throbber
Case5:14-cv-03928-PSG Document76 Filed04/13/15 Page1 of 3
`
`
`
`John C. Carey (pro hac vice)
`jcarey@careyrodriguez.com
`Ernesto M. Rubi (pro hac vice)
`erubi@careyrodriguez.com
`Frank S. Hedin (CA SBN 291289)
`fhedin@careyrodriguez.com
`CAREY RODRIGUEZ
`O’KEEFE MILIAN GONYA, LLP
`1395 Brickell Avenue, Suite 700
`Miami, FL 33131
`Telephone: 305-372-7474
`Facsimile: 305-372-7475
`
`Mark Punzalan (CA SBN 247599)
`markp@punzalanlaw.com
`Herbert T. Patty (CA SBN 255502)
`herbertp@punzalanlaw.com
`PUNZALAN LAW, P.C.
`600 Allerton Street, Suite 201
`Redwood City, CA 94063
`Telephone: 650-362-4150
`Facsimile: 650-362-4151
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`Rothschild Digital Media Innovations, LLC
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`SAN JOSE DIVISION
`
`Case No. 5:14-cv-03928-PSG
`
`PLAINTIFF ROTHSCHILD DIGITAL MEDIA
`INNOVATIONS, LLC’S ANSWER TO SONY
`COMPUTER ENTERTAINMENT AMERICA
`LLC’S AMENDED COUNTERCLAIMS FOR
`DECLARATORY RELIEF
`
`
`
`
`
`ROTHSCHILD DIGITAL MEDIA
`INNOVATIONS, LLC,
`
`Plaintiff / Counter - Defendant
`
`v.
`
`SONY COMPUTER ENTERTAINMENT
`AMERICA LLC,
`
`Defendant / Counter – Plaintiff
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`RDMI’s Response to SCEA’s Amended Counterclaims
`Case No. 5:14-cv-03928-PSG
`
`

`
`Case5:14-cv-03928-PSG Document76 Filed04/13/15 Page2 of 3
`
`
`
`
`
`Rothschild Digital Media Innovations, LLC (“RDMI”) hereby responds to Sony Computer
`
`Entertainment America LLC’s (“SCEA”) Amended Counterclaims for Declaratory Relief (Docket
`
`No. 74) and states as follows:
`
`1.
`
`SCEA’s preamble does not contain any allegations to which a response is required,
`
`but to the extent a response is required, RDMI denies the same.
`
`2.
`
`3.
`
`4.
`
`5.
`
`6.
`
`7.
`
`RDMI admits the allegations of paragraph 2 of the amended counterclaims.
`
`RDMI admits the allegations of paragraph 3 of the amended counterclaims.
`
`RDMI admits the allegations of paragraph 4 of the amended counterclaims.
`
`RDMI denies the allegations of paragraph 5 of the amended counterclaims.
`
`RDMI denies the allegations of paragraph 6 of the amended counterclaims.
`
`RDMI admits the allegations of paragraph 7 of the amended counterclaims.
`
`COUNT I –
`(FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT OF NON-INFRINGEMENT)
`
`8.
`
`RDMI repeats and realleges each and all of its responses to the allegations contained
`
`
`
`in paragraphs 1-7 above as though fully set forth herein.
`
`9.
`
`10.
`
`11.
`
`RDMI denies the allegations of paragraph 9 of the amended counterclaims.
`
`RDMI denies the allegations of paragraph 10 of the amended counterclaims.
`
`COUNT II –
`(FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT OF INVALIDITY
`AND/OR UNENFORCEABILITY
`
`RDMI repeats and realleges each and all of its responses to the allegations contained
`
`in paragraphs 1-7 above as though fully set forth herein.
`
`12.
`
`13.
`
`RDMI denies the allegations of paragraph 12 of the amended counterclaims.
`
`RDMI denies the allegations of paragraph 13 of the amended counterclaims.
`
`1
`RDMI’s Response to SCEA’s Amended Counterclaims
`Case No. 5:14-cv-03928-PSG
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`

`
`Case5:14-cv-03928-PSG Document76 Filed04/13/15 Page3 of 3
`
`
`
`
`
`COUNT III –
`(FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT OF UNENFORCEABILITY
`FOR INEQUITABLE CONDUCT)
`
`RDMI repeats and realleges each and all of its responses to the allegations contained
`
`14.
`
`in paragraphs 1-7 above as though fully set forth herein.
`
`15.
`
`16.
`
`RDMI denies the allegations of paragraph 15 of the amended counterclaims.
`
`RDMI denies the allegations of paragraph 16 of the amended counterclaims.
`
`SCEA’S PRAYER FOR RELIEF AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
`
`SCEA’s Prayer for Relief and Demand for Jury Trial do not contain any allegations to
`
`
`
`which a response is required, but to the extent a response is required, RDMI denies the same.
`
`
`
`Date: April 13, 2015
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/s/ John C. Carey___________
`John C. Carey (pro hac vice)
`jcarey@careyrodriguez.com
`Ernesto M. Rubi (pro hac vice)
`erubi@careyrodriguez.com
`Frank Hedin (CA SBN 291289)
`fhedin@careyrodriguez.com
`CAREY RODRIGUEZ
`O’KEEFE MILIAN GONYA , LLP
`1395 Brickell Avenue, Suite 700
`Miami, FL 33131
`Telephone: 305-372-7474
`Facsimile: 305-372-7475
`
`Mark Punzalan (CA SBN 247599)
`markp@punzalanlaw.com
`Herbert T. Patty (CA SBN 255502)
`herbertp@punzalanlaw.com
`PUNZALAN LAW, P.C.
`600 Allerton Street, Suite 201
`Redwood City, CA 94063
`Telephone: 650-362-4150
`Facsimile: 650-362-4151
`
`
`Counsel for RDMI
`
`
`2
`RDMI’s Response to SCEA’s Amended Counterclaims
`Case No. 5:14-cv-03928-PSG

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket