`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`ZOOM CIVIL MINUTE ORDER
`
`Case Name: In Re: Apple Securities Litigation
`Date: May 28, 2021
`Time: 40 M (10:49-
`11:25)
`
`Case No.: 19-cv-02033-YGR (JCS)
`Chief Magistrate Judge: JOSEPH
`C. SPERO
`
`
`Attorney for Plaintiff: Dan Pfefferbaum, Shawn Williams, Ken Black
`Attorney for Defendant: Nicomedes Herrera, for non-party Hon Hai
`
`
`Deputy Clerk: Karen Hom
`
` Court Reporter: Marla Knox
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ZOOM WEBINAR PROCEEDINGS
`
`
`
`
`1. Discovery Hearing re: Redacted Discovery Letter Brief re: Plaintiff’s Subpoena to Non-
`Party Hon Hai [dkt 167] – Granted.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ORDERED AFTER HEARING
`
`1. Hon Hai may not limit the information produced to documents sent to or from Apple.
`2. Hon Hai need not produce documents related only to smartphones other than Apple
`smartphones
`3. Hon Hai shall produce communications with a reasonable number of its contract
`suppliers, focusing on the biggest suppliers by volume. The parties shall meet and confer
`on the number of suppliers.
`4. The parties shall meet and confer on Hon Hai’s proposed search terms and custodians.
`Hon Hai shall provide information on its proposed custodians, and on other custodians
`that may have the documents or information sought. Hon Hai has proposed only one
`custodian, which the court finds to be inadequate. A broader range of custodians shall be
`proposed.
`5. Hon Hai shall produce the MPS reports as soon as possible.
`6. After the documents have been produced the parties shall meet and confer on whether
`there is an appropriate person to be designated as a 30(b)(6) witness.
`7. Within thirty (30) days from today (5/28/2021) the parties shall meet and confer on the
`following: proposed custodians; suppliers by volume; and shifting of costs.
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
