`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`IN RE APPLE SECURITIES LITIGATION
`
`
`CASE NO. 19-cv-02033-YGR
`
`
`ORDER RE: ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION FOR
`RELIEF TO AMENDED COMPLAINT
`Re: Dkt. No. 90
`
`
`
`
`
`
`The Court has received lead plaintiff’s motion for administrative relief pursuant to Civil
`Local Rule 7-11 to file a corrected consolidated and amended class action complaint. (Dkt. No.
`90.) In its administrative motion, lead plaintiff seeks to correct certain errors in the operative
`complaint, which purportedly would not affect the amended complaint substantively or impact the
`briefing schedule in effect. Lead plaintiff represents that defendants are unwilling to stipulate to
`the filing of a corrected amended complaint but take no position as to the administrative motion.
`Since the filing of the administrative motion, and pursuant to the briefing schedule in effect
`in this case, defendants have filed a motion to dismiss the operative complaint. (Dkt. No. 91.) As
`such, the parties are hereby ORDERED to submit a joint statement addressing any procedural issues
`that may arise from this Court granting the administrative motion subsequent to the filing of the
`motion to dismiss. Specifically, the parties shall address whether defendants will need to
`substantively amend their motion to dismiss if the administrative motion is granted, and if so, any
`effect this may have on the current briefing schedule. The parties shall file their statement no later
`than Friday, January 10, 2020.
`IT IS SO ORDERED.
`
`Dated: December 23, 2019
`
`
`
`
`
`YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`Northern District of California
`United States District Court
`
`