Case 5:15-cv-02008-EJD Document 101-3 Filed 05/17/16 Page 1 of 6
`Case 5:l5—cv—O2008—EJD Document 101-3 Filed 05/17/16 Page 1 of 6
`
`
`
`EXHIBIT 2
`
`EXHIBIT 2
`
`
`Case 5:l5—cv—O2008—EJD Document 101-3 Filed 05/17/16 Page 1 of 6
`
`
`
`EXHIBIT 2
`
`EXHIBIT 2
`
`
`
`Case 5:15-cv-02008-EJD Document 101-3 Filed 05/17/16 Page 2 of 6
`Trials@uspto.gov
`Paper No. 14
`571-272-7822
`Date Entered: April 25, 2014
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`REDFIN CORPORATION
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`CORELOGIC SOLUTIONS, LLC
`Patent Owner
`____________
`
`Case CBM2014-00027
`Patent 5,361,201
`____________
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Before MICHAEL P. TIERNEY, JONI Y. CHANG and
`BRIAN J. McNAMARA, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`McNAMARA, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`INITIAL CONFERENCE SUMMARY
`Conduct of the Proceeding
`37C.F.R. § 42.5
`
`
`
`
`Case 5:15-cv-02008-EJD Document 101-3 Filed 05/17/16 Page 3 of 6
`Case CBM2014-00027
`Patent 5,361,201
`
`
`
`An initial conference in CBM2014-00027, which involves U.S. Patent
`5,361,201 (the ’201 Patent) was conducted on April 23, 2014. Redfin Corporation
`(“Petitioner”) was represented by Richard T. Black and Joel B. Ard. Corelogic
`Solutions, LLC (“Patent Owner”) was represented by Thomas A. Rozylowicz. The
`following subjects were discussed during the conference:
`Related Matters
`The final written decision in related CBM2012-00007 (Paper 58), entered on
`January 30, 2014, is currently on appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for
`the Federal Circuit. The parties reported that the litigation pending in the U.S.
`District Court for the Eastern District of Texas currently is stayed.
`Scheduling Order
`Patent Owner noted that the only substantive issue in this proceeding
`concerns patentable subject matter under 35 U.S.C. § 101 and that the United
`States Supreme Court recently heard arguments on this issue in Case No. 13-298,
`Alice Corporation Pty. v. CLS Bank International, (“CLS Bank”). Patent Owner
`requested that the date for filing a Patent Owner Response in this proceeding be
`delayed to allow time for the Supreme Court to issue its decision in CLS Bank.
`Patent Owner noted that such a delay would be more efficient and cost effective
`than proceeding on the current schedule by avoiding the need for Patent Owner to
`update its Patent Owner Response should the Supreme Court issue a ruling in the
`current term, which is expected to end on June 30, 2014. We did not agree to
`revise the schedule during the hearing, but noted that we would consider Patent
`Owner’s request.
`Upon due consideration, we agree that Patent Owner’s request has merit and
`that the Scheduling Order should be revised to set the date for the Patent Owner
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`Case 5:15-cv-02008-EJD Document 101-3 Filed 05/17/16 Page 4 of 6
`Case CBM2014-00027
`Patent 5,361,201
`
`Response to be a date after June 30, 2014. An Amended Scheduling Order is being
`entered separately. The intervals between the remaining DUE DATES in the
`Amended Scheduling Order are approximately the same as the intervals in the
`Scheduling Order entered on March 20, 2014 (Paper 13).
`The parties are reminded that, without obtaining prior authorization from the
`Board, they may stipulate to different dates for DATES 1-3, as provided in the
`Scheduling Order, by filing an appropriate notice with the Board. The parties may
`not stipulate to any other changes to the Scheduling Order.
`Protective Order
`The parties have not discussed a protective order at this time. No protective
`order has been entered. The parties are reminded of the requirement for a
`protective order when filing a motion to seal. 37 C.F.R. § 42.54. If the parties
`have agreed to a proposed protective order, they should file a signed copy of the
`proposed protective order with the motion to seal. If the parties propose a
`protective order other than or departing from the default Standing Protective Order,
`Office Trial Practice Guide, 77 Fed. Reg. 48756, App. B (Aug. 14, 2012), they
`must submit a joint, proposed protective order, accompanied by a red-lined version
`based on the default protective order in Appendix B to the Board’s Office Patent
`Trial Practice Guide. See, id. at 48769.
`Initial Disclosures and Discovery
`The parties have not stipulated to any initial disclosures at this time. The
`parties are reminded of the discovery provisions of 37 C.F.R. § 42.51-52 and
`Office Trial Practice Guide. See, 77 Fed. Reg. at 48761-2. Discovery requests and
`objections are not to be filed with the Board without prior authorization. If the
`parties are unable to resolve discovery issues between them, the parties may
`request a conference with the Board. A motion to exclude, which does not require
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`Case 5:15-cv-02008-EJD Document 101-3 Filed 05/17/16 Page 5 of 6
`Case CBM2014-00027
`Patent 5,361,201
`
`Board authorization, must be filed to preserve any objection. See 37 C.F.R.
`§ 42.64; Office Trial Practice Guide, 77 Fed. Reg. at 48767. There are no
`discovery issues pending at this time.
`The parties are reminded of the provisions for taking testimony found at 37
`C.F.R. § 42.53 and the Office Trial Practice Manual at 77 Fed. Reg. at 48772,
`App. D.
`Motions
`The parties indicated that there are currently no motions to be addressed.
`The parties are reminded that, except as otherwise provided in the Rules,
`Board authorization is required before filing a Motion. 37 C.F.R. § 42.20(b). A
`party seeking to file a motion should request a conference to obtain authorization
`to file the motion. No motions are authorized in this proceeding at this time.
`A Motion to Amend the patent is not available in this proceeding because
`the ’201 Patent is expired.
` Settlement
`The parties stated that there are no settlement discussions currently
`underway.
`
`4
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 5:15-cv-02008-EJD Document 101-3 Filed 05/17/16 Page 6 of 6
`Case CBM2014-00027
`Patent 5,361,201
`
`
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`Richard T. Black
`Joel B. Ard
`FOSTER PEPPER, PLLC
`BlacR@foster.com
`ArdJB@Foster.com
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`W. Karl Renner
`David L. Holt
`Thomas A. Rozylowicz
`FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
`axf@fr.com
`holt2@fr.com
`rozylowicz@fr.com
`CBM38668-0003CP1@fr.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`5
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
