`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IN RE APPLE INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case No. 4:19-CV-2033-YGR
`
`
`ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN
`
`
`PART ADMINISTRATIVE MOTIONS TO SEAL
`
`
`
`Re: Dkt. Nos. 195, 201
`
`
`
`
`Defendants filed an administrative motion to file under seal portions of their opposition brief
`
`and exhibits in support of their opposition to the motion for class certification. (Dkt. No. 195.)
`Specifically, defendants seek to seal portions of their opposition brief and exhibits 6, 7, and 9 to
`defense counsel declaration filed in support of their opposition to the motion for class certification.
`(Id.) Plaintiff’s counsel filed a declaration in connection with the motion, stating that he does not
`object to the redacted portions of opposition brief and exhibits 6 and 9 being filed publicly. (Dkt.
`No. 198.) He also does not object to exhibit 7 being filed publicly except for plaintiff’s account
`numbers and transactions in other securities. (Id.) Thus, finding good cause, the Court hereby
`GRANTS defendants’ administrative motion to seal with respect to the account numbers and
`transactions in other securities contained in exhibit 7. The motion is otherwise DENIED.
`
`Plaintiff also filed an administrative motion to file under seal portions of its reply brief and
`certain exhibits thereto. (Dkt. No. 201.) Specifically, plaintiff seeks to seal portions of its reply
`brief and exhibits 5, 8, 9, 10, and 11 to plaintiff’s counsel’s reply declaration filed in support of the
`motion for class certification. (Id.) Defendant Apple, Inc.’s finance manager filed a declaration,
`averring that exhibits 5, 8, and 9 and excerpts in the reply brief that reference those exhibits contain
`confidential business information. (Dkt. No. 203.) Plaintiff’s counsel filed a notice withdrawing the
`confidentiality designations as to the excerpts submitted as exhibits 10 and 11 and stating that he
`does not object to the redacted portions of the reply brief that reference those exhibits. (Dkt. No.
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`Northern District of California
`United States District Court
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`Northern District of California
`United States District Court
`
`204.) Thus, finding good cause, the Court hereby GRANTS plaintiff’s administrative motion to seal
`with respect to exhibits 5, 8, and 9 and excerpts in the reply brief that reference those exhibits. The
`motion is otherwise DENIED.
`This Order terminates Docket Number 195 and 201.
`IT IS SO ORDERED.
`Dated: February 4, 2022
`
`
`
`
`
`____________________________________
` YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
`
`2
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
