`
`
`
`
`Frank E. Scherkenbach (SBN 142549 /
`scherkenbach@fr.com)
`Adam J. Kessel (Admitted pro hac vice /
`kessel@fr.com)
`FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
`One Marina Park Drive
`Boston, MA 02210
`Tel: (617) 542-5070 | Fax : (617) 542-8906
`
`Michael R. Headley (SBN 220834 /
`headley@fr.com)
`FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
`500 Arguello Street, Suite 500
`Redwood City, CA 94063
`Tel: (650) 839-5070 | Fax: (650) 839-5071
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiffs
`BYTEDANCE INC., TIKTOK INC., and
`TIKTOK PTE. LTD.
`
`
`M. Elizabeth Day (SBN 177125)
`eday@feinday.com
`FEINBERG DAY KRAMER ALBERTI
`LIM TONKOVICH & BELLOLI LLP
`577 Airport Blvd., Suite 250
`Burlingame, CA. 94010
`Tel: 650 825-4300 | Fax 650 460-8443
`
`Brian N. Platt (Admitted pro hac vice)
`bplatt@wnlaw.com
`Brent P. Lorimer (Admitted pro hac vice)
`blorimer@wnlaw.com
`WORKMAN NYDEGGER
`60 East South Temple Suite 1000
`Salt Lake City, UT 84111
`Tel: 801-533-9800 | Fax 801-328-1707
`
`Attorneys for Defendant
`TRILLER, INC.
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`OAKLAND DIVISION
`
`
`BYTEDANCE INC., TIKTOK INC., AND
`TIKTOK PTE. LTD.,
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`v.
`
`
`TRILLER, INC.,
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`Case No. 4:20-cv-07572-JSW
`
`STIPULATION REGARDING AMENDED
`COMPLAINT AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
`REGARDING SCHEDULE FOR
`BRIEFING ANY FURTHER SECTION 101
`MOTION TRILLER FILES
`
`IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and among Plaintiffs ByteDance Inc.,
`
`TikTok Inc., and TikTok Pte. Ltd. (“TikTok”) and Defendant Triller, Inc. (“Triller”), by and
`
`through their undersigned counsel, pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-2, that TikTok be permitted to file a
`
`Second Amended Complaint, and that the following schedule will apply for Triller to answer or
`
`otherwise respond to the complaint, including filing any renewed Section 101 challenge, which
`
`will permit the parties to maintain the current October 8, 2021 hearing date on calendar for
`
`Triller’s Section 101 motion (Dkt. No. 46) and move the parties’ disputes forward on the merits.
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`STIPULATION REGARDING AMENDED COMPLAINT
`AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
`Case No 4:20-cv-07572-JSW
`
`
`
`Case 4:20-cv-07572-JSW Document 52 Filed 08/24/21 Page 2 of 3
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
` 8/25: TikTok to file Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”)
` 9/8: Triller to answer or otherwise respond to the SAC, including any Section 101 motion
` 9/17: TikTok to oppose any Section 101 motion Triller files
` 9/24: Triller to file reply re: any Section 101 motion it files
` 10/8: Hearing on Section 101 motion (unchanged from the current schedule)
`
`
`The SAC will moot the currently-pending Section 101 motion and obviate the need to brief the
`
`issue on the prior schedule set for that motion, but the parties’ agreement will permit the Court to
`
`hear Triller’s renewed Section 101 challenge on the currently-scheduled hearing date, and the
`
`Court will maintain its standard 14-day period between the time of the filing of the final brief and
`
`the noticed hearing date under the Local Rules, and thus the stipulation will not have any impact
`
`on the schedule for this case.
`
`10
`
`The only prior extensions of time in this case were a stipulated extension of time for Triller
`
`11
`
`to answer or otherwise respond to the First Amended Complaint (Dkt. No. 19) and a stipulated
`
`12
`
`extension of the time for TikTok to respond to Triller’s motion to dismiss, which the Court
`
`13
`
`granted (Dkt. No. 38).
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: August 24, 2021
`
`FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
`
`
`/s/ Michael R. Headley
`Michael R. Headley
`
`Attorneys for
`BYTEDANCE INC., TIKTOK INC.,
`and TIKTOK PTE. LTD
`
`
`Dated: August 24, 2021
`
`WORKMAN NYDEGGER
`
`
`/s/ Brian N. Platt
`Brian N. Platt
`
`Attorneys for
`TRILLER, INC.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`STIPULATION REGARDING AMENDED
`COMPLAINT AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
`Case No 4:20-cv-07572-JSW
`
`
`
`Case 4:20-cv-07572-JSW Document 52 Filed 08/24/21 Page 3 of 3
`
`
`
`
`
`I hereby attest under penalty of perjury that concurrence in the filing of this document has
`
`been obtained from counsel for Triller, Inc.
`
`Dated: August 24, 2021
`
`FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
`
`By: /s/ Michael R. Headley
` Michael R. Headley
`
`Attorneys for
`BYTEDANCE INC.
`TIKTOK INC., and TIKTOK PTE. LTD.
`
`
`
` PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
`
`
`
`
`Dated: _____________________
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`The Hon. Jeffrey S. White
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`STIPULATION REGARDING AMENDED
`COMPLAINT AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
`Case No 4:20-cv-07572-JSW
`
`