throbber
Case 4:19-cv-05153-YGR Document 57 Filed 03/27/23 Page 1 of 5
`
`
`
`
`JAMES N. KRAMER (SBN 154709)
`jkramer@orrick.com
`ALEXANDER K. TALARIDES (SBN 268068)
`atalarides@orrick.com
`ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP
`The Orrick Building
`405 Howard Street
`San Francisco, CA 94105-2669
`Telephone:
`(415) 773-5700
`Facsimile:
`(415) 773-5759
`
`Attorneys for Nominal Defendant Apple Inc.
`[Additional Counsel on Signature Pages]
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`OAKLAND DIVISION
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`
`Lead Case No. 4:19-cv-05153-YGR
`(Consolidated with Cases No. 4:19-cv-05863-
`YGR, 4:19-cv-05881-YGR, and 4:19-cv-08246-
`YGR)
`
`STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
`ORDER REGARDING SCHEDULE
`
`Judge: Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers
`Date Action Filed: August 19, 2019
`
`IN RE APPLE INC. STOCKHOLDER
`DERIVATIVE LITIGATION
`
`______________________________________
`
`This Document Relates To:
`
`ALL ACTIONS.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING SCHEDULE
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

`

`Case 4:19-cv-05153-YGR Document 57 Filed 03/27/23 Page 2 of 5
`
`
`
`Plaintiffs Terrence Zehrer, Andrew Fine, Tammy Federman SEP/IRA, and the Rosenfeld Family
`Foundation (collectively “Plaintiffs”), and nominal defendant Apple Inc. (“Apple”), by and through their
`undersigned counsel, stipulate as follows:
`WHEREAS, the Court previously entered orders, pursuant to stipulations submitted by the parties,
`temporarily staying this action pending further developments in the consolidated securities fraud class
`action captioned In re Apple Inc. Securities Litigation, No. 4:19-cv-02033-YGR (N.D. Cal.) (see Dkt. Nos.
`43, 47, 49, 51, and 53);
`WHEREAS, the most recently-entered stay expired on February 1, 2023 (see Dkt. No. 53);
`WHEREAS, pursuant to paragraph 6 of the most recently-entered stipulation to stay this action
`(id.), the parties have now met and conferred concerning a proposed schedule for further proceedings;
`WHEREAS, the parties agree it will preserve judicial and party resources to first brief and
`determine the issue of Plaintiffs’ standing to assert claims derivatively on behalf of Apple, before any
`briefing takes place on motions raising substantive issues concerning Plaintiffs’ claims pursuant to Federal
`Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6);
`NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by the parties, through their
`respective counsel of record, as follows:
`1.
`On or before May 19, 2023, Plaintiffs shall either (a) file a Consolidated Complaint; or (b)
`file a notice designating one of the existing Complaints in this action as the operative Consolidated
`Complaint.
`2.
`Nominal Defendant Apple shall file its anticipated motion to dismiss (“Apple’s MTD”) no
`later than June 19, 2023.
`3.
`Plaintiffs shall file an opposition to Apple’s MTD no later than August 3, 2023.
`4.
`Nominal Defendant Apple shall file a reply brief in support of Apple’s MTD no later than
`August 24, 2023.
`5.
`A hearing on Apple’s MTD shall be set for October 3, 2023, at 2 p.m., or at a later date and
`time convenient to the Court.
`6.
`The Individual Defendants shall not be required to answer or otherwise respond to the
`operative complaint pending the Court’s ruling on Apple’s MTD.
`- 1 -
`STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING SCHEDULE
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

`

`Case 4:19-cv-05153-YGR Document 57 Filed 03/27/23 Page 3 of 5
`
`
`
`7.
`In the event Apple’s MTD is denied, counsel will, within 10 days, meet and confer
`regarding a proposed schedule in connection with the Individual Defendants’ response to the operative
`complaint, and will file a stipulation with the Court regarding the same.
`8.
`By entering into this stipulation, the parties do not waive any rights or defenses not
`specifically addressed herein.
`IT IS SO STIPULATED.
`
`Dated: March 20, 2023
`
`
`
`ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP
`JAMES N. KRAMER
`ALEXANDER K. TALARIDES
`
`
` /s/ James N. Kramer
`JAMES N. KRAMER
`
`The Orrick Building
`405 Howard Street
`San Francisco, CA 94105
`Telephone: (415) 773-5700
`E-mail:
` jkramer@orrick.com
` atalarides@orrick.com
`
`Counsel for Nominal Defendant Apple Inc.
`
`
`- 2 -
`STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING SCHEDULE
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

`

`Case 4:19-cv-05153-YGR Document 57 Filed 03/27/23 Page 4 of 5
`
`
`
`
`Dated: March 20, 2023
`
`
`
`
`
`
`WEISSLAW LLP
`JOEL E. ELKINS
`
`
`
`/s/ Joel E. Elkins
`JOEL E. ELKINS
`
`9107 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 450
`Beverly Hills, CA 90210
`Telephone: (310) 208-2800
`Facsimile (310) 209-2348
`E-mail: jelkins@weisslawllp.com
`
`WEISSLAW LLP
`DAVID C. KATZ (admitted pro hac vice)
`MARK D. SMILOW (pro hac to be filed)
`JOSHUA RUBIN (pro hac to be filed)
`1500 Broadway, 16th Floor
`New York, NY 10036
`E-Mail: dkatz@weisslawllp.com
` msmilow@weisslawllp.com
` jrubin@weisslawllp.com
`
`-and-
`
`ROBBINS LLP
`BRIAN J. ROBBINS
`CRAIG W. SMITH
`SHANE P. SANDERS
`5040 Shoreham Place
`San Diego, CA 92122
`Telephone: (619) 525-3990
`Facsimile (619) 525-3991
`E-mail: brobbins@robbinsllp.com
`csmith@robbinsllp.com
`ssanders@robbinsllp.com
`
`Co-Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs
`
`
`I, James N. Kramer, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this
`Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Regarding Schedule. In compliance with Civil L.R. 5-1(i), I hereby
`attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the other signatories.
`
`
`/s/ James N. Kramer
`JAMES N. KRAMER
`
`
`
`- 3 -
`STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING SCHEDULE
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

`

`Case 4:19-cv-05153-YGR Document 57 Filed 03/27/23 Page 5 of 5
`
`***
`PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
`
`March 27
`Dated: _______________, 2023
`
`HONORABLE YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
`
`- 4 -
`STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING SCHEDULE
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket