`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`SAN JOSE DIVISION
`
`FINJAN, INC.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`SONICWALL, INC.,
`
`Defendant.
`
`Case No. 17-cv-04467-BLF (VKD)
`
`
`INTERIM ORDER RE APRIL 17, 2020
`JOINT DISCOVERY LETTER BRIEF
`
`Re: Dkt. No. 248
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`On April 28, 2020, the Court held a hearing on the parties’ discovery dispute concerning
`
`plaintiff Finjan, Inc.’s assertion of the attorney-client privilege and attorney work product
`
`protection over certain documents produced in another Finjan action1 against Cisco Systems, Inc.
`
`(“Cisco”). Dkt. No. 248. For the reasons discussed at the hearing, Finjan shall submit all disputed
`
`documents listed on Finjan’s privilege log (excluding listed deposition testimony that merely
`
`discusses the contents of a listed document) for in camera review by May 4, 2020. The disputed
`
`documents shall be submitted in electronic form to VKDcrd@cand.uscourts.gov. The submitted
`
`documents should include highlighting to indicate which portions have been redacted on
`
`privileged or work product grounds.
`
`To assist the Court in determining whether Finjan waived work product protection, the
`
`parties shall submit the evidence on which they rely for their respective contentions that at the
`
`time the disputed documents were disclosed to Cisco’s board observer, Yoav Samet, Cisco and
`
`Mr. Samet did or did not have an obligation to maintain the disputed documents in confidence,
`
`
`1 Finjan, Inc. v. Cisco Systems, Inc., No. 5:17-cv00072-BLF-SVK (N.D. Cal.).
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`Northern District of California
`
`United States District Court
`
`
`
`Case 5:17-cv-04467-BLF Document 255 Filed 04/28/20 Page 2 of 2
`
`
`
`and/or that the disputed documents were or were not disclosed to Mr. Samet in a manner that
`
`would enable an adversary to gain access to the information. The parties shall make these
`
`submissions by filing supplemental attorney declaration(s) identifying and attaching the evidence,
`
`without further argument. The Court requests that the parties submit their declarations with
`
`attached evidence by May 4, 2020.
`
`IT IS SO ORDERED.
`
`Dated: April 28, 2020
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`VIRGINIA K. DEMARCHI
`United States Magistrate Judge
`
`2
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`Northern District of California
`
`United States District Court
`
`