throbber
Case 4:20-cv-05640-YGR Document 389 Filed 03/30/21 Page 1 of 4
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`
`Case No. 4:20-cv-05640-YGR
`
`PRETRIAL ORDER NO. 3
`
`
`
`
`
`
`EPIC GAMES, INC.,
`Plaintiff,
`
`vs.
`
`APPLE INC.,
`Defendant.
`APPLE INC.,
`
`Counterclaimant,
`
`v.
`
`EPIC GAMES, INC.,
` Counter-Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`TO ALL PARTIES AND COUNSEL OF RECORD:
`On Monday, March 26, 2021, the Court held a regularly-scheduled pretrial conference.
`Considering the parties’ requests and arguments, and good cause appearing, the Court issues the
`orders set forth below, including a modification to Pretrial Order No. 1.
`1. The Court is still preparing to proceed in person assuming the conditions in the Bay
`Area continue to improve at current rates which would have a majority of Bay Area
`counties in Minimal Tier 4 by April 27, 2021 and perhaps all by May 4, 2021.
`2. For public health and safety reasons given COVID-19, the following protocols are
`ORDERED:
`a. Each party may have no more than six (6) individuals in the courtroom. Each
`may choose how to allocate those slots. If the Court can accommodate more
`given public safety concerns, the parties will be so advised.
`b. Every person shall wear a mask while in the courthouse. The Court will
`provide transparent masks for witnesses to use while testifying.
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`Northern District of California
`United States District Court
`
`

`

`Case 4:20-cv-05640-YGR Document 389 Filed 03/30/21 Page 2 of 4
`
`
`
`c. The Court will designate a room close to the courtroom to be used by the
`witness who is next scheduled to testify on any given day. Parties are advised
`that the Court will not be able to accommodate cleaning during the business day
`although the room will be stocked with wipes. If any party choses to use the
`room, you should take appropriate precautions.
`d. The Oakland courthouse has an attorney lounge which is open and available.
`This lounge is not monitored. Two conference rooms exist which can be
`reserved by lawyers for any trial in the courthouse on a first-come, first-serve
`basis by contacting Odile_Hansen@cand.uscourts.gov.
`3. With respect to previously-designated confidential information, such designation is not
`presumptive at trial. The Court concurs that the parties should meet and confer and
`attempt to limit the quantity of information to be sealed. This trial is a public
`proceeding. Judges in this district critically evaluate any request to seal.
`4. Deposition Designations
`a. Pretrial Order No. 2 identifies the parameters under which the Court will
`consider deposition designations. The Court agrees that the parties may use a
`“run time” calculation from a third-party vendor to calculate the time associated
`with the designations.
`b. Each deposition designation for a witness shall bear the Exhibit marking “Ex.
`Depo. [insert number]” and repeat with consecutive numbering.
`c. The parties shall file one joint stipulation requesting that the Court admit the
`exhibits for all deposition designations so that they will become part of the trial
`record. The stipulation shall be submitted with the designations and shall
`identify each exhibit separately with the name of each deponent.
`5. Expert Witness Written Direct Testimony
`a. The parties are allowed to submit written direct testimony of its expert
`witnesses which in total shall be limited to 100,000 words per side. The parties
`may divide the words in any many they chose among their respective fifteen
`2
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`Northern District of California
`United States District Court
`
`

`

`Case 4:20-cv-05640-YGR Document 389 Filed 03/30/21 Page 3 of 4
`
`
`
`(15) expert witnesses.
`b. Written testimony shall begin with an executive summary listing each opinion
`and identifying by page number the explanation of such opinion. It shall
`include an oath by the declarant and shall end noting the word count for the
`written testimony.
`c. Epic Games Inc. shall serve, but not file, its written direct testimony on Apple
`Inc. by April 20, 2021. Apple shall serve, but not file, its written direct
`testimony on Epic Games by April 23, 2021. The parties shall then file and
`serve the final written direct testimony by Tuesday, April 27, 2021. One
`physical hard copy and an electronic version on flash drive, in Word format,
`shall be delivered to the Court no later than noon on April 28, 2021. Each
`party shall make arrangements for the delivery by sending an email to
`YGRChambers@cand.uscourts.gov.
`d. The Court acknowledges that some expert testimony may be proffered prior to
`proof of a fact upon which an opinion relies. Ultimately, if facts are not
`admitted into evidence, and an expert relied upon such fact, the parties may
`move to strike the opinion on which it was based, if appropriate.
`e. Each written testimony submission shall bear the Exhibit marking “Ex. Expert
`[insert number]” and repeat with consecutive numbering.
`f. The parties shall file one joint stipulation requesting that the Court admit the
`exhibits for all written testimony so that they will become part of the trial
`record. The stipulation shall be submitted with the written testimony
`submissions. Further the list shall include the exhibit number, the name of the
`witness, the word count and the summation of the collective word counts.
`6. The Court shall not bifurcate the remedies portion of the trial.
`7. The Court MODIFIES Pretrial Order No. 1 with respect to the filing of a redlined
`version of the proposed Findings of Fact to reflect what was proved and the record
`references and the corollary Conclusions of Law. Rather than delay such filing until the
`3
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`Northern District of California
`United States District Court
`
`

`

`Case 4:20-cv-05640-YGR Document 389 Filed 03/30/21 Page 4 of 4
`
`
`
`end of the trial, the parties shall file the update each day following a trial day. Any
`objections to record citations shall be made within two business days or shall be
`waived.
`8. Parties may use encrypted digital wireless system that includes a receiver and
`transmitter with XLR connector. However, given the Zoom platform overlay as a
`device for allowing witnesses to participate remotely, the parties should test their
`equipment in advance.
`9. Parties are advised that the U.S. Marshals require a court order to allow equipment into
`the courthouse. Thus, if applicable, a party will need to send the Court a proposed form
`of order with any specific requests.
`10. The next pretrial conference shall be Wednesday, April 21, 2021 at 9:00 a.m. by the
`Zoom platform.
`IT IS SO ORDERED.
`
`Dated: March 30, 2021
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
`
`4
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`Northern District of California
`United States District Court
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket