Case 5:15-cv-03295-BLF Document 289-5 Filed 09/21/17 Page 1 of 99
`Case 5:15-cv-03295-BLF Document 289-5 Filed 09/21/17 Page 1 of 99
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`APPENDIX C-3
`APPENDIX C-3
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 5:15-cv-03295-BLF Document 289-5 Filed 09/21/17 Page 2 of 99
`
`APPENDIX C-3
`
`DEFENDANT BLUE COAT SYSTEMS LLC’S EXHIBIT LIST
`
`United States District Court
`For the Northern District of California (San Jose Division)
`
`Finjan, Inc. v. Blue Coat Systems LLC
`
`Case No. 15-cv-03295-BLF
`
`Trial Date: October 27, 2017
`
`Defendant Blue Coat Systems LLC (“Blue Coat”) respectfully submits its Trial Exhibit
`
`List. Blue Coat reserves the right to supplement, amend, or modify its list as the parties meet
`
`and confer and the case proceeds toward the pretrial conference and trial; to introduce such other
`
`or additional evidence as may be permitted in the discretion of the Court; and to introduce
`
`additional evidence for impeachment or rebuttal purposes. Blue Coat reserves the right to object
`
`to the admission of any document included on its exhibit list. Blue Coat reserves the right to
`
`offer at trial any exhibit listed on Finjan’s exhibit list.
`
`Blue Coat reserves the right to print in paper format any document that is listed as a
`
`native exhibit on the exhibit list. Blue Coat further reserves the right to use metadata from
`
`documents on the exhibit list.
`
`sf-3818340
`
`1
`
`

`

`Case 5:15-cv-03295-BLF Document 289-5 Filed 09/21/17 Page 3 of 99
`
`APPENDIX C-3
`
`Finjan’s General Objections
`
`Finjan objects to all of Blue Coat’s Trial Exhibits, deposition transcript designations, and
`
`
`
`discovery response designations to the extent they are precluded by a pending motion, i.e.
`
`motions in limine, Daubert motion, motion to strike, or issue identified in the Pretrial Statement
`
`or at the forthcoming Pretrial Conference. Finjan objects to all of Joint exhibits are noted as
`
`“JOINT.” Descriptions for these exhibits are found in the Joint Exhibit List at Appendix C-1.
`
`Finjan reserves its right to further object to these exhibits based on any changes made to the Joint
`
`Exhibit List. To the extent any exhibits are introduced for issues outside the scope of the
`
`October 30, 2017 trial, Finjan reserves the right to assert additional objections at trial. Finjan
`
`further reserves the right to assert additional objections at the time that Blue Coat introduces the
`
`proposed exhibits or testimony at trial depending on Blue Coat’s ability to properly authenticate,
`
`lay the proper foundation and demonstrate the intended use for the admission of the proposed
`
`exhibits, discovery responses and/or testimony into evidence.
`
`Finjan’s counter-designations apply to each of Blue Coat’s designations. Finjan
`
`incorporates by reference all objections stated by counsel in the deposition transcript in its
`
`objections to Blue Coat’s designations. Finjan reserves all objections to designated testimony
`
`that is incomplete or contains errors in the designation. Finjan reserves the right to rely upon
`
`Blue Coat’s designations to the extent that Blue Coat withdraws any of its designations. Finjan
`
`specifically objects to Blue Coat’s designation of trial testimony from Finjan v. Blue Coat, Case
`
`No. 13-3999, as hearsay that does not fall under the exceptions of Fed. R. Evid. 803 and 804.
`
`Finjan objects to Blue Coat’s statement that it “reserves all rights, including its right to amend,
`
`modify, or supplement the following designations as trial preparation and trial progresses, to call
`
`witnesses live, by deposition, or both, and to use additional segments of depositions for
`
`sf-3818340
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case 5:15-cv-03295-BLF Document 289-5 Filed 09/21/17 Page 4 of 99
`
`
`
`APPENDIX C-3
`
`impeachment, rebuttal, foundation, or other purposes” as such a broad statement does not
`
`provide sufficient notice of Blue Coat’s pretrial disclosures and violates the Court’s Standing
`
`Order, Local Rules of the Court, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and/or Federal Rules of
`
`Evidence.
`
`Plaintiff Finjan, Inc.’s Key of Objections
`
`Objection List
`Hearsay (FRE 801, 802)—The exhibits/testimony are hearsay and do not fall
`within any hearsay exception.
`Irrelevant (FRE 401, 402)—The exhibits/testimony are inadmissible without any
`tendency to make the existence of any fact that is of consequence to the
`determination of the action more or less probable than it would be without them.
`Finjan notes this objection is used for the purpose for which Blue Coat offers the
`exhibit without waiving the right to use the exhibit or evidence for another
`purpose.
`Unfair Prejudice, Confusing, Waste of Time (403) —To the extent that these
`exhibits/testimony contain any relevant information, they should be excluded
`because their probative value is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair
`prejudice, confusion of issues, or is a mischaracterization of the testimony, or
`misleading the jury, or by considerations of undue delay, waste of time, or
`needless presentation of cumulative evidence.
`Violates FRE 401, 402 and 403
`Lack of Personal Knowledge/Foundation (FRE 602)—Defendant has not
`identified a witness with personal knowledge to testify regarding these exhibits.
`The witness does not have personal knowledge to testify about a matter, the
`proposed testimony is speculation and/or outside the scope of the 30(b)(6)
`designation.
`Improper Lay Opinion (FRE 701)—The exhibits/testimony necessarily rely upon
`the opinion testimony of a lay witness beyond the scope of what is permitted.
`Improper Expert Opinion / Testimony (FRE 702)
`Authenticity—These exhibits have not been authenticated within the meaning of
`FRE 901. The testimony fails to authenticate the deposition exhibit.
`Best Evidence (FRE 1001-1003)—The exhibits/testimony fail to satisfy the best
`evidence rule under FRE 1001-1003.
`FRE 1006—These exhibits are an improper summary, chart, or calculation.
`Privilege (501)
`Improper Character Evidence (404, 608, 609)
`Leading/Waste of Time (611)—The presentation of these exhibits/testimony will
`result in needless consumption of time and cause witnesses harassment or undue
`embarrassment. Leading questions should not be used on direct examination of a
`witness except as may be necessary to develop a witness’ testimony.
`
`Abbreviation
`
`H
`
`401, 402
`
`403
`401-403
`
`602
`
`701
`702
`
`901
`
`1001-1003
`1006
`501
`CE
`
`611
`
`
`sf-3818340
`
`-3-
`
`

`

`Case 5:15-cv-03295-BLF Document 289-5 Filed 09/21/17 Page 5 of 99
`
`
`
`APPENDIX C-3
`
`Objection List
`Compound, Vague, Argumentative, Duplicative, Asked and Answered—The
`presentation of these exhibits/testimony violate FRE 403 and 611.
`Improper Legal Conclusion (401, 611)
`Subject to motion in limine and/or evidentiary dispute raised in the Pretrial
`Statement
`Not Related—Counter Designation is Not Related to Initial Designations
`Documents Not Produced During Discovery
`Multiple documents are listed as a single exhibit
`Incomplete/unintelligible document or testimony
`Not Testimony
`
`
`Abbreviation
`
`403, 611
`LC
`
`EXC
`NR
`NP
`MD
`IC
`NT
`
`
`sf-3818340
`
`-4-
`
`

`

`Case 5:15-cv-03295-BLF Document 289-5 Filed 09/21/17 Page 6 of 99
`
`APPENDIX C-3
`
`Defendant Blue Coat Systems LLC’s Response to
`Plaintiff Finjan, Inc.’s General Objections
`
`Blue Coat objects to Finjan’s statement that “[t]o the extent any exhibits are introduced
`
`for issues outside the scope of the October 30, 2017 trial, Finjan reserves the right to assert
`
`additional objections at trial” as overly broad and fails to provide sufficient notice of Finjan’s
`
`pretrial disclosures, violates the Court’s Standing Order, Local Rules of the Court, the Federal
`
`Rules of Civil Procedure and/or Federal Rules of Evidence, and is an improper reservation of
`
`rights.
`
`
`Abbreviation
`C
`REL
`F
`
`LAY
`EXPERT
`NH
`AUTH
`BEST
`SUM
`AVAIL
`
`OPP
`IMPOBJ
`IMPRC
`
`
`
`
`Defendant Blue Coat Systems LLC’s Key of Responses
`
`Responses
`Complete
`Relevant, not unfairly prejudicial, confusing, or waste of time
`Will be used with witness with personal knowledge or 30(b)(6) deponent, or
`relied upon by expert
`Proper lay testimony, not submitted as expert testimony
`Proper expert testimony
`Not hearsay or qualifies as an exception to hearsay
`Properly authenticated or subject to stipulation re authentication
`Best evidence
`Proper summary
`Produced, publicly available and identified in deposition or expert report, or
`exchanged
`Subject to opposition to motion in limine
`Improper objection
`Improper counter-designation
`
`sf-3818340
`
`5
`
`

`

`Doc Date
`
`Bates Range
`
`
`
`DTX
`Exh
`No.
`2001
`2002
`2003
`2004
`2005
`2006
`2007
`2008
`
`2009
`
`4/21/2017 N/A
`
`2010
`2011
`2012
`2013
`2014
`2015
`2016
`2017
`2018
`2019
`2020
`2021
`2022
`2023
`
`Case 5:15-cv-03295-BLF Document 289-5 Filed 09/21/17 Page 7 of 99
`
`APPENDIX C-3
`
`Purpose For
`Which
`Offered
`
`Objs. Response
`To Objs.
`
`Court
`Use
`
`Noninfringem
`ent
`
`H, 401,
`402, 403,
`611, 702
`
`NH, REL,
`IMPOBJ:
`611,
`EXPERT
`
`
`
`Document Description
`
`Sponsoring
`Witness(es)
`Withdrawn
`Withdrawn
`Withdrawn
`Withdrawn
`Withdrawn
`Withdrawn
`Withdrawn
`Withdrawn
`Rebuttal Expert Report of Dr. Seth
`Nielson Regarding Noninfringement
`of U.S. Patent Nos. 6,154,844,
`6,965,968, 7,418,731, 8,079,086,
`8,225,408, 8,566,580, 8,677,494,
`9,141,786, 9,189,621, and 9,219,755
`Withdrawn
`Withdrawn
`Withdrawn
`Withdrawn
`Withdrawn
`Withdrawn
`Withdrawn
`Withdrawn
`Withdrawn
`Withdrawn
`Withdrawn
`Withdrawn
`Withdrawn
`Withdrawn
`
`Nielson
`
`sf-3818340
`
`6
`
`

`

`Case 5:15-cv-03295-BLF Document 289-5 Filed 09/21/17 Page 8 of 99
`
`APPENDIX C-3
`
`
`
`DTX
`Exh
`No.
`2024
`2025
`2026
`2027
`2028
`2029
`2030
`2031
`2032
`2033
`2034
`2035
`2036
`2037
`2038
`2039
`2040
`2041
`
`Doc Date
`
`Bates Range
`
`Document Description
`
`Sponsoring
`Witness(es)
`Withdrawn
`Withdrawn
`Withdrawn
`Withdrawn
`Withdrawn
`Withdrawn
`Withdrawn
`Withdrawn
`Withdrawn
`Withdrawn
`Withdrawn
`Withdrawn
`Withdrawn
`Withdrawn
`Withdrawn
`Withdrawn
`Withdrawn
`Withdrawn
`
`Purpose For
`Which
`Offered
`
`Objs. Response
`To Objs.
`
`Court
`Use
`
`2042
`
`n/a
`
`N/A
`
`2043
`2044
`2045
`2046
`
`
`sf-3818340
`
`https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-
`us/library/windows/desktop/aa36651
`0(v=vs.85).aspx (Windows Filtering
`Platform)
`
`Nielson
`
`Technical
`Background,
`Noninfringem
`ent
`
`H, 401,
`402, 403,
`611, 702,
`901, NP
`
`Withdrawn
`Withdrawn
`Withdrawn
`Withdrawn
`
`-7-
`
`NH, REL,
`IMPOBJ:
`611,
`EXPERT,
`AUTH,
`AVAIL
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 5:15-cv-03295-BLF Document 289-5 Filed 09/21/17 Page 9 of 99
`
`APPENDIX C-3
`
`Doc Date
`
`Bates Range
`
`Document Description
`
`
`
`DTX
`Exh
`No.
`2047
`2048
`2049
`2050
`2051
`2052
`2053
`2054
`2055
`
`2056
`
`4/28/2016 N/A
`
`2057
`2058
`2059
`2060
`2061
`2062
`2063
`
`Sponsoring
`Witness(es)
`Withdrawn
`Withdrawn
`Withdrawn
`Withdrawn
`Withdrawn
`Withdrawn
`Withdrawn
`Withdrawn
`Withdrawn
`Plaintiff Finjan Disclosure of
`Asserted Claims and Infringement
`Contentions and Document
`Production Accompanying
`Disclosure Pursuant to Patent Local
`Rules 3-1 and 3-2
`
`Nielson
`
`Withdrawn
`Withdrawn
`Withdrawn
`Withdrawn
`Withdrawn
`Withdrawn
`Withdrawn
`
`Purpose For
`Which
`Offered
`
`Objs. Response
`To Objs.
`
`Court
`Use
`
`Accused
`Products,
`Noninfringem
`ent
`
`H, 401,
`402, 403,
`611, 702
`
`NH, REL,
`IMPOBJ:
`611,
`EXPERT
`
`
`
`Blue Coat
`Background,
`Damages
`
`H, 401,
`402, 403,
`602, 611,
`701, 901
`
`NH, REL,
`F, LAY,
`AUTH,
`IMPOBJ:
`611
`
`
`
`2064 12/15/2015 BC2-1888618-
`BC2-1888632
`
`Non-Exclusive Patent License and
`Settlement Agreement
`
`Schoenfeld
`
`2065
`
`
`sf-3818340
`
`Withdrawn
`
`-8-
`
`

`

`Case 5:15-cv-03295-BLF Document 289-5 Filed 09/21/17 Page 10 of 99
`
`APPENDIX C-3
`
`Doc Date
`
`Bates Range
`
`
`
`DTX
`Exh
`No.
`2066
`2067
`2068
`2069
`2070
`2071
`2072
`
`2073 12/31/2013 N/A
`
`2074 12/31/2016 N/A
`
`2075
`2076
`
`2077
`
`2004
`
`BC0210711-
`BC0211416
`
`Blue Coat Systems ProxySG
`Configuration and Management
`Guide
`
`Sorgic
`
`Accused
`Products,
`Noninfringem
`ent
`
`H, 401,
`402, 403,
`602, 611,
`901, 1006
`
`2078
`2079
`
`
`sf-3818340
`
`Withdrawn
`Withdrawn
`
`-9-
`
`Purpose For
`Which
`Offered
`
`Objs. Response
`To Objs.
`
`Court
`Use
`
`Document Description
`
`Sponsoring
`Witness(es)
`Withdrawn
`Withdrawn
`Withdrawn
`Withdrawn
`Withdrawn
`Withdrawn
`Withdrawn
`Finjan Holdings, Inc. Annual Report
`Pursuant To Section 13 or 15(D) Of
`The Securities Exchange Act Of
`1934 For The Fiscal Year Ended
`December 31, 2013
`
`Thomas
`
`Finjan
`Background
`
`Finjan Holdings, Inc. Annual Report
`Pursuant To Section 13 or 15(D) Of
`The Securities Exchange Act Of
`1934 For The Fiscal Year Ended
`December 31, 2016
`
`Thomas
`
`Finjan
`Background
`
`Withdrawn
`Withdrawn
`
`H, 401,
`402,
`403, 702,
`611, NP
`
`H, 401,
`402, 403,
`611, 702,
`NP
`
`NH, REL,
`EXPERT,
`EXPERT,
`AVAIL,
`IMPOBJ:
`611
`NH, REL,
`EXPERT,
`EXPERT,
`AVAIL,
`IMPOBJ:
`611
`
`NH, REL,
`F,
`IMPOBJ:
`611,
`AUTH,
`SUM
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 5:15-cv-03295-BLF Document 289-5 Filed 09/21/17 Page 11 of 99
`
`
`
`DTX
`Exh
`No.
`2080
`2081
`
`Doc Date
`
`Bates Range
`
`APPENDIX C-3
`
`Document Description
`
`Sponsoring
`Witness(es)
`Withdrawn
`Withdrawn
`
`2082
`
`4/20/2016 BC2-0054940-
`BC2-0054940
`
`Email re: FS-ISAC Intelligence Data
`within Blue Coat or GIN
`
`Runald
`
`2083
`
`4/19/2016 BC2-0054941-
`BC2-0054942
`
`Email re: Visa EBC follow up and
`your algorithm!
`
`C. Larsen
`
`2084
`
`4/19/2016 BC2-0054943-
`BC2-0054943
`
`Email re: Visa EBC follow up and
`your algorithm!
`
`C. Larsen
`
`2085
`
`4/19/2016 BC2-0054944-
`BC2-0054944
`
`Email re: FS-ISAC Intelligence Data
`within Blue Coat or GIN
`
`C. Larsen
`
`Purpose For
`Which
`Offered
`
`Accused
`Products, Blue
`Coat
`Background,
`Noninfringem
`ent
`Accused
`Products, Blue
`Coat
`Background,
`Noninfringem
`ent
`Accused
`Products, Blue
`Coat
`Background,
`Noninfringem
`ent
`Accused
`Products, Blue
`Coat
`Background,
`Noninfringem
`ent
`
`Objs. Response
`To Objs.
`
`Court
`Use
`
`H, 401,
`402, 403,
`611, 701
`
`NH, REL,
`IMPOBJ:
`611, LAY
`
`H, 401,
`402, 403,
`611, 701
`
`NH, REL,
`IMPOBJ:
`611, LAY
`
`H, 401,
`402, 403,
`611, 701
`
`NH, REL,
`IMPOBJ:
`611, LAY
`
`H, 401,
`402, 403,
`611, 701,
`dupe
`
`NH, REL,
`IMPOBJ:
`611, LAY
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`sf-3818340
`
`-10-
`
`

`

`Case 5:15-cv-03295-BLF Document 289-5 Filed 09/21/17 Page 12 of 99
`
`APPENDIX C-3
`
`
`
`DTX
`Exh
`No.
`
`Doc Date
`
`Bates Range
`
`Document Description
`
`Sponsoring
`Witness(es)
`
`2086
`
`4/19/2016 BC2-0054945-
`BC2-0054947
`
`Email re: False Positive Rate on
`Intelligence Service
`
`C. Larsen
`
`2087
`
`4/19/2016 BC2-0054948-
`BC2-0054949
`
`Email re: False Positive Rate on
`Intelligence Service
`
`C. Larsen
`
`2088
`
`1/9/2015 BC2-0433324-
`BC2-0433325
`
`Email re: wiper malware
`
`C. Larsen;
`Runald
`
`2089
`
`9/16/2016 BC2-0698271-
`BC2-0698297
`
`Malware Analysis and Integration
`with Content Analysis
`
`Nielson
`
`2090
`
`5/21/2014 BC2-0778672-
`BC2-0778673
`
`Email re: eBay Hacked
`
`C. Larsen
`
`
`sf-3818340
`
`-11-
`
`Purpose For
`Which
`Offered
`Accused
`Products, Blue
`Coat
`Background,
`Noninfringem
`ent
`Accused
`Products, Blue
`Coat
`Background,
`Noninfringem
`ent
`Accused
`Products, Blue
`Coat
`Background,
`Noninfringem
`ent
`Accused
`Products, Blue
`Coat
`Background,
`Noninfringem
`ent
`Accused
`Products, Blue
`Coat
`Background,
`Noninfringem
`ent
`
`Objs. Response
`To Objs.
`
`Court
`Use
`
`H, 401,
`402, 403,
`611, 701
`
`NH, REL,
`IMPOBJ:
`611, LAY
`
`H, 401,
`402, 403,
`611, 701
`
`NH, REL,
`IMPOBJ:
`611, LAY
`
`H, 401,
`402, 403,
`611
`
`NH, REL,
`IMPOBJ:
`611
`
`H, 401,
`402, 403,
`602, 611,
`702,
`1006,
`EXC
`
`NH, REL,
`F,
`IMPOBJ:
`611,
`EXPERT,
`SUM, OPP
`
`H, 401,
`402, 403,
`602, 611,
`701
`
`NH, REL,
`F,
`IMPOBJ:
`611, LAY
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 5:15-cv-03295-BLF Document 289-5 Filed 09/21/17 Page 13 of 99
`
`APPENDIX C-3
`
`
`
`DTX
`Exh
`No.
`2091
`
`Purpose For
`Which
`Offered
`
`Accused
`Products, Blue
`Coat
`Background
`Accused
`Products, Blue
`Coat
`Background,
`Noninfringem
`ent
`Accused
`Products, Blue
`Coat
`Background
`
`Blue Coat
`Sales Related
`Information,
`Damages
`
`Objs. Response
`To Objs.
`
`Court
`Use
`
`H, 401,
`402, 403,
`602, 611,
`1006, 701
`
`H, 401,
`402, 403,
`602, 611,
`701, 901,
`IC
`H, 401,
`402, 403,
`602, 611,
`701, 901,
`IC
`H, 401,
`402, 403,
`602, 611,
`901 ,
`1006, IC,
`EXC
`
`H, 401,
`402, 403,
`611, 702,
`901, NP
`
`NH, REL,
`F, LAY,
`SUM,
`IMPOBJ:
`611, 1006
`NH, REL,
`F,
`IMPOBJ:
`611, LAY,
`AUTH, C
`NH, REL,
`F,
`IMPOBJ:
`611, LAY,
`AUTH, C
`NH, REL,
`F, AUTH,
`SUM, C.
`OPP,
`IMPOBJ:
`611, 1006
`
`NH, REL,
`EXPERT,
`AUTH,
`AVAIL,
`IMPOBJ:
`611
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Doc Date
`
`Bates Range
`
`Document Description
`
`Sponsoring
`Witness(es)
`Withdrawn
`
`2092
`
`11/1/2014 BC2-1361100-
`BC2-1361123
`
`Blue Coat Product One Pagers
`
`Schoenfeld
`
`2093 12/30/2013 BC2-1414859-
`BC2-1414870
`
`BC Unit 06 - Malware Analysis
`Appliance KernelScout Drivers v1.0 Rohan
`
`2094 12/30/2013 BC2-1414871-
`BC2-1414887
`
`BC Unit 07 - Malware Analysis
`Appliance Event Capture v1.0
`
`Rohan
`
`2095
`
`2/17/2017 BC2-1895235-
`BC2-1895235
`
`US Gov't list FY13 YtdFY17.xlsx
`
`Dildine
`
`2096
`
`Withdrawn
`
`2097 Mar-11 N/A
`
`The Evolving IP Marketplace:
`Aligning Patent Notice and
`Remedies With Competition
`
`Thomas
`
`Damages
`
`
`sf-3818340
`
`-12-
`
`

`

`Case 5:15-cv-03295-BLF Document 289-5 Filed 09/21/17 Page 14 of 99
`
`APPENDIX C-3
`
`
`
`DTX
`Exh
`No.
`
`Doc Date
`
`Bates Range
`
`Document Description
`
`Sponsoring
`Witness(es)
`
`Purpose For
`Which
`Offered
`
`2098 10/16/2013 BC0054779-
`BC0054780
`
`Supplier Payment History Report
`
`Schoenfeld Blue Coat
`Background
`
`Objs. Response
`To Objs.
`NH, REL,
`F, AUTH,
`SUM, C.
`OPP,
`IMPOBJ:
`611, 1006
`
`H, 401,
`402, 403,
`602, 611,
`901,
`1006, IC,
`EXC
`
`Court
`Use
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2099
`
`Withdrawn
`
`2100
`
`n/a
`
`BC2-0070332-
`BC2-0070332
`
`Blue Coat Threat Risk Level
`Descriptions
`
`Sorgic;
`Runald
`
`2101
`
`9/22/2014 BC2-0426163-
`BC2-0426164
`
`Email re: Align MA verdicts to GIN
`Threat Levels
`
`C. Larsen;
`Runald
`
`2102
`
`2009
`
`BC0193806-
`BC0193807
`
`Optimizing Federal Networks:
`Achieve Greater Application
`Visibility Across The Enterprise
`
`Schoenfeld
`
`2103
`
`2010
`
`BC0193849-
`BC0193868
`
`Controlling WAN Bandwidth and
`Application Traffic on Government
`Networks
`
`Schoenfeld
`
`
`sf-3818340
`
`-13-
`
`Accused
`Products, Blue
`Coat
`Background
`Accused
`Products, Blue
`Coat
`Background
`Accused
`Products, Blue
`Coat
`Background,
`Damages
`Accused
`Products, Blue
`Coat
`Background,
`Damages
`
`H, 401,
`402, 403,
`611, 701,
`901, IC
`
`NH, REL,
`IMPOBJ:
`611, LAY,
`AUTH, C
`
`H, 401,
`402, 403,
`611, 701
`H, 401,
`402, 403,
`602, 611,
`901,
`1006, IC,
`EXC
`H, 401,
`402, 403,
`602, 611,
`901. EXC
`
`NH, REL,
`IMPOBJ:
`611, LAY
`
`NH, REL,
`F, AUTH,
`C. OPP,
`IMPOBJ:
`611, 1006
`NH, REL,
`F, AUTH,
`OPP,
`IMPOBJ:
`611
`
`

`

`Case 5:15-cv-03295-BLF Document 289-5 Filed 09/21/17 Page 15 of 99
`
`APPENDIX C-3
`
`
`
`DTX
`Exh
`No.
`
`Doc Date
`
`Bates Range
`
`Document Description
`
`Sponsoring
`Witness(es)
`
`Court
`Use
`
`Purpose For
`Which
`Offered
`Accused
`Products, Blue
`Coat
`Background,
`Damages
`Accused
`Products, Blue
`Coat
`Background,
`Damages
`Accused
`Products, Blue
`Coat
`Background,
`Damages
`Accused
`Products, Blue
`Coat
`Background,
`Damages
`Accused
`Products, Blue
`Coat
`Background,
`Damages
`
`Objs. Response
`To Objs.
`NH, REL,
`F, AUTH,
`OPP,
`IMPOBJ:
`611
`NH, REL,
`F, AUTH,
`OPP,
`IMPOBJ:
`611, 1006
`NH, REL,
`F, AUTH,
`LAY,
`IMPOBJ:
`611, 1006
`NH, REL,
`F, AUTH,
`LAY,
`IMPOBJ:
`611, 1006
`NH, REL,
`F, AUTH,
`LAY,
`IMPOBJ:
`611, 1006
`
`H, 401,
`402, 403,
`602, 611,
`901, EXC
`H, 401,
`402, 403,
`602, 611,
`901,
`1006,
`EXC
`H, 401,
`402, 403,
`602, 611,
`901,
`1006, 701
`H, 401,
`402, 403,
`602, 611,
`901,
`1006, 701
`H, 401,
`402, 403,
`602, 611,
`901,
`1006, 701
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2104
`
`2010
`
`BC0194073-
`BC0194088
`
`Application Visibility in Federal
`Networks
`
`Schoenfeld
`
`2105
`
`2007
`
`BC0190250-
`BC0190259
`
`The Federal Case for Application
`Delivery Networks
`
`Schoenfeld
`
`2106
`
`2014
`
`BC2-1654217-
`BC2-1654220
`
`Web Proxy Situational Assessment:
`Aligning JRSS Capabilities with
`DOD Needs
`
`Schoenfeld
`
`2107
`
`2014
`
`BC2-1654221-
`BC2-1654224
`
`A Complete Lifecycle Approach to
`Advanced Threat Protection
`
`Schoenfeld
`
`2108
`
`2014
`
`BC2-1654225-
`BC2-1654226
`
`Cost-Effective and Flexible
`Deployments
`
`Schoenfeld
`
`
`sf-3818340
`
`-14-
`
`

`

`Case 5:15-cv-03295-BLF Document 289-5 Filed 09/21/17 Page 16 of 99
`
`APPENDIX C-3
`
`
`
`DTX
`Exh
`No.
`
`Doc Date
`
`Bates Range
`
`Document Description
`
`Sponsoring
`Witness(es)
`
`Court
`Use
`
`Purpose For
`Which
`Offered
`Accused
`Products, Blue
`Coat
`Background,
`Damages
`Accused
`Products, Blue
`Coat
`Background,
`Damages
`
`Accused
`Products, Blue
`Coat
`Background,
`Damages
`Accused
`Products, Blue
`Coat
`Background,
`Damages
`Accused
`Products, Blue
`Coat
`Background,
`Damages
`
`Objs. Response
`To Objs.
`NH, REL,
`F, AUTH,
`LAY,
`IMPOBJ:
`611, 1006
`NH, REL,
`F, AUTH,
`LAY,
`OPP,
`IMPOBJ:
`611, 1006
`NH, REL,
`F, AUTH,
`LAY,
`OPP,
`IMPOBJ:
`611, 1006
`NH, REL,
`IMPOBJ:
`611, LAY,
`SUM
`
`H, 401,
`402, 403,
`602, 611,
`901,
`1006, 701
`H, 401,
`402, 403,
`602, 611,
`1006,
`701, EXC
`H, 401,
`402, 403,
`602, 611,
`701,
`1006,
`EXC
`H, 401,
`402, 403,
`611, 701,
`1006
`
`H, 401,
`402, 403,
`611, 701
`
`NH, REL,
`IMPOBJ:
`611, LAY
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2109
`
`2014
`
`BC2-1654231-
`BC2-1654232
`
`Secure Web Gateways
`
`Schoenfeld
`
`2110 12/26/2013 BC2-1393509-
`BC2-1393516
`
`The Last Line of Defense: Malware
`Analysis Secure Federal IT Systems.
`White Paper
`
`Schoenfeld
`
`2111
`
`3/1/2015 BC2-0813255-
`BC2-0813268
`
`Federal Strategic Business Plan
`FY2016
`
`Schoenfeld
`
`2112
`
`7/1/2016 BC2-0505408-
`BC2-0505510
`
`Security Analytics (SA): Gaining
`Forensic Workflow Efficiencies
`
`Wood;
`Harrison
`
`2113
`
`7/8/2013 BC2-0137379-
`BC2-0137380
`
`Email re: Please read: Federal
`Knowledge Exchange information
`
`C. Larsen
`
`
`sf-3818340
`
`-15-
`
`

`

`Case 5:15-cv-03295-BLF Document 289-5 Filed 09/21/17 Page 17 of 99
`
`APPENDIX C-3
`
`Purpose For
`Which
`Offered
`Accused
`Products, Blue
`Coat
`Background,
`Damages
`Accused
`Products, Blue
`Coat
`Background,
`Damages
`Accused
`Products, Blue
`Coat
`Background,
`Damages
`Accused
`Products, Blue
`Coat
`Background,
`Damages
`Accused
`Products, Blue
`Coat
`Background,
`Damages
`
`H, 401,
`402, 403,
`611, 701,
`901, 1006
`
`H, 401,
`402, 403,
`611, 701,
`EXC
`H, 401,
`402, 403,
`602, 611,
`701, 901,
`1006
`H, 401,
`402, 403,
`602, 611,
`901, IC,
`EXC
`
`Objs. Response
`To Objs.
`NH, REL,
`IMPOBJ:
`611, LAY,
`AUTH,
`SUM
`NH, REL,
`IMPOBJ:
`611, LAY,
`OPP
`NH, REL,
`IMPOBJ:
`611, LAY,
`AUTH,
`SUM
`NH, REL,
`F,
`IMPOBJ:
`611,
`AUTH, C,
`OPP
`NH, REL,
`IMPOBJ:
`611, LAY,
`OPP
`
`H, 401,
`402, 403,
`611, 701,
`EXC
`
`Court
`Use
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`DTX
`Exh
`No.
`
`Doc Date
`
`Bates Range
`
`Document Description
`
`Sponsoring
`Witness(es)
`
`2114
`
`7/8/2013 BC2-0137381-
`BC2-0137459
`
`Blue Coat Labs Threat Research:
`Why is Search Engine Poisoning
`Still the #1 Attack Vector?
`
`C. Larsen
`
`2115
`
`6/28/2013 BC2-0137471-
`BC2-0137472
`
`Email re: Please read: Federal
`Knowledge Exchange information
`
`C. Larsen
`
`2116
`
`6/28/2013 BC2-0137473-
`BC2-0137489
`
`Mission Assurance Technology
`
`C. Larsen
`
`2117
`
`6/28/2013 BC2-0137490-
`BC2-0137490
`
`Federal User Knowledge Exchange
`Agenda
`
`C. Larsen
`
`2118
`
`4/5/2016 BC2-1153584-
`BC2-1153585
`
`Email re: Learning more about AIS Runald
`
`
`sf-3818340
`
`-16-
`
`

`

`Case 5:15-cv-03295-BLF Document 289-5 Filed 09/21/17 Page 18 of 99
`
`APPENDIX C-3
`
`Purpose For
`Which
`Offered
`Accused
`Products, Blue
`Coat
`Background,
`Damages
`
`Accused
`Products, Blue
`Coat
`Background,
`Damages
`
`Accused
`Products, Blue
`Coat
`Background,
`Damages
`
`Accused
`Products, Blue
`Coat
`Background,
`Damages
`Accused
`Products, Blue
`Coat
`Background,
`Damages
`
`H, 401,
`402, 403,
`602, 611,
`701, 901,
`EXC
`
`H, 401,
`402, 403,
`602, 611,
`701, 901,
`IC, EXC
`
`Objs. Response
`To Objs.
`NH, REL,
`F,
`IMPOBJ:
`611, LAY,
`AUTH,
`OPP
`NH, REL,
`F,
`IMPOBJ:
`611, LAY,
`AUTH, C,
`OPP
`NH, REL,
`F,
`IMPOBJ:
`611, LAY,
`AUTH, C,
`OPP
`NH, REL,
`F,
`IMPOBJ:
`611, LAY,
`AUTH,
`OPP
`NH, REL,
`F, LAY,
`OPP,
`IMPOBJ:
`611
`
`H, 401,
`402, 403,
`602, 611,
`701, 901,
`IC, EXC
`
`H, 401,
`402, 403,
`602, 611,
`701, 901,
`EXC
`
`H, 401,
`402, 403,
`602, 611,
`701, EXC
`
`Court
`Use
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`DTX
`Exh
`No.
`
`Doc Date
`
`Bates Range
`
`Document Description
`
`Sponsoring
`Witness(es)
`
`2119
`
`4/5/2016 BC2-1153586-
`BC2-1153588
`
`AIS Interconnection Agreement
`(unsigned)
`
`Runald
`
`2120
`
`4/5/2016 BC2-1153589-
`BC2-1153599
`
`AIS Submission Initiative
`Submission Guidance
`
`Runald
`
`2121
`
`4/5/2016 BC2-1153600-
`BC2-1153667
`
`AIS Submission Initiative
`Submission Guidance Appendix
`
`Runald
`
`2122 11/10/2015 BC2-1153670-
`BC2-1153687
`
`DHS TAXII Server Onboarding
`
`Runald
`
`2123
`
`2/23/2015 BC2-1364954-
`BC2-1364954
`
`Email re: PPT & Spreadsheet for
`Federal Sales/Products Interlock
`Meeting
`
`Schoenfeld
`
`
`sf-3818340
`
`-17-
`
`

`

`Case 5:15-cv-03295-BLF Document 289-5 Filed 09/21/17 Page 19 of 99
`
`APPENDIX C-3
`
`Purpose For
`Which
`Offered
`Accused
`Products, Blue
`Coat
`Background,
`Damages
`
`Accused
`Products, Blue
`Coat
`Background,
`Damages
`
`H, 401,
`402, 403,
`602, 611,
`1006,
`EXC, 701
`
`Objs. Response
`To Objs.
`NH, REL,
`F, SUM,
`LAY,
`OPP,
`IMPOBJ:
`611, 1006
`NH, REL,
`F, SUM,
`LAY,
`OPP,
`IMPOBJ:
`611, 1006
`
`H, 401,
`402, 403,
`602, 611,
`EXC,
`701, 1006
`
`Accused
`Products, Blue
`Coat
`Background,
`Damages
`
`H, 401,
`402, 403,
`602, 611,
`701, 901,
`EXC
`
`NH, REL,
`F, LAY,
`AUTH,
`OPP,
`IMPOBJ:
`611
`
`Court
`Use
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`DTX
`Exh
`No.
`
`Doc Date
`
`Bates Range
`
`Document Description
`
`Sponsoring
`Witness(es)
`
`2124
`
`2/23/2015 BC2-1364955-
`BC2-1364955
`
`Federal Requirements Tracker
`
`Schoenfeld
`
`2125
`
`2/23/2015 BC2-1364956-
`BC2-1364974
`
`Federal Sales / Product Management
`Interlock
`
`Schoenfeld
`
`2126
`2127
`2128
`2129
`2130
`2131
`
`Withdrawn
`Withdrawn
`Withdrawn
`Withdrawn
`Withdrawn
`Withdrawn
`
`2132
`
`11/1/2016 BC2-0035487-
`BC2-0035503
`
`Symantec Enterprise Hardware
`Supply Chain Overview
`
`Schoenfeld,
`Dildine
`
`2133
`2134
`2135
`
`
`sf-3818340
`
`Withdrawn
`Omitted
`Withdrawn
`
`-18-
`
`

`

`Case 5:15-cv-03295-BLF Document 289-5 Filed 09/21/17 Page 20 of 99
`
`APPENDIX C-3
`
`Doc Date
`
`Bates Range
`
`Document Description
`
`Sponsoring
`Witness(es)
`
`Purpose For
`Which
`Offered
`
`Objs. Response
`To Objs.
`
`Court
`Use
`
`
`
`DTX
`Exh
`No.
`
`2136
`
`6/5/2002
`
`FINJAN-BC
`064473-FINJAN-
`BC 064482
`
`Product Focus: Behavior-Blocking
`Stops Unknown Malicious Code
`
`Touboul;
`Hartstein
`
`Finjan
`Background
`
`H, 401,
`402, 403,
`602, 611,
`EXC
`
`NH, REL,
`F,
`IMPOBJ:
`611, OPP
`
`2137
`
`6/21/2016 N/A
`
`Symantec Corp. v. Finjan, Inc., No.
`IPR2015-01892, Paper No. 27
`(PTAB June 21, 2016)
`
`Nielson;
`Prakash
`
`2138
`
`6/21/2016 N/A
`
`Symantec Corp. v. Finjan, Inc., No.
`IPR2015-01892, Ex. 2007 (PTAB
`June 21, 2016)
`
`Nielson;
`Prakash
`
`2139
`
`1/0/1900 N/A
`
`http://redislabs.com/blog/5-key-
`takeaways-for-developing-with-
`redis/
`
`Nielson
`
`Relates to
`Asserted
`Patents,
`Noninfringem
`ent, Invalidity
`
`H, 401,
`402, 403,
`611, 702,
`NP, EXC
`
`Relates to
`Asserted
`Patents,
`Noninfringem
`ent, Invalidity
`
`H, 401,
`402, 403,
`611, 702,
`NP, EXC
`
`Technical
`Background,
`Noninfringem
`ent
`
`H, 401,
`402, 403,
`602, 611,
`702, 901,
`IC, NP
`
`REL,
`EXPERT,
`NH,
`AVAIL,
`OPP,
`IMPOBJ:
`611
`REL,
`EXPERT,
`NH,
`AVAIL,
`OPP,
`IMPOBJ:
`611
`NH, REL,
`F,
`IMPOBJ:
`611,
`EXPERT,
`AUTH, C,
`AVAIL
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`sf-3818340
`
`-19-
`
`

`

`Case 5:15-cv-03295-BLF Document 289-5 Filed 09/21/17 Page 21 of 99
`
`APPENDIX C-3
`
`Doc Date
`
`Bates Range
`
`Document Description
`
`Sponsoring
`Witness(es)
`
`Purpose For
`Which
`Offered
`
`
`
`DTX
`Exh
`No.
`
`2140
`
`1/0/1900 N/A
`
`https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Key-
`value_database
`
`Nielson
`
`Technical
`Background,
`Noninfringem
`ent
`
`2141
`
`n/a
`
`N/A
`
`Expert Report of Dr. Atul Prakash
`Regarding Invalidity of U.S. Patent
`Nos. 6154844; 6965968; 7418731;
`8079086; 8225408; 8566580;
`8677494; 9141786; 9189621; AND
`9219755
`
`Prakash
`
`Invalidity
`
`2142
`
`9/14/1999 BC00039171-
`BC00039191
`
`United States Patent No. 5,951,698 Prakash
`
`Invalidity
`
`2143
`
`4/22/1997 BC00032015-
`BC00032038
`
`United States Patent No. 5,623,600 Prakash
`
`Invalidity
`
`
`sf-3818340
`
`-20-
`
`H, 401,
`402, 403,
`602, 611,
`702, 901,
`NP, EXC
`
`H, 401,
`402, 403,
`611, 702,
`1006
`
`Objs. Response
`To Objs.
`NH, REL,
`F,
`IMPOBJ:
`611,
`EXPERT,
`AUTH,
`AVAIL,
`OPP
`REL,
`EXPERT,
`NH, SUM,
`IMPOBJ:
`611
`REL,
`EXPERT,
`NH,
`IMPOBJ:
`611
`REL,
`EXPERT,
`NH,
`IMPOBJ:
`611
`
`H, 401,
`402, 403,
`611, 702
`
`H, 401,
`402, 403,
`611, 702
`
`Court
`Use
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 5:15-cv-03295-BLF Document 289-5 Filed 09/21/17 Page 22 of 99
`
`APPENDIX C-3
`
`Doc Date
`
`Bates Range
`
`Document Description
`
`Sponsoring
`Witness(es)
`
`Purpose For
`Which
`Offered
`
`
`
`DTX
`Exh
`No.
`
`2144
`
`7/1/1996 BC2-0031567-
`BC2-0031580
`
`A Secure Environment For
`Untrusted Helper Applications
`(Confining the Wily Hacker
`
`Prakash
`
`Technical
`Background,
`Invalidity
`
`2145
`2146
`
`2147
`
`Withdrawn
`Withdrawn
`
`1/12/1999 BC2-0033976-
`BC2-0033988
`
`United States Patent No. 5,860,011 Prakash
`
`2148
`
`10/3/2000 BC00038915-
`BC00038931
`
`United States Patent No. 6,128,774 Prakash
`
`2149
`
`7/8/2008 BC2-0034529-
`BC2-0034549
`
`United States Patent No. 7,398,553 Prakash
`
`2150 12/22/2009 BC2-0034599-
`BC2-0034614
`
`United States Patent No. 7,636,945 Prakash
`
`Technical
`Background,
`Invalidity
`
`Technical
`Background,
`Invalidity
`
`Technical
`Background,
`Invalidity
`
`Technical
`Background,
`Invalidity
`
`
`sf-3818340
`
`-21-
`
`Court
`Use
`
`Objs. Response
`To Objs.
`REL,
`EXPERT,
`NH,
`AUTH,
`OPP,
`IMPOBJ:
`611
`
`H, 401,
`402, 403,
`611, 901,
`702, EXC
`
`H, 401,
`402, 403,
`611, 702,
`EXC
`
`H, 401,
`402, 403,
`611, 702,
`EXC
`
`H, 401,
`402, 403,
`611, 702,
`EXC
`
`H, 401,
`402, 403,
`611, 702,
`EXC
`
`REL,
`EXPERT,
`NH, OPP,
`IMPOBJ:
`611
`REL,
`EXPERT,
`NH, OPP,
`IMPOBJ:
`611
`REL,
`EXPERT,
`NH, OPP,
`IMPOBJ:
`611
`REL,
`EXPERT,
`NH, OPP,
`IMPOBJ:
`611
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 5:15-cv-03295-BLF Document 289-5 Filed 09/21/17 Page 23 of 99
`
`APPENDIX C-3
`
`H, 401,
`402, 403,
`611, 702,
`EXC
`
`H, 401,
`402, 403,
`611, 702,
`EXC
`
`H, 401,
`402, 403,
`611, 702,
`901, EXC
`
`Objs. Response
`To Objs.
`REL,
`EXPERT,
`NH, OPP,
`IMPOBJ:
`611
`REL,
`EXPERT,
`NH, OPP,
`IMPOBJ:
`611
`REL,
`EXPERT,
`NH,
`AUTH,
`OPP,
`IMPOBJ:
`611
`REL,
`EXPERT,
`NH, OPP,
`IMPOBJ:
`611
`REL,
`EXPERT,
`NH, OPP,
`IMPOBJ:
`611
`
`H, 401,
`402, 403,
`611, 702,
`EXC
`
`H, 401,
`402, 403,
`611, 702,
`EXC
`
`Court
`Use
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`DTX
`Exh
`No.
`
`Doc Date
`
`Bates Range
`
`Document Description
`
`Sponsoring
`Witness(es)
`
`Purpose For
`Which
`Offered
`
`2151
`
`9/28/1999 BC2-0033989-
`BC2-0034003
`
`United States Patent No. 5,958,050 Prakash
`
`2152
`
`11/9/1999 BC00036123-
`BC00036131
`
`United States Patent No. 5,983,348 Prakash
`
`2153
`
`1995
`
`BC2-0031366-
`BC2-0031498
`
`A New Technique for Detecting
`Polymorphic Computer Viruses
`
`Prakash
`
`2154
`
`8/14/2001 BC00036183-
`BC00036194
`
`United States Patent No. 6,275,938 Prakash
`
`2155
`
`6/26/2001 BC00034772-
`BC00034779
`
`United States Patent No. 6,253,370 Prakash
`
`Technical
`Background,
`Invalidity
`
`Technical
`Background,
`Invalidity
`
`Technical
`Background,
`Invalidity
`
`Technical
`Background,
`Invalidity
`
`Technical
`Background,
`Invalidity
`
`
`sf-3818340
`
`-22-
`
`

`

`Case 5:15-cv-03295-BLF Document 289-5 Filed 09/21/17 Page 24 of 99
`
`APPENDIX C-3
`
`Doc Date
`
`Bates Range
`
`Document Description
`
`Sponsoring
`Witness(es)
`
`Purpose For
`Which
`Offered
`
`
`
`DTX
`Exh
`No.
`
`2156
`
`9/1/1996 BC00034195-
`BC00034256
`
`Proof-Carrying Code
`
`Prakash
`
`Technical
`Background,
`Invalidity
`
`2157
`
`9/1/1995 BC2-0032550-
`BC2-0032563
`
`Dynamic Detection and
`Classification of Computer Viruses
`Using General Behavior Patterns
`
`Prakash
`
`Technical
`Background,
`Invalidity
`
`2158
`
`2159
`
`2/9/2010 BC00034949-
`BC00034949
`
`United States Patent No. 7,660,902 Prakash
`
`Technical
`Background,
`Invalidity
`
`Withdrawn
`
`2160
`
`12/2/2008 BC00034925-
`BC00034948
`
`Methods and Apparatus for
`Providing Security in a Caching
`Device
`
`Prakash
`
`Technical
`Background,
`Invalidity
`
`
`sf-3818340
`
`-23-
`
`Court
`Use
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`H, 401,
`402, 403,
`611, 702,
`901, EXC
`
`Objs. Response
`To Objs.
`REL,
`EXPERT,
`NH,
`AUTH,
`OPP,
`IMPOBJ:
`611
`REL,
`EXPERT,
`NH,
`AUTH,
`OPP,
`IMPOBJ:
`611
`
`H, 401,
`402, 403,
`611, 702,
`901, EXC
`
`H, 401,
`402, 403,
`611, 702,
`EXC
`
`H, 401,
`402, 403,
`611, 702,
`901, EXC
`
`REL,
`EXPERT,
`NH, OPP,
`IMPOBJ:
`611
`REL,
`EXPERT,
`NH,
`AUTH,
`OPP,
`IMPOBJ:
`611
`
`

`

`Case 5:15-cv-03295-BLF Document 289-5 Filed 09/21/17 Page 25 of 99
`
`APPENDIX C-3
`
`Doc Date
`
`Bates Range
`
`Document