`
`DUANE MORRIS LLP
`Matthew C. Gaudet (GA SBN 287759)
`Admitted Pro Hac Vice
`mcgaudet@duanemorris.com
`Robin L. McGrath (GA SBN 493115)
`Admitted Pro Hac Vice
`rlmcgrath@duanemorris.com
`David C. Dotson (GA SBN 138040)
`Admitted Pro Hac Vice
`dcdotson@duanemorris.com
`Jennifer H. Forte (GA SBN 940650)
`Admitted Pro Hac Vice
`jhforte@duanemorris.com
`1075 Peachtree Street, Ste. 2000
`Atlanta, GA 30309
`Telephone: 404.253.6900
`Facsimile: 404.253.6901
`
`
`DUANE MORRIS LLP
`D. Stuart Bartow (SBN 233107)
`Email: DSBartow@duanemorris.com
`Nicole E. Grigg (SBN 307733)
`Email: NEGrigg@duanemorris.com
`2475 Hanover Street
`Palo Alto, CA 94304-1194
`Telephone: 650.847.4150
`Facsimile: 650.847.4151
`
`DUANE MORRIS LLP
`Joseph A. Powers (PA SBN 84590)
`Admitted Pro Hac Vice
`japowers@duanemorris.com
`Jarrad M. Gunther (PA SBN 207038)
`Admitted Pro Hac Vice
`jmgunther@duanemorris.com
`30 South 17th Street
`Philadelphia, PA 19103
`Telephone: 215.979.1000
`Facsimile: 215.979.1020
`
`Attorneys for Defendant
`SONICWALL INC.
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`SAN JOSE DIVISION
`
`FINJAN, INC., a Delaware Corporation,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`vs.
`
`SONICWALL INC., a Delaware
`Corporation
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
` Case No. 5:17-cv-04467-BLF-VKD
`
`[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
`DEFENDANT SONICWALL INC.’S
`ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE
`DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL
`
`
`
`[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING SONICWALL, INC.’S ADMINSTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL;
`CASE NO. 5:17-CV-04467-BLF-VKD
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`Case 5:17-cv-04467-BLF Document 249-2 Filed 04/17/20 Page 2 of 3
`
`Having considered SonicWall Inc.’s (“SonicWall”) Administrative Motion to File
`Documents Under Seal and the declaration of Jennifer Forte In Support thereof, the Court hereby
`finds there to be good cause for granting the request to file certain documents and information under
`seal.
`
`Good cause having been shown, the Court finds that:
`1.
`There exist overriding confidentiality interests that overcome the right of public
`access to the following documents:
`
`Exhibit No.
`
`Document Title
`
`Portion(s) to Seal
`
`Reason(s) for Sealing
`
`
`
`Joint Discovery Letter Highlighted portions on pg.
`2 and pg. 3
`
`Ex. A
`
`Finjan, Inc.’s
`Supplemental Privilege
`and Redaction Log
`
`Entire Document
`
`This document reflects
`information, including
`the terms of an
`agreement and
`deposition testimony that
`Finjan has designated as
`“Confidential –
`Attorneys’ Eyes Only”
`pursuant to the
`Stipulated Protective
`Order. See Declaration
`of Jennifer Forte in
`Support of
`Administrative Motion
`to File Documents Under
`Seal (“Forte
`Declaration”), ¶¶ 2-4.
`
`This document reflects
`information that Finjan
`has designated as
`“Confidential –
`Attorneys’ Eyes Only”
`pursuant to the
`Stipulated Protective
`Order. See Forte
`Declaration, ¶¶ 2-4.
`
`
`
`2.
`A substantial probability exists that the overriding confidentiality interests will be
`prejudiced if the record is not sealed;
`3.
`The proposed sealing is narrowly tailored; and
`
`1
`[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING SONICWALL, INC.’S ADMINSTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL;
`CASE NO. 5:17-CV-04467-BLF-VKD
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`Case 5:17-cv-04467-BLF Document 249-2 Filed 04/17/20 Page 3 of 3
`
`4.
`No less restrictive means exist to achieve these overriding interests.
`IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that SonicWall’s Administrative Motion to File Documents
`Under Seal is GRANTED with respect to the document set forth above.
`
`
`IT IS SO ORDERED.
`Dated:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`MAGISTRATE JUDGE VIRGINIA K. DEMARCHI
`United States District Court Magistrate Judge
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`2
`[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING SONICWALL, INC.’S ADMINSTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL;
`CASE NO. 5:17-CV-04467-BLF-VKD
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
