`
`Mark A. Perry, SBN 212532
`mperry@gibsondunn.com
`GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
`1050 Connecticut Avenue, N.W.
`Washington, DC 20036-5306
`Telephone: 202.955.8500
`Facsimile: 202.467.0539
`Attorneys for Defendant and
`Counter-Plaintiff Apple Inc.
`[Additional Counsel on Signature Page]
`
`Gary A. Bornstein (pro hac vice)
`gbornstein@cravath.com
`CRAVATH, SWAINE & MOORE LLP
`825 Eighth Avenue
`New York, New York 10019
`Telephone: (212) 474-1000
`Facsimile: (212) 474-3700
`Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant
`Epic Games, Inc.
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`OAKLAND DIVISION
`
` Plaintiff,
`
` Defendant.
`
`CASE NO. 4:20-cv-05640-YGR
`
`ORDER GRANTING
`STIPULATION BETWEEN EPIC
`GAMES, INC. AND APPLE INC.
`RE: CASE SCHEDULE
`
`Civil Local Rule 6-2
`
`The Honorable Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers
`
`Counterclaimant,
`
` Counter-defendant.
`
`EPIC GAMES, INC.,
`
`v.
`
`v.
`
`APPLE INC.,
`
`APPLE INC.,
`
`EPIC GAMES, INC.,
`
`STIPULATION BETWEEN EPIC GAMES,
`INC. AND APPLE INC. RE: CASE
`[[DMS:5523042v17:9/29/2020 5:11:55 PM
`SCHEDULE
`
`Case No. 4:20-cv-05640-YGR
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`Case 4:20-cv-05640-YGR Document 345 Filed 02/18/21 Page 2 of 4
`
`The Parties, by and through their respective counsel, hereby agree and stipulate as
`
`follows:
`
`WHEREAS, in its October 6, 2020 Case Scheduling and Pretrial Order, the Court ordered
`that February 15, 2021 is the deadline for serving initial expert reports (Dkt. 116);
`WHEREAS, counsel for Apple Inc. and Epic Games, Inc. have conferred and determined
`that a minor extension of that deadline would benefit the Parties and the Court
`WHEREAS, no other time modification has been made to the case schedule; and
`WHEREAS, the requested time modification would not have any effect on the schedule
`
`for the case.
`
`NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED among the
`Parties, by and through their respective counsel, subject to the approval of the Court:
`1.
`That the deadline for the service of initial expert reports be extended by 24 hours,
`to February 16, 2021; and
`2.
`That all other case deadlines remain in place.
`
`IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD.
`
`DATED: February 15, 2021
`
`By
`
`/s/ Gary A. Bornstein
`CRAVATH, SWAINE & MOORE LLP
`Christine A. Varney
`Katherine B. Forrest
`Gary A. Bornstein
`Yonatan Even
`Lauren Moskowitz
`M. Brent Byars
`
`FAEGRE DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP
`Paul J. Riehle
`
`Attorneys for Epic Games, Inc.
`
`STIPULATION BETWEEN EPIC GAMES,
`INC. AND APPLE INC. RE: CASE
`
`SCHEDULE
`\\dbr.com\Users$\SFUsers\RIEHLEPJ\Documents\Epic v.
`Apple - Stipulation re Case Schedule_104407416_7
`
`1
`
`Case No. 4:20-cv-05640-YGR
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
`
`Case 4:20-cv-05640-YGR Document 345 Filed 02/18/21 Page 3 of 4
`
`DATED: February 15, 2021
`
`By
`
`/s/ Mark A. Perry
`GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
`Theodore J. Boutrous, Jr.
`Richard J. Doren
`Daniel G. Swanson
`Mark A. Perry
`Veronica S. Lewis
`Cynthia E. Richman
`Jay P. Srinivasan
`
`ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP
`E. Joshua Rosenkranz
`William F. Stute
`
`Attorneys for Apple Inc.
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`STIPULATION BETWEEN EPIC GAMES,
`INC. AND APPLE INC. RE: CASE
`SCHEDULE
`
`2
`
`Case No. 4:20-cv-05640-YGR
`
`
`
`Case 4:20-cv-05640-YGR Document 345 Filed 02/18/21 Page 4 of 4
`
`PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
`
`February 18, 2021
`DATED: ________________
`
`______________________________________________
`YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
`
`STIPULATION BETWEEN EPIC GAMES,
`INC. AND APPLE INC. RE: CASE
`SCHEDULE
`
`3
`
`Case No. 4:20-cv-05640-YGR
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
