throbber
Case 5:17-cv-04467-BLF Document 342 Filed 01/19/21 Page 1 of 4
`
`DUANE MORRIS LLP
`D. Stuart Bartow (CA SBN 233107)
`dsbartow@duanemorris.com
`Nicole E. Grigg (CA SBN 307733)
`negrigg@duanemorris.com
`2475 Hanover Street
`Palo Alto, CA 94304-1194
`Telephone: 650.847.4150
`Facsimile: 650.847.4151
`DUANE MORRIS LLP
`Joseph A. Powers (PA SBN 84590)
`Admitted Pro Hac Vice
`japowers@duanemorris.com
`Jarrad M. Gunther (PA SBN 207038)
`Admitted Pro Hac Vice
`jmgunther@duanemorris.com
`30 South 17th Street
`Philadelphia, PA 19103
`Telephone: 215.979.1000
`Facsimile: 215.979.1020
`Attorneys for Defendant
`SONICWALL INC.
`
`DUANE MORRIS LLP
`Matthew C. Gaudet (GA SBN 287789)
`Admitted Pro Hac Vice
`mcgaudet@duanemorris.com
`Robin L. McGrath (GA SBN 493115)
`Admitted Pro Hac Vice
`rlmcgrath@duanemorris.com
`David C. Dotson (GA SBN 138040)
`Admitted Pro Hac Vice
`dcdotson@duanemorris.com
`Jennifer H. Forte (GA SBN 940650)
`Admitted Pro Hac Vice
`jhforte@duanemorris.com
`1075 Peachtree NE, Suite 2000
`Atlanta, GA 30309
`Telephone: 404.253.6900
`Facsimile: 404.253.6901
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`SAN JOSE DIVISION
`
`FINJAN, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability
`Company,
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`SONICWALL INC., a Delaware Corporation,
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Case No.: 5:17-cv-04467-BLF-VKD
`
`SONICWALL’S SUBMISSION
`REGARDING THE ’926 PATENT’S
`“TRANSMITTER LIMITATION”
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`SONICWALL’S SUBMISSION REGARDING ’926 PATENT’S “TRANSMITTER LIMITATION”
`CASE NO. 5:17-CV-04467-BLF-VKD
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

`

`Case 5:17-cv-04467-BLF Document 342 Filed 01/19/21 Page 2 of 4
`
`During the January 14, 2021 hearing on SonicWall, Inc.’s Motion for Partial Summary
`Judgment, the Court permitted SonicWall to submit a chart identifying, for each of Finjan’s five
`theories regarding the ’926 Patent’s “Transmitter Limitation,”1 a single aspect of that Limitation for
`which Finjan has failed to come forward with any evidence. SonicWall thus submits the following
`chart:
`
`
`
`MISSING CLAIM ELEMENT
`
`“transmitting . . . a representation of the retrieved Downloadable
`security profile data”
`
`
`
`
`
`“transport protocol transmission”
`
`
`“transport protocol transmission”
`
`
`
`FINJAN’S THEORY 1
`GRID Server/Human
`Threat Research Team
`(TRT) as “Destination
`Computer” based on
`retrieval of the file
`
`[Mitzenmacher Rep., ¶
`282]
`FINJAN’S THEORY 2
`Sandbox Database as
`“destination computer”,
`based on “transmission
`by reference” via “a
`hash pointer”
`[Mitzenmacher Rep., ¶¶
`283-285]
`FINJAN’S THEORY 3
`Known File Database as
`“destination computer”
`based on “transmission
`by reference” via “a
`hash pointer”
`[Mitzenmacher Rep., ¶
`286]
`
`
`1 The Transmitter Limitation of the asserted claims of the ’926 Patent recites “a transmitter coupled
`
`with said receiver, for transmitting the incoming Downloadable and a representation of the retrieved
`
`Downloadable security profile data to a destination computer, via a transport protocol transmission.”
`
`
`
`1
`SONICWALL’S SUBMISSION REGARDING ’926 PATENT’S “TRANSMITTER LIMITATION”
`CASE NO. 5:17-CV-04467-BLF-VKD
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

`

`Case 5:17-cv-04467-BLF Document 342 Filed 01/19/21 Page 3 of 4
`
`“transport protocol transmission”
`
`“transport protocol transmission”
`
`FINJAN’S THEORY 4
`Cloud Database as
`“destination computer”
`based on data uploaded
`to the cloud database
`[Mitzenmacher Rep., ¶
`287]
`FINJAN’S THEORY 5
`Capture Database as
`“destination computer”
`based on data stored in
`Capture Database
`[Mitzenmacher Rep., ¶
`285]
`
`Dated: January 19, 2021
`
`DUANE MORRIS LLP
`
`/s/ Nicole E. Grigg
`Nicole E. Grigg
`D. Stuart Bartow
`Matthew C. Gaudet (admitted pro hac vice)
`Robin McGrath (admitted pro hac vice)
`David C. Dotson (admitted pro hac vice)
`Jennifer H. Forte (admitted pro hac vice)
`Joseph A. Powers (admitted pro hac vice)
`Jarrad M. Gunther (admitted pro hac vice)
`
`Attorneys for Defendant
`SONICWALL INC.
`
`2
`SONICWALL’S SUBMISSION REGARDING ’926 PATENT’S “TRANSMITTER LIMITATION”
`CASE NO. 5:17-CV-04467-BLF-VKD
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

`

`Case 5:17-cv-04467-BLF Document 342 Filed 01/19/21 Page 4 of 4
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`The undersigned hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing
`document has been served on January 19, 2021, to all counsel of record who are deemed to have
`consented to electronic service via the Court’s CM/ECF system.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Nicole E. Grigg
` Nicole E. Grigg
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`SONICWALL’S SUBMISSION REGARDING ’926 PATENT’S “TRANSMITTER LIMITATION”
`CASE NO. 5:17-CV-04467-BLF-VKD
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket