throbber
Case 4:20-cv-07572-JSW Document 54-16 Filed 08/25/21 Page 1 of 4
`Case 4:20-cv-07572-JSW Document 54-16 Filed 08/25/21 Page 1 of 4
`
`EXHIBIT P
`EXHIBIT P
`
`

`

`8/11/2021
`
`Does The Long Tail Apply to Mobile Music? | WIRED
`Case 4:20-cv-07572-JSW Document 54-16 Filed 08/25/21 Page 2 of 4
`
`Does The Long Tail Apply to Mobile Music?
`Mobile music hasn’t yet been able to tame the long tail, according to details unveiled at the Popkomm
`conference in Berlin, but that could be due to cellphone providers’ inability to embrace the openness
`and integration that have become second nature to web 2.0 developers. Chris Anderson’s long tail
`theory posits that technology has enabled […]
`
`https://www.wired.com/2008/10/emusic-the-musi/
`
`1/3
`
`ELIOT VAN BUSKIRK
`10.17.2008 06:45 AM
` Mobile music hasn't yet been able to tame the long tail, according to
`details unveiled at the Popkomm conference in Berlin, but that could be due to cellphone providers' inability to embrace the
`openness and integration that have become second nature to web 2.0 developers.
`Chris Anderson's long tail theory posits that technology has enabled companies to earn significant revenue by selling seemingly
`insignificant amounts of lots of lesser-known media, in addition to the tried and true method of selling millions of copies of a
`few hits. While there's plenty of evidence to support his theory in the music world, attendees of the conference heard one
`executive claim that the long tail is dead, insofar as mobile music goes.
`

`

`8/11/2021
`
`Does The Long Tail Apply to Mobile Music? | WIRED
`Case 4:20-cv-07572-JSW Document 54-16 Filed 08/25/21 Page 3 of 4
`
`https://www.wired.com/2008/10/emusic-the-musi/
`
`2/3
`
`Frank Taubert, CEO of 24/7 Entertainment, which provides 4.5 million songs to a wide variety of digital music services including
`the unlimited mobile music services Omnifone we liked so much, toldPopkomm attendees on Monday that a full 66 percent of
`those songs had never been purchased or downloaded – not even once.
`However, Taubert's assertion that the long tail does not apply to mobile music was challenged on Friday by Madeleine Milne,
`managing director of eMusic Europe. "Three quarters of eMusic's entire four million track catalog sells at least once every year
`– or, to put it another way, we sell more than 50 percent of our catalog at least once every quarter," she said.
`Why would the long tail theory apply to eMusic's website but not 24/7 Entertainment's mobile-oriented business?
`The real reason the long tail doesn't apply to 24/7's clients,
`according to eMusic, is that mobile music has failed to offer musicfans the social, encyclopedic, grassroots-oriented services
`thatencourage the discovery of new music.
`Meanwhile, Milne said, sites likeeMusic have had great success selling long tail content because webusers – unlike their mobile
`counterparts – have a wealth of resourcesat their fingertips for finding new music. The site's web 2.0 features,
`which she said will soon be expanded, let the site's users access"relevant content from around the web andallowing music fans
`to share their finds with friends on major socialnetworks, bookmarking sites and blogs."
`Omnifone MusicStation Max, which uses 24/7's catalog,
`actually does offer some fledgling social/web 2.0 features, likethe ability to recommend tracks to other users and to have news
`feedstailored automatically to the artists in your collection. Yet these recommendations have apparently not had the same
`longtail-enabling effect that their online counterparts have had – and there's a good reason for that.
`If cellphone networks want people to delve into their entire musiccatalogs and make the long tail theory work for them, they
`need to make cellphones more like computers. MaybeOmnifone's recommendations shouldn't only come from friends within
`thenetwork, but also from friends on Facebook, imeem, MySpace and so on. The walled-garden approach taken by most
`cellphoneproviders is making the mobile music world resemble the pre-web musicworld, before people had so many music
`recommendations at theirfingertips.
`As computer-like cellphones like the Apple iPhone and the GoogleAndroid-based devices that allow the installation of music
`discovery applications become more prevalent – especially if those can be linked to the device's music store features – music
`fans' mobile music behavior will start resembling their behavior online. Untilthen, mobile music will likely continue to be
`dominated by artists atthe top of the charts, causing mobile music providers to leave long tail money on the table.
`See Also:
`Hands-On With Omnifone's Unlimited Cellphone Music Service
`OurStage: Pushing Bands Up the Long Tail
`The Long Tail
`Major Labels Release Long Tail Music on Amazon
`UK Royalty Organization: 'The Long Tail Is Not Worth Calculating'
`MTV Gets Down with the Long Tail
`Screenshot: The Long Tail
`TOPICS
`DIGITAL MUSIC NEWS
`

`

`8/11/2021
`
`Does The Long Tail Apply to Mobile Music? | WIRED
`Case 4:20-cv-07572-JSW Document 54-16 Filed 08/25/21 Page 4 of 4
`
`One year for $29.99 $10
`Get WIRED
`
`S U B S C R I B E
`
`https://www.wired.com/2008/10/emusic-the-musi/
`
`3/3
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket