`
`
`
`John C. Carey (pro hac vice)
`jcarey@careyrodriguez.com
`Ernesto M. Rubi (pro hac vice)
`erubi@careyrodriguez.com
`Frank S. Hedin (CA SBN 291289)
`fhedin@careyrodriguez.com
`CAREY RODRIGUEZ
`O’KEEFE MILIAN GONYA, LLP
`1395 Brickell Avenue, Suite 700
`Miami, FL 33131
`Telephone: 305-372-7474
`Facsimile: 305-372-7475
`
`Mark Punzalan (CA SBN 247599)
`markp@punzalanlaw.com
`Herbert T. Patty (CA SBN 255502)
`herbertp@punzalanlaw.com
`PUNZALAN LAW, P.C.
`600 Allerton Street, Suite 201
`Redwood City, CA 94063
`Telephone: 650-362-4150
`Facsimile: 650-362-4151
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`Rothschild Digital Media Innovations, LLC
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`SAN JOSE DIVISION
`
`Case No. 5:14-cv-03928-PSG
`
`PLAINTIFF ROTHSCHILD DIGITAL MEDIA
`INNOVATIONS, LLC’S ANSWER TO SONY
`COMPUTER ENTERTAINMENT AMERICA
`LLC’S AMENDED COUNTERCLAIMS FOR
`DECLARATORY RELIEF
`
`
`
`
`
`ROTHSCHILD DIGITAL MEDIA
`INNOVATIONS, LLC,
`
`Plaintiff / Counter - Defendant
`
`v.
`
`SONY COMPUTER ENTERTAINMENT
`AMERICA LLC,
`
`Defendant / Counter – Plaintiff
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`RDMI’s Response to SCEA’s Amended Counterclaims
`Case No. 5:14-cv-03928-PSG
`
`
`
`Case5:14-cv-03928-PSG Document76 Filed04/13/15 Page2 of 3
`
`
`
`
`
`Rothschild Digital Media Innovations, LLC (“RDMI”) hereby responds to Sony Computer
`
`Entertainment America LLC’s (“SCEA”) Amended Counterclaims for Declaratory Relief (Docket
`
`No. 74) and states as follows:
`
`1.
`
`SCEA’s preamble does not contain any allegations to which a response is required,
`
`but to the extent a response is required, RDMI denies the same.
`
`2.
`
`3.
`
`4.
`
`5.
`
`6.
`
`7.
`
`RDMI admits the allegations of paragraph 2 of the amended counterclaims.
`
`RDMI admits the allegations of paragraph 3 of the amended counterclaims.
`
`RDMI admits the allegations of paragraph 4 of the amended counterclaims.
`
`RDMI denies the allegations of paragraph 5 of the amended counterclaims.
`
`RDMI denies the allegations of paragraph 6 of the amended counterclaims.
`
`RDMI admits the allegations of paragraph 7 of the amended counterclaims.
`
`COUNT I –
`(FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT OF NON-INFRINGEMENT)
`
`8.
`
`RDMI repeats and realleges each and all of its responses to the allegations contained
`
`
`
`in paragraphs 1-7 above as though fully set forth herein.
`
`9.
`
`10.
`
`11.
`
`RDMI denies the allegations of paragraph 9 of the amended counterclaims.
`
`RDMI denies the allegations of paragraph 10 of the amended counterclaims.
`
`COUNT II –
`(FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT OF INVALIDITY
`AND/OR UNENFORCEABILITY
`
`RDMI repeats and realleges each and all of its responses to the allegations contained
`
`in paragraphs 1-7 above as though fully set forth herein.
`
`12.
`
`13.
`
`RDMI denies the allegations of paragraph 12 of the amended counterclaims.
`
`RDMI denies the allegations of paragraph 13 of the amended counterclaims.
`
`1
`RDMI’s Response to SCEA’s Amended Counterclaims
`Case No. 5:14-cv-03928-PSG
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`Case5:14-cv-03928-PSG Document76 Filed04/13/15 Page3 of 3
`
`
`
`
`
`COUNT III –
`(FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT OF UNENFORCEABILITY
`FOR INEQUITABLE CONDUCT)
`
`RDMI repeats and realleges each and all of its responses to the allegations contained
`
`14.
`
`in paragraphs 1-7 above as though fully set forth herein.
`
`15.
`
`16.
`
`RDMI denies the allegations of paragraph 15 of the amended counterclaims.
`
`RDMI denies the allegations of paragraph 16 of the amended counterclaims.
`
`SCEA’S PRAYER FOR RELIEF AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
`
`SCEA’s Prayer for Relief and Demand for Jury Trial do not contain any allegations to
`
`
`
`which a response is required, but to the extent a response is required, RDMI denies the same.
`
`
`
`Date: April 13, 2015
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/s/ John C. Carey___________
`John C. Carey (pro hac vice)
`jcarey@careyrodriguez.com
`Ernesto M. Rubi (pro hac vice)
`erubi@careyrodriguez.com
`Frank Hedin (CA SBN 291289)
`fhedin@careyrodriguez.com
`CAREY RODRIGUEZ
`O’KEEFE MILIAN GONYA , LLP
`1395 Brickell Avenue, Suite 700
`Miami, FL 33131
`Telephone: 305-372-7474
`Facsimile: 305-372-7475
`
`Mark Punzalan (CA SBN 247599)
`markp@punzalanlaw.com
`Herbert T. Patty (CA SBN 255502)
`herbertp@punzalanlaw.com
`PUNZALAN LAW, P.C.
`600 Allerton Street, Suite 201
`Redwood City, CA 94063
`Telephone: 650-362-4150
`Facsimile: 650-362-4151
`
`
`Counsel for RDMI
`
`
`2
`RDMI’s Response to SCEA’s Amended Counterclaims
`Case No. 5:14-cv-03928-PSG