throbber
Case 4:19-cv-02033-YGR Document 192 Filed 06/11/21 Page 1 of 4
`
`JAMES N. KRAMER (SBN 154709)
`jkramer@orrick.com
`ALEXANDER K. TALARIDES (SBN 268068)
`atalarides@orrick.com
`ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP
`The Orrick Building
`405 Howard Street
`San Francisco, CA 94105-2669
`Telephone:
`(415) 773-5700
`Facsimile:
`(415) 773-5759
`Attorneys for Defendants Apple Inc.,
`Timothy Cook and Luca Maestri
`[additional counsel appears on signature page]
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`OAKLAND DIVISION
`
`IN RE APPLE INC. SECURITIES
`LITIGATION
`
`This Document Relates to:
`ALL ACTIONS.
`
`Case No. 4:19-cv-02033-YGR
`CLASS ACTION
`STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
`ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING
`SCHEDULE FOR LEAD PLAINTIFF’S
`MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE BRIEFING
`SCHEDULE FOR LEAD PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR
`CLASS CERTIFICATION, CASE NO. 19-CV-02033-YGR
`
`

`

`4Case 4:19-cv-02033-YGR Document 192 Filed 06/11/21 Page 2 of 4
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`This Stipulation is entered into by and among lead plaintiff, the Norfolk County Council
`as Administering Authority of the Norfolk Pension Fund (“Norfolk” or “Lead Plaintiff”) and
`defendants Apple Inc., Timothy Cook, and Luca Maestri (collectively “Defendants”), through
`their respective attorneys of record.
`WHEREAS, on December 22, 2020, the Court entered a Case Management Order which
`established deadlines for key events in the litigation including a briefing schedule for Lead
`Plaintiff’s Motion for Class Certification (the “Motion”) [Dkt. 128];
`WHEREAS, on May 5, 2021 pursuant the December 22, 2020 Case Management Order
`Lead Plaintiff filed the Motion, which requests among other things, that Norfolk be appointed
`class representative [Dkt. 165];
`WHEREAS, pursuant to the Case Management Order, Defendants are currently scheduled
`to file their opposition to the Motion on June 30, 2021; and Lead Plaintiff’s reply in support of the
`Motion is currently due on August 13, 2021;
`WHEREAS, on June 1, 2021, following a discovery hearing concerning the scope and
`timing of Lead Plaintiff’s document productions, Judge Spero ordered: (i) that by June 11, 2021,
`Lead Plaintiff should complete production of documents reflecting Norfolk’s transactions in
`Apple securities for six months following the end of the class period, approximately three months
`more than Lead Plaintiff had already produced, and additional responsive documents located
`through the application of agreed upon search terms; and (ii) the parties to “meet and confer on a
`date for the class representative depositions and opposition to class certification” [Dkt. 176];
`WHEREAS, Lead Plaintiff has agreed to make a deponent available for a deposition
`pursuant to Rule 30(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure on June 22, 2021;
`WHEREAS, Defendants have proposed an adjustment to the briefing scheduled for the
`
`Motion to enable Defendants to prepare their opposition to the Motion;
`NOW THEREFORE, the parties have met and conferred and agreed subject to the
`
`approval of the court, to extend the briefing schedule for the Motion as follows: the deadline for
`Defendants’ opposition to the Motion will be extended from June 30, 2021 to July 9, 2021, and
`the deadline for Lead Plaintiff’s reply in support of the Motion will be extended from August 13,
`STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE BRIEFING
`SCHEDULE FOR LEAD PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR
`CLASS CERTIFICATION, CASE NO. 19-CV-02033-YGR
`
`- 1 -
`
`

`

`Case 4:19-cv-02033-YGR Document 192 Filed 06/11/21 Page 3 of 4
`
`2021 to August 24, 2021.
`IT IS SO STIPULATED.
```
`
`Dated: June 9, 2021
`
`ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP
`
` /s/ James N. Kramer
`JAMES N. KRAMER
`Attorneys for Defendants
`Apple Inc., Timothy Cook and Luca Maestri
`
`Dated: June 9, 2021
`
`ROBBINS GELLER RUDMAN & DOWD LLP
`
` /s/ Shawn A. Williams
`SHAWN A. WILLIAMS
`Attorneys for Lead Plaintiff,
`Norfolk County Council as Administering
`Authority of the Norfolk Pension Fund
`
`CIVIL L.R. 5-1 ATTESTATION
`Pursuant to Civil L.R. 5-1(i)(3), I, James N. Kramer, am the ECF user whose ID
`and password are being used to file this Stipulation and [Proposed] Order regarding Briefing
`Schedule for Lead Plaintiff’s Motion for Class Certification. In compliance with General Order
`45, X.B., I hereby attest that Shawn A. Williams has concurred in this filing.
`
`/s/ James N. Kramer
`JAMES N. KRAMER
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`- 2 -
`
`STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE BRIEFING
`SCHEDULE FOR LEAD PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR
`CLASS CERTIFICATION, CASE NO. 19-CV-02033-YGR
`
`

`

`Case 4:19-cv-02033-YGR Document 192 Filed 06/11/21 Page 4 of 4
`
`***
`PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
```
`
`Dated:
`
`6/11/2021
`
`HONORABLE YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`- 3 -
`
`STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE BRIEFING
`SCHEDULE FOR LEAD PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR
`CLASS CERTIFICATION, CASE NO. 19-CV-02033-YGR
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket