throbber

`
`
`Case 4:20-cv-05640-YGR Document 474 Filed 04/23/21 Page 1 of 5
`
`PAUL J. RIEHLE (SBN 115199)
`paul.riehle@faegredrinker.com
`FAEGRE DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH
`LLP
`Four Embarcadero Center
`San Francisco, CA 94111
`Telephone: (415) 591-7500
`Facsimile: (415) 591-7510
`
`CHRISTINE A. VARNEY (pro hac vice)
`cvarney@cravath.com
`KATHERINE B. FORREST (pro hac vice)
`kforrest@cravath.com
`GARY A. BORNSTEIN (pro hac vice)
`gbornstein@cravath.com
`YONATAN EVEN (pro hac vice)
`yeven@cravath.com
`LAUREN A. MOSKOWITZ (pro hac vice)
`lmoskowitz@cravath.com
`M. BRENT BYARS (pro hac vice)
`mbyars@cravath.com
`CRAVATH, SWAINE & MOORE LLP
`825 Eighth Avenue
`New York, New York 10019
`Telephone: (212) 474-1000
`Facsimile: (212) 474-3700
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counter-
`defendant Epic Games, Inc.
`
`[Additional counsel appear on signature
`page]
`
`THEODORE J. BOUTROUS JR. (SBN
`132099)
`tboutrous@gibsondunn.com
`RICHARD J. DOREN (SBN 124666)
`rdoren@gibsondunn.com
`DANIEL G. SWANSON (SBN 116556)
`dswanson@gibsondunn.com
`JAY P. SRINIVASAN (SBN 181471)
`jsrinivasan@gibsondunn.com
`GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
`333 South Grand Avenue
`Los Angeles, CA 90071-3197
`Telephone: 213.229.7000
`Facsimile: 213.229.7520
`
`VERONICA S. MOYE (pro hac vice)
`vlewis@gibsondunn.com
`GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
`2100 McKinney Avenue, Suite 1100
`Dallas, TX 75201
`Telephone: 214.698.3100
`Facsimile: 214.571.2900
`
`CYNTHIA E. RICHMAN (pro hac vice)
`crichman@gibsondunn.com
`GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
`1050 Connecticut Avenue, N.W.
`Washington, DC 20036-5306
`Telephone: 202.955.8500
`Facsimile: 202.467.0539
`
`Attorneys for Defendant and
`Counterclaimant Apple Inc.
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`OAKLAND DIVISION
`
`EPIC GAMES, INC.,
`Plaintiff, Counter-defendant,
`
`vs.
`
`APPLE INC.,
`
`Defendant, Counterclaimant.
`
`
`No. 4:20-CV-05640-YGR-TSH
`STIPULATION AND PROPOSED
`ORDER RE BREACH OF CONTRACT
`COUNTERCLAIM
`Trial Date: May 3, 2021
`Time: 8:00 a.m.
`Courtroom: 1, 4th Floor
`Judge: Hon. Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers
`
`
`
`
`STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER RE BREACH OF CONTRACT COUNTERCLAIM
`Case No.: 4:20-cv-05640-YGR-TSH
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 4:20-cv-05640-YGR Document 474 Filed 04/23/21 Page 2 of 5
`
`
`
`Pursuant to the Court’s Standing Order Re: Pretrial Instructions in Civil Cases,
`Plaintiff and Counter-defendant Epic Games, Inc. (“Epic”), and Defendant and Counterclaimant
`Apple Inc. (“Apple”), together, the “Parties”, by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby
`agree and stipulate to the following:
`1.
`Epic stipulates and agrees that Apple has proven all elements of its cause of
`action for breach of Epic’s Apple Developer Program License Agreement with Apple (the
`“DPLA”), the incorporated App Store Review Guidelines, and Schedule 2 to the DPLA. See
`Counterclaims Count I (ECF No. 66 at 56-57).
`2.
` This stipulation does not resolve the First and Second (illegal under the
`antitrust laws), Third (void as against public policy), or Fourth (unconscionability) affirmative
`defenses asserted by Epic. See Answer to Counterclaims (ECF No. 106 at 17).
`3.
`If Epic is found liable for breach of contract following resolution by the
`Court of the affirmative defenses specified in paragraph 2, then (a) Apple would be entitled to
`recover damages in an amount equal to (i) 30% of the $12,167,719 in revenue Epic collected from
`users in the Fortnite app on iOS through Epic Direct Payment between August and October 2020,
`plus (ii) 30% of any such revenue Epic collected from November 1, 2020 through the date of
`judgment; and (b) Apple would be entitled to a declaration that (i) Apple’s termination of the
`DPLA and Developer Agreement between Epic and Apple was valid, lawful, and enforceable, and
`(ii) Apple has the contractual right to terminate its DPLA with any or all of Epic’s wholly owned
`subsidiaries, affiliates, and/or other entities under Epic’s control at any time and at Apple’s sole
`discretion. See Joint Submission Regarding Trial Elements, Legal Framework and Remedies,
`Appendix A (ECF No. 276-1 at 9).
`4.
`This stipulation does not resolve any other cause of action asserted by
`Apple, including but not limited to its claim for indemnification under the DPLA (Counterclaims
`Count VII (ECF No. 66 at 63-64), or its claim for unjust enrichment (Counterclaims Count III
`(ECF No. 66, at 58).
`
`
`-2-
`STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER RE BREACH OF CONTRACT COUNTERCLAIM
`Case No.: 4:20-cv-05640-YGR-TSH
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`

`

`Case 4:20-cv-05640-YGR Document 474 Filed 04/23/21 Page 3 of 5
`
`IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD.
`
`Dated: April 22, 2021
`
`Dated: April 22, 2021
`
`CRAVATH, SWAINE & MOORE LLP
`Christine A. Varney (pro hac vice)
`Katherine B. Forrest (pro hac vice)
`Gary A. Bornstein (pro hac vice)
`Yonatan Even (pro hac vice)
`Lauren A. Moskowitz (pro hac vice)
`M. Brent Byars (pro hac vice)
`FAEGRE DRINKER RIDDLE & REATH
`LLP
` Paul J. Riehle
`
`By:
`
`/s/ Katherine B. Forrest
`Katherine B. Forrest
`825 Eighth Avenue
`New York, New York 10019
`Telephone: (212) 474-1000
`Attorneys for Plaintiff and
`Counter-defendant Epic Games, Inc.
`
`GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
`Theodore J. Boutrous Jr.
`Richard J. Doren
`Daniel G. Swanson
`Mark A. Perry
`Veronica S. Moye
`Cynthia E. Richman
`Jay P. Srinivasan
`Ethan D. Dettmer
`Eli M. Lazarus
`/s/ Richard J. Doren
`Richard J. Doren
`333 South Grand Avenue
`Los Angeles, CA 90071
`Telephone: (213) 229-7000
`Attorneys for Defendant and
`Counterclaimant Apple Inc.
`
`By:
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`-3-
`STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER RE BREACH OF CONTRACT COUNTERCLAIM
`Case No.: 4:20-cv-05640-YGR-TSH
`
`

`

`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`Case 4:20-cv-05640-YGR Document 474 Filed 04/23/21 Page 4 of 5
`
`PURSUANT TO STIPULATION AND GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, IT IS SO
`ORDERED.
`
`DATED: ________________
`April 23, 2021
`
`__________________________________________
`HON. YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
`United States District Judge
`
`-4-
`STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER RE BREACH OF CONTRACT COUNTERCLAIM
`Case No.: 4:20-cv-05640-YGR-TSH
`
`

`

`Case 4:20-cv-05640-YGR Document 474 Filed 04/23/21 Page 5 of 5
`
`
`
`
`
`ECF SIGNATURE ATTESTATION
`
`In accordance with Civil Local Rule 5-1, the filer of this document hereby attests that the
`
`concurrence of the filing of this document has been obtained from the other signatory hereto.
`
`Dated: April 22, 2021
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
`
`
`By:
`/s/ Richard J. Doren
`Richard J. Doren
`
`Attorney for Defendant and
`Counterclaimant Apple Inc.
`
`
`
`
`-5-
`STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER RE BREACH OF CONTRACT COUNTERCLAIM
`Case No.: 4:20-cv-05640-YGR-TSH
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket