throbber
1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`Case 4:20-cv-05640-YGR Document 374 Filed 03/17/21 Page 1 of 5
`
`Mark A. Perry, SBN 212532
`mperry@gibsondunn.com
`GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
`1050 Connecticut Avenue, N.W.
`Washington, DC 20036-5306
`Telephone: 202.955.8500
`Facsimile: 202.467.0539
`Attorneys for Defendant and
`Counter-Plaintiff Apple Inc.
`[Additional Counsel on Signature Page]
`
`Gary A. Bornstein (pro hac vice)
`gbornstein@cravath.com
`CRAVATH, SWAINE & MOORE LLP
`825 Eighth Avenue
`New York, New York 10019
`Telephone: (212) 474-1000
`Facsimile: (212) 474-3700
`Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant
`Epic Games, Inc.
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`OAKLAND DIVISION
`
` Plaintiff,
`
` Defendant.
`
`CASE NO. 4:20-cv-05640-YGR-TSH
`
`ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION
`BETWEEN EPIC GAMES, INC. AND
`APPLE INC. AND [PROPOSED]
`ORDER RE: CASE SCHEDULE
`
`Civil Local Rule 6-2
`
`The Honorable Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers
`
`Counterclaimant,
`
` Counter-defendant.
`
`EPIC GAMES, INC.,
`
`APPLE INC.,
`
`APPLE INC.,
`
`EPIC GAMES, INC.,
`
`v.
`
`v.
`
`STIPULATION BETWEEN EPIC GAMES,
`INC. AND APPLE INC. AND [PROPOSED]
`[[DMS:5523042v17:9/29/2020 5:11:55 PM
`ORDER RE: CASE SCHEDULE
`
`Case No. 4:20-cv-05640-YGR-TSH
`
`
`

`

`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`Case 4:20-cv-05640-YGR Document 374 Filed 03/17/21 Page 2 of 5
`
`The Parties, by and through their respective counsel, hereby agree and stipulate as
`
`follows:
`
`WHEREAS, in its October 6, 2020 Case Scheduling and Pretrial Order, the Court ordered
`that March 15, 2021 is the deadline for serving rebuttal expert reports (Dkt. 116);
`WHEREAS, backup materials must generally be produced within two business days after
`service of expert reports (Cameron Dkt. 87 at 1);
`WHEREAS, on March 14, 2021, counsel for Epic informed counsel for Apple of certain
`errors in data previously produced by Epic, and provided corrected data;
`WHEREAS, counsel for the Parties have conferred regarding the most efficient way for
`the expert witnesses retained by Apple to analyze the corrected data and incorporate the results of that
`analysis into their opinions;
`WHEREAS, the agreed-upon procedure would not affect any other deadlines in the case.
`NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED among the
`Parties, by and through their respective counsel, subject to the approval of the Court:
`1.
`That Apple may supplement its expert rebuttal reports no later than March 17,
`2021, without objection from Epic, solely to the extent the supplementation is necessary to incorporate
`the corrected data;
`That the backup materials for Apple’s expert, Dr. Lorin Hitt, may be produced no
`2.
`later than March 19, 2021; and
`3.
`That all other case deadlines remain in place.
`
`IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD.
`
`STIPULATION BETWEEN EPIC GAMES,
`INC. AND APPLE INC. AND [PROPOSED]
`
`ORDER RE: CASE SCHEDULE
`\\dbr.com\Users$\SFUsers\RIEHLEPJ\Documents\Epic v.
`Apple - Stipulation re Case Schedule_104407416_7
`
`
`1
`
`Case No. 4:20-cv-05640-YGR-TSH
`
`
`

`

`Case 4:20-cv-05640-YGR Document 374 Filed 03/17/21 Page 3 of 5
`
`DATED: March 15, 2021
`
`By
`
`DATED: March 15, 2021
`
`By
`
`/s/ Gary A. Bornstein
`CRAVATH, SWAINE & MOORE LLP
`Christine A. Varney
`Katherine B. Forrest
`Gary A. Bornstein
`Yonatan Even
`Lauren Moskowitz
`M. Brent Byars
`
`FAEGRE DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP
`Paul J. Riehle
`
`Attorneys for Epic Games, Inc.
`
`/s/ Mark A. Perry
`GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
`Theodore J. Boutrous, Jr.
`Richard J. Doren
`Daniel G. Swanson
`Mark A. Perry
`Veronica S. Lewis
`Cynthia E. Richman
`Jay P. Srinivasan
`
`ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP
`E. Joshua Rosenkranz
`William F. Stute
`
`Attorneys for Apple Inc.
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`STIPULATION BETWEEN EPIC GAMES,
`INC. AND APPLE INC. AND [PROPOSED]
`ORDER RE: CASE SCHEDULE
`
`
`2
`
`Case No. 4:20-cv-05640-YGR-TSH
`
`
`

`

`Case 4:20-cv-05640-YGR Document 374 Filed 03/17/21 Page 4 of 5
`
`PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
`
`March 17, 2021
`DATED: ________________
`
`______________________________________________
`THE HONORABLE YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`STIPULATION BETWEEN EPIC GAMES,
`INC. AND APPLE INC. AND [PROPOSED]
`ORDER RE: CASE SCHEDULE
`
`
`3
`
`Case No. 4:20-cv-05640-YGR-TSH
`
`
`

`

`Case 4:20-cv-05640-YGR Document 374 Filed 03/17/21 Page 5 of 5
`
`DECLARATION REGARDING CONCURRENCE
`I, Mark A. Perry, am the ECF user whose identification and password are being used to file this
`STIPULATION BETWEEN EPIC GAMES, INC. AND APPLE INC. RE: CASE SCHEDULE. In
`compliance with Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that all of the signatories listed above have
`concurred in this filing.
`
`DATED: March 15, 2021
`
`GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
`/s/ Mark A. Perry
`Mark A. Perry
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`STIPULATION BETWEEN EPIC GAMES,
`INC. AND APPLE INC. AND [PROPOSED]
`ORDER RE: CASE SCHEDULE
`
`
`4
`
`Case No. 4:20-cv-05640-YGR-TSH
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket