throbber
Case 4:19-cv-05553-YGR Document 189-8 Filed 09/21/21 Page 1 of 3
`Case 4:19-cv-05553-YGR Document 189-8 Filed 09/21/21 Page 1of3
`
`
`
`EXHIBIT 7
`EXHIBIT 7
`
`

`

`
`
`Case 2:19-cv-10074-PA-RAO Document 177 Filed 05/03/21 Page 1 of 2 Page ID #:99606Case 4:19-cv-05553-YGR Document 189-8 Filed 09/21/21 Page 2 of 3
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
`Case No. CV 19-10074 PA (RAOx)
`Title
`Gianni Versace S.r.l. v. Fashion Nova, Inc.
`
`Date May 3, 2021
`
`PERCY ANDERSON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
`Present: The Honorable
`Kamilla Sali-Suleyman (video)
`Anne Kielwasser (video)
`Deputy Clerk
`Court Reporter / Recorder
`Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs:
`Attorneys Present for Defendants:
`Andrew Gordon (video)
`Tiffany Sung (video)
`Darren Johnson (video)
`Cynthia Rigsby (video)
`Patrick Somers (video)
`Jeanne Gills (video)
`Jeannie Rhee (video)
`Kelsey Boehm (video)
`
`Proceedings:
`
`MOTIONS IN LIMINE HEARING (via ZOOM)
`
`Cause called; appearances made. The Court has before it Plaintiff’s Motion in Limine No. 1 to
`Exclude Testimony of Fashion Nova’s Damages Expert Brian Buss (Dkt. 99); Plaintiff’s Motion in
`Limine No. 2 to Exclude Testimony of Fashion Nova’s Art History Expert Song Tae Chong (Dkt. 93);
`Plaintiff’s Motion in Limine No. 3 to Exclude Testimony of Fashion Nova’s Late-Disclosed Witnesses
`Ana Hernandez and Luis Escobar (Dkt. 95); Defendant’s Amended Motion in Limine No. 4 to Limit
`Evidence and Testimony on Plaintiff’s Copyright Claims (Dkt. 157); Defendant’s Amended Motion in
`Limine No. 5 to Exclude Testimony of Versace’s Consumer Survey Expert Yoram (Jerry) Wind (Dkt.
`158); Defendant’s Amended Motion in Limine No. 6 to Preclude Plaintiff’s Expansion of its IP
`Allegations (Dkt. 159); and Defendant’s Amended Motion in Limine No. 7 to Exclude Testimony of
`Versace’s Damages Expert James Donohue (Dkt. 160). Court hears oral argument on the motions.
`
`For the reasons stated in the record, the Court issues the following rulings:
`
`Plaintiff’s Motion in Limine No. 1, (Dkt. 99), in which Plaintiff seeks to exclude the testimony of
`Fashion Nova’s Damages Expert Brian Buss, is denied.
`
`Plaintiff’s Motion in Limine No. 2, (Dkt. 93), in which Plaintiff seeks to exclude the testimony of
`Fashion Nova’s Art History Expert Song Tae Chong, is hereby taken under submission.
`
`Plaintiff’s Motion in Limine No. 3, (Dkt. 95), in which Plaintiff seeks to exclude the testimony of
`Fashion Nova’s late-disclosed witnesses Ana Hernandez and Luis Escobar, is denied as moot because
`the parties have resolved the issue.
`
`Defendant’s Amended Motion in Limine No. 4, (Dkt. 157), in which Defendant seeks to limit
`evidence and testimony on Plaintiff’s copyright claims, is denied. Defendant may offer a limiting
`instruction to address its concerns expressed in this motion.
`CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
`CV-90 (10/08)
`
`Page 1 of 2
`
`

`

`
`
`Case 2:19-cv-10074-PA-RAO Document 177 Filed 05/03/21 Page 2 of 2 Page ID #:99607Case 4:19-cv-05553-YGR Document 189-8 Filed 09/21/21 Page 3 of 3
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
`Case No. CV 19-10074 PA (RAOx)
`Title
`Gianni Versace S.r.l. v. Fashion Nova, Inc.
`
`Date May 3, 2021
`
`Defendant’s Amended Motion in Limine No. 5, (Dkt. 158), in which Defendant seeks to exclude
`the testimony of Versace’s Consumer Survery Expert Yoram (Jerry) Wind, is denied.
`
`Defendant’s Amended Motion in Limine No. 6, (Dkt. 159), in which Defendant seeks to exclude
`Plaintiff’s expansion of its IP allegations, is hereby taken under submission.
`
`Defendant’s Amended Motion in Limine No. 7, (Dkt. 160), in which Defendant seeks to exclude
`the testimony of Versace’s Damages Expert James Donohue, is denied.
`
`Court and counsel further confer regarding ongoing settlement discussions and the upcoming jury
`trial. The Court orders the parties to, no later than 12:00 p.m. on Monday, May 10, 2021, submit
`the name(s) of the parties’ business representatives who are authorized to settle this case. Finally,
`the Court will issue a separate order regarding the parties’ submission of a Confidential Settlement
`Conference Statement.
`
`IT IS SO ORDERED.
`
`Initials of Preparer
`
`58
`
`:
`kss
`
`CV-90 (10/08)
`
`CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
`
`Page 2 of 2
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket