`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`CITY OF ROSEVILLE EMPLOYEES'
`RETIREMENT SYSTEM,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`APPLE INC., et al.,
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`
`Case No. 19-cv-02033-YGR (JCS)
`
`
`ORDER DENYING MOTION TO FILE
`PORTIONS OF JOINT DISCOVERY
`LETTER UNDER SEAL
`
`Re: Dkt. No. 155
`
`On April 13, 2021, Plaintiff filed an administrative motion to file portions of the parties’
`
`joint discovery letter (“the Joint Discovery Letter”) under seal based solely on citation of witness
`
`testimony that was designated by Defendant as HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL under the protective
`
`order in this case. As the designating party, Defendant was required to file within four days of the
`
`filing of the administrative motion a declaration establishing that the material at issue is sealable.
`
`See Civil Local Rule 79-5(d)(1)(A) & (e). Defendant has not filed the required declaration and
`
`the deadline to do so has passed. Accordingly, the administrative motion is DENIED without
`
`prejudice. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 79-5(e)(2), Plaintiff is required to file the unredacted
`
`document in the public record “no earlier than 4 days, and no later than 10 days” after the date of
`
`this Order. However, if Defendant files a motion to seal in connection with the Joint Discovery
`
`Letter within 4 days of the date of this Order, Plaintiff shall not file the unredacted Joint Discovery
`
`Letter in the public record unless and until the Court denies that motion.
`
`IT IS SO ORDERED.
`
`Dated: April 22, 2021
`
`______________________________________
`JOSEPH C. SPERO
`Chief Magistrate Judge
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`Northern District of California
`
`United States District Court
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
