Case 5:17-cv-04467-BLF Document 335-2 Filed 12/31/20 Page 1 of 5
`
`DUANE MORRIS LLP
`D. Stuart Bartow (CA SBN 233107)
`dsbartow@duanemorris.com
`Nicole E. Grigg (CA SBN 307733)
`negrigg@duanemorris.com
`2475 Hanover Street
`Palo Alto, CA 94304-1194
`Telephone: 650.847.4150
`Facsimile: 650.847.4151
`DUANE MORRIS LLP
`Joseph A. Powers (PA SBN 84590)
`Admitted Pro Hac Vice
`japowers@duanemorris.com
`Jarrad M. Gunther (PA SBN 207038)
`Admitted Pro Hac Vice
`jmgunther@duanemorris.com
`30 South 17th Street
`Philadelphia, PA 19103
`Telephone: 215.979.1000
`Facsimile: 215.979.1020
`Attorneys for Defendant
`SONICWALL INC.
`
`DUANE MORRIS LLP
`Matthew C. Gaudet (GA SBN 287789)
`Admitted Pro Hac Vice
`mcgaudet@duanemorris.com
`Robin L. McGrath (GA SBN 493115)
`Admitted Pro Hac Vice
`rlmcgrath@duanemorris.com
`David C. Dotson (GA SBN 138040)
`Admitted Pro Hac Vice
`dcdotson@duanemorris.com
`Jennifer H. Forte (GA SBN 940650)
`Admitted Pro Hac Vice
`jhforte@duanemorris.com
`1075 Peachtree NE, Suite 2000
`Atlanta, GA 30309
`Telephone: 404.253.6900
`Facsimile: 404.253.6901
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`SAN JOSE DIVISION
`
`FINJAN, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability
`Company,
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`SONICWALL INC., a Delaware Corporation,
`
`
`v.
`
`Defendant.
`
` Case No.: 5:17-cv-04467-BLF-VKD
`
`[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
`SONICWALL INC.’S ADMINISTRATIVE
`MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER
`SEAL
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING SONICWALL’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL
`CASE NO. 5:17-CV-04467-BLF-VKD
`
`

`

`Case 5:17-cv-04467-BLF Document 335-2 Filed 12/31/20 Page 2 of 5
`
`Having considered SonicWall Inc.’s (“SonicWall”) Administrative Motion to File
`Documents Under Seal and the declaration of Nicole Grigg in Support thereof, the Court hereby
`finds there to be good cause for granting the request to file certain documents and information under
`seal.
`
`Good cause having been shown, the Court finds that:
`1.
`There exist overriding confidentiality interests that overcome the right of public
`access to the following documents:
`
`Exh. No.
`
`Document
`
`
`
`Defendant SonicWall,
`Inc’s Reply in Support
`of its Motion for Partial
`Summary Judgment
`
`Portion(s) to
`Seal
`Highlighted
`portions at:
`Page 2: lines 3-
`4;
`Page 3: lines 3-
`4;
`Page 9: lines 15-
`21, 24-26;
`Page 10: lines
`21, 23, 25-28;
`Page 11: lines 1-
`3, 5-17;
`Page 12: lines 1-
`3
`
`
`41 to
`Gunther
`Declaration
`
`Excerpts from the July
`14, 2020 John
`Gordineer Deposition
`Transcript
`
`Entirety
`
`Reason(s) for Sealing
`The highlighted portions of this
`document reflect information that
`SonicWall has designated as
`“Highly Confidential – Attorneys’
`Eyes Only” or “Highly
`Confidential – Attorney’s Eyes
`Only – Source Code” pursuant to
`the Stipulated Protective Order. If
`filed publicly, this confidential
`information could be used to
`SonicWall’s disadvantage by
`competitors as it concerns the
`identification, organization, and or
`operation of SonicWall’s
`proprietary products. See
`Declaration of Nicole E. Grigg in
`Support of Administrative Motion
`to File Documents Under Seal
`(“Grigg Declaration”), ¶¶ 2-5.
`This document contains testimony
`that SonicWall has designated as
`“Highly Confidential – Attorneys’
`Eyes Only” or “Highly
`Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes
`Only - Source Code” pursuant to
`the Stipulated Protective Order. If
`filed publicly, this confidential
`information could be used to
`SonicWall’s disadvantage by
`competitors as it concerns the
`identification, organization, and or
`operation of SonicWall’s
`proprietary products, including its
`
`
`
`1
`[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING SONICWALL’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL
`CASE NO. 5:17-CV-04467-BLF-VKD
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

`

`Case 5:17-cv-04467-BLF Document 335-2 Filed 12/31/20 Page 3 of 5
`
`Exh. No.
`
`Document
`
`Portion(s) to
`Seal
`
`42 to
`Gunther
`Declaration
`
`Excerpts from the July
`21, 2020 Eric Hawkes
`Deposition Transcript
`
`Entirety
`
`43 to
`Gunther
`Declaration
`
`Excerpts from the July
`24, 2020 Michael King
`Deposition Transcript
`
`Entirety
`
`44 to
`Gunther
`Declaration
`
`Excerpts from the
`October 22, 2020 Dr.
`Eric Cole Deposition
`Transcript
`
`Entirety
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`Reason(s) for Sealing
`source code. See Grigg
`Declaration, ¶¶ 2-5.
`This document contains testimony
`that SonicWall has designated as
`“Highly Confidential – Attorneys’
`Eyes Only” or “Highly
`Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes
`Only - Source Code” pursuant to
`the Stipulated Protective Order. If
`filed publicly, this confidential
`information could be used to
`SonicWall’s disadvantage by
`competitors as it concerns the
`identification, organization, and or
`operation of SonicWall’s
`proprietary products, including its
`source code. See Grigg
`Declaration, ¶¶ 2-5.
`This document contains testimony
`that SonicWall has designated as
`“Highly Confidential – Attorneys’
`Eyes Only” or “Highly
`Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes
`Only - Source Code” pursuant to
`the Stipulated Protective Order. If
`filed publicly, this confidential
`information could be used to
`SonicWall’s disadvantage by
`competitors as it concerns the
`identification, organization, and or
`operation of SonicWall’s
`proprietary products, including its
`source code. See Grigg
`Declaration, ¶¶ 2-5.
`This document contains testimony
`that SonicWall has designated as
`“Highly Confidential – Attorneys’
`Eyes Only” or “Highly
`Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes
`Only - Source Code” pursuant to
`the Stipulated Protective Order. If
`filed publicly, this confidential
`information could be used to
`SonicWall’s disadvantage by
`
`2
`[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING SONICWALL’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL
`CASE NO. 5:17-CV-04467-BLF-VKD
`
`

`

`Case 5:17-cv-04467-BLF Document 335-2 Filed 12/31/20 Page 4 of 5
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`Exh. No.
`
`Document
`
`Portion(s) to
`Seal
`
`45 to
`Gunther
`Declaration
`
`46 to
`Gunther
`Declaration
`
`Entirety
`
`Entirety
`
`Finjan’s notice of
`inadvertently produced
`documents bearing
`Bates numbers Finjan-
`SW 047873-76 and
`privilege log dated July
`24, 2018
`SonicWall’s
`Comprehensive
`Gateway Security Suite
`datasheet bearing Bates
`Nos. SonicWall-Finjan
`00454707-709
`
`47 to
`Gunther
`Declaration
`
`Entirety
`
`SonicWall’s WAN
`Acceleration Appliance
`(WXA) Series
`datasheet bearing Bates
`Nos. SonicWall-Finjan
`00017623-627
`
`Reason(s) for Sealing
`competitors as it concerns the
`identification, organization, and or
`operation of SonicWall’s
`proprietary products, including its
`source code. See Grigg
`Declaration, ¶¶ 2-5.
`This document contains
`information that Finjan has
`designated as “Highly Confidential
`– Attorneys’ Eyes Only” pursuant
`to the Stipulated Protective Order.
`See Grigg Declaration, ¶¶ 2-5.
`
`SonicWall has designated this
`internal datasheet “Highly
`Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes
`Only” pursuant to the Stipulated
`Protective Order. If filed publicly,
`this confidential information could
`be used to SonicWall’s
`disadvantage by competitors as it
`concerns the identification,
`organization, and or operation of
`SonicWall’s proprietary products.
`See Grigg Declaration, ¶¶ 2-5.
`SonicWall has designated this
`internal datasheet “Highly
`Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes
`Only” pursuant to the Stipulated
`Protective Order. If filed publicly,
`this confidential information could
`be used to SonicWall’s
`disadvantage by competitors as it
`concerns the identification,
`organization, and or operation of
`SonicWall’s proprietary products.
`See Grigg Declaration, ¶¶ 2-5.
`
`
`
`A substantial probability exists that the overriding confidentiality interests will be
`2.
`prejudiced if the record is not sealed;
`
`
`
`3
`[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING SONICWALL’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL
`CASE NO. 5:17-CV-04467-BLF-VKD
`
`

`

`Case 5:17-cv-04467-BLF Document 335-2 Filed 12/31/20 Page 5 of 5
`
`3.
`
`4.
`
`The proposed sealing is narrowly tailored; and
`
`No less restrictive means exist to achieve these overriding interests.
`
`IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that SonicWall’s Administrative Motion to File
`Documents Under Seal is GRANTED with respect to the documents set forth above.
`
`IT IS SO ORDERED.
`
`Dated:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Judge Beth Labson Freeman
`United States District Court Judge
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING SONICWALL’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL
`CASE NO. 5:17-CV-04467-BLF-VKD
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`