`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`EPIC GAMES, INC.,
`
`Case No.: 4:20-CV-05640-YGR
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`APPLE INC.,
`
`Defendant.
`
`ORDER REGARDING PAGE LIMITS AND
`BRIEFING SCHEDULE
`
`10
`
`TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR COUNSEL OF RECORD:
`
`11
`
`The Court is in receipt of three requests from non-parties for leave to file amicus curiae briefs
`
`12
`
`in support of plaintiff Epic Games, Inc.’s motion to enforce the injunction. (See Dkt. Nos. 904, 906 &
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`908.) The Court understands defendant Apple, Inc. intends to oppose the requests.
`
`For efficiency and to keep the scheduled hearing date on Epic’s motion, the Court ORDERS
`
`that defendant shall file their oppositions to the pending motions for leave by no later than 12:00 p.m.
`
`Pacific Time on April 3, 2024. Plaintiff shall file their replies by no later than 12:00 p.m. Pacific
`
`17
`
`Time on April 5, 2024.
`
`Northern District of California
`
`United States District Court
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`Pursuant to the parties’ joint stipulation and good cause showing, the Court further ORDERS as
`
`follows: First, Apple’s consolidated response to Epic’s motion, as well as any amicus briefs allowed
`
`to be filed, shall be due on April 12, 2024. Second, Epic’s reply in support of their motion to enforce
`
`the injunction shall be due ten calendar days later on April 22, 2024. Third, if this Court permits any
`
`non-parties to file amicus briefs in connection with Epic’s motion, Apple’s consolidated response
`
`shall not exceed 35 pages.
`
`This terminates Dkt. No. 910.
`
`IT IS SO ORDERED.
`
`Date:
`
`March 28, 2024
`
`_______________________________________
`YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
`
`