throbber
Case5:15-cv-01277-BLF Document29 Filed07/27/15 Page1 of 5
`
`STADHEIM & GREAR, LTD.
`George Summerfield
`(Summerfield@StadheimGrear.com)
`400 N. Michigan Avenue, Suite 2200
`Chicago, IL 60611
`Telephone:
`(312) 755-4400
`Facsimile:
`(312) 755-4408
`
`
`
`Attorneys for Defendant
`DANIEL L. FLAMM
`
`
`IRELL & MANELLA LLP
`Morgan Chu (70446) (mchu@irell.com)
`Samuel K. Lu (171969) (slu@irell.com)
`Talin Gordnia (274213) (tgordnia@irell.com)
`1800 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 900
`Los Angeles, California 90067-4276
`Telephone:
`(310) 277-1010
`Facsimile:
`(310) 203-7199
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`LAM RESEARCH CORP.
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`SAN JOSE DIVISION
`
`Case No. 5:15-cv-01277-BLF
`
`[PROPOSED] ORDER APPROVING
`STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME FOR
`PLAINTIFF TO RESPOND TO
`
`DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS,
`DKT. NO. 24, AND RESCHEDULING
`HEARING DATE
`
`DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`
`
`LAM RESEARCH CORP.,
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`vs.
`
`
`
`
`DANIEL L. FLAMM,
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`Case No. 5:15-cv-01277-BLF
`
`
`[PROPOSED] ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION
`EXTENDING TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO RESPOND TO
`DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS, AND
`RESCHEDULING HEARING DATE
`
`
`
`

`
`Case5:15-cv-01277-BLF Document29 Filed07/27/15 Page2 of 5
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-2, Plaintiff Lam Research Corporation ("Lam"), and Defendant
`
`Daniel L. Flamm ("Flamm"), through their undersigned counsel, hereby agree and stipulate as
`
`follows:
`
`WHEREAS Lam filed the complaint in the above-captioned case on March 18, 2015, Dkt.
`
`No. 1 ("the Complaint");
`
`WHEREAS, on May 15, 2015, counsel for Lam effectuated service of the Complaint,
`
`Summons, and documents required by Civil L.R. 4-2 on counsel for Flamm through electronic
`
`mail;
`
`WHEREAS, on May 22, 2015, this Court entered an Order Approving Stipulation to
`
`Extend Time for Defendant to Answer Complaint and to Continue Case Management Conference;
`
`Setting Initial Case Management Conference and ADR Deadlines;
`
`WHEREAS, the Court's May 22, 2015 order approved, inter alia, the parties' stipulation to
`
`extend the time for Flamm to answer the Complaint to July 14, 2015;
`
`WHEREAS, on July 14, 2015, this Court entered an Order Approving Stipulation to
`
`Extend Time for Defendant to answer the Complaint;
`
`WHEREAS, the Court's July 14, 2015 order approved the parties' stipulation to extend the
`
`time for Flamm to answer the Complaint to July 21, 2015;
`
`WHEREAS, the Court's July 14, 2015 order did not alter any other deadlines in the
`
`schedule, including those set by the Court's Order of May 22, 2015;
`
`WHEREAS, Flamm has not answered the Complaint as of the filing of this stipulation;
`
`WHEREAS, on July 21, 2015, Flamm filed a motion captioned "Motion and Memorandum
`
`In Support of Motion to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, for a More Definite Statement," ("Motion
`
`to Dismiss"), Dkt. No. 24;
`
`WHEREAS, under Civil L.R. 7-3, the deadline for Lam to file an opposition to the Motion
`
`to Dismiss is August 4, 2015, and the deadline for Flamm to file a reply in support of the Motion
`
`to Dismiss is August 11, 2015;
`
`WHEREAS, the hearing date for the Motion to Dismiss is currently scheduled for
`
`September 17, 2015;
`
`Case No. 5:15-cv-01277-BLF
`
`
`[PROPOSED] ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION
`EXTENDING TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO RESPOND TO
`DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS, AND
`RESCHEDULING HEARING DATE
`
`- 2 -
`
`

`
`Case5:15-cv-01277-BLF Document29 Filed07/27/15 Page3 of 5
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`WHEREAS, pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-2, the parties conferred, agreed and stipulated to ask
`
`the Court to extend the deadline for Lam to file an opposition to the Motion to Dismiss to
`
`September 1, 2015;
`
`WHEREAS, pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-2, the parties conferred, agreed and stipulated to ask
`
`the Court to extend the deadline for Flamm to file a reply in support of the Motion to Dismiss to
`
`September 15, 2015;
`
`WHEREAS, pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-2, the parties conferred, agreed and stipulated to ask
`
`the Court to reschedule the hearing date for the Motion to Dismiss to November 12, 2015 because
`
`Lam's counsel is not available to attend the hearing on September 17, 2015;
`
`WHEREAS, the parties' requested time modification does not affect any other deadline in
`
`the schedule, including those set by the Court's Order of May 22, 2015;
`
`NOW THEREFORE, pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-2 and 7-12, Lam and Flamm, by and
`
`through their respective counsel of record, HEREBY STIPULATE AS FOLLOWS:
`
`The deadline for Lam to file an opposition to the Motion to Dismiss shall be extended to
`
`September 1, 2015, the deadline for Lam to file a reply in support of the Motion to Dismiss shall
`
`be extended to September 15, 2015, and the hearing for the Motion to Dismiss shall be
`
`rescheduled to November 12, 2015.
`
`18
`
`
`
`IT IS SO STIPULATED
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`Dated: July 27, 2015
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`IRELL & MANELLA LLP
`
`By: /s/ Talin Gordnia
` Talin Gordnia
`
`Morgan Chu (70446) (mchu@irell.com)
`Samuel K. Lu (171969) (slu@irell.com)
`Talin Gordnia (274213) (tgordnia@irell.com)
`IRELL & MANELLA LLP
`1800 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 900
`Los Angeles, California 90067-4276
`Telephone:
`(310) 277-1010
`Facsimile:
`(310) 203-7199
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff Lam Research Corp.
`
`
`Case No. 5:15-cv-01277-BLF
`
`
`- 3 -
`
`[PROPOSED] ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION
`EXTENDING TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO RESPOND TO
`DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS, AND
`RESCHEDULING HEARING DATE
`
`

`
`Case5:15-cv-01277-BLF Document29 Filed07/27/15 Page4 of 5
`
`
`
`Dated: July 27, 2015
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`STADHEIM & GREAR, LTD.
`
`By: /s/ George Summerfield (by permission)
` George Summerfield
`
`George Summerfield (Summerfield@StadheimGrear.com)
`STADHEIM & GREAR, LTD.
`400 N. Michigan Avenue, Suite 2200
`Chicago, IL 60611
`Telephone:
`(312) 755-4400
`Facsimile:
`(312) 755-4408
`
`Attorneys for Defendant Daniel L. Flamm
`
`
`
`
`
`[PROPOSED] ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION
`EXTENDING TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO RESPOND TO
`DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS, AND
`RESCHEDULING HEARING DATE
`
`- 4 -
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`Case No. 5:15-cv-01277-BLF
`
`
`

`
`Case5:15-cv-01277-BLF Document29 Filed07/27/15 Page5 of 5
`
`PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED
`
`ORDER
`
`
`
`Dated: _______________, 2015
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`By:___________________________
` BETH LABSON FREEMAN
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`Case No. 5:15-cv-01277-BLF
`
`
`[PROPOSED] ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION
`EXTENDING TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO RESPOND TO
`DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS, AND
`RESCHEDULING HEARING DATE
`
`
`
`July 27, 2015

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket