throbber
Case 5:17-cv-04467-BLF Document 272 Filed 07/21/20 Page 1 of 2
`
`
`PAUL ANDRE (State Bar No. 196585)
`pandre@kramerlevin.com
`LISA KOBIALKA (State Bar No. 191404)
`lkobialka@kramerlevin.com
`JAMES HANNAH (State Bar No. 237978)
`jhannah@kramerlevin.com
`KRISTOPHER KASTENS (State Bar No. 254797)
`kkastens@kramerlevin.com
`HANNAH LEE (State Bar No. 253197)
`hlee@kramerlevin.com
`KRAMER LEVIN NAFTALIS
` & FRANKEL LLP
`990 Marsh Road
`Menlo Park, CA 94025
`Telephone: (650) 752-1700
`Facsimile: (650) 752-1800
`
`AARON FRANKEL (pro hac vice)
`afrankel@kramerlevin.com
`KRAMER LEVIN NAFTALIS
` & FRANKEL LLP
`1177 Avenue of the Americas
`New York, NY 10036
`Telephone: (212) 715-7793
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`FINJAN, INC.
`
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`SAN JOSE DIVISION
`
`FINJAN, INC.,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`
`SONICWALL, INC.,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`Case No.: 5:17-cv-04467-BLF-VKD
`
`[PROPOSED] ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF
`FINJAN, INC.’S RESPONSE TO THE
`COURT’S ORDER OF REDACTION [DKT.
`NO. 269]
`
`
`__________________________________________________________________________________
`[PROPOSED] ORDER RE: FINJAN’S RESP.
`CASE NO.: 17-cv-04467-BLF-VKD
`TO COURT’S ORDER OF REDACTION
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

`

`Case 5:17-cv-04467-BLF Document 272 Filed 07/21/20 Page 2 of 2
`
`Plaintiff Finjan, Inc.’s (“Finjan”) submitted its response to the Court’s Order of Redaction (Dkt.
`No. 269) regarding the Court’s Order on a Discovery Dispute Regarding Privilege Claims (Dkt. No.
`268, the “Order”). Upon consideration of Finjan’s request and the supporting declaration of Aaron
`Frankel filed in support of the response, the Court finds there to be good cause for granting the request
`to file certain documents under seal.
`Good cause having been shown, the Court finds that:
`There exists overriding confidentiality interests that overcome the right of public access to the
`record of the following document:
`
`Identification of
`Document to be Sealed
`Order re Discovery
`Dispute re Privilege
`Claims (Dkt. No. 268)
`
`Portions of Document to
`be Sealed
`Highlighted portion at Page
`2, lines 19-23
`
`Designating
`Party
`Finjan
`
`Reasons for Sealing
`
`This excerpt of the
`Order contains an
`excerpt from the
`confidential
`agreement between
`Cisco Systems, Inc.
`and Finjan.
`
`A substantial probability exists that the overriding confidentiality interests will be prejudiced if
`the record is not sealed;
`The proposed sealing is narrowly tailored; and
`No less restrictive means exist to achieve these overriding interests.
`IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Finjan’s request to seal the above information is
`GRANTED.
`IT IS SO ORDERED.
`
`DATED: ____________________
`July 21, 2020
`
` Honarable Virginia K. DeMarchi
` United States Magistrate Judge
`
`1
`PROPOSED] ORDER RE: FINJAN’S RESP.
`TO COURT’S ORDER OF REDACTION
`
`CASE NO.: 17-cv-04467-BLF-VKD
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket