`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`
`
`
`
`FINJAN, INC.,
`
`Case No.15-cv-03295-BLF (SVK)
`
`
`
`ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND
`DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF'S
`MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY
`
`Re: Dkt. Nos. 151, 174
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`BLUE COAT SYSTEMS, LLC,
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`The Court has reviewed the parties’ Discovery Dispute Joint Report submitted November
`
`23, 2016, that presented Plaintiff Finjan Inc.’s (“Finjan”) motion to compel responses to specific
`
`discovery requests. (Dkt. No. 151.) The Court has also reviewed the Supplemental Brief to
`
`Discovery Joint Report No. 1 submitted January 30, 2017, that narrowed the issues that remain.
`
`(Dkt. No. 174.) The Court grants in part and denies in part Finjan’s motion.
`
`First, with respect to the technical documents regarding design and functional
`
`specifications for Mail Threat Defense (“MTD”), Security Analytics, and Webpulse 2.0 (Request
`
`for Production Nos. 10, 12, and 13), Blue Coat Systems, LLC (“Blue Coat”) has agreed to confirm
`
`whether additional technical documents exist. Blue Coat shall produce additional documents or
`
`confirm production is complete on RFP Nos. 10 and 13 by February 3, 2017. The Court finds
`
`RFP No. 12 is overly broad and therefore denies Finjan’s motion as to that request.
`
`Second, regarding the revenue forecasts for the accused products (RFP No. 19), Blue Coat
`
`has agreed to produce revenue forecasts for the accused products if the documents exist. Blue
`
`Coat shall produce additional documents or confirm production is complete on RFP No. 19 by
`
`February 3, 2017.
`
`Third, regarding the schema of databases (RFP No. 53), Blue Coat shall produce additional
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`Northern District of California
`
`United States District Court
`
`
`
`Case 5:15-cv-03295-BLF Document 177 Filed 01/31/17 Page 2 of 2
`
`
`
`documents or confirm production is complete of those documents describing the database
`
`structure of the “specifically identified databases,” as referenced in the January 30, 2017 Joint
`
`Report (Dkt. No. 174 at 4).
`
`Fourth, with respect to documents related to the valuation of Blue Coat, the accused
`
`products, or the Finjan patents (RFP Nos. 54, 55; Dkt. No. 174), the Court grants the motion in
`
`part as follows: Blue Coat shall produce documents arising out of acquisitions of Blue Coat in the
`
`last six years that reflect a valuation of the Finjan patents or the accused products. Such
`
`production shall be complete by February 3, 2017. Although it appears that the requests had been
`
`narrowed by meet and confer efforts, to be clear, the motion is denied as to requests for valuation
`
`of Blue Coat as a whole. The request is also denied as to documents relating to mere offers for
`
`sale, potential mergers or potential acquisitions or “other attempts to market Bluecoat.”
`
`Finally, the Court denies without prejudice Finjan’s request regarding document
`
`production deadlines for depositions. All documents should be produced by February 3, 2017.
`
`SO ORDERED.
`
`Dated:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`SUSAN VAN KEULEN
`United States Magistrate Judge
`
`2
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`Northern District of California
`
`United States District Court
`
`1/31/2017
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
