throbber
Case 5:17-cv-04467-BLF Document 281 Filed 08/18/20 Page 1 of 2
`
`
`
`‘
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`SAN JOSE DIVISION
`
`FINJAN, INC.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`SONICWALL, INC.,
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case No. 17-cv-04467-BLF (VKD)
`
`
`ORDER RE DISCOVERY DISPUTES
`RE SONICWALL’S PATENT
`PORTFOLIO AND RESPONSES TO
`FINJAN’S REQUESTS FOR
`ADMISSION
`
`Re: Dkt. Nos. 276, 277
`
`
`
`On August 7, 2020, the parties filed joint discovery letter briefs regarding two discovery-
`
`related disputes: (1) SonicWall’s responses to Finjan’s Requests for Admission Nos. 17-19 and 22
`
`(Dkt. No. 276), and (2) SonicWall’s identification of its patent portfolio in its second supplemental
`
`initial disclosures served on the last day of fact discovery (Dkt. No. 277). Finjan seeks sanctions
`
`in the form of deemed admissions or further responses to its requests for admission, and striking
`
`SonicWall’s second supplemental initial disclosures with respect to its patent portfolio. The Court
`
`heard oral argument on the parties’ disputes on August 18, 2020. Dkt. No. 280.
`
`For the reasons stated on the record, the Court resolves these disputes as follows:
`
`With respect to SonicWall’s responses to Finjan’s requests for admission, the Court finds
`
`no violation of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 36 occurred. SonicWall’s objections and answers
`
`satisfy the requirements of Rule 36(a)(4) with respect to the requests at issue. No sanctions are
`
`warranted.
`
`With respect to SonicWall’s second supplemental initial disclosures, the Court finds that
`
`no violation of Rule 26(a) or (e) occurred. Rule 26(a)(1)(A)(ii) requires a party to provide a
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`Northern District of California
`
`United States District Court
`
`

`

`Case 5:17-cv-04467-BLF Document 281 Filed 08/18/20 Page 2 of 2
`
`
`
`description or a copy of documents that it may use to support a claim or defense. There is no
`
`dispute that SonicWall timely produced the documents at issue. The fact that SonicWall also
`
`separately identified those documents in a supplement to its initial disclosures on the last day of
`
`fact discovery does not create a violation of Rule 26(a) or (e) where none otherwise exists. No
`
`sanctions are warranted.
`
`IT IS SO ORDERED.
`
`Dated: August 18, 2020
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`VIRGINIA K. DEMARCHI
`United States Magistrate Judge
`
`2
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`Northern District of California
`
`United States District Court
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket