipulated
`Protective Order.
`
`This document was
`designated by SonicWall as
`“Highly Confidential –
`Attorneys’ Eyes Only”
`pursuant to the Stipulated
`Protective Order.
`
`Entirety
`
`Entirety
`
`Entirety
`
`Exh. A
`(ECF
`348-2)
`
`Exh. B
`(ECF
`348-3)
`
`Exh. C
`(ECF
`348-4)
`
`Exh. D
`
`Excerpts from the
`Expert Report of Dr.
`Avi Rubin Regarding
`Invalidity of U.S.
`Patent No. 8,225,408,
`U.S. Patent No.
`7,975,305, U.S. Patent
`No. 7,613,926 and U.S.
`Patent No. 6,965,968
`dated September 4,
`2020
`Excerpts from the
`Expert Report of Dr.
`Kevin Almeroth on
`Invalidity of U.S.
`Patent Nos. 6,154,844
`and 8,141,154 dated
`September 4, 2020
`Excerpts from the
`Expert Report of Dr.
`Patrick McDaniel
`Regarding the
`Invalidity of the ’494
`and ’780 Patents dated
`September 4, 2020
`Excerpt from the
`
`
`
`
`
`Entirety
`
`1
`
`This deposition transcript
`
`Case No. 5:17-cv-04467 BLF (VKD)
`FINJAN ADMINISTRATIVE
`MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL
`
`

`

`Case 5:17-cv-04467-BLF Document 351 Filed 01/21/21 Page 3 of 8
`
`
`
`
`
`(ECF
`348-5)
`
`Exh. F
`(ECF
`348-7)
`
`ECF 350
`
`Deposition Transcript
`of Avi Rubin, Ph.D.
`taken October 29, 2020
`
`Excerpt from the
`Deposition Transcript
`of Patrick McDaniel,
`Ph.D. taken October
`23, 2020
`
`Finjan LLC’s Motion
`to Preclude Trial
`Testimony from
`Stephen Becker, Ph.D.
`
`Entirety
`
`Highlighted portions
`at page 3, lines 21-24;
`page 4, lines 9-11
`
`Entirety
`
`Exh. A
`(ECF
`350-2)
`
`Excerpts from the
`Expert Report of
`Stephen L. Becker,
`Ph.D. on Behalf of
`Defendant dated
`October 9, 2020
`
`Entirety
`
`Exh. B
`(ECF
`350-3)
`
`Excerpts from the
`Errata to Expert Report
`of Stephen L. Becker,
`Ph.D. on Behalf of
`Defendant dated
`October 28, 2020
`
`Exh. C
`(ECF
`350-4)
`
`
`Excerpts from the
`Deposition Transcript
`of Stephen Becker,
`
`Entirety
`
`2
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`was designated by
`SonicWall as “Highly
`Confidential” pursuant to
`the Stipulated Protective
`Order.
`This deposition transcript
`was designated by
`SonicWall as “Highly
`Confidential – Attorneys’
`Eyes Only” pursuant to the
`Stipulated Protective Order.
`The highlighted portions of
`this document reflect
`information SonicWall has
`designated “Highly
`Confidential – Attorneys’
`Eyes Only” pursuant to the
`Stipulated Protective Order,
`and from which confidential
`information regarding
`SonicWall’s accused
`products could potentially
`be discerned.
`This document was
`designated by SonicWall as
`“Confidential – Outside
`Counsel Only” pursuant to
`the Stipulated Protective
`Order. Confidential
`information regarding
`SonicWall’s accused
`products could potentially
`be discerned from this
`document.
`This document was
`designated by SonicWall as
`“Confidential – Outside
`Counsel Only” pursuant to
`the Stipulated Protective
`Order. Confidential
`information regarding
`SonicWall’s accused
`products could potentially
`be discerned from this
`document.
`This deposition transcript
`was designated by
`SonicWall as “Confidential
`Case No. 5:17-cv-04467 BLF (VKD)
`FINJAN ADMINISTRATIVE
`MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL
`
`

`

`Case 5:17-cv-04467-BLF Document 351 Filed 01/21/21 Page 4 of 8
`
`
`
`
`
`Ph.D. taken October
`29, 2020
`
`Exh. D
`(ECF
`350-5)
`
`Excerpts from the
`Expert Report of
`DeForest McDuff,
`Ph.D. dated September
`4, 2020
`
`Entirety
`
`Entirety
`
`Exh. E
`(ECF
`350-6)
`
`Plaintiff Finjan, Inc.’s
`Third Supplemental
`Objections and
`Responses to
`Defendant SonicWall,
`Inc.’s First Set of
`Interrogatories (No. 6)
`dated July 31, 2020
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`– Outside Counsel Eyes
`Only” pursuant to the
`Stipulated Protective Order,
`and from which confidential
`information regarding
`SonicWall’s accused
`products could potentially
`be discerned.
`This document reflects
`information SonicWall has
`designated “Highly
`Confidential – Attorneys’
`Eyes Only” pursuant to the
`Stipulated Protective Order,
`and from which confidential
`information regarding
`SonicWall’s accused
`products could potentially
`be discerned.
`This document reflects
`information regarding
`Finjan’s internal business
`practices and licensing
`negotiations, which Finjan
`has designated “HIGHLY
`CONFIDENTIAL –
`ATTORNEYS’ EYES
`ONLY” under the Protective
`Order (ECF No. 68). Public
`disclosure of this
`information would cause
`harm to Finjan. See
`Declaration of K. Nicole
`Williams in Support of
`SonicWall’s Administrative
`Motion to File Under Seal
`(“Williams Decl.”) ¶ 7.
`This document also reflects
`information SonicWall has
`designated “Highly
`Confidential – Attorneys’
`Eyes Only” pursuant to the
`Stipulated Protective Order,
`and from which confidential
`information regarding
`SonicWall’s accused
`products could potentially
`be discerned.
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`Case No. 5:17-cv-04467 BLF (VKD)
`FINJAN ADMINISTRATIVE
`MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL
`
`

`

`Case 5:17-cv-04467-BLF Document 351 Filed 01/21/21 Page 5 of 8
`
`
`
`
`
`Exh. F
`(ECF
`350-7)
`
`
`
`Entirety
`
`Excerpts from the
`Supplement to Expert
`Report of Stephen L.
`Becker on Behalf of
`Defendant dated
`December 22, 2020
`
`This document was
`designated by SonicWall as
`“Confidential – Outside
`Counsel Only” pursuant to
`the Stipulated Protective
`Order. Confidential
`information regarding
`SonicWall’s accused
`products could potentially
`be discerned from this
`document.
`
`Per Civil Local Rule 79-5(d)(1)(A) and 79-5(e), the statements above are confirmed by the
`
`accompanying Declaration of K. Nicole Williams in Support of Finjan LLC’s Omnibus
`
`Administrative Motion to File Under Seal, filed contemporaneously herewith. Per Civil Local Rule
`
`79-5(d)(1)(B), a proposed order narrowly tailored to seal only the sealable material, and listing in
`
`table format each document or portion thereof that is sought to be sealed, is attached hereto. Per
`
`Civil Local Rule 79-5(d)(1)(C) and (D), redacted and unredacted versions of the documents sought
`
`to be sealed are attached hereto as exhibits to Ms. Williams’s Declaration.
`
`II.
`
`ARGUMENT
`
`A.
`
`Legal Standard
`
`Under Fed. Rule Civ. P. 26(c)(1)(G), the Court may, in its discretion and for good cause,
`
`issue an order “requiring that a trade secret or other confidential research, development, or
`
`commercial information not be revealed or be revealed only in a specified way.” Similarly, in this
`
`Circuit, the Court may seal documents and information in the case of a dispositive motion if there
`
`are “compelling reasons” to do so, and where “good cause” exists in the case of non-dispositive
`
`motions. Ctr. For Auto Safety v. Chrysler Grp., LLC, 809 F.3d 1092, 1095-1100 (9th Cir. 2016).
`
`A motion is considered “non-dispositive” when the motion is no more than “tangentially related” to
`
`the underlying cause of action. Id. at 1099. The “good cause” standard requires a “particularized
`
`showing” that “specific prejudice or harm will result” if the information is disclosed. Phillips ex
`
`rel. Estates of Byrd v. Gen Motors Corp.¸ 307 F.3d 1206, 1210-11 (9th Cir. 2002) (internal quotation
`
`marks omitted). “Broad allegations of harm, unsubstantiated by specific examples of articulated
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`Case No. 5:17-cv-04467 BLF (VKD)
`FINJAN ADMINISTRATIVE
`MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL
`
`

`

`Case 5:17-cv-04467-BLF Document 351 Filed 01/21/21 Page 6 of 8
`
`
`
`
`reasoning” will not suffice. Beckman Indus., Inc. v. Int’l Ins. Co., 966 F.2d 470, 476 (9th Cir. 1992).
`
`A request to seal material “must be narrowly tailored to seek sealing only of sealable material.”
`
`L.R. 79-5(b).
`
`B.
`
`Finjan’s Administrative Motion to Seal Is Supported by Compelling Reasons
`and Is Narrowly Tailored
`
`Good cause and compelling reasons exist to file the documents in question under seal, as
`
`described in the Declaration of K. Nicole Williams in Support of Finjan LLC’s Omnibus
`
`Administration Motion to File Under Seal its Motions to Preclude Trial Testimony Relating to
`
`Written Description (ECF No. 348) and Motion to Preclude Trial Testimony Relating to Written
`
`Description (ECF No. 350) (“Williams Decl.”) accompanying this motion to seal. For example,
`
`Exhibit E to Finjan’s Motion to Preclude Trial Testimony from Stephen Becker, Ph.D. (ECF 350-
`
`6) contains information regarding Finjan’s confidential business practices and licensing
`
`negotiations. Disclosure of such information may be used by Finjan’s competitors to gain an
`
`advantage in negotiations with Finjan and cause it harm in the marketplace.
`
`Finjan’s request is narrowly tailored to seal only information (1) that is confidential to
`
`Finjan and which could cause harm to Finjan’s business if disclosed, or (2) that has been
`
`designated as confidential by SonicWall pursuant to the Protective Order entered in this case. For
`
`the foregoing reasons, Finjan respectfully requests that the Court grant its request that the
`
`documents described above remain under seal.
`
`
`
`
`Dated: January 21, 2021
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ K. Nicole Williams
`Juanita R. Brooks (CA SBN 75934)
`brooks@fr.com
`Roger A. Denning (CA SBN 228998)
`denning@fr.com
`Jason W. Wolff (CA SBN 215819)
`wolff@fr.com
`John-Paul Fryckman (CA 317591)
`fryckman@fr.com
`K. Nicole Williams (CA291900)
`nwilliams@fr.com
`FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
`12860 El Camino Real, Ste. 400
`San Diego, CA 92130
`Phone: (858) 678-5070 / Fax: (858) 678-5099
`Case No. 5:17-cv-04467 BLF (VKD)
`5
`FINJAN ADMINISTRATIVE
`MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL
`
`

`

`Case 5:17-cv-04467-BLF Document 351 Filed 01/21/21 Page 7 of 8
`
`
`Proshanto Mukherji (Pro Hac Vice)
`mukherji@fr.com
`FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
`One Marina Park Drive
`Boston, MA 02210
`Phone: (617) 542-5070/ Fax: (617) 542-5906
`
`Robert Courtney (CA SNB 248392)
`courtney@fr.com
`FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
`3200 RBC Plaza
`60 South Sixth Street
`Minneapolis, MN 55402
`Phone: (612) 335-5070 / Fax: (612) 288-9696
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`FINJAN LLC
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`6
`
`Case No. 5:17-cv-04467 BLF (VKD)
`FINJAN ADMINISTRATIVE
`MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL
`
`

`

`Case 5:17-cv-04467-BLF Document 351 Filed 01/21/21 Page 8 of 8
`
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing
`
`document has been served on January 21, 2021 to all counsel of record who are deemed to have
`
`consented to electronic service via the Court’s CM/ECF system. Any other counsel of record will
`
`be served by electronic mail and regular mail.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ K. Nicole Williams
`K. Nicole Williams
`nwilliams@fr.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`7
`
`Case No. 5:17-cv-04467 BLF (VKD)
`FINJAN ADMINISTRATIVE
`MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL
`
`