throbber
Case 5:17-cv-04467-BLF Document 271 Filed 07/17/20 Page 1 of 3
`
`
`PAUL ANDRE (State Bar No. 196585)
`pandre@kramerlevin.com
`LISA KOBIALKA (State Bar No. 191404)
`lkobialka@kramerlevin.com
`JAMES HANNAH (State Bar No. 237978)
`jhannah@kramerlevin.com
`KRISTOPHER KASTENS (State Bar No. 254797)
`kkastens@kramerlevin.com
`HANNAH LEE (State Bar No. 253197)
`hlee@kramerlevin.com
`KRAMER LEVIN NAFTALIS
` & FRANKEL LLP
`990 Marsh Road
`Menlo Park, CA 94025
`Telephone: (650) 752-1700
`Facsimile: (650) 752-1800
`
`AARON FRANKEL (pro hac vice)
`afrankel@kramerlevin.com
`KRAMER LEVIN NAFTALIS
` & FRANKEL LLP
`1177 Avenue of the Americas
`New York, NY 10036
`Telephone: (212) 715-7793
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`FINJAN, INC.
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`SAN JOSE DIVISION
`
`FINJAN, INC.,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`Case No.: 5:17-cv-04467-BLF-VKD
`
`PLAINTIFF FINJAN, INC.’S RESPONSE
`TO THE COURT’S ORDER OF
`REDACTION RE ORDER [DKT. NO. 269]
`
`
`
`
`SONICWALL, INC.,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`__________________________________________________________________________________
`FINJAN’S RESPONSE TO THE COURT’S
`CASE NO.: 17-cv-04467-BLF-VKD
`ORDER RE REDACTION [Dkt. No. 269]
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

`

`Case 5:17-cv-04467-BLF Document 271 Filed 07/17/20 Page 2 of 3
`
`
`
`I.
`
`INTRODUCTION
`Plaintiff Finjan, Inc. (“Finjan”) provides this response to the Court’s Order of Redaction (Dkt.
`No. 269) regarding the Court’s Order on a Discovery Dispute Regarding Privilege Claims (Dkt. No.
`268, the “Order”). Finjan seeks to seal only one portion of the Order, which contains an excerpt from a
`confidential agreement between Finjan and non-party, Cisco Systems, Inc. (“Cisco”).
`
`Identification of
`Document to be Sealed
`Order re Discovery
`Dispute re Privilege
`Claims (Dkt. No. 268)
`
`Portions of Document to
`be Sealed
`Highlighted portion at Page
`2, lines 19-23
`
`Designating
`Party
`Finjan
`
`Reasons for Sealing
`
`This excerpt of the
`Order contains an
`excerpt from the
`confidential
`agreement between
`Cisco Systems, Inc.
`and Finjan.
`
`
`II.
`
`ARGUMENT
`Finjan seeks to seal the confidential information indicated above and highlighted in the
`attachment to the Declaration of Aaron Frankel in Support of Finjan’s Response (“Frankel
`Declaration”). Mindful of the Stipulated Protective Order and also Civil Local Rule 79-5, Finjan
`supports the public filing of the entire Order, with the exception of the five lines on page 2 of the Order
`that are quoted from the confidential agreement between Finjan and Cisco.
`As set forth in the accompanying Frankel Declaration, the excerpt for which redaction is
`requested contains confidential business information relating to the relationship between Finjan and
`third-party Cisco and is designated as “Highly Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only” under the
`Protective Order in this case. Specifically, Finjan previously attached the confidential agreement
`between Finjan and Cisco as Exhibit 2 to the Frankel Declaration in Support of Finjan’s Submission of
`Documents for In Camera Review Relating to the Joint Discovery Letter Brief and requested this
`document to be filed under seal. See Dkt. Nos. 256, 258. Consistent with the Court’s July 9th Order
`(Dkt. No. 270) granting Finjan’s request to seal the confidential agreement between Finjan and Cisco
`
`FINJAN’S RESPONSE TO THE COURT’S
`ORDER RE REDACTION [Dkt. No. 269]
`
`1
`
`CASE NO.: 17-cv-04467-BLF-VKD
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

`

`Case 5:17-cv-04467-BLF Document 271 Filed 07/17/20 Page 3 of 3
`
`
`
`under the good cause standard, Finjan now requests that the highlighted portion at page 2, lines 19-23
`of the Order to be filed under seal.
`Attached hereto are redacted and unredacted versions of the Order.
`III. CONCLUSION
`Finjan has shown good cause for this request to file the above-referenced excerpt of the Court’s
`Order under seal. This request is narrowly tailored to seal only information that is regarded as
`confidential. For these reasons, Finjan respectfully requests that the Court seal the excerpt indicated
`above.
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: July 17, 2020
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`By: /s/ Aaron Frankel
`Paul J. Andre (SBN 196585)
`Lisa Kobialka (SBN 191404)
`James Hannah (SBN 237978)
`Kristopher Kastens (SBN 254797)
`Hannah Lee (SBN 253197)
`KRAMER LEVIN NAFTALIS
` & FRANKEL LLP
`990 Marsh Road
`Menlo Park, CA 94025
`Telephone: (650) 752-1700
`Facsimile: (650) 752-1800
`pandre@kramerlevin.com
`lkobialka@kramerlevin.com
`jhannah@kramerlevin.com
`kkastens@kramerlevin.com
`hlee@kramerlevin.com
`
`AARON FRANKEL (pro hac vice)
`KRAMER LEVIN NAFTALIS
` & FRANKEL LLP
`1177 Avenue of the Americas
`New York, NY 10036
`Telephone: (212) 715-7793
`afrankel@kramerlevin.com
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`FINJAN, INC.
`
`FINJAN’S RESPONSE TO THE COURT’S
`ORDER RE REDACTION [Dkt. No. 269]
`
`2
`
`CASE NO.: 17-cv-04467-BLF-VKD
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket