`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`CIVIL MINUTES
`
`
`Judge: YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
`Time: 18 minutes
`Date: May 7, 2024
`Case No.: 19-cv-02033-YGR Case Name: In re Apple Securities Litigation
`
`
`
`Attorney for Plaintiff: Shawn Williams and Dan Pfefferbaum
`Attorney for Defendant: Melinda Haag, Daniel Kramer, James Kramer, and Stephanie Fines
`
`Deputy Clerk: Edwin Angelo A. Cuenco
`
`
`
`Court Reporter: Stephen Franklin; via Zoom
`
`
`
`PROCEEDINGS
`
`
`Motion for Settlement for Preliminary Approval – HELD.
`
`The Court heard argument on plaintiffs’ motion for settlement for preliminary approval.
`
`The Court noted that the material terms of the settlement appear satisfactory, but several issues
`should be addressed. First, the first page of the class notice should be simplified, and the notice
`should include a table of contents. Second, the release language should be narrowed. Third, lead
`counsel should provide more support for their request for interest on attorneys’ fees. Fourth, lead
`counsel should address paragraphs 2 and 9 of the Northern District of California’s Procedural
`Guidance for Class Action Settlements. Parties to resubmit their motion for preliminary
`approval by May 21, 2024.
`
`This case is continued to May 31, 2024, at 10:00 a.m. for status conference re: settlement via
`Zoom. This hearing may be taken off the calendar if the Court deems the resubmitted stipulation
`sufficient.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
