`
`
`PAUL ANDRE (State Bar No. 196585)
`pandre@kramerlevin.com
`LISA KOBIALKA (State Bar No. 191404)
`lkobialka@kramerlevin.com
`JAMES HANNAH (State Bar No. 237978)
`jhannah@kramerlevin.com
`KRISTOPHER KASTENS (State Bar No. 254797)
`kkastens@kramerlevin.com
`HANNAH LEE (State Bar No. 253197)
`hlee@kramerlevin.com
`KRAMER LEVIN NAFTALIS
` & FRANKEL LLP
`990 Marsh Road
`Menlo Park, CA 94025
`Telephone: (650) 752-1700
`Facsimile: (650) 752-1800
`
`AARON FRANKEL (pro hac vice)
`afrankel@kramerlevin.com
`KRAMER LEVIN NAFTALIS
` & FRANKEL LLP
`1177 Avenue of the Americas
`New York, NY 10036
`Telephone: (212) 715-7793
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`FINJAN, INC.
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`SAN JOSE DIVISION
`
`FINJAN, INC.,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`Case No.: 5:17-cv-04467-BLF-VKD
`
`PLAINTIFF FINJAN, INC.’S RESPONSE
`TO THE COURT’S ORDER OF
`REDACTION RE ORDER [DKT. NO. 269]
`
`
`
`
`SONICWALL, INC.,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`__________________________________________________________________________________
`FINJAN’S RESPONSE TO THE COURT’S
`CASE NO.: 17-cv-04467-BLF-VKD
`ORDER RE REDACTION [Dkt. No. 269]
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`Case 5:17-cv-04467-BLF Document 271 Filed 07/17/20 Page 2 of 3
`
`
`
`I.
`
`INTRODUCTION
`Plaintiff Finjan, Inc. (“Finjan”) provides this response to the Court’s Order of Redaction (Dkt.
`No. 269) regarding the Court’s Order on a Discovery Dispute Regarding Privilege Claims (Dkt. No.
`268, the “Order”). Finjan seeks to seal only one portion of the Order, which contains an excerpt from a
`confidential agreement between Finjan and non-party, Cisco Systems, Inc. (“Cisco”).
`
`Identification of
`Document to be Sealed
`Order re Discovery
`Dispute re Privilege
`Claims (Dkt. No. 268)
`
`Portions of Document to
`be Sealed
`Highlighted portion at Page
`2, lines 19-23
`
`Designating
`Party
`Finjan
`
`Reasons for Sealing
`
`This excerpt of the
`Order contains an
`excerpt from the
`confidential
`agreement between
`Cisco Systems, Inc.
`and Finjan.
`
`
`II.
`
`ARGUMENT
`Finjan seeks to seal the confidential information indicated above and highlighted in the
`attachment to the Declaration of Aaron Frankel in Support of Finjan’s Response (“Frankel
`Declaration”). Mindful of the Stipulated Protective Order and also Civil Local Rule 79-5, Finjan
`supports the public filing of the entire Order, with the exception of the five lines on page 2 of the Order
`that are quoted from the confidential agreement between Finjan and Cisco.
`As set forth in the accompanying Frankel Declaration, the excerpt for which redaction is
`requested contains confidential business information relating to the relationship between Finjan and
`third-party Cisco and is designated as “Highly Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only” under the
`Protective Order in this case. Specifically, Finjan previously attached the confidential agreement
`between Finjan and Cisco as Exhibit 2 to the Frankel Declaration in Support of Finjan’s Submission of
`Documents for In Camera Review Relating to the Joint Discovery Letter Brief and requested this
`document to be filed under seal. See Dkt. Nos. 256, 258. Consistent with the Court’s July 9th Order
`(Dkt. No. 270) granting Finjan’s request to seal the confidential agreement between Finjan and Cisco
`
`FINJAN’S RESPONSE TO THE COURT’S
`ORDER RE REDACTION [Dkt. No. 269]
`
`1
`
`CASE NO.: 17-cv-04467-BLF-VKD
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`Case 5:17-cv-04467-BLF Document 271 Filed 07/17/20 Page 3 of 3
`
`
`
`under the good cause standard, Finjan now requests that the highlighted portion at page 2, lines 19-23
`of the Order to be filed under seal.
`Attached hereto are redacted and unredacted versions of the Order.
`III. CONCLUSION
`Finjan has shown good cause for this request to file the above-referenced excerpt of the Court’s
`Order under seal. This request is narrowly tailored to seal only information that is regarded as
`confidential. For these reasons, Finjan respectfully requests that the Court seal the excerpt indicated
`above.
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: July 17, 2020
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`By: /s/ Aaron Frankel
`Paul J. Andre (SBN 196585)
`Lisa Kobialka (SBN 191404)
`James Hannah (SBN 237978)
`Kristopher Kastens (SBN 254797)
`Hannah Lee (SBN 253197)
`KRAMER LEVIN NAFTALIS
` & FRANKEL LLP
`990 Marsh Road
`Menlo Park, CA 94025
`Telephone: (650) 752-1700
`Facsimile: (650) 752-1800
`pandre@kramerlevin.com
`lkobialka@kramerlevin.com
`jhannah@kramerlevin.com
`kkastens@kramerlevin.com
`hlee@kramerlevin.com
`
`AARON FRANKEL (pro hac vice)
`KRAMER LEVIN NAFTALIS
` & FRANKEL LLP
`1177 Avenue of the Americas
`New York, NY 10036
`Telephone: (212) 715-7793
`afrankel@kramerlevin.com
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`FINJAN, INC.
`
`FINJAN’S RESPONSE TO THE COURT’S
`ORDER RE REDACTION [Dkt. No. 269]
`
`2
`
`CASE NO.: 17-cv-04467-BLF-VKD
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`