Case 4:20-cv-07572-JSW Document 75 Filed 11/24/21 Page 1 of 3
`
`
`
`
`Frank E. Scherkenbach (SBN 142549 /
`scherkenbach@fr.com)
`Adam J. Kessel (Admitted pro hac vice /
`kessel@fr.com)
`Jeffrey Shneidman (Admitted pro hac vice /
`shneidman@fr.com)
`FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
`One Marina Park Drive
`Boston, MA 02210
`Tel: (617) 542-5070 | Fax : (617) 542-8906
`
`Michael R. Headley (SBN 220834 /
`headley@fr.com)
`FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
`500 Arguello Street, Suite 400
`Redwood City, CA 94063
`Tel: (650) 839-5070 | Fax: (650) 839-5071
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiffs
`BYTEDANCE LTD., BYTEDANCE INC.
`TIKTOK INC., and TIKTOK PTE. LTD.
`
`
`M. Elizabeth Day (SBN 177125)
`eday@feinday.com
`Marc Belloli (SBN 244290)
`mbelloli@feinday.com
`FEINBERG DAY KRAMER ALBERTI
`LIM TONKOVICH & BELLOLI LLP
`577 Airport Blvd., Suite 250
`Burlingame, CA. 94010
`Tel: 650 825-4300 | Fax 650 460-8443
`
`Brian N. Platt (Admitted pro hac vice)
`bplatt@wnlaw.com
`Brent P. Lorimer (Admitted pro hac vice)
`blorimer@wnlaw.com
`WORKMAN NYDEGGER
`60 East South Temple Suite 1000
`Salt Lake City, UT 84111
`Tel: 801-533-9800 | Fax 801-328-1707
`
`Attorneys for Defendant
`TRILLER, INC.
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`(OAKLAND DIVISION)
`
`
`BYTEDANCE LTD., BYTEDANCE INC.
`TIKTOK INC., and TIKTOK PTE. LTD.,
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`v.
`
`
`TRILLER, INC.,
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`Case No. 4:20-cv-7572-JSW
`
`JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
`ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR
`PLAINTIFFS TO FILE OPPOSITION TO
`TRILLER’S MOTION TO STAY AND
`STAYING PATENT LOCAL RULES
`DEADLINES AND DISCOVERY
`PENDING RESOLUTION OF THE
`MOTION TO STAY
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`JT STIP & PROP ORDER
` Case No. 4:20-cv-7572-JSW
`
`
`
`AS MODIFIED HEREIN
`
`

`

`Case 4:20-cv-07572-JSW Document 75 Filed 11/24/21 Page 2 of 3
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`Plaintiffs ByteDance Ltd., ByteDance Inc., TikTok Inc., and TikTok Pte. Ltd (“Plaintiffs”)
`
`and Defendant Triller, Inc. (“Defendant” or “Triller”) hereby stipulate pursuant to Local Rule 6-2,
`
`subject to the approval of the Court, to extend by two weeks the date for Plaintiffs to file their
`
`response to Triller’s motion to stay, currently due November 29, 2021, up through and including
`
`December 13, 2021. This extension would make Triller’s reply brief due December 20, well in
`
`advance of the hearing on Triller’s motion to stay, which is currently scheduled for January 7, 2022.
`
`Moreover, pending resolution of the motion to stay, the parties hereby stipulate, subject to
`
`the approval of the Court, to stay the next Patent Local Rules deadlines in sequence, with the next
`
`deadlines under the Patent Local Rules to be set for two weeks after the Court rules on Triller’s
`
`10
`
`motion to stay, if the Court denies the motion to stay. In particular, this stay would apply to
`
`11
`
`Plaintiff’s opening damages contentions (currently due Dec. 1) and the parties’ joint submission of a
`
`12
`
`Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement and associated disclosures under Patent Local
`
`13
`
`Rule 4-3 (currently due Dec. 13). The parties also agree to stay discovery during this period.
`
`14
`
`The parties certify that this extension is not being sought for the purposes of delay, and that
`
`15
`
`this brief extension will not meaningfully delay or otherwise impact these proceedings, as the
`
`16
`
`hearing on Defendant’s motion to stay is not scheduled until January 7, 2022, the hearing on
`
`17
`
`Defendant’s motion to dismiss is not scheduled until January 28, 2022, and there is no claim
`
`18
`
`construction hearing on calendar at this time. This two-week extension is being sought in view of
`
`19
`
`the Thanksgiving holidays and Plaintiffs’ counsel’s preparations for an upcoming trial in another
`
`20
`
`matter.
`
`21
`
`The only prior extensions of time in this case were a stipulated extension of time for
`
`22
`
`Defendant to answer or otherwise respond to the First Amended Complaint (Dkt. No. 19), a
`
`23
`
`stipulated extension of time extending the briefing schedule on Defendant’s motion to dismiss (Dkt.
`
`24
`
`No. 38), and a stipulated extension of time for the hearing on Defendant’s motion to dismiss (Dkt.
`
`25
`
`No. 68).
`
`26
`
`
`
`27
`
`
`
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`JT STIP & PROP ORDER
`Case No. 4:20-cv-7572-JSW
`
`

`

`Case 4:20-cv-07572-JSW Document 75 Filed 11/24/21 Page 3 of 3
`
`
`
`
`Dated: November 24, 2021
`
`FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
`
`
`/s/Michael R. Headley
`Michael R. Headley
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiffs
`BYTEDANCE LTD., BYTEDANCE INC.
`TIKTOK INC., and TIKTOK PTE. LTD.
`
`
`
`Dated: November 24, 2021
`
`WORKMAN NYDEGGER
`
`
`/s/Brian N. Platt
`Brian N. Platt
`
`Attorneys for Defendant
`TRILLER, INC.
`
`
`
` I
`
` hereby attest under penalty of perjury that concurrence in the filing of this document has
`
`been obtained from counsel for Defendant.
`
`Dated: November 24, 2021
`
`FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
`
`By: /s/ Michael R. Headley
`
` Michael R. Headley
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiffs
`BYTEDANCE LTD., BYTEDANCE INC.
`TIKTOK INC., and TIKTOK PTE. LTD.
`
`
`
`PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
`
`
`
`
`Dated: _____________________
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`The Hon. Jeffrey S. White
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`JT STIP & PROP ORDER
`Case No. 4:20-cv-7572-JSW
`
`
`
`The Court RESERVES the right to
`
`continue the hearing date.
`
`November 24, 2021
`
`