`
`Case 5:17-cv-04467-BLF Document 317 Filed 12/01/20 Page 1 of 4Case 5:17-cv-04467-BLF Document 318 Filed 12/02/20 Page 1 of 4
`
`Juanita R. Brooks (CA SBN 75934)
`brooks@fr.com
`Roger A. Denning (CA SBN 228998)
`denning@fr.com
`Jason W. Wolff (CA SBN 215819)
`wolff@fr.com
`John-Paul Fryckman (CA 317591)
`fryckman@fr.com
`K. Nicole Williams (CA291900)
`nwilliams@fr.com
`FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
`12860 El Camino Real, Ste. 400
`San Diego, CA 92130
`Tel.: (858) 678-5070
`Fax: (858) 678-5099
`
`Additional counsel listed on
`signature page
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`FINJAN LLC
`
`
`D. Stuart Bartow (SBN 233107)
`Email: DSBartow@duanemorris.com
`Nicole E. Grigg (SBN 307733)
`Email: NEGrigg@duanemorris.com
`DUANE MORRIS LLP
`2475 Hanover Street
`Palo Alto, CA 94304-1194
`Tel.: 650.847.4150
`Fax: 650.847.4151
`
`Additional counsel listed on
`signature page
`
`Attorneys for Defendant
`SONICWALL, INC.
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`SAN JOSE DIVISION
`
`
`Case No. 5:17-cv-04467-BLF-HRL
`
`
`JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING
`35 U.S.C. § 287; [PROPOSED] ORDER
`
`Judge: Hon. Beth Labson Freeman
`
`FINJAN LLC, a Delaware Corporation,
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`vs.
`
`SONICWALL, INC., a Delaware Corporation,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`Plaintiff Finjan LLC (“Finjan”) and Defendant SonicWall Inc. (“SonicWall”), hereby stipulate
`
`as follows: For purposes of this litigation only, the parties stipulate that Finjan will not rely on patent
`
`marking pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 287 to prove notice and, therefore, the starting date for any damages
`
`owed by SonicWall to Finjan begins with actual notice of infringement by Finjan pursuant to 35 U.S.C.
`
`§ 287.
`
`
`
`IT IS SO STIPULATED.
`
`
`
`
`STIPULATION REGARDING 35 U.S.C. § 287; [PROPOSED] ORDER
`CASE NO. 5:17-CV-04467-BLF-HRL
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 5:17-cv-04467-BLF Document 317 Filed 12/01/20 Page 2 of 4Case 5:17-cv-04467-BLF Document 318 Filed 12/02/20 Page 2 of 4
`
`
`
`Dated: December 1, 2020.
`
` Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`By: /s/ Robert Courtney
`Juanita R. Brooks (CA SBN 75934)
`brooks@fr.com
`Roger A. Denning (CA SBN 228998)
`denning@fr.com
`Jason W. Wolff (CA SBN 215819)
`wolff@fr.com
`John-Paul Fryckman (CA 317591)
`fryckman@fr.com
`K. Nicole Williams (CA291900)
`nwilliams@fr.com
`FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
`12860 El Camino Real, Ste. 400
`San Diego, CA 92130
`Tel.: (858) 678-5070
`Fax: (858) 678-5099
`
`Proshanto Mukherji (Pro Hac Vice)
`mukherji@fr.com
`FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
`One Marina Park Drive
`Boston, MA 02210
`Telephone: (617) 542-5070
`
`Robert Courtney (CA SNB 248392)
`courtney@fr.com
`FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
`3200 RBC Plaza
`60 South Sixth Street
`Minneapolis, MN 55402
`Telephone: (612) 335-5070
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`FINJAN, INC.
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`
`
`By: /s/ Jennifer H. Forte
`Matthew C. Gaudet (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
`mcgaudet@duanemorris.com
`David C. Dotson (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
`dcdotson@duanemorris.com
`Robin McGrath
`rlmcgrath@duanemorris.com
`Jennifer H. Forte (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
`jhforte@duanemorris.com
`Alice E. Snedeker
`aesnedeker@duanemorris.com
`DUANE MORRIS LLP
`1075 Peachtree NE, Suite 2000
`Atlanta, GA 30309-3929
`Telephone: 404.253.6900
`
`D. Stuart Bartow (SBN 233107)
`Email: DSBartow@duanemorris.com
`Nicole E. Grigg (SBN 307733)
`Email: NEGrigg@duanemorris.com
`DUANE MORRIS LLP
`2475 Hanover Street
`Palo Alto, CA 94304-1194
`Tel.: 650.847.4150
`Fax: 650.847.4151
`
`Joseph A. Powers (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
`Email: japowers@duanemorris.com
`Jarrad M. Gunther (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
`Email: jmgunther@duanemorris.com
`DUANE MORRIS LLP
`30 South 17th Street
`Philadelphia, PA 19103
`Telephone: 215.979.1000
`
`Counsel for Defendant
`SONICWALL, INC.
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`STIPULATION REGARDING 35 U.S.C. § 287; [PROPOSED] ORDER
`CASE NO. 5:17-CV-04467-BLF-HRL
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 5:17-cv-04467-BLF Document 317 Filed 12/01/20 Page 3 of 4Case 5:17-cv-04467-BLF Document 318 Filed 12/02/20 Page 3 of 4
`
`PROPOSED] ORDER
`The Court, having read and considered the parties’ Stipulation, and finding good cause in
`support thereof, hereby orders that Finjan shall not rely on patent marking pursuant to 35 U.S.C.
`§ 287 to prove notice and, therefore, the starting date for any damages owed by SonicWall to Finjan
`begins with actual notice of infringement by Finjan pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 287.
`IT IS SO ORDERED.
`
`December 2, 2020
`Dated: ______________
`
`Judge Beth Labson Freeman
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
`
`3
`STIPULATION REGARDING 35 U.S.C. § 287; [PROPOSED] ORDER
`CASE NO. 5:17-CV-04467-BLF-HRL
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 5:17-cv-04467-BLF Document 317 Filed 12/01/20 Page 4 of 4Case 5:17-cv-04467-BLF Document 318 Filed 12/02/20 Page 4 of 4
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`By: /s/ Jennifer H. Forte
`Jennifer H. Forte
`
`
`
`
`
`ATTESTATION
`I, Jennifer H. Forte, am the ECF user whose identification and password are being used to
`file this JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING 35 U.S.C. § 287; [PROPOSED] ORDER. I
`hereby attest that I received authorization to insert the signatures indicated by a conformed signature
`(/s/) within this e-filed document.
`
`Dated: December 1, 2020
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`STIPULATION REGARDING 35 U.S.C. § 287; [PROPOSED] ORDER
`CASE NO. 5:17-CV-04467-BLF-HRL
`
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
