Case 5:17-cv-04467-BLF Document 299 Filed 10/14/20 Page 1 of 16
`
`DUANE MORRIS LLP
`D. Stuart Bartow (SBN 233107)
`Email: DSBartow@duanemorris.com
`2475 Hanover Street
`Palo Alto, CA 94304-1194
`Telephone: 650.847.4150
`Facsimile: 650.847.4151
`
`DUANE MORRIS LLP
`Joseph A. Powers (PA SBN 84590)
`Admitted Pro Hac Vice
`japowers@duanemorris.com
`Jarrad M. Gunther (PA SBN 207038)
`Admitted Pro Hac Vice
`jmgunther@duanemorris.com
`30 South 17th Street
`Philadelphia, PA 19103
`Telephone: 215.979.1000
`Facsimile: 215.979.1020
`
`Attorneys for Defendant
`SONICWALL INC.
`
`DUANE MORRIS LLP
`Matthew C. Gaudet (GA SBN 287759)
`Admitted Pro Hac Vice
`mcgaudet@duanemorris.com
`Robin L. McGrath (GA SBN 493115)
`Admitted Pro Hac Vice
`rlmcgrath@duanemorris.com
`David C. Dotson (GA SBN 138040)
`Admitted Pro Hac Vice
`dcdotson@duanemorris.com
`Jennifer H. Forte (GA SBN 940650)
`Admitted Pro Hac Vice
`jhforte@duanemorris.com
`1075 Peachtree Street, Ste. 2000
`Atlanta, GA 30309
`Telephone: 404.253.6900
`Facsimile: 404.253.6901
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`SAN JOSE DIVISION
`
`FINJAN, LLC, a Delaware Corporation,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`vs.
`
`SONICWALL INC., a Delaware
`Corporation
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
` Case No. 5:17-cv-04467-BLF-VKD
`
`DEFENDANT SONICWALL INC.’S
`ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO
`FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL
`
`
`
`SONICWALL’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL;
`CASE NO.: 5:17-CV-04467-BLF-VKD
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

`

`Case 5:17-cv-04467-BLF Document 299 Filed 10/14/20 Page 2 of 16
`
`I.
`
`INTRODUCTION
`Pursuant to Civil L.R. 7-11 and 79-5, this Court’s Standing Civil Order Re: Civil Cases, the
`Parties Stipulated Protective Order (Dkt. 68), the Parties Stipulated Order Regarding Discovery of
`Electronically Stored Information (Dkt. 69), and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(b)(5)(B),
`Defendant SonicWall Inc. (“SonicWall”) hereby moves the Court for leave to file under seal,
`pursuant to Civil L.R. 79-5(d)-(e), the items identified in the table below.
`
`Exhibit No.
`
`Document Title
`
`Portion(s) to Seal
`
`Reason(s) for Sealing
`
`
`
`Defendant SonicWall
`Inc.’s Motion to Strike
`New Theories in
`Finjan’s Expert Reports
`
`Highlighted portions at:
`Page 2, lines 3-9, 11-12,
`14-15;
`Page 3, lines 16-18, 20-24,
`26;
`Page 4, lines 11, 18-20;
`Page 5, lines 13-14, 20-24;
`Page 6, lines 20-26;
`Page 10, lines 21-23
`
`
`Ex. A
`
`Entirety
`
`Excerpts from Finjan’s
`Third Supplemental
`Infringement
`Contentions – Appendix
`G-2
`
`The highlighted portions
`of this document reflect
`information that
`SonicWall has
`designated as “Highly
`Confidential –
`Attorneys’ Eyes Only”
`or “Highly Confidential
`– Attorney’s Eyes Only
`– Source Code” pursuant
`to the Stipulated
`Protective Order. If filed
`publicly, this
`confidential information
`could be used to
`SonicWall’s
`disadvantage by
`competitors as it
`concerns the
`identification,
`organization, and or
`operation of SonicWall’s
`proprietary products.
`See Declaration of
`Nicole E. Grigg in
`Support of
`Administrative Motion
`to File Documents Under
`Seal (“Grigg
`Declaration”), ¶¶ 2-5.
`
`This document reflects
`information that
`SonicWall has
`designated as “Highly
`Confidential –
`Attorneys’ Eyes Only”
`and “Highly
`Confidential –
`Attorneys’ Eyes Only -
`
`1
`SONICWALL’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL;
`CASE NO.: 5:17-CV-04467-BLF-VKD
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

`

`Case 5:17-cv-04467-BLF Document 299 Filed 10/14/20 Page 3 of 16
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`Ex. B
`
`Entirety
`
`Excerpts from Finjan’s
`Third Supplemental
`Infringement
`Contentions – Appendix
`G-3
`
`Ex. C
`
`Entirety
`
`Excerpts from Finjan’s
`Third Supplemental
`Infringement
`Contentions – Appendix
`G-4
`
`Source Code” pursuant
`to the Stipulated
`Protective Order. If filed
`publicly, this
`confidential information
`could be used to
`SonicWall’s
`disadvantage by
`competitors as it
`concerns the
`identification,
`organization, and or
`operation of SonicWall’s
`proprietary products,
`including its source
`code. See Grigg
`Declaration, ¶¶ 2-5.
`
`This document reflects
`information that
`SonicWall has
`designated as “Highly
`Confidential –
`Attorneys’ Eyes Only”
`and “Highly
`Confidential –
`Attorneys’ Eyes Only -
`Source Code” pursuant
`to the Stipulated
`Protective Order. If filed
`publicly, this
`confidential information
`could be used to
`SonicWall’s
`disadvantage by
`competitors as it
`concerns the
`identification,
`organization, and or
`operation of SonicWall’s
`proprietary products,
`including its source
`code. See Grigg
`Declaration, ¶¶ 2-5.
`
`This document reflects
`information that
`SonicWall has
`designated as “Highly
`Confidential –
`Attorneys’ Eyes Only”
`and “Highly
`Confidential –
`Attorneys’ Eyes Only -
`Source Code” pursuant
`
`2
`SONICWALL’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL;
`CASE NO.: 5:17-CV-04467-BLF-VKD
`
`

`

`Case 5:17-cv-04467-BLF Document 299 Filed 10/14/20 Page 4 of 16
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`Ex. D
`
`10-2-2020 Email from
`J. Wolff to R. McGrath
`
`Entirety
`
`Ex. E
`
`Entirety
`
`Excerpts from the
`EXPERT REPORT OF
`DR. NENAD
`MEDVIDOVIĆ
`REGARDING
`INFRINGEMENT BY
`SONICWALL, INC.
`OF PATENT NOS.
`8,225,408; 7,975,305;
`AND 8,141,154
`
`to the Stipulated
`Protective Order. If filed
`publicly, this
`confidential information
`could be used to
`SonicWall’s
`disadvantage by
`competitors as it
`concerns the
`identification,
`organization, and or
`operation of SonicWall’s
`proprietary products,
`including its source
`code. See Grigg
`Declaration, ¶¶ 2-5.
`
`The highlighted portions
`of this document reflect
`information that
`SonicWall has
`designated as “Highly
`Confidential –
`Attorneys’ Eyes Only”
`pursuant to the
`Stipulated Protective
`Order. If filed publicly,
`this confidential
`information could be
`used to SonicWall’s
`disadvantage by
`competitors as it
`concerns the
`identification,
`organization, and or
`operation of SonicWall’s
`proprietary products.
`See Grigg Declaration,
`¶¶ 2-5.
`
`This document reflects
`information that
`SonicWall has
`designated as “Highly
`Confidential –
`Attorneys’ Eyes Only”
`and “Highly
`Confidential –
`Attorneys’ Eyes Only -
`Source Code” pursuant
`to the Stipulated
`Protective Order. If filed
`publicly, this
`confidential information
`could be used to
`
`3
`SONICWALL’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL;
`CASE NO.: 5:17-CV-04467-BLF-VKD
`
`

`

`Case 5:17-cv-04467-BLF Document 299 Filed 10/14/20 Page 5 of 16
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`Ex. F
`
`Entirety
`
`Excerpts from Finjan’s
`Third Supplemental
`Infringement
`Contentions – Appendix
`E-2
`
`Ex. G
`
`Entirety
`
`Excerpts from Finjan’s
`Third Supplemental
`Infringement
`Contentions – Appendix
`D-1
`
`SonicWall’s
`disadvantage by
`competitors as it
`concerns the
`identification,
`organization, and or
`operation of SonicWall’s
`proprietary products,
`including its source
`code. See Grigg
`Declaration, ¶¶ 2-5.
`
`This document reflects
`information that
`SonicWall has
`designated as “Highly
`Confidential –
`Attorneys’ Eyes Only”
`and “Highly
`Confidential –
`Attorneys’ Eyes Only -
`Source Code” pursuant
`to the Stipulated
`Protective Order. If filed
`publicly, this
`confidential information
`could be used to
`SonicWall’s
`disadvantage by
`competitors as it
`concerns the
`identification,
`organization, and or
`operation of SonicWall’s
`proprietary products,
`including its source
`code. See Grigg
`Declaration, ¶¶ 2-5.
`
`This document reflects
`information that
`SonicWall has
`designated as “Highly
`Confidential –
`Attorneys’ Eyes Only”
`and “Highly
`Confidential –
`Attorneys’ Eyes Only -
`Source Code” pursuant
`to the Stipulated
`Protective Order. If filed
`publicly, this
`confidential information
`could be used to
`SonicWall’s
`
`4
`SONICWALL’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL;
`CASE NO.: 5:17-CV-04467-BLF-VKD
`
`

`

`Case 5:17-cv-04467-BLF Document 299 Filed 10/14/20 Page 6 of 16
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`Ex. H
`
`Entirety
`
`Excerpts from Finjan’s
`Third Supplemental
`Infringement
`Contentions – Appendix
`D-2
`
`Ex. I
`
`Entirety
`
`Excerpts from Finjan’s
`Third Supplemental
`Infringement
`Contentions – Appendix
`D-3
`
`disadvantage by
`competitors as it
`concerns the
`identification,
`organization, and or
`operation of SonicWall’s
`proprietary products,
`including its source
`code. See Grigg
`Declaration, ¶¶ 2-5.
`
`This document reflects
`information that
`SonicWall has
`designated as “Highly
`Confidential –
`Attorneys’ Eyes Only”
`and “Highly
`Confidential –
`Attorneys’ Eyes Only -
`Source Code” pursuant
`to the Stipulated
`Protective Order. If filed
`publicly, this
`confidential information
`could be used to
`SonicWall’s
`disadvantage by
`competitors as it
`concerns the
`identification,
`organization, and or
`operation of SonicWall’s
`proprietary products,
`including its source
`code. See Grigg
`Declaration, ¶¶ 2-5.
`
`This document reflects
`information that
`SonicWall has
`designated as “Highly
`Confidential –
`Attorneys’ Eyes Only”
`and “Highly
`Confidential –
`Attorneys’ Eyes Only -
`Source Code” pursuant
`to the Stipulated
`Protective Order. If filed
`publicly, this
`confidential information
`could be used to
`SonicWall’s
`disadvantage by
`
`5
`SONICWALL’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL;
`CASE NO.: 5:17-CV-04467-BLF-VKD
`
`

`

`Case 5:17-cv-04467-BLF Document 299 Filed 10/14/20 Page 7 of 16
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`Ex. J
`
`Entirety
`
`Excerpts from Finjan’s
`Third Supplemental
`Infringement
`Contentions – Appendix
`D-4
`
`Ex. K
`
`Entirety
`
`Excerpts from the
`EXPERT REPORT OF
`MICHAEL
`MITZENMACHER,
`PH.D. REGARDING
`INFRINGEMENT BY
`SONICWALL, INC.
`OF PATENT NOS.
`6,804,780; 6,965,968;
`AND 7,613,926
`
`competitors as it
`concerns the
`identification,
`organization, and or
`operation of SonicWall’s
`proprietary products,
`including its source
`code. See Grigg
`Declaration, ¶¶ 2-5.
`
`This document reflects
`information that
`SonicWall has
`designated as “Highly
`Confidential –
`Attorneys’ Eyes Only”
`and “Highly
`Confidential –
`Attorneys’ Eyes Only -
`Source Code” pursuant
`to the Stipulated
`Protective Order. If filed
`publicly, this
`confidential information
`could be used to
`SonicWall’s
`disadvantage by
`competitors as it
`concerns the
`identification,
`organization, and or
`operation of SonicWall’s
`proprietary products,
`including its source
`code. See Grigg
`Declaration, ¶¶ 2-5.
`
`This document reflects
`information that
`SonicWall has
`designated as “Highly
`Confidential –
`Attorneys’ Eyes Only”
`and “Highly
`Confidential –
`Attorneys’ Eyes Only -
`Source Code” pursuant
`to the Stipulated
`Protective Order. If filed
`publicly, this
`confidential information
`could be used to
`SonicWall’s
`disadvantage by
`competitors as it
`
`6
`SONICWALL’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL;
`CASE NO.: 5:17-CV-04467-BLF-VKD
`
`

`

`Case 5:17-cv-04467-BLF Document 299 Filed 10/14/20 Page 8 of 16
`
`Ex. L
`
`Entirety
`
`Excerpts from Finjan’s
`Fourth Supplemental
`Infringement
`Contentions – Appendix
`H-2
`
`Ex. M
`
`Entirety
`
`Excerpts from Finjan’s
`Fourth Supplemental
`Infringement
`Contentions – Appendix
`H-4
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`concerns the
`identification,
`organization, and or
`operation of SonicWall’s
`proprietary products,
`including its source
`code. See Grigg
`Declaration, ¶¶ 2-5.
`
`This document reflects
`information that
`SonicWall has
`designated as “Highly
`Confidential –
`Attorneys’ Eyes Only”
`and “Highly
`Confidential –
`Attorneys’ Eyes Only -
`Source Code” pursuant
`to the Stipulated
`Protective Order. If filed
`publicly, this
`confidential information
`could be used to
`SonicWall’s
`disadvantage by
`competitors as it
`concerns the
`identification,
`organization, and or
`operation of SonicWall’s
`proprietary products,
`including its source
`code. See Grigg
`Declaration, ¶¶ 2-5.
`
`This document reflects
`information that
`SonicWall has
`designated as “Highly
`Confidential –
`Attorneys’ Eyes Only”
`and “Highly
`Confidential –
`Attorneys’ Eyes Only -
`Source Code” pursuant
`to the Stipulated
`Protective Order. If filed
`publicly, this
`confidential information
`could be used to
`SonicWall’s
`disadvantage by
`competitors as it
`concerns the
`
`7
`SONICWALL’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL;
`CASE NO.: 5:17-CV-04467-BLF-VKD
`
`

`

`Case 5:17-cv-04467-BLF Document 299 Filed 10/14/20 Page 9 of 16
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`Ex. O
`
`07-23-2020 Email from
`J. Hannah to D. Dotson
`(5:19 P.M.)
`
`Highlighted portion at:
`Page 2.
`
`Ex. P
`
`07-24-2020 Email from
`J. Hannah to D. Dotson
`(8:20 P.M.)
`
`Highlighted portions at:
`Page 2 (graphic);
`Page 4
`
`identification,
`organization, and or
`operation of SonicWall’s
`proprietary products,
`including its source
`code. See Grigg
`Declaration, ¶¶ 2-5.
`
`The highlighted portions
`of this document reflect
`information that
`SonicWall has
`designated as “Highly
`Confidential –
`Attorneys’ Eyes Only”
`pursuant to the
`Stipulated Protective
`Order. If filed publicly,
`this confidential
`information could be
`used to SonicWall’s
`disadvantage by
`competitors as it
`concerns the
`identification,
`organization, and or
`operation of SonicWall’s
`proprietary products.
`See Grigg Declaration,
`¶¶ 2-5.
`
`The highlighted portions
`of this document reflect
`information that
`SonicWall has
`designated as “Highly
`Confidential –
`Attorneys’ Eyes Only”
`pursuant to the
`Stipulated Protective
`Order. If filed publicly,
`this confidential
`information could be
`used to SonicWall’s
`disadvantage by
`competitors as it
`concerns the
`identification,
`organization, and or
`operation of SonicWall’s
`proprietary products.
`See Grigg Declaration,
`¶¶ 2-5.
`
`8
`SONICWALL’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL;
`CASE NO.: 5:17-CV-04467-BLF-VKD
`
`

`

`Case 5:17-cv-04467-BLF Document 299 Filed 10/14/20 Page 10 of 16
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`Ex. R
`
`07-13-2020 Email from
`D. Dotson to J. Hannah
`(10:08 A.M.)
`
`Highlighted portion at:
`Page 1
`
`Ex. S
`
`07-23-2020 Email from
`D. Dotson and J.
`Hannah (5:21 P.M.)
`
`Highlighted portion at:
`Page 2.
`
`Ex. T
`
`07-24-2020 Email from
`D. Dotson to J. Hannah
`(3:43 P.M.)
`
`Highlighted portions at:
`Page 2 (graphic);
`Page 3;
`Page 4
`
`The highlighted portions
`of this document reflect
`information that
`SonicWall has
`designated as “Highly
`Confidential –
`Attorneys’ Eyes Only”
`pursuant to the
`Stipulated Protective
`Order. If filed publicly,
`this confidential
`information could be
`used to SonicWall’s
`disadvantage by
`competitors as it
`concerns the
`identification,
`organization, and or
`operation of SonicWall’s
`proprietary products.
`See Grigg Declaration,
`¶¶ 2-5.
`
`The highlighted portions
`of this document reflect
`information that
`SonicWall has
`designated as “Highly
`Confidential –
`Attorneys’ Eyes Only”
`pursuant to the
`Stipulated Protective
`Order. If filed publicly,
`this confidential
`information could be
`used to SonicWall’s
`disadvantage by
`competitors as it
`concerns the
`identification,
`organization, and or
`operation of SonicWall’s
`proprietary products.
`See Grigg Declaration,
`¶¶ 2-5.
`
`The highlighted portions
`of this document reflect
`information that
`SonicWall has
`designated as “Highly
`Confidential –
`Attorneys’ Eyes Only”
`pursuant to the
`
`9
`SONICWALL’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL;
`CASE NO.: 5:17-CV-04467-BLF-VKD
`
`

`

`Case 5:17-cv-04467-BLF Document 299 Filed 10/14/20 Page 11 of 16
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`Ex. U
`
`07-24-2020 Email from
`J. Hannah to D. Dotson
`(5:48 P.M.)
`
`Highlighted portions at:
`Page 2 (graphic);
`Page 4
`
`Ex. V
`
`07-23-2020 Email from
`D. Dotson to J. Hannah
`(3:12 P.M.)
`
`Highlighted portion at page
`2.
`
`Stipulated Protective
`Order. If filed publicly,
`this confidential
`information could be
`used to SonicWall’s
`disadvantage by
`competitors as it
`concerns the
`identification,
`organization, and or
`operation of SonicWall’s
`proprietary products.
`See Grigg Declaration,
`¶¶ 2-5.
`
`The highlighted portions
`of this document reflect
`information that
`SonicWall has
`designated as “Highly
`Confidential –
`Attorneys’ Eyes Only”
`pursuant to the
`Stipulated Protective
`Order. If filed publicly,
`this confidential
`information could be
`used to SonicWall’s
`disadvantage by
`competitors as it
`concerns the
`identification,
`organization, and or
`operation of SonicWall’s
`proprietary products.
`See Grigg Declaration,
`¶¶ 2-5.
`
`The highlighted portions
`of this document reflect
`information that
`SonicWall has
`designated as “Highly
`Confidential –
`Attorneys’ Eyes Only”
`pursuant to the
`Stipulated Protective
`Order. If filed publicly,
`this confidential
`information could be
`used to SonicWall’s
`disadvantage by
`competitors as it
`concerns the
`identification,
`
`10
`SONICWALL’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL;
`CASE NO.: 5:17-CV-04467-BLF-VKD
`
`

`

`Case 5:17-cv-04467-BLF Document 299 Filed 10/14/20 Page 12 of 16
`
`Ex. X
`
`Entirety
`
`Excerpts from Finjan’s
`Third Supplemental
`Infringement
`Contentions – Appendix
`H-1
`
`Ex. Y
`
`Entirety
`
`Excerpts from Finjan’s
`Third Supplemental
`Infringement
`Contentions – Appendix
`H-5
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`organization, and or
`operation of SonicWall’s
`proprietary products.
`See Grigg Declaration,
`¶¶ 2-5.
`
`This document reflects
`information that
`SonicWall has
`designated as “Highly
`Confidential –
`Attorneys’ Eyes Only”
`and “Highly
`Confidential –
`Attorneys’ Eyes Only -
`Source Code” pursuant
`to the Stipulated
`Protective Order. If filed
`publicly, this
`confidential information
`could be used to
`SonicWall’s
`disadvantage by
`competitors as it
`concerns the
`identification,
`organization, and or
`operation of SonicWall’s
`proprietary products,
`including its source
`code. See Grigg
`Declaration, ¶¶ 2-5.
`
`This document reflects
`information that
`SonicWall has
`designated as “Highly
`Confidential –
`Attorneys’ Eyes Only”
`and “Highly
`Confidential –
`Attorneys’ Eyes Only -
`Source Code” pursuant
`to the Stipulated
`Protective Order. If filed
`publicly, this
`confidential information
`could be used to
`SonicWall’s
`disadvantage by
`competitors as it
`concerns the
`identification,
`organization, and or
`operation of SonicWall’s
`
`11
`SONICWALL’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL;
`CASE NO.: 5:17-CV-04467-BLF-VKD
`
`

`

`Case 5:17-cv-04467-BLF Document 299 Filed 10/14/20 Page 13 of 16
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`Entirety
`
`Excerpts from the
`EXPERT REPORT OF
`DR. ERIC COLE
`REGARDING
`TECHNOLOGY
`TUTORIAL
`AND
`INFRINGEMENT BY
`SONICWALL,
`INC. OF PATENT
`NOS. 6,154,844;
`7,058,822; 7,647,633;
`AND 8,677,494
`
`Ex. Z
`
`
`
`proprietary products,
`including its source
`code. See Grigg
`Declaration, ¶¶ 2-5.
`
`This document reflects
`information that
`SonicWall has
`designated as “Highly
`Confidential –
`Attorneys’ Eyes Only”
`and “Highly
`Confidential –
`Attorneys’ Eyes Only -
`Source Code” pursuant
`to the Stipulated
`Protective Order. If filed
`publicly, this
`confidential information
`could be used to
`SonicWall’s
`disadvantage by
`competitors as it
`concerns the
`identification,
`organization, and or
`operation of SonicWall’s
`proprietary products,
`including its source
`code. See Grigg
`Declaration, ¶¶ 2-5.
`
`II.
`
`ARGUMENT
`A.
`Legal Standard
`There is a presumption of public access to judicial records and documents. Nixon v. Warner
`Commc'ns, Inc., 435 U.S. 589, 597 (1978). However, records attached to non-dispositive motions,
`such is the case here, are not subject to the strong presumption of access. Finjan, Inc. v. Proofpoint,
`Inc, No. 13-CV-05808-HSG, 2015 WL 9023164, at *1 (N.D. Cal. Dec. 16, 2015) (internal citation
`omitted). Because the documents attached to non-dispositive motions “are often unrelated, or only
`tangentially related, to the underlying cause of action,” parties moving to seal must meet the lower
`“good cause” standard of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 26(c). Id. (internal quotation
`marks omitted). The “good cause” standard requires a “particularized showing” that “specific
`
`12
`SONICWALL’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL;
`CASE NO.: 5:17-CV-04467-BLF-VKD
`
`

`

`Case 5:17-cv-04467-BLF Document 299 Filed 10/14/20 Page 14 of 16
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`prejudice or harm will result” if the information is disclosed. Phillips ex rel. Estates of Byrd v. Gen.
`Motors Corp., 307 F.3d 1206, 1210-11 (9th Cir. 2002) (internal quotation marks omitted); see Fed.
`R. Civ. P. 26(c). “Broad allegations of harm, unsubstantiated by specific examples of articulated
`reasoning” will not suffice. Beckman Indus., Inc. v. Int'l Ins. Co., 966 F.2d 470, 476 (9th Cir. 1992).
`Sealing is appropriate where the requesting party “establishes that the document, or portions
`thereof is privileged or protectable as a trade secret or otherwise entitled to protection under the
`law.” N.D. Cal. Civ. L.R. 79–5(a). A party must “narrowly tailor” its request to sealable material
`only. Id.
`
`B.
`
`SonicWall’s Administrative Motion to Seal Is Supported By Good Cause and Is
`Narrowly Tailored
`
`SonicWall seeks to seal select portions of SonicWall’s Motion to Strike New Theories in
`Finjan’s Expert Reports (“Motion to Strike”) and Exhibits A-C, E-M, O-P, R-V, and X-Z to the
`Declaration of David Dotson in support thereof. SonicWall’s Motion to Strike quotes from various
`appendices to Finjan’s Infringement Contentions or Expert Reports each of which has been
`designated as “Highly Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only” or “Highly Confidential – Attorneys’
`Eyes Only – Source Code” pursuant to the terms of the Stipulated Protective Order. Moreover,
`each of the appendices and reports cite to and quote from various internal SonicWall documents,
`such as functional specifications and design materials that SonicWall considers confidential and
`proprietary. Grigg Decl., ¶ 3.
`Exhibits A-C, F-J, L-M, and X-Y to the Dotson Declaration are excerpts from the appendices
`to Finjan’s Infringement Contentions, which have been designated as “Highly Confidential –
`Attorneys’ Eyes Only – Source Code” under the Protective Order because they cite to and quote
`from various internal SonicWall documents and source code that SonicWall considers confidential
`and proprietary.
`Exhibits E, K, and Z to the Dotson Declaration are excerpts from Finjan’s Expert Reports,
`which have been designated as “Highly Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only – Source Code” under
`the Protective Order because they cite to and quote from various internal SonicWall documents and
`source code that SonicWall considers confidential and proprietary.
`13
`SONICWALL’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL;
`CASE NO.: 5:17-CV-04467-BLF-VKD
`
`

`

`Case 5:17-cv-04467-BLF Document 299 Filed 10/14/20 Page 15 of 16
`
`Lastly, Exhibits D, O-P, and R-V to the Declaration of David Dotson in Support of
`SonicWall’s Motion to Strike Second Supplemental Infringement Contentions quotes from Finjan’s
`First and Second Supplemental Contentions which have been designated as “Highly Confidential –
`Attorneys’ Eyes Only – Source Code” under the Protective Order because they because they cite to
`and quote from various internal SonicWall documents and source code that SonicWall considers
`confidential and proprietary.
`SonicWall contends that public disclosure of this information would cause irreparable harm
`to SonicWall. Id.; see also Andrx Pharms., LLC v. GlaxoSmithKline, 236 F.R.D. 583, 586 (S.D. Fla.
`2006) (“Courts dress technical information with a heavy cloak of judicial protection because of the
`threat of serious economic injury to the disclosure of scientific information.”); Network Appliance,
`Inc. v. Sun Microsys. Inc., 2010 WL 841274, at *5 (N.D. Cal. Mar. 10, 2010) (granting application
`to seal “information regarding NetApp’s internal usability testing of its software”).
`SonicWall’s administrative motion is narrowly tailored and only seeks to seal the select
`portions of SonicWall’s Motion to Strike that quote from the information designated as Highly-
`Confidential Attorneys’ Eyes Only. See Kowalsky v. Hewlett-Packard Co., 2012 WL 892427, at *2
`(N.D. Cal. Mar. 14, 2012) (finding sealing appropriate where “[t]he proposed redactions
`contain[ed] . . . confidential product development information, the disclosure of which could harm
`[the defendant's] competitive advantage in the marketplace.”).
`III. CONCLUSION
`For these reasons, SonicWall respectfully requests that the Court grant its Administrative
`Motion to Seal.
`
`Dated: October 14, 2020
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/s/ Nicole E. Grigg
`Nicole E. Grigg
`D. Stuart Bartow
`DUANE MORRIS LLP
`Email: NEGrigg@duanemorris.com
`Email: DSBartow@duanemorris.com
`2475 Hanover Street
`Palo Alto, CA 94304-1194
`Telephone: 650.847.4150
`14
`SONICWALL’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL;
`CASE NO.: 5:17-CV-04467-BLF-VKD
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

`

`Case 5:17-cv-04467-BLF Document 299 Filed 10/14/20 Page 16 of 16
`
`Facsimile: 650.847.4151
`
`Matthew C. Gaudet (admitted pro hac vice)
`Email: mcgaudet@duanemorris.com
`Roblin L. McGrath (admitted pro hac vice)
`Email: rlmcgrath@duanemorris.com
`David C. Dotson (admitted pro hac vice)
`Email: dcdotson@duanemorris.com
`Jennifer H. Forte (admitted pro hac vice)
`Email: jhforte@duanemorris.com
`1075 Peachtree Street, Ste. 2000
`Atlanta, GA 30309
`Telephone: 404.253.6901
`Facsimile: 404.253.6901
`
`Joseph A. Powers (admitted pro hac vice)
`Email: japowers@duanemorris.com
`Jarrad M. Gunther (admitted pro hac vice)
`Email: jmgunther@duanemorris.com
`30 South 17th Street
`Philadelphia, PA 19103
`Telephone: 215.979.1000
`Facsimile: 215.979.1020
`
`Attorneys for Defendant
`SONICWALL INC.
`
`15
`SONICWALL’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL;
`CASE NO.: 5:17-CV-04467-BLF-VKD
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`