throbber
Case 5:17-cv-04467-BLF Document 111 Filed 01/31/19 Page 1 of 5
`
`DUANE MORRIS LLP
`Patrick S. Salceda (CA SBN 247978)
`psalceda@duanemorris.com
`One Market Plaza
`Spear Tower, Suite 2200
`San Francisco, CA 94105
`Telephone: 415.957.3000
`Facsimile: 650.618.2713
`
`DUANE MORRIS LLP
`Joseph A. Powers (PA SBN 84590)
`Admitted Pro Hac Vice
`japowers@duanemorris.com
`Jarrad M. Gunther (PA SBN 207038)
`Admitted Pro Hac Vice
`jmgunther@duanemorris.com
`30 South 17th Street
`Philadelphia, PA 19103
`Telephone: 215.979.1000
`Facsimile: 215.979.1020
`
`Attorneys for Defendant
`SONICWALL INC.
`
`DUANE MORRIS LLP
`Matthew C. Gaudet (GA SBN 287759)
`Admitted Pro Hac Vice
`mcgaudet@duanemorris.com
`Robin L. McGrath (GA SBN 493115)
`Admitted Pro Hac Vice
`rlmcgrath@duanemorris.com
`David C. Dotson (GA SBN 138040)
`Admitted Pro Hac Vice
`dcdotson@duanemorris.com
`Jennifer H. Forte (GA SBN 940650)
`Admitted Pro Hac Vice
`jhforte@duanemorris.com
`1075 Peachtree Street, Ste. 2000
`Atlanta, GA 30309
`Telephone: 404.253.6900
`Facsimile: 404.253.6901
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`SAN JOSE DIVISION
`
`FINJAN, INC., a Delaware Corporation,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`vs.
`
`SONICWALL INC., a Delaware
`Corporation
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
` Case No. 5:17-cv-04467-BLF-VKD
`
`DEFENDANT SONICWALL INC.’S
`ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO
`FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL
`
`
`
`SONICWALL’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL;
`CASE NO.: 5:17-CV-04467-BLF-VKD
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

`

`Case 5:17-cv-04467-BLF Document 111 Filed 01/31/19 Page 2 of 5
`
`I.
`
`INTRODUCTION
`Pursuant to Civil L.R. 7-11 and 79-5, this Court’s Standing Civil Order Re: Civil Cases, the
`Parties Stipulated Protective Order (Dkt. 68), the Parties Stipulated Order Regarding Discovery of
`Electronically Stored Information (Dkt. 69), and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(b)(5)(B),
`Defendant SonicWall Inc. (“SonicWall”) hereby moves the Court for leave to file under seal,
`pursuant to Civil L.R. 79-5(d)-(e), the items identified in the table below.
`
`Document to Be Filed Under Seal
`
`Designating Party
`
`Finjan, Inc. and SonicWall Inc.
`
`Finjan, Inc. and SonicWall Inc.
`
`Exhibits 3-15 to Declaration of Robin McGrath
`in Support of SonicWall Inc.’s Motion to
`Compel Further Supplemental Infringement
`Contentions
`
`SonicWall Inc.’s Motion to Compel Further
`Supplemental Infringement Contentions, at:
`Page 6, lines 21-25;
`Page 7, lines 21-22;
`Page 8, lines 23-27;
`Page 9, lines 1-6;
`Page 10, lines 10-21; 24-27;
`Page 11, lines 4-10; 16-20; 24; 26; 28;
`Page 12, lines 6-11;
`Page 13, lines 7-9; 12-15; 17-19; 21-22;
`Page 14, lines 19-23;
`Page 15, lines 3-5; 7-9; 20-27;
`Page 17, lines 27-28;
`Page 18, lines 1-6; 12; 24-25; 27-28;
`Page 19, lines 5-11; 24-26;
`Page 20, lines 3-11; 13-20; 21-28;
`Page 21, lines 1-2; 4-9; 12-19;
`Page 22, lines 1-3; 11-14; 25-28;
`Page 23, lines 1; 18-20; 23;
`Page 24, lines 1-4; 6-10; 19-21.
`
`II.
`
`ARGUMENT
`A.
`Legal Standard
`There is a presumption of public access to judicial records and documents. Nixon v. Warner
`Commc'ns, Inc., 435 U.S. 589, 597 (1978). However, records attached to non-dispositive motions,
`such is the case here, are not subject to the strong presumption of access. Finjan, Inc. v. Proofpoint,
`Inc, No. 13-CV-05808-HSG, 2015 WL 9023164, at *1 (N.D. Cal. Dec. 16, 2015) (internal citation
`1
`SONICWALL’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL;
`CASE NO.: 5:17-CV-04467-BLF-VKD
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

`

`Case 5:17-cv-04467-BLF Document 111 Filed 01/31/19 Page 3 of 5
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`omitted). Because the documents attached to non-dispositive motions “are often unrelated, or only
`tangentially related, to the underlying cause of action,” parties moving to seal must meet the lower
`“good cause” standard of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 26(c). Id. (internal quotation
`marks omitted). The “good cause” standard requires a “particularized showing” that “specific
`prejudice or harm will result” if the information is disclosed. Phillips ex rel. Estates of Byrd v. Gen.
`Motors Corp., 307 F.3d 1206, 1210-11 (9th Cir. 2002) (internal quotation marks omitted); see Fed.
`R. Civ. P. 26(c). “Broad allegations of harm, unsubstantiated by specific examples of articulated
`reasoning” will not suffice. Beckman Indus., Inc. v. Int'l Ins. Co., 966 F.2d 470, 476 (9th Cir. 1992).
`Sealing is appropriate where the requesting party “establishes that the document, or portions
`thereof is privileged or protectable as a trade secret or otherwise entitled to protection under the
`law.” N.D. Cal. Civ. L.R. 79–5(a). A party must “narrowly tailor” its request to sealable material
`only. Id.
`
`B.
`
`SonicWall’s Administrative Motion to Seal Is Supported By Good Cause and Is
`Narrowly Tailored
`
`SonicWall seeks to seal select portions of SonicWall’s Motion to Compel Further
`Supplemental Infringement Contentions, and Exhibits 3-15 to the Declaration of Robin McGrath in
`support. These documents consist of appendices to Finjan’s Supplemental Infringement
`Contentions, each of which is designated by Finjan as “Highly Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only”
`pursuant to the terms of the Stipulated Protective Order. See Declaration of Patrick S. Salceda in
`Support of Administrative Motion to File Documents Under Seal (“Salceda Declaration”), ¶¶ 3-15.
`Moreover, each of these appendices cite to and quote from various internal SonicWall documents,
`such as functional specifications and design materials that SonicWall considers confidential and
`proprietary and are not to be disclosed without the consent of SonicWall. Salceda Decl., ¶ 16. Public
`disclosure of the information contained in Exhibits 3-15 to the McGrath Declaration would cause
`irreparable harm to SonicWall. Id.; see also Andrx Pharms., LLC v. GlaxoSmithKline, 236 F.R.D.
`583, 586 (S.D. Fla. 2006) (“Courts dress technical information with a heavy cloak of judicial
`protection because of the threat of serious economic injury to the disclosure of scientific
`information.”); Network Appliance, Inc. v. Sun Microsys. Inc., 2010 WL 841274, at *5 (N.D. Cal.
`2
`SONICWALL’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL;
`CASE NO.: 5:17-CV-04467-BLF-VKD
`
`

`

`Case 5:17-cv-04467-BLF Document 111 Filed 01/31/19 Page 4 of 5
`
`Mar. 10, 2010) (granting application to seal “information regarding NetApp’s internal usability
`testing of its software”).
`Further, SonicWall’s administrative motion is narrowly tailored and only seeks to seal those
`exhibits designated Highly-Confidential Attorneys’ Eyes Only and the select portions of
`SonicWall’s Motion to Compel that quote from these designated exhibits. See Kowalsky v. Hewlett-
`Packard Co., 2012 WL 892427, at *2 (N.D. Cal. Mar. 14, 2012) (finding sealing appropriate where
`“[t]he proposed redactions contain[ed] . . . confidential product development information, the
`disclosure of which could harm [the defendant's] competitive advantage in the marketplace.”).
`III. CONCLUSION
`For these reasons, SonicWall respectfully requests that the Court grant its Administrative
`Motion to Seal.
`
`Dated: January 31, 2019
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/s/ Patrick S. Salceda
`Patrick S. Salceda
`DUANE MORRIS LLP
`One Market Plaza
`Spear Tower, Suite 2200
`San Francisco, CA 94105
`Telephone: 415.957.3000
`Facsimile: 650.618.2713
`Email: psalceda@duanemorris.com
`
`Matthew C. Gaudet (admitted pro hac vice)
`Email: mcgaudet@duanemorris.com
`Roblin L. McGrath (admitted pro hac vice)
`Email: rlmcgrath@duanemorris.com
`David C. Dotson (admitted pro hac vice)
`Email: dcdotson@duanemorris.com
`Jennifer H. Forte (admitted pro hac vice)
`Email: jhforte@duanemorris.com
`1075 Peachtree Street, Ste. 2000
`Atlanta, GA 30309
`Telephone: 404.253.6901
`Facsimile: 404.253.6901
`
`
`
`
`3
`SONICWALL’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL;
`CASE NO.: 5:17-CV-04467-BLF-VKD
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

`

`Case 5:17-cv-04467-BLF Document 111 Filed 01/31/19 Page 5 of 5
`
`Joseph A. Powers (admitted pro hac vice)
`Email: japowers@duanemorris.com
`Jarrad M. Gunther (admitted pro hac vice)
`Email: jmgunther@duanemorris.com
`30 South 17th Street
`Philadelphia, PA 19103
`Telephone: 215.979.1000
`Facsimile: 215.979.1020
`
`Attorneys for Defendant
`SONICWALL INC.
`
`4
`SONICWALL’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL;
`CASE NO.: 5:17-CV-04467-BLF-VKD
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket