`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`Case 4:19-cv-02033-YGR Document 84 Filed 10/11/19 Page 1 of 2
`
`
`
`
`
`MELINDA L. HAAG (SBN 132612)
`mhaag@orrick.com
`JAMES N. KRAMER (SBN 154709)
`jkramer@orrick.com
`ALEXANDER K. TALARIDES (SBN 268068)
`atalarides@orrick.com
`ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP
`The Orrick Building
`405 Howard Street
`San Francisco, CA 94105-2669
`Telephone: (415) 773-5700
`Facsimile: (415) 773-5957
`
`Attorneys for Defendant Apple Inc.
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`IN RE APPLE INC. SECURITIES
`LITIGATION
`
`Case No. 19-cv-02033-YGR
`
`[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
`UNOPPOSED ADMINISTRATIVE
`MOTION TO CONSIDER WHETHER
`CASES SHOULD BE RLATED
`PURSUANT TO CIVIL LOCAL RULE
`3-12
`
`Judge: Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers
`
`ANDREW FINE, TAMMY FEDERMAN
`SEP/IRA, and THE ROSENFELD FAMILY
`FOUNDATION, Derivatively on behalf of
`APPLE INC.,
`
`Case No. 19-cv-05863-LHK
`
`Judge: Lucy J. Koh
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`
`
`v.
`
`TIMOTHY D. COOK, LUCA MAESTRI,
`CRAIG FEDERIGHI, ARTHUR D.
`LEVINSON, ALBERT GORE, JR., ANDREA
`JUNG, JAMES A BELL, RONALD D.
`SUGAR, ROGERT A. IGER, and SUSAN L.
`WAGNER,
`
`Defendants.
`
` -and-
`
`APPLE INC., a California Corporation,
`
` Nominal Defendant.
`
`
`
` 4154-6185-1423.1
`
`
`
`
`
`[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION
`TO RELATE CASES – CASE NO. 19-CV-02033-YGR
`
`* as modified by the Court *
`
`
`
`Case 4:19-cv-02033-YGR Document 84 Filed 10/11/19 Page 2 of 2
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`Before the Court is the Unopposed Administrative Motion to Consider Whether Cases
`
`Should be Related filed by Defendant Apple Inc. (“Apple”) on October 8, 2019 pursuant to Civ.
`
`L.R. 3-12 (the “Motion”). The Court, having fully considered the papers and pleadings on file
`
`and submitted herewith, and good cause appearing, HEREBY ORDERS as follows:
`
`1.
`
`2.
`
`The Motion is GRANTED;
`
`Pursuant to Civ. L.R. 3-12, the action captioned Fine v. Cook, Case No. 19-cv-
`
`05863-LHK (the “Fine Action”) is deemed related to the consolidated action captioned In re
`
`
`Apple Inc. Securities Litigation, Case No. 4:19-cv-02033-YGR (the “Securities Litigation”).
`
`Accordingly, the Fine Action is hereby reassigned to the Honorable Yvonne Gonzalez
`
`10
`
`Rogers, who is assigned to the Securities Litigation.
`
`11
`
`3.
`
`Within five (5) business days of this order, the parties in Fine shall file a joint
`
`12
`
`statement regarding the manner in which the Fine action will proceed given the other actions
`
`13
`
`currently pending.
`
`11
`Dated: October ___, 2019
`
`.
`
`HONORABLE GONZALEZ ROGERS
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
` 4154-6185-1423.1
`
`
`- 1 -
`
`[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION
`TO RELATE CASES– CASE NO. 19-CV-02033-YGR
`
`