throbber
Case 4:20-cv-05640-YGR Document 485 Filed 04/26/21 Page 1 of 4
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`
`Case No. 4:20-cv-05640-YGR
`
`PRETRIAL ORDER NO. 5
`
`
`Dkt. Nos. 475, 476
`
`
`
`EPIC GAMES, INC.,
`Plaintiff,
`
`vs.
`
`APPLE INC.,
`Defendant.
`APPLE INC.,
`
`Counterclaimant,
`
`v.
`
`EPIC GAMES, INC.,
` Counter-Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`TO ALL PARTIES AND COUNSEL OF RECORD:
`The Court issues this Pretrial Order regarding trial logistics.
`1. Media and Special Access. The Court has received responses to Pretrial Order No. 4
`from (1) The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press and 18 Media Organizations (“Media
`Coalition”) (Dkt. No. 475); and (2) counsel for class plaintiffs in the related actions, In re Apple
`iPhone Antitrust Litigation, 4:11-cv-06714-YGR, and Donald R. Cameron, et. al., v. Apple Inc.,
`4:19-cv-03074-YGR. (Dkt. No. 476)1 Based on a review of the responses, the Court HEREBY
`ORDERS as follows:
`
`
`1 The Court notes that there was an error in Pretrial Order No. 4 regarding class plaintiffs’
`counsel (2:17-18). The sentence there is AMENDED to read: “Similarly, the attorneys for the Class
`Plaintiffs shall meet and confer amongst themselves to determine the manner in which the
`attorneys shall be selected and shall provide the Court with its proposed protocol by Friday, April
`23, 2021.”
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`Northern District of California
`United States District Court
`
`

`

`Case 4:20-cv-05640-YGR Document 485 Filed 04/26/21 Page 2 of 4
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`Media Access: The Court ADOPTS the Media’s Coalitions proposal as follows: on or
`before noon PDT on the Friday before a trial week, the Media Coalition SHALL file with the
`Court—and provide via email to the Court’s Media Liaison, Nicholas Jackson—a pool schedule
`indicating which of the two reporters listed in the response (Dkt. No. 475) will provide pool
`coverage for each day of the trial. Any necessary changes to the pool schedule for a given day
`SHALL be communicated to the Court via Chambers email and to Mr. Jackson at least 48 hours in
`advance. So long as these names and changes are timely conveyed, these selected reporters are
`AUTHORIZED to enter the Ronald V. Dellums Federal Building & United States Courthouse and
`the specific courtroom (Courtroom 1) in accordance with the pool schedule provided to Court.2
`Daily pool reports SHALL be made electronically available to all journalists and/or news
`organizations who request them by the end of each trial day. Any journalist and/or news
`organization who wishes to receive daily pool reports may contact counsel for the Media Coalition
`at ktownsend@rcfp.org to facilitate that access.
`Special Access: The Court ADOPTS counsel for class plaintiffs’ proposal as follows: on or
`before noon PDT on the Friday before a trial week, counsel for class plaintiffs SHALL file with
`the Court a schedule indicating which specific individual attorney will attend each day of the trial.
`The Court ADOPTS the proposed schedule as follows:
` Week 1: M-W: developer counsel; Th-F: consumer counsel;
` Week 2: M-W: consumer counsel; Th-F: developer counsel;
` Week 3: M-W: developer counsel; Th-F: consumer counsel; and
`
`
`2 Each designated pool reporter SHALL have a press credential and/or other photo
`identification that can be checked against the pool schedule when they arrive at the courthouse.
`Members of the news media who serve as pool reporters SHALL also comply with the Court’s
`health and safety protocols while in the courthouse, including by wearing a protective face
`covering. Members of the news media who serve as pool reporters SHALL further comply with the
`Court’s General Order 58 which permits the text functions (and only the text functions) of
`electronic devices (such as typing documents, emailing, text messaging, and tweeting) to be used
`in a non-disruptive manner in the courtroom while proceedings are in session. See General Order
`No. 58, Regulating Possession and Use of Electronic Devices in the Courthouse, available at
`https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/filelibrary/144/GO- 58_Eff_9-15-2015.pdf (Oct. 20, 2005, as
`amended, Sept. 15, 2015). Outlets do exist in the courtroom’s public gallery which designated
`pool reporters may use. However, they may want to bring an extension cord to make access
`easier.
`
`2
`
`Northern District of California
`United States District Court
`
`

`

`Case 4:20-cv-05640-YGR Document 485 Filed 04/26/21 Page 3 of 4
`
`
`
` Week 4 (if trial is ongoing): split evenly between consumer and developer counsel.
`Any necessary changes to the schedule for a given day SHALL be communicated to the
`Court via Chambers email at least 48 hours in advance. So long as these names and changes are
`timely conveyed, these selected attorneys are AUTHORIZED to enter the Ronald V. Dellums
`Federal Building & United States Courthouse and the specific courtroom (Courtroom 1) in
`accordance with the schedule provided to Court.
`Other Access: Other remaining counsel for class plaintiffs and members of the news media
`not serving as the designated pool reporters on a given trial day may listen to livestreamed audio
`of the trial on the designated telephone line provided by the Court. See Pretrial Order No. 4 (Dkt.
`No. 468).3 As stated in Pretrial Order No. 4, to access this telephone line, requests from
`remaining counsel and the media should be submitted through the following online form by
`Thursday, April 29, 2021: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/Epic-Apple.
`2. Public Access. As discussed in Pretrial Order No. 4, the telephone number for general
`public access will be publicized on the Court’s website at either
`https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges/gonzalez-rogers-yvonne-ygr/ or
`https://cand.uscourts.gov/epic-games-inc-v-apple-inc/. Such telephone numbers along with the
`access codes shall be posted on these websites on or before Friday, April 30, 2021.
`The general public, including members of the media and attorneys for class plaintiffs in the
`related actions, may access a box account containing exhibits and demonstratives used that day of
`trial at the following link: http://tinyurl.com/epicvapple. Such link shall also be posted to the
`Court’s websites above on or before Friday, April 30, 2021. The parties are ORDERED to comply
`with the requirements of Pretrial Order No. 4 in uploading documents to this box account.
`3. Public Health Considerations. The Court has contemplated the parties’ request to
`have the examining attorneys and the testifying witnesses forgo a mask during the trial. Having
`balanced considerations relating to the ongoing coronavirus pandemic, to the health and safety of
`
`
`3 The Court’s staff SHALL automatically mute those who dial-in to that designated
`telephone line in order to minimize background noise.
`
`3
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`Northern District of California
`United States District Court
`
`

`

`Case 4:20-cv-05640-YGR Document 485 Filed 04/26/21 Page 4 of 4
`
`
`
`the public and Court staff, and to evaluating the credibility of the witnesses in this action, the
`Court reaffirms its prior order that the questioning attorneys MUST wear masks. Credibility is not
`at issue for these attorneys. With respect to the witnesses, as described and discussed before, the
`Court will provide transparent masks for the witnesses. The parties may, however, at their
`choosing, substitute full face shields to be used by testifying witnesses in lieu of the transparent
`face mask.
`IT IS SO ORDERED.
`Dated: April 26, 2021
`
`
`
`YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`Northern District of California
`United States District Court
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket