Case 5:17-cv-04467-BLF Document 314 Filed 11/24/20 Page 1 of 8
`
`Juanita R. Brooks (CA SBN 75934) brooks@fr.com
`Roger A. Denning (CA SBN 228998) denning@fr.com
`Jason W. Wolff (CA SBN 215819) wolff@fr.com
`John-Paul Fryckman (CA SBN 317591) fryckman@fr.com
`K. Nicole Williams (CA291900) nwilliams@fr.com
`FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
`12860 El Camino Real, Suite 400
`San Diego, CA 92130
`Telephone: (858) 678-5070 / Fax: (858) 678-5099
`
`Proshanto Mukherji (Pro Hac Vice) mukherji@fr.com
`FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
`One Marina Park Drive
`Boston, MA 02210
`Phone: (617) 542-5070/ Fax: (617) 542-5906
`
`Robert Courtney (CA SNB 248392) courtney@fr.com
`FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
`3200 RBC Plaza
`60 South Sixth Street
`Minneapolis, MN 55402
`Phone: (612) 335-5070 / Fax: (612) 288-9696
`
`Additional counsel listed on signature page
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`FINJAN LLC
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`(SAN JOSE DIVISION)
`
`FINJAN LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability
`Company,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`SONICWALL INC., a Delaware Corporation,
`
`Defendant.
`
`Case No. 5:17-cv-04467-BLF (VKD)
`
`FINJAN LLC’S ADMINISTRATIVE
`MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`Case No. 5:17-cv-04467 BLF (VKD)
`FINJAN ADMINISTRATIVE
`MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL
`
`

`

`Case 5:17-cv-04467-BLF Document 314 Filed 11/24/20 Page 2 of 8
`
`
`
`
`I.
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`Plaintiff Finjan LLC (“Finjan”), having reviewed and complied with Civil Local Rule 79-
`
`5, hereby moves the Court for permission to file under seal the following documents:
`
`Document
`
`Portion(s) to Seal
`
`Reason(s) for Sealing
`
`Highlighted portions
`at:
`page 2, lines 12, 20-
`25;
`page 3, lines 1-7, 11-
`13;
`page 4, lines 14-21,
`23-26;
`page 5, lines 6-12, 14;
`page 6, lines 3-10;
`page 7, lines 1-2, 5,
`16-17;
`page 8, lines 6-7, 13-
`17, 21-22;
`page 9, lines 8, 10-18,
`20-21, 26-27;
`page 10, lines 1-3, 7-
`8, 17-20
`Entirety
`
`Entirety
`
`The highlighted portions of
`this document reflect
`information that SonicWall
`has designated as “Highly
`Confidential –Attorneys’
`Eyes Only” or “Highly
`Confidential – Attorneys’
`Eyes Only – Source Code”
`pursuant to the Stipulated
`Protective Order, and from
`which confidential
`information regarding
`SonicWall’s accused
`products could be
`potentially discerned.
`
`This document reflects
`information SonicWall has
`designated “Highly
`Confidential – Attorneys’
`Eyes Only” and “Highly
`Confidential – Attorneys’
`Eyes Only – Source Code”
`pursuant to the Stipulated
`Protective Order, and from
`which confidential
`information regarding
`SonicWall’s accused
`products could be
`potentially discerned.
`
`This document reflects
`information SonicWall has
`designated “Highly
`Confidential – Attorneys’
`Eyes Only” and “Highly
`Confidential – Attorneys’
`
`
`
`ECF or
`Exh. No.
`D313
`
`Finjan’s Opposition to
`SonicWall’s Motion to
`Strike Finjan’s Expert
`Reports
`
`Exh. B
`
`Exh. C
`
`Excerpts from
`Appendix G-2 to
`Finjan’s Third
`Supplemental
`Disclosure of Asserted
`Claims and
`Infringement
`Contentions and
`Document Production
`Pursuant to Patent L.R.
`3-1 and 3-2, dated
`December 11, 2019
`(“Third Supplemental
`Infringement
`Contentions”)
`Excerpts from the
`Expert Report of Dr.
`Nenad Medvidovic
`Regarding
`Infringement by
`SonicWall Inc. of
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`Case No. 5:17-cv-04467 BLF (VKD)
`FINJAN ADMINISTRATIVE
`MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL
`
`

`

`Case 5:17-cv-04467-BLF Document 314 Filed 11/24/20 Page 3 of 8
`
`
`
`
`
`Exh. D
`
`Patent Nos. 8,225,408;
`7,975,305; and
`8,141,154, dated
`September 3, 2020
`
`Entirety
`
`Excerpts from
`Appendix G-4 to
`Finjan’s Third
`Supplemental
`Disclosure
`Infringement
`Contentions, dated
`December 11, 2019
`
`Entirety
`
`Exh. E
`
`Excerpts from
`Appendix G-3 to
`Finjan’s Third
`Supplemental
`Disclosure
`Infringement
`Contentions, dated
`December 11, 2019
`
`Exh. F
`
`Entirety
`
`Excerpts from
`Appendix G-2 to
`Finjan’s First
`Supplemental
`Disclosure of Asserted
`Claims and
`Infringement
`Contentions and
`Document Production
`Pursuant to Patent L.R.
`3-1 and 3-2, dated
`November 9, 2018
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`Eyes Only – Source Code”
`pursuant to the Stipulated
`Protective Order, and from
`which confidential
`information regarding
`SonicWall’s accused
`products could be
`potentially discerned.
`This document reflects
`information SonicWall has
`designated “Highly
`Confidential – Attorneys’
`Eyes Only” and “Highly
`Confidential – Attorneys’
`Eyes Only – Source Code”
`pursuant to the Stipulated
`Protective Order, and from
`which confidential
`information regarding
`SonicWall’s accused
`products could be
`potentially discerned.
`This document reflects
`information SonicWall has
`designated “Highly
`Confidential – Attorneys’
`Eyes Only” and “Highly
`Confidential – Attorneys’
`Eyes Only – Source Code”
`pursuant to the Stipulated
`Protective Order, and from
`which confidential
`information regarding
`SonicWall’s accused
`products could be
`potentially discerned.
`This document reflects
`information SonicWall has
`designated “Highly
`Confidential – Attorneys’
`Eyes Only” pursuant to the
`Stipulated Protective Order,
`and from which confidential
`information regarding
`SonicWall’s accused
`products could be
`potentially discerned.
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`Case No. 5:17-cv-04467 BLF (VKD)
`FINJAN ADMINISTRATIVE
`MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL
`
`

`

`Case 5:17-cv-04467-BLF Document 314 Filed 11/24/20 Page 4 of 8
`
`
`
`
`
`Exh. G
`
`Exh. I
`
`Exh. J
`
`Exh. K
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`(“First Supplemental
`Infringement
`Contentions”)
`Excerpts from
`Appendix E-2 to
`Finjan’s Third
`Supplemental
`Disclosure
`Infringement
`Contentions, dated
`December 11, 2019
`
`Excerpts from
`Appendix D-2 to
`Finjan’s First
`Supplemental
`Infringement
`Contentions, dated
`November 9, 2018
`
`Excerpts from
`Appendix D-3 to
`Finjan’s Second
`Supplemental
`Disclosure of Asserted
`Claims and
`Infringement
`Contentions and
`Document Production
`Pursuant to Patent L.R.
`3-1 and 3-2, dated May
`31, 2019 (“Second
`Supplemental
`Infringement
`Contentions”)
`Excerpts from
`Appendix D-3 to
`Finjan’s Third
`Supplemental
`Disclosure
`
`Entirety
`
`Entirety
`
`Entirety
`
`Entirety
`
`This document reflects
`information SonicWall has
`designated “Highly
`Confidential – Attorneys’
`Eyes Only” and “Highly
`Confidential – Attorneys’
`Eyes Only – Source Code”
`pursuant to the Stipulated
`Protective Order, and from
`which confidential
`information regarding
`SonicWall’s accused
`products could be
`potentially discerned.
`This document reflects
`information SonicWall has
`designated “Highly
`Confidential – Attorneys’
`Eyes Only” pursuant to the
`Stipulated Protective Order,
`and from which confidential
`information regarding
`SonicWall’s accused
`products could be
`potentially discerned.
`This document reflects
`information SonicWall has
`designated “Highly
`Confidential – Attorneys’
`Eyes Only” and “Highly
`Confidential – Attorneys’
`Eyes Only – Source Code”
`pursuant to the Stipulated
`Protective Order, and from
`which confidential
`information regarding
`SonicWall’s accused
`products could be
`potentially discerned.
`
`This document reflects
`information SonicWall has
`designated “Highly
`Confidential – Attorneys’
`Eyes Only” and “Highly
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`Case No. 5:17-cv-04467 BLF (VKD)
`FINJAN ADMINISTRATIVE
`MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL
`
`

`

`Case 5:17-cv-04467-BLF Document 314 Filed 11/24/20 Page 5 of 8
`
`
`
`
`
`Exh. L
`
`Infringement
`Contentions, dated
`December 11, 2019
`
`Entirety
`
`Excerpts from the
`Expert Report of Dr.
`Michael Mitzenmacher
`Regarding
`Infringement by
`SonicWall Inc. of
`Patent Nos. 6,804,780;
`6,965,968; and
`7,613,926, dated
`September 3, 2020
`
`Entirety
`
`Exh. M
`
`Excerpts from
`Appendix H-1 to
`Finjan’s Third
`Supplemental
`Disclosure
`Infringement
`Contentions, dated
`December 11, 2019
`
`Entirety
`
`Exh. N
`
`Excerpts from
`Appendix H-5 to
`Finjan’s Third
`Supplemental
`Disclosure
`Infringement
`Contentions, dated
`December 11, 2019
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`Confidential – Attorneys’
`Eyes Only – Source Code”
`pursuant to the Stipulated
`Protective Order, and from
`which confidential
`information regarding
`SonicWall’s accused
`products could be
`potentially discerned.
`This document reflects
`information SonicWall has
`designated “Highly
`Confidential – Attorneys’
`Eyes Only” and “Highly
`Confidential – Attorneys’
`Eyes Only – Source Code”
`pursuant to the Stipulated
`Protective Order, and from
`which confidential
`information regarding
`SonicWall’s accused
`products could be
`potentially discerned.
`This document reflects
`information SonicWall has
`designated “Highly
`Confidential – Attorneys’
`Eyes Only” and “Highly
`Confidential – Attorneys’
`Eyes Only – Source Code”
`pursuant to the Stipulated
`Protective Order, and from
`which confidential
`information regarding
`SonicWall’s accused
`products could be
`potentially discerned.
`This document reflects
`information SonicWall has
`designated “Highly
`Confidential – Attorneys’
`Eyes Only” and “Highly
`Confidential – Attorneys’
`Eyes Only – Source Code”
`pursuant to the Stipulated
`Protective Order, and from
`which confidential
`information regarding
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`Case No. 5:17-cv-04467 BLF (VKD)
`FINJAN ADMINISTRATIVE
`MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL
`
`

`

`Case 5:17-cv-04467-BLF Document 314 Filed 11/24/20 Page 6 of 8
`
`
`
`
`
`Exh. O
`
`Ex. P
`
`
`
`Entirety
`
`Excerpts from the
`Expert Report of Dr.
`Deforest McDuff
`Regarding Damages
`dated September 3,
`2020
`
`Entirety
`
`Excerpts from a
`document entitled,
`“SonicWall Threat
`Research Telemetry
`Database” produced
`beginning at
`SonicWall-
`Finjan_00519307
`
`SonicWall’s accused
`products could be
`potentially discerned.
`This document reflects
`information SonicWall has
`designated “Highly
`Confidential – Attorneys’
`Eyes Only” pursuant to the
`Stipulated Protective Order,
`and from which confidential
`information regarding
`SonicWall’s accused
`products could be
`potentially discerned.
`This document reflects
`information SonicWall has
`designated “Highly
`Confidential – Attorneys’
`Eyes Only” pursuant to the
`Stipulated Protective Order,
`and from which confidential
`information regarding
`SonicWall’s accused
`products could be
`potentially discerned.
`
`Per Civil Local Rule 79-5(d)(A) and 79-5(e), the statements above are confirmed by the
`
`accompanying Declaration of K. Nicole Williams in Support of Finjan’s Administrative Motion to
`
`File Under Seal, filed contemporaneously herewith. Per Civil Local Rule 79-5(d)(B), a proposed
`
`order narrowly tailored to seal only the sealable material, and listing in table format each document
`
`or portion thereof that is sought to be sealed, is attached hereto. Per Civil Local Rule 79-5(d)(C)
`
`and (D), redacted and unredacted versions of the documents sought to be sealed are attached hereto
`
`as exhibits to Ms. Williams’s Declaration.
`
`II.
`
`ARGUMENT
`
`A.
`
`Legal Standard
`
`Under Fed. Rule Civ. P. 26(c)(1)(G), the Court may, in its discretion and for good cause,
`
`issue an order “requiring that a trade secret or other confidential research, development, or
`
`commercial information not be revealed or be revealed only in a specified way.” Similarly, in this
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`5
`
`Case No. 5:17-cv-04467 BLF (VKD)
`FINJAN ADMINISTRATIVE
`MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL
`
`

`

`Case 5:17-cv-04467-BLF Document 314 Filed 11/24/20 Page 7 of 8
`
`
`
`
`Circuit, the Court may seal documents and information in the case of a dispositive motion if there
`
`are “compelling reasons” to do so, and where “good cause” exists in the case of non-dispositive
`
`motions. Ctr. For Auto Safety v. Chrysler Grp., LLC, 809 F.3d 1092, 1095-1100 (9th Cir. 2016).
`
`A motion is considered “non-dispositive” when the motion is no more than “tangentially related” to
`
`the underlying cause of action. Id. at 1099. The “good cause” standard requires a “particularized
`
`showing” that “specific prejudice or harm will result” if the information is disclosed. Phillips ex
`
`rel. Estates of Byrd v. Gen Motors Corp.¸ 307 F.3d 1206, 1210-11 (9th Cir. 2002) (internal quotation
`
`marks omitted). “Broad allegations of harm, unsubstantiated by specific examples of articulated
`
`reasoning” will not suffice. Beckman Indus., Inc. v. Int’l Ins. Co., 966 F.2d 476 (9th Cir. 1992). A
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`request to seal material “must be narrowly tailored to seek sealing only of sealable material.” L.R.
`
`11
`
`79-5(b).
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`B.
`
`Finjan’s Administrative Motion to Seal Is Supported by Good Cause and is
`Narrowly Tailored
`
`Good cause exists to file the documents in question under seal, as described in the
`
`Declaration of K. Nicole Williams in Support of Finjan Inc.’s Motion to File under Seal its
`
`Opposition to SonicWall’s Motion to Strike Finjan’s Expert Reports (“Williams Decl.”)
`
`accompanying this motion to seal.
`
`Finjan’s request is narrowly tailored to seal only information that has been designated as
`
`confidential by SonicWall pursuant to the Protective Order entered in this case. For the foregoing
`
`reasons, Finjan respectfully requests that the Court grant its request that the documents described
`
`above remain under seal.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`6
`
`Case No. 5:17-cv-04467 BLF (VKD)
`FINJAN ADMINISTRATIVE
`MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL
`
`

`

`Case 5:17-cv-04467-BLF Document 314 Filed 11/24/20 Page 8 of 8
`
`
`
`
`Dated: November 24, 2020
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ K. Nicole Williams
`Juanita R. Brooks (CA SBN 75934)
`brooks@fr.com
`Roger A. Denning (CA SBN 228998)
`denning@fr.com
`Jason W. Wolff (CA SBN 215819)
`wolff@fr.com
`John-Paul Fryckman (CA 317591)
`fryckman@fr.com
`K. Nicole Williams (CA291900)
`nwilliams@fr.com
`FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
`12860 El Camino Real, Ste. 400
`San Diego, CA 92130
`Phone: (858) 678-5070 / Fax: (858) 678-5099
`
`Proshanto Mukherji (Pro Hac Vice)
`mukherji@fr.com
`FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
`One Marina Park Drive
`Boston, MA 02210
`Phone: (617) 542-5070/ Fax: (617) 542-5906
`
`Robert Courtney (CA SNB 248392)
`courtney@fr.com
`FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
`3200 RBC Plaza
`60 South Sixth Street
`Minneapolis, MN 55402
`Phone: (612) 335-5070 / Fax: (612) 288-9696
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`FINJAN LLC
`
`
`
`7
`
`Case No. 5:17-cv-04467 BLF (VKD)
`FINJAN ADMINISTRATIVE
`MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL
`
`