`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`IN RE APPLE IPHONE ANTITRUST
`LITIGATION
`
`DONALD R. CAMERON, et al.,
`Plaintiffs,
`
`v.
`
`APPLE INC.,
`
`Defendants.
`
`EPIC GAMES, INC.,
`Plaintiff and Counter-
`
`defendant,
`v.
`
`APPLE INC.,
`
`Defendant and
`Counterclaimant.
`
`Case No. 11-cv-06714-YGR (TSH)
`
`
`DISCOVERY ORDER
`Re: Dkt. Nos. 370, 371, 372
`
`Case No. 19-cv-03074-YGR (TSH)
`
`
`Re: Dkt. Nos. 240, 241, 242
`
`Case No. 20-cv-05640-YGR (TSH)
`
`
`Re: Dkt. Nos. 260, 261, 262
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`The Court is in receipt of three discovery letter briefs in these related actions. For the
`reasons stated below, the discovery hearing currently scheduled for tomorrow is reset for Monday.
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`Northern District of California
`United States District Court
`
`FILED
`
`SUSANY. SOONG
`CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`SAN FRANCISCO
`
`Jan 20 2021
`
`
`
`Case 4:20-cv-05640-YGR Document 268 Filed 01/20/21 Page 2 of 2
`
`
`
`A.
`
`Apple Subpoena to Samsung (11-6714 ECF No. 370; 19-3074 ECF No. 240; 20-5640
`ECF No. 260)
`Apple states in footnote 1 that it “was unable to obtain Samsung’s consent in order to file
`in time. This letter brief reflects the last version exchanged between the Parties and contains only
`minimal, stylistic changes from the last draft Apple received.” Consistent with that footnote, the
`letter brief lacks the efiling attestation required by Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3).
`The Court is unwilling to take action on this letter brief. Instead, the Court orders Apple
`and Samsung to refile this letter brief as a truly joint letter brief that complies with Local Rule 5
`by noon on January 21, 2021. The parties should include the documents cited in the letter brief.
`The hearing on this letter brief currently scheduled for January 21, 2021 at 10:00 a.m. is
`rescheduled for January 25, 2021 at 10:00 a.m.
`
`B.
`
`Cue and Federighi Depositions (11-6714 ECF No. 371; 19-3074 ECF No. 241; 20-5640
`ECF No. 261)
`The joint discovery letter brief cites a lot of documents and testimony, and the Court would
`like to be able to read them before the hearing. The Court orders the parties to file the documents
`and testimony by noon on January 21, 2021. The hearing on this letter brief currently scheduled
`for January 21, 2021 at 10:00 a.m. is rescheduled for January 25, 2021 at 10:00 a.m.
`
`C.
`
`Cook Deposition (11-6714 ECF No. 372; 19-3074 ECF No. 242; 20-5640 ECF No. 262)
`The Court’s view is the same here. The Court orders the parties to file the cited documents
`and testimony by noon on January 21, 2021. The hearing on this letter brief currently scheduled
`for January 21, 2021 at 10:00 a.m. is rescheduled for January 25, 2021 at 10:00 a.m.
`IT IS SO ORDERED.
`
`Dated:
`
`
`THOMAS S. HIXSON
`United States Magistrate Judge
`
`
`
`2
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`Northern District of California
`United States District Court
`
`January 20, 2021
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
