`
`
`
`
`M. Elizabeth Day (SBN 177125)
`eday@feinday.com
`FEINBERG DAY KRAMER ALBERTI
`LIM TONKOVICH & BELLOLI LLP
`577 Airport Blvd., Suite 250
`Burlingame, CA. 94010
`Tel: 650 825-4300 | Fax 650 460-8443
`
`Brian N. Platt (Admitted pro hac vice)
`bplatt@wnlaw.com
`Brent P. Lorimer (Admitted pro hac vice)
`blorimer@wnlaw.com
`WORKMAN NYDEGGER
`60 East South Temple Suite 1000
`Salt Lake City, UT 84111
`Tel: 801-533-9800 | Fax 801-328-1707
`
`Attorneys for Defendant
`TRILLER, INC.
`
`
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`OAKLAND DIVISION
`
`
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`v.
`
`
`BYTEDANCE INC., TIKTOK INC., and
`TIKTOK PTE. LTD.,
`
`
`
`
`
`TRILLER, INC.,
`
`
`
`
`
`Case No: 4:20-cv-7572-JSW
`
`RESPONSE TO ORDER REGARDING
`CORRECTED MOTION FOR
`JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS
`
`Hon. Jeffrey S. White
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`Defendant provides the following response to the Court’s Order Regarding Corrected
`
`Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Dkt. No. 59).
`
`On September 8, 2021, Triller filed a motion for judgment on the pleadings under 35 U.S.C.
`
`§ 101 in accordance with the briefing schedule previously ordered by the Court pursuant to the
`
`parties’ stipulation. (Dkt. No. 56.) Triller’s motion was 25 pages in length, consistent with Local
`
`Rule 7-4(b), but inadvertently overlooking the fact that this Court’s Standing Order No. 6 limits
`
`RESPONSE TO ORDER RE: CORRECTED MOTION
`
`4:20-cv-7572-JSW
`
`1
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 4:20-cv-07572-JSW Document 60 Filed 09/17/21 Page 2 of 2
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`such motions to 15 pages. On September 13, 2021, counsel for Plaintiffs notified Defendants that
`
`Triller’s motion was in excess of the 15-page limit specified in the Court’s Civil Standing Order
`
`No. 6 and demanded that Defendant re-file a brief in compliance with the page-limits of Civil
`
`Standing Order No. 6.
`
`On September 15, 2021, Defendant filed a corrected 15-page version of its motion for
`
`judgment on the pleadings (Dkt. No. 58). The Corrected Motion is a shortened version of the
`
`original motion. The basic arguments remain unchanged. Counsel for Plaintiffs requested
`
`additional time to respond to the corrected motion, and the Court’s next available hearing date is
`
`November 5, 2021. Accordingly, Defendant agreed to November 5, 2021.
`
`10
`
`This response is accompanied by a stipulation by the parties agreeing that the default
`
`11
`
`briefing schedule set forth in the local rules should govern for Triller’s corrected motion, and that
`
`12
`
`the motion should be set for hearing on November 5, 2021 instead of October 8, 2021.
`
`
`
`
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`
`
`
`
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`Dated: September 17, 2021
`
`WORKMAN NYDEGGER
`
`/s/ Brian N. Platt
`Brian N. Platt
`
`Attorneys for
`TRILLER, INC.
`
`
`
`2
`
`RESPONSE TO ORDER RE: CORRECTED MOTION
`
`4:20-cv-7572-JSW
`
`