throbber
Case 5:17-cv-04467-BLF Document 255 Filed 04/28/20 Page 1 of 2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`SAN JOSE DIVISION
`
`FINJAN, INC.,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`SONICWALL, INC.,
`
`Defendant.
`
`Case No. 17-cv-04467-BLF (VKD)
`
`
`INTERIM ORDER RE APRIL 17, 2020
`JOINT DISCOVERY LETTER BRIEF
`
`Re: Dkt. No. 248
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`On April 28, 2020, the Court held a hearing on the parties’ discovery dispute concerning
`
`plaintiff Finjan, Inc.’s assertion of the attorney-client privilege and attorney work product
`
`protection over certain documents produced in another Finjan action1 against Cisco Systems, Inc.
`
`(“Cisco”). Dkt. No. 248. For the reasons discussed at the hearing, Finjan shall submit all disputed
`
`documents listed on Finjan’s privilege log (excluding listed deposition testimony that merely
`
`discusses the contents of a listed document) for in camera review by May 4, 2020. The disputed
`
`documents shall be submitted in electronic form to VKDcrd@cand.uscourts.gov. The submitted
`
`documents should include highlighting to indicate which portions have been redacted on
`
`privileged or work product grounds.
`
`To assist the Court in determining whether Finjan waived work product protection, the
`
`parties shall submit the evidence on which they rely for their respective contentions that at the
`
`time the disputed documents were disclosed to Cisco’s board observer, Yoav Samet, Cisco and
`
`Mr. Samet did or did not have an obligation to maintain the disputed documents in confidence,
`
`
`1 Finjan, Inc. v. Cisco Systems, Inc., No. 5:17-cv00072-BLF-SVK (N.D. Cal.).
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`Northern District of California
`
`United States District Court
`
`

`

`Case 5:17-cv-04467-BLF Document 255 Filed 04/28/20 Page 2 of 2
`
`
`
`and/or that the disputed documents were or were not disclosed to Mr. Samet in a manner that
`
`would enable an adversary to gain access to the information. The parties shall make these
`
`submissions by filing supplemental attorney declaration(s) identifying and attaching the evidence,
`
`without further argument. The Court requests that the parties submit their declarations with
`
`attached evidence by May 4, 2020.
`
`IT IS SO ORDERED.
`
`Dated: April 28, 2020
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`VIRGINIA K. DEMARCHI
`United States Magistrate Judge
`
`2
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`Northern District of California
`
`United States District Court
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket